Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,778,474 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.934% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 934.3 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,944 compared to $54,030, a difference of 5.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $53,722, a difference of 4.8%), and wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,451 compared to $89,673, a difference of 0.25%), median household income ($80,873 compared to $80,341, a difference of 0.66%), and median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $38,644, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.77%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.5%), married-couple households (44.6% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and currently married (44.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.010%), family households (64.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 62.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 33.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 12.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 32.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 36.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and male disability (11.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.83%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%).