Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from Italy Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,069,094 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.586. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.172% in Immigrants from Italy. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 172.1 Immigrants from Italy.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($95,647 compared to $112,848, a difference of 18.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,815 compared to $110,434, a difference of 17.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,451 compared to $105,201, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $54,449, a difference of 6.2%), median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $42,446, a difference of 8.7%), and median earnings ($45,198 compared to $50,581, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 31.3%), family poverty (10.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 25.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.3%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.1%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 33.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 4.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.3%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.0%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.3%).