Immigrants from Panama vs Chickasaw Currently Married

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,180,776 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073 and weighted average of 44.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 3.9%.

Currently Married Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Panama	Chickasaw
Minimum	32.9%	27.5%
Maximum	78.2%	68.4%
Range	45.3%	40.9%
Mean	49.5%	48.9%
Median	47.2%	49.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	43.1%	45.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	56.2%	54.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	13.1%	9.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.7%	7.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.6%	7.4%

Similar Demographics by Currently Married

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Panama by Currently Married

In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Immigrants from Kenya (44.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cree (44.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Nepalese (44.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Spanish American (45.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (45.0%, a difference of 0.27%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Currently Married
Immigrants \| Uganda	2.2 /100 \| #224	Tragic 45.0%
French American Indians	2.2 /100 \| #225	Tragic 45.0%
Comanche	2.1 /100 \| #226	Tragic 45.0%
Spanish Americans	2.1 /100 \| #227	Tragic 45.0%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	2.0 /100 \| #228	Tragic 45.0%
Cree	1.7 /100 \| #229	Tragic 44.9%
Immigrants \| Kenya	1.6 /100 \| #230	Tragic 44.9%
Immigrants \| Panama	1.5 /100 \| #231	Tragic 44.9%
Nepalese	1.2 /100 \| #232	Tragic 44.7%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	1.1 /100 \| #233	Tragic 44.7%
Iroquois	1.1 /100 \| #234	Tragic 44.7%
Alaskan Athabascans	0.9 /100 \| #235	Tragic 44.6%
Cubans	0.9 /100 \| #236	Tragic 44.6%
Seminole	0.9 /100 \| #237	Tragic 44.6%
Moroccans	0.9 /100 \| #238	Tragic 44.6%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married

In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Currently Married
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	52.4 /100 \| #171	Average 46.7%
Aleuts	52.0 /100 \| #172	Average 46.7%
Tlingit-Haida	51.2 /100 \| #173	Average 46.7%
Peruvians	50.0 /100 \| #174	Average 46.6%
Immigrants \| Brazil	49.9 /100 \| #175	Average 46.6%
Hawaiians	48.6 /100 \| #176	Average 46.6%
Israelis	48.6 /100 \| #177	Average 46.6%
Chickasaw	47.8 /100 \| #178	Average 46.6%
Immigrants \| Oceania	44.6 /100 \| #179	Average 46.5%
Costa Ricans	43.7 /100 \| #180	Average 46.5%
Ottawa	43.0 /100 \| #181	Average 46.5%
Potawatomi	41.9 /100 \| #182	Average 46.5%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	39.7 /100 \| #183	Fair 46.5%
Brazilians	39.3 /100 \| #184	Fair 46.4%
Mongolians	37.6 /100 \| #185	Fair 46.4%