Arapaho vs Pima Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Arapaho
 Pima
 Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Arapaho
Pima
8.8%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.3%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho vs Pima Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,729,190 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.634 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,489,621 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416 and weighted average of 9.3%, a difference of 6.2%.
 
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arapaho | Pima | 
| Minimum | 3.7% | 4.5% | 
| Maximum | 23.7% | 70.6% | 
| Range | 20.0% | 66.1% | 
| Mean | 11.9% | 19.4% | 
| Median | 9.5% | 14.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 7.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 22.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 14.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 18.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 17.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Arapaho and Pima by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Puerto Rican (8.3%, a difference of 5.4%), Inupiat (8.2%, a difference of 7.7%), Hopi (8.1%, a difference of 8.6%), Yuman (9.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and Immigrants from Yemen (7.8%, a difference of 12.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yuman (9.6%, a difference of 2.8%), Puerto Rican (8.3%, a difference of 11.9%), Inupiat (8.2%, a difference of 14.4%), Hopi (8.1%, a difference of 15.3%), and Yup'ik (10.9%, a difference of 16.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment | 
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 6.7% | 
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 6.7% | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 6.7% | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 6.8% | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 7.2% | 
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 7.2% | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 7.3% | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 7.7% | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 7.8% | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.1% | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.2% | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.3% | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.8% | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 9.3% | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 9.6% | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 10.9% | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 12.1% |