Immigrants from Panama vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,799,852 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.375% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 1,375.1 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,853 compared to $37,407, a difference of 11.9%), median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $35,629, a difference of 9.6%), and median earnings ($45,198 compared to $41,719, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $51,783, a difference of 0.98%), householder income over 65 years ($56,944 compared to $56,089, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,815 compared to $90,811, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.90%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.7%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.71%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 61.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 48.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 31.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 41.3%), master's degree (14.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 26.8%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.93%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 8.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.030%), disability (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and male disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.76%).