Immigrants from Panama vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,488,442 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.853. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.649% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 649.4 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $55,543, a difference of 8.3%), wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,944 compared to $59,934, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $39,376, a difference of 0.84%), per capita income ($41,853 compared to $41,495, a difference of 0.86%), and median family income ($95,647 compared to $97,958, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 29.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 22.9%), and family poverty (10.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (29.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (64.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.17, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 65.9%), no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 53.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 21.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 48.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 32.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 32.2%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 35.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 28.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.5%).