Immigrants from Panama vs Pennsylvania German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,448,434 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.214. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Pennsylvania Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 12.3 Pennsylvania Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 31.1%), median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $34,802, a difference of 12.2%), and per capita income ($41,853 compared to $37,842, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $50,852, a difference of 0.84%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,815 compared to $91,956, a difference of 2.0%), and median male earnings ($51,962 compared to $50,878, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 26.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.5%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.23%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 39.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.93%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 36.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.2%), married-couple households (44.6% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and currently married (44.9% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 0.57%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (64.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 34.6%), no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 33.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 26.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 52.1%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 37.7%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.88%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 68.5%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 0.68%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.6%).