Immigrants from Panama vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Panama
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Panama
Chickasaw
12.1%
MALE POVERTY
4.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Panama vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,141,756 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.248 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 11.9%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Panama | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.30% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 21.6% | 33.0% |
| Range | 21.3% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 9.7% | 15.0% |
| Median | 10.3% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Panama by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Moroccan (12.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from the Azores (12.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants (12.0%, a difference of 0.29%), American (12.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and Nonimmigrants (12.1%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 8.5 /100 | #204 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Panamanians | 6.2 /100 | #205 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 5.4 /100 | #206 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Malaysians | 5.2 /100 | #207 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #208 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 4.3 /100 | #209 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Moroccans | 4.2 /100 | #210 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.0 /100 | #211 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Americans | 3.2 /100 | #212 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Japanese | 2.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 2.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 2.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 12.2% |
| German Russians | 2.5 /100 | #218 | Tragic 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |