Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,512,910 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.837. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.373% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 373.3 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($95,647 compared to $106,188, a difference of 11.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,815 compared to $103,584, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,944 compared to $61,976, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $52,374, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $40,739, a difference of 4.3%), and median earnings ($45,198 compared to $48,041, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 18.4%), receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.27%), male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and poverty (13.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 12.1%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.6% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.12%), currently married (44.9% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 46.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.2%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.3%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.0%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.6%).