	Zip Code	Detached Home Residency	vs State	vs National
1.	16802, Pennsylvania	100.0%	9.3%(+90.7)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#1
2.	10280, New York	100.0%	29.4%(+70.6)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#2
3.	10069, New York	100.0%	29.4%(+70.6)#2	13.8%(+86.2)#3
4.	55455, Minnesota	100.0%	16.8%(+83.2)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#4
5.	83844, Idaho	100.0%	5.7%(+94.3)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#5
6.	20742, Maryland	100.0%	16.9%(+83.1)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#6
7.	90089, California	100.0%	17.8%(+82.2)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#7
8.	53706, Wisconsin	100.0%	11.8%(+88.2)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#8
9.	95053, California	100.0%	17.8%(+82.2)#2	13.8%(+86.2)#9
10.	66506, Kansas	100.0%	8.4%(+91.6)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#10
11.	58202, North Dakota	100.0%	20.0%(+80.0)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#11
12.	93944, California	100.0%	17.8%(+82.2)#3	13.8%(+86.2)#12
13.	63102, Missouri	100.0%	8.4%(+91.6)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#13
14.	48859, Michigan	100.0%	9.0%(+91.0)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#14
15.	39217, Mississippi	100.0%	4.8%(+95.2)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#15
16.	23284, Virginia	100.0%	13.7%(+86.3)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#16
17.	20052, District Of Columbia	100.0%	47.5%(+52.5)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#17
18.	59812, Montana	100.0%	6.7%(+93.3)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#18
19.	77010, Texas	100.0%	15.2%(+84.8)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#19
20.	20701, Maryland	100.0%	16.9%(+83.1)#2	13.8%(+86.2)#20
21.	60604, Illinois	100.0%	14.7%(+85.3)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#21
22.	58405, North Dakota	100.0%	20.0%(+80.0)#2	13.8%(+86.2)#22
23.	27531, North Carolina	100.0%	9.4%(+90.6)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#23
24.	98438, Washington	100.0%	16.7%(+83.3)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#24
25.	89557, Nevada	100.0%	13.1%(+86.9)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#25
26.	99258, Washington	100.0%	16.7%(+83.3)#2	13.8%(+86.2)#27
27.	56562, Minnesota	100.0%	16.8%(+83.2)#2	13.8%(+86.2)#28
28.	89191, Nevada	100.0%	13.1%(+86.9)#2	13.8%(+86.2)#29
29.	92350, California	100.0%	17.8%(+82.2)#4	13.8%(+86.2)#30
30.	96848, Hawaii	100.0%	21.5%(+78.5)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#31
31.	61625, Illinois	100.0%	14.7%(+85.3)#2	13.8%(+86.2)#32
32.	80290, Colorado	100.0%	16.7%(+83.3)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#33
33.	07939, New Jersey	100.0%	16.6%(+83.4)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#34
34.	60141, Illinois	100.0%	14.7%(+85.3)#3	13.8%(+86.2)#35
35.	70801, Louisiana	100.0%	7.1%(+92.9)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#36
36.	70148, Louisiana	100.0%	7.1%(+92.9)#2	13.8%(+86.2)#37
37.	98164, Washington	100.0%	16.7%(+83.3)#3	13.8%(+86.2)#38
38.	49074, Michigan	100.0%	9.0%(+91.0)#2	13.8%(+86.2)#39
39.	13441, New York	100.0%	29.4%(+70.6)#3	13.8%(+86.2)#40
40.	40280, Kentucky	100.0%	6.7%(+93.3)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#41
41.	14302, New York	100.0%	29.4%(+70.6)#4	13.8%(+86.2)#42
42.	60208, Illinois	100.0%	14.7%(+85.3)#4	13.8%(+86.2)#43
43.	10279, New York	100.0%	29.4%(+70.6)#5	13.8%(+86.2)#44
44.	20889, Maryland	100.0%	16.9%(+83.1)#3	13.8%(+86.2)#45
45.	00906, Puerto Rico	100.0%	8.7%(+91.3)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#46
46.	20899, Maryland	100.0%	16.9%(+83.1)#4	13.8%(+86.2)#47
47.	19108, Pennsylvania	100.0%	9.3%(+90.7)#2	13.8%(+86.2)#48
48.	64101, Missouri	100.0%	8.4%(+91.6)#2	13.8%(+86.2)#49
49.	55111, Minnesota	100.0%	16.8%(+83.2)#3	13.8%(+86.2)#50
50.	10503, New York	100.0%	29.4%(+70.6)#6	13.8%(+86.2)#51
51.	81612, Colorado	100.0%	16.7%(+83.3)#2	13.8%(+86.2)#52
52.	28641, North Carolina	100.0%	9.4%(+90.6)#2	13.8%(+86.2)#53
53.	37213, Tennessee	100.0%	8.5%(+91.5)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#54
54.	84150, Utah	100.0%	11.5%(+88.5)#1	13.8%(+86.2)#55
55.	66251, Kansas	100.0%	8.4%(+91.6)#2	13.8%(+86.2)#56
56.	10162, New York	99.7%	29.4%(+70.3)#7	13.8%(+85.9)#57
57.	60606, Illinois	99.2%	14.7%(+84.5)#5	13.8%(+85.4)#58
58.	10282, New York	99.1%	29.4%(+69.7)#8	13.8%(+85.3)#59
59.	95113, California	99.1%	17.8%(+81.3)#5	13.8%(+85.3)#60
60.	75207, Texas	98.8%	15.2%(+83.6)#2	13.8%(+85.0)#61
61.	07311, New Jersey	98.7%	16.6%(+82.1)#2	13.8%(+84.9)#62
62.	44503, Ohio	98.7%	9.6%(+89.1)#1	13.8%(+84.9)#63
63.	02210, Massachusetts	98.5%	16.2%(+82.3)#1	13.8%(+84.7)#64
64.	55101, Minnesota	98.2%	16.8%(+81.4)#4	13.8%(+84.4)#65
65.	02199, Massachusetts	98.1%	16.2%(+81.9)#2	13.8%(+84.3)#66
66.	10044, New York	97.7%	29.4%(+68.3)#9	13.8%(+83.9)#67
67.	55402, Minnesota	97.7%	16.8%(+80.9)#5	13.8%(+83.9)#68
68.	10017, New York	97.2%	29.4%(+67.8)#10	13.8%(+83.4)#69
69.	11109, New York	97.2%	29.4%(+67.8)#11	13.8%(+83.4)#70
70.	02142, Massachusetts	97.2%	16.2%(+81.0)#3	13.8%(+83.4)#71
71.	77046, Texas	97.1%	15.2%(+81.9)#3	13.8%(+83.3)#72
72.	98101, Washington	97.0%	16.7%(+80.3)#4	13.8%(+83.2)#73
73.	60601, Illinois	96.9%	14.7%(+82.2)#6	13.8%(+83.1)#74
74.	30326, Georgia	96.8%	11.3%(+85.5)#1	13.8%(+83.0)#75
75.	06103, Connecticut	96.8%	12.8%(+84.0)#1	13.8%(+83.0)#76
76.	60611, Illinois	96.6%	14.7%(+81.9)#7	13.8%(+82.8)#77
77.	98104, Washington	96.6%	16.7%(+79.9)#5	13.8%(+82.8)#78
78.	98121, Washington	96.5%	16.7%(+79.8)#6	13.8%(+82.7)#79
79.	60661, Illinois	96.4%	14.7%(+81.7)#8	13.8%(+82.6)#80
80.	10040, New York	96.3%	29.4%(+66.9)#12	13.8%(+82.5)#81
81.	20004, District Of Columbia	96.2%	47.5%(+48.7)#2	13.8%(+82.4)#82
82.	33131, Florida	96.1%	17.2%(+78.9)#1	13.8%(+82.3)#83
83.	10005, New York	96.1%	29.4%(+66.7)#13	13.8%(+82.3)#84
84.	10034, New York	96.0%	29.4%(+66.6)#14	13.8%(+82.2)#85
85.	94158, California	96.0%	17.8%(+78.2)#6	13.8%(+82.2)#86
86.	55415, Minnesota	96.0%	16.8%(+79.2)#6	13.8%(+82.2)#87
87.	60603, Illinois	96.0%	14.7%(+81.3)#9	13.8%(+82.2)#88
88.	78701, Texas	95.8%	15.2%(+80.6)#4	13.8%(+82.0)#89
89.	10004, New York	95.7%	29.4%(+66.3)#15	13.8%(+81.9)#90
90.	80202, Colorado	95.6%	16.7%(+78.9)#3	13.8%(+81.8)#91
91.	20006, District Of Columbia	95.6%	47.5%(+48.1)#3	13.8%(+81.8)#92
92.	10038, New York	95.2%	29.4%(+65.8)#16	13.8%(+81.4)#93
93.	90014, California	95.2%	17.8%(+77.4)#7	13.8%(+81.4)#94
94.	11005, New York	95.1%	29.4%(+65.7)#17	13.8%(+81.3)#95
95.	10033, New York	95.0%	29.4%(+65.6)#18	13.8%(+81.2)#96
96.	75201, Texas	95.0%	15.2%(+79.8)#5	13.8%(+81.2)#97
97.	94104, California	95.0%	17.8%(+77.2)#8	13.8%(+81.2)#98
98.	37219, Tennessee	94.6%	8.5%(+86.1)#2	13.8%(+80.8)#99
99.	44308, Ohio	94.5%	9.6%(+84.9)#2	13.8%(+80.7)#100
100.	10006, New York	94.4%	29.4%(+65.0)#19	13.8%(+80.6)#101

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in the United States?

Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in the United States are:

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

#10

66506, Kansas

100.0%

What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in the United States?

16802 has the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in the United States with 100.0%.

What is the Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in the United States?

Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in the United States is 13.8%.