Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Security & Protection
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States

20.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 32831, Florida 100.0% 2.4% (+97.6)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#1
2. 31314, Georgia 100.0% 2.2% (+97.8)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#2
3. 60141, Illinois 100.0% 2.2% (+97.8)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#3
4. 36267, Alabama 100.0% 2.3% (+97.7)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#4
5. 71406, Louisiana 100.0% 2.6% (+97.4)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#5
6. 31704, Georgia 100.0% 2.2% (+97.8)#2 2.1% (+97.9)#6
7. 88354, New Mexico 100.0% 2.8% (+97.2)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#7
8. 83227, Idaho 100.0% 1.7% (+98.3)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#8
9. 77855, Texas 100.0% 2.2% (+97.8)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#9
10. 93226, California 100.0% 2.1% (+97.9)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#10
11. 81059, Colorado 100.0% 2.0% (+98.0)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#11
12. 13051, New York 100.0% 2.9% (+97.1)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#12
13. 85191, Arizona 100.0% 2.5% (+97.5)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#13
14. 98353, Washington 100.0% 1.8% (+98.2)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#14
15. 57741, South Dakota 98.1% 1.8% (+96.4)#1 2.1% (+96.0)#15
16. 25688, West Virginia 80.4% 2.4% (+78.0)#1 2.1% (+78.3)#16
17. 25204, West Virginia 80.0% 2.4% (+77.6)#2 2.1% (+77.9)#17
18. 25972, West Virginia 76.7% 2.4% (+74.3)#3 2.1% (+74.6)#18
19. 10914, New York 76.3% 2.9% (+73.4)#2 2.1% (+74.2)#19
20. 57563, South Dakota 73.3% 1.8% (+71.6)#2 2.1% (+71.2)#20
21. 72686, Arkansas 67.9% 2.0% (+65.9)#1 2.1% (+65.8)#21
22. 65461, Missouri 67.3% 1.9% (+65.5)#1 2.1% (+65.2)#22
23. 83643, Idaho 65.5% 1.7% (+63.8)#2 2.1% (+63.4)#23
24. 87049, New Mexico 61.8% 2.8% (+59.1)#2 2.1% (+59.7)#24
25. 13472, New York 61.2% 2.9% (+58.3)#3 2.1% (+59.1)#25
26. 78243, Texas 60.0% 2.2% (+57.8)#2 2.1% (+57.9)#26
27. 86038, Arizona 59.4% 2.5% (+56.9)#2 2.1% (+57.2)#27
28. 24612, Virginia 59.3% 2.7% (+56.6)#1 2.1% (+57.1)#28
29. 62359, Illinois 55.3% 2.2% (+53.1)#2 2.1% (+53.1)#29
30. 87712, New Mexico 54.2% 2.8% (+51.4)#3 2.1% (+52.1)#30
31. 43433, Ohio 53.5% 1.9% (+51.6)#1 2.1% (+51.3)#31
32. 70464, Louisiana 51.9% 2.6% (+49.2)#2 2.1% (+49.7)#32
33. 27342, North Carolina 50.9% 1.9% (+49.0)#1 2.1% (+48.8)#33
34. 95420, California 50.7% 2.1% (+48.6)#2 2.1% (+48.5)#34
35. 98430, Washington 50.0% 1.8% (+48.2)#2 2.1% (+47.9)#35
36. 96014, California 50.0% 2.1% (+47.9)#3 2.1% (+47.9)#36
37. 85360, Arizona 50.0% 2.5% (+47.5)#3 2.1% (+47.9)#37
38. 62541, Illinois 50.0% 2.2% (+47.8)#3 2.1% (+47.9)#38
39. 15647, Pennsylvania 50.0% 2.0% (+48.0)#1 2.1% (+47.9)#39
40. 79258, Texas 50.0% 2.2% (+47.8)#3 2.1% (+47.9)#40
41. 78391, Texas 48.7% 2.2% (+46.5)#4 2.1% (+46.5)#41
42. 24415, Virginia 48.6% 2.7% (+45.9)#2 2.1% (+46.4)#42
43. 72478, Arkansas 48.4% 2.0% (+46.4)#2 2.1% (+46.2)#43
44. 12787, New York 47.1% 2.9% (+44.1)#4 2.1% (+44.9)#44
45. 95556, California 44.8% 2.1% (+42.7)#4 2.1% (+42.6)#45
46. 12527, New York 43.8% 2.9% (+40.8)#5 2.1% (+41.6)#46
47. 12448, New York 43.2% 2.9% (+40.3)#6 2.1% (+41.1)#47
48. 12823, New York 42.6% 2.9% (+39.7)#7 2.1% (+40.5)#48
49. 80622, Colorado 42.4% 2.0% (+40.4)#2 2.1% (+40.3)#49
50. 87014, New Mexico 42.2% 2.8% (+39.4)#4 2.1% (+40.0)#50
51. 85343, Arizona 42.1% 2.5% (+39.7)#4 2.1% (+40.0)#51
52. 26546, West Virginia 41.8% 2.4% (+39.3)#4 2.1% (+39.6)#52
53. 25651, West Virginia 41.2% 2.4% (+38.8)#5 2.1% (+39.1)#53
54. 73851, Oklahoma 41.2% 2.0% (+39.2)#1 2.1% (+39.0)#54
55. 29122, South Carolina 41.2% 2.1% (+39.1)#1 2.1% (+39.0)#55
56. 82005, Wyoming 40.0% 1.9% (+38.1)#1 2.1% (+37.9)#56
57. 40903, Kentucky 39.5% 2.0% (+37.4)#1 2.1% (+37.3)#57
58. 10975, New York 38.7% 2.9% (+35.8)#8 2.1% (+36.5)#58
59. 19456, Pennsylvania 38.3% 2.0% (+36.3)#2 2.1% (+36.2)#59
60. 36763, Alabama 37.1% 2.3% (+34.8)#2 2.1% (+34.9)#60
61. 25979, West Virginia 36.8% 2.4% (+34.4)#6 2.1% (+34.7)#61
62. 75641, Texas 36.8% 2.2% (+34.6)#5 2.1% (+34.7)#62
63. 26619, West Virginia 36.4% 2.4% (+33.9)#7 2.1% (+34.2)#63
64. 12750, New York 36.4% 2.9% (+33.5)#9 2.1% (+34.2)#64
65. 13638, New York 36.2% 2.9% (+33.3)#10 2.1% (+34.1)#65
66. 38928, Mississippi 36.2% 2.4% (+33.9)#1 2.1% (+34.1)#66
67. 28552, North Carolina 35.9% 1.9% (+34.0)#2 2.1% (+33.7)#67
68. 57639, South Dakota 35.7% 1.8% (+34.0)#3 2.1% (+33.6)#68
69. 02824, Rhode Island 35.7% 2.4% (+33.3)#1 2.1% (+33.6)#69
70. 77464, Texas 35.6% 2.2% (+33.4)#6 2.1% (+33.5)#70
71. 59411, Montana 35.0% 1.9% (+33.1)#1 2.1% (+32.9)#71
72. 24220, Virginia 34.5% 2.7% (+31.8)#3 2.1% (+32.3)#72
73. 41764, Kentucky 33.9% 2.0% (+31.9)#2 2.1% (+31.8)#73
74. 12791, New York 33.9% 2.9% (+31.0)#11 2.1% (+31.8)#74
75. 56666, Minnesota 33.9% 1.3% (+32.6)#1 2.1% (+31.8)#75
76. 92332, California 33.6% 2.1% (+31.5)#5 2.1% (+31.4)#76
77. 41712, Kentucky 33.3% 2.0% (+31.3)#3 2.1% (+31.2)#77
78. 82450, Wyoming 33.3% 1.9% (+31.4)#2 2.1% (+31.2)#78
79. 78712, Texas 33.3% 2.2% (+31.1)#7 2.1% (+31.2)#79
80. 72168, Arkansas 33.0% 2.0% (+31.0)#3 2.1% (+30.8)#80
81. 47445, Indiana 32.9% 1.8% (+31.1)#1 2.1% (+30.7)#81
82. 87051, New Mexico 32.6% 2.8% (+29.9)#5 2.1% (+30.5)#82
83. 24815, West Virginia 32.4% 2.4% (+30.0)#8 2.1% (+30.3)#83
84. 18035, Pennsylvania 32.0% 2.0% (+30.0)#3 2.1% (+29.9)#84
85. 88263, New Mexico 31.9% 2.8% (+29.1)#6 2.1% (+29.7)#85
86. 46595, Indiana 31.6% 1.8% (+29.8)#2 2.1% (+29.4)#86
87. 22725, Virginia 31.6% 2.7% (+28.9)#4 2.1% (+29.4)#87
88. 68113, Nebraska 31.2% 1.7% (+29.6)#1 2.1% (+29.1)#88
89. 96128, California 31.2% 2.1% (+29.2)#6 2.1% (+29.1)#89
90. 57361, South Dakota 31.0% 1.8% (+29.3)#4 2.1% (+28.9)#90
91. 25646, West Virginia 31.0% 2.4% (+28.6)#9 2.1% (+28.9)#91
92. 81033, Colorado 31.0% 2.0% (+28.9)#3 2.1% (+28.8)#92
93. 25173, West Virginia 30.8% 2.4% (+28.3)#10 2.1% (+28.6)#93
94. 12161, New York 30.8% 2.9% (+27.9)#12 2.1% (+28.6)#94
95. 29519, South Carolina 30.5% 2.1% (+28.4)#2 2.1% (+28.3)#95
96. 17887, Pennsylvania 30.2% 2.0% (+28.1)#4 2.1% (+28.0)#96
97. 95568, California 29.7% 2.1% (+27.6)#7 2.1% (+27.5)#97
98. 27862, North Carolina 29.6% 1.9% (+27.7)#3 2.1% (+27.4)#98
99. 92328, California 29.3% 2.1% (+27.2)#8 2.1% (+27.2)#99
100. 70712, Louisiana 29.2% 2.6% (+26.6)#3 2.1% (+27.0)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States?
32831 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States is 2.1%.