Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Security & Protection
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States

20.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.32831, Florida100.0%2.4%(+97.6)#12.1%(+97.9)#1
2.31314, Georgia100.0%2.2%(+97.8)#12.1%(+97.9)#2
3.60141, Illinois100.0%2.2%(+97.8)#12.1%(+97.9)#3
4.36267, Alabama100.0%2.3%(+97.7)#12.1%(+97.9)#4
5.71406, Louisiana100.0%2.6%(+97.4)#12.1%(+97.9)#5
6.31704, Georgia100.0%2.2%(+97.8)#22.1%(+97.9)#6
7.88354, New Mexico100.0%2.8%(+97.2)#12.1%(+97.9)#7
8.83227, Idaho100.0%1.7%(+98.3)#12.1%(+97.9)#8
9.77855, Texas100.0%2.2%(+97.8)#12.1%(+97.9)#9
10.93226, California100.0%2.1%(+97.9)#12.1%(+97.9)#10
11.81059, Colorado100.0%2.0%(+98.0)#12.1%(+97.9)#11
12.13051, New York100.0%2.9%(+97.1)#12.1%(+97.9)#12
13.85191, Arizona100.0%2.5%(+97.5)#12.1%(+97.9)#13
14.98353, Washington100.0%1.8%(+98.2)#12.1%(+97.9)#14
15.57741, South Dakota98.1%1.8%(+96.4)#12.1%(+96.0)#15
16.25688, West Virginia80.4%2.4%(+78.0)#12.1%(+78.3)#16
17.25204, West Virginia80.0%2.4%(+77.6)#22.1%(+77.9)#17
18.25972, West Virginia76.7%2.4%(+74.3)#32.1%(+74.6)#18
19.10914, New York76.3%2.9%(+73.4)#22.1%(+74.2)#19
20.57563, South Dakota73.3%1.8%(+71.6)#22.1%(+71.2)#20
21.72686, Arkansas67.9%2.0%(+65.9)#12.1%(+65.8)#21
22.65461, Missouri67.3%1.9%(+65.5)#12.1%(+65.2)#22
23.83643, Idaho65.5%1.7%(+63.8)#22.1%(+63.4)#23
24.87049, New Mexico61.8%2.8%(+59.1)#22.1%(+59.7)#24
25.13472, New York61.2%2.9%(+58.3)#32.1%(+59.1)#25
26.78243, Texas60.0%2.2%(+57.8)#22.1%(+57.9)#26
27.86038, Arizona59.4%2.5%(+56.9)#22.1%(+57.2)#27
28.24612, Virginia59.3%2.7%(+56.6)#12.1%(+57.1)#28
29.62359, Illinois55.3%2.2%(+53.1)#22.1%(+53.1)#29
30.87712, New Mexico54.2%2.8%(+51.4)#32.1%(+52.1)#30
31.43433, Ohio53.5%1.9%(+51.6)#12.1%(+51.3)#31
32.70464, Louisiana51.9%2.6%(+49.2)#22.1%(+49.7)#32
33.27342, North Carolina50.9%1.9%(+49.0)#12.1%(+48.8)#33
34.95420, California50.7%2.1%(+48.6)#22.1%(+48.5)#34
35.98430, Washington50.0%1.8%(+48.2)#22.1%(+47.9)#35
36.96014, California50.0%2.1%(+47.9)#32.1%(+47.9)#36
37.85360, Arizona50.0%2.5%(+47.5)#32.1%(+47.9)#37
38.62541, Illinois50.0%2.2%(+47.8)#32.1%(+47.9)#38
39.15647, Pennsylvania50.0%2.0%(+48.0)#12.1%(+47.9)#39
40.79258, Texas50.0%2.2%(+47.8)#32.1%(+47.9)#40
41.78391, Texas48.7%2.2%(+46.5)#42.1%(+46.5)#41
42.24415, Virginia48.6%2.7%(+45.9)#22.1%(+46.4)#42
43.72478, Arkansas48.4%2.0%(+46.4)#22.1%(+46.2)#43
44.12787, New York47.1%2.9%(+44.1)#42.1%(+44.9)#44
45.95556, California44.8%2.1%(+42.7)#42.1%(+42.6)#45
46.12527, New York43.8%2.9%(+40.8)#52.1%(+41.6)#46
47.12448, New York43.2%2.9%(+40.3)#62.1%(+41.1)#47
48.12823, New York42.6%2.9%(+39.7)#72.1%(+40.5)#48
49.80622, Colorado42.4%2.0%(+40.4)#22.1%(+40.3)#49
50.87014, New Mexico42.2%2.8%(+39.4)#42.1%(+40.0)#50
51.85343, Arizona42.1%2.5%(+39.7)#42.1%(+40.0)#51
52.26546, West Virginia41.8%2.4%(+39.3)#42.1%(+39.6)#52
53.25651, West Virginia41.2%2.4%(+38.8)#52.1%(+39.1)#53
54.73851, Oklahoma41.2%2.0%(+39.2)#12.1%(+39.0)#54
55.29122, South Carolina41.2%2.1%(+39.1)#12.1%(+39.0)#55
56.82005, Wyoming40.0%1.9%(+38.1)#12.1%(+37.9)#56
57.40903, Kentucky39.5%2.0%(+37.4)#12.1%(+37.3)#57
58.10975, New York38.7%2.9%(+35.8)#82.1%(+36.5)#58
59.19456, Pennsylvania38.3%2.0%(+36.3)#22.1%(+36.2)#59
60.36763, Alabama37.1%2.3%(+34.8)#22.1%(+34.9)#60
61.25979, West Virginia36.8%2.4%(+34.4)#62.1%(+34.7)#61
62.75641, Texas36.8%2.2%(+34.6)#52.1%(+34.7)#62
63.26619, West Virginia36.4%2.4%(+33.9)#72.1%(+34.2)#63
64.12750, New York36.4%2.9%(+33.5)#92.1%(+34.2)#64
65.13638, New York36.2%2.9%(+33.3)#102.1%(+34.1)#65
66.38928, Mississippi36.2%2.4%(+33.9)#12.1%(+34.1)#66
67.28552, North Carolina35.9%1.9%(+34.0)#22.1%(+33.7)#67
68.57639, South Dakota35.7%1.8%(+34.0)#32.1%(+33.6)#68
69.02824, Rhode Island35.7%2.4%(+33.3)#12.1%(+33.6)#69
70.77464, Texas35.6%2.2%(+33.4)#62.1%(+33.5)#70
71.59411, Montana35.0%1.9%(+33.1)#12.1%(+32.9)#71
72.24220, Virginia34.5%2.7%(+31.8)#32.1%(+32.3)#72
73.41764, Kentucky33.9%2.0%(+31.9)#22.1%(+31.8)#73
74.12791, New York33.9%2.9%(+31.0)#112.1%(+31.8)#74
75.56666, Minnesota33.9%1.3%(+32.6)#12.1%(+31.8)#75
76.92332, California33.6%2.1%(+31.5)#52.1%(+31.4)#76
77.41712, Kentucky33.3%2.0%(+31.3)#32.1%(+31.2)#77
78.82450, Wyoming33.3%1.9%(+31.4)#22.1%(+31.2)#78
79.78712, Texas33.3%2.2%(+31.1)#72.1%(+31.2)#79
80.72168, Arkansas33.0%2.0%(+31.0)#32.1%(+30.8)#80
81.47445, Indiana32.9%1.8%(+31.1)#12.1%(+30.7)#81
82.87051, New Mexico32.6%2.8%(+29.9)#52.1%(+30.5)#82
83.24815, West Virginia32.4%2.4%(+30.0)#82.1%(+30.3)#83
84.18035, Pennsylvania32.0%2.0%(+30.0)#32.1%(+29.9)#84
85.88263, New Mexico31.9%2.8%(+29.1)#62.1%(+29.7)#85
86.46595, Indiana31.6%1.8%(+29.8)#22.1%(+29.4)#86
87.22725, Virginia31.6%2.7%(+28.9)#42.1%(+29.4)#87
88.68113, Nebraska31.2%1.7%(+29.6)#12.1%(+29.1)#88
89.96128, California31.2%2.1%(+29.2)#62.1%(+29.1)#89
90.57361, South Dakota31.0%1.8%(+29.3)#42.1%(+28.9)#90
91.25646, West Virginia31.0%2.4%(+28.6)#92.1%(+28.9)#91
92.81033, Colorado31.0%2.0%(+28.9)#32.1%(+28.8)#92
93.25173, West Virginia30.8%2.4%(+28.3)#102.1%(+28.6)#93
94.12161, New York30.8%2.9%(+27.9)#122.1%(+28.6)#94
95.29519, South Carolina30.5%2.1%(+28.4)#22.1%(+28.3)#95
96.17887, Pennsylvania30.2%2.0%(+28.1)#42.1%(+28.0)#96
97.95568, California29.7%2.1%(+27.6)#72.1%(+27.5)#97
98.27862, North Carolina29.6%1.9%(+27.7)#32.1%(+27.4)#98
99.92328, California29.3%2.1%(+27.2)#82.1%(+27.2)#99
100.70712, Louisiana29.2%2.6%(+26.6)#32.1%(+27.0)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States?
32831 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States is 2.1%.