Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Local Government Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States

50.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States

Zip Code % Local Government Employees vs State vs National
1. 28330, North Carolina 100.0% 5.9% (+94.1)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#1
2. 23395, Virginia 100.0% 7.7% (+92.3)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#2
3. 30454, Georgia 100.0% 7.0% (+93.0)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#3
4. 12471, New York 100.0% 9.9% (+90.1)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#4
5. 25057, West Virginia 100.0% 7.5% (+92.5)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#5
6. 06059, Connecticut 100.0% 7.3% (+92.7)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#6
7. 77993, Texas 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#7
8. 92389, California 100.0% 8.1% (+91.9)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#8
9. 70522, Louisiana 100.0% 7.3% (+92.7)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#9
10. 25211, West Virginia 100.0% 7.5% (+92.5)#2 7.2% (+92.8)#10
11. 25864, West Virginia 100.0% 7.5% (+92.5)#3 7.2% (+92.8)#11
12. 72747, Arkansas 100.0% 6.2% (+93.8)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#12
13. 88040, New Mexico 100.0% 8.4% (+91.6)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#13
14. 81325, Colorado 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#14
15. 38765, Mississippi 100.0% 6.7% (+93.3)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#15
16. 77855, Texas 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#2 7.2% (+92.8)#16
17. 93226, California 100.0% 8.1% (+91.9)#2 7.2% (+92.8)#17
18. 78564, Texas 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#3 7.2% (+92.8)#18
19. 30289, Georgia 100.0% 7.0% (+93.0)#2 7.2% (+92.8)#19
20. 24316, Virginia 100.0% 7.7% (+92.3)#2 7.2% (+92.8)#20
21. 21644, Maryland 100.0% 7.4% (+92.6)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#21
22. 13051, New York 100.0% 9.9% (+90.1)#2 7.2% (+92.8)#22
23. 89404, Nevada 100.0% 6.7% (+93.3)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#23
24. 99575, Alaska 100.0% 9.2% (+90.8)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#24
25. 99706, Alaska 100.0% 9.2% (+90.8)#2 7.2% (+92.8)#25
26. 01260, Massachusetts 100.0% 7.0% (+93.0)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#26
27. 27877, North Carolina 100.0% 5.9% (+94.1)#2 7.2% (+92.8)#28
28. 82218, Wyoming 100.0% 10.5% (+89.5)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#29
29. 57659, South Dakota 100.0% 7.7% (+92.3)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#30
30. 95480, California 100.0% 8.1% (+91.9)#3 7.2% (+92.8)#31
31. 64765, Missouri 100.0% 6.3% (+93.7)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#32
32. 83602, Idaho 100.0% 6.9% (+93.1)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#33
33. 69042, Nebraska 100.0% 7.6% (+92.4)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#34
34. 99608, Alaska 93.8% 9.2% (+84.5)#3 7.2% (+86.5)#35
35. 13647, New York 89.7% 9.9% (+79.8)#3 7.2% (+82.4)#36
36. 85343, Arizona 86.8% 6.7% (+80.1)#1 7.2% (+79.6)#37
37. 30573, Georgia 85.5% 7.0% (+78.5)#3 7.2% (+78.2)#38
38. 23422, Virginia 85.4% 7.7% (+77.7)#3 7.2% (+78.1)#39
39. 99580, Alaska 83.3% 9.2% (+74.1)#4 7.2% (+76.1)#40
40. 99647, Alaska 83.3% 9.2% (+74.1)#5 7.2% (+76.1)#41
41. 08248, New Jersey 82.2% 8.2% (+74.1)#1 7.2% (+75.0)#42
42. 41819, Kentucky 81.6% 6.5% (+75.1)#1 7.2% (+74.4)#43
43. 79780, Texas 81.4% 7.2% (+74.1)#4 7.2% (+74.1)#44
44. 26266, West Virginia 80.4% 7.5% (+73.0)#4 7.2% (+73.2)#45
45. 99549, Alaska 78.9% 9.2% (+69.7)#6 7.2% (+71.7)#46
46. 99722, Alaska 78.1% 9.2% (+68.9)#7 7.2% (+70.9)#47
47. 12453, New York 78.0% 9.9% (+68.1)#4 7.2% (+70.7)#48
48. 89430, Nevada 76.2% 6.7% (+69.5)#2 7.2% (+69.0)#49
49. 99751, Alaska 75.0% 9.2% (+65.8)#8 7.2% (+67.8)#50
50. 99745, Alaska 75.0% 9.2% (+65.8)#9 7.2% (+67.8)#51
51. 99569, Alaska 75.0% 9.2% (+65.8)#10 7.2% (+67.8)#52
52. 18936, Pennsylvania 74.0% 6.0% (+68.0)#1 7.2% (+66.8)#53
53. 13134, New York 74.0% 9.9% (+64.1)#5 7.2% (+66.8)#54
54. 41849, Kentucky 73.8% 6.5% (+67.3)#2 7.2% (+66.6)#55
55. 59035, Montana 73.5% 7.3% (+66.2)#1 7.2% (+66.2)#56
56. 47392, Indiana 73.3% 6.2% (+67.2)#1 7.2% (+66.1)#57
57. 83235, Idaho 72.6% 6.9% (+65.7)#2 7.2% (+65.4)#58
58. 21077, Maryland 72.6% 7.4% (+65.2)#2 7.2% (+65.4)#59
59. 89426, Nevada 72.3% 6.7% (+65.7)#3 7.2% (+65.1)#60
60. 10975, New York 70.8% 9.9% (+60.9)#6 7.2% (+63.6)#61
61. 38623, Mississippi 70.6% 6.7% (+63.9)#2 7.2% (+63.4)#62
62. 99649, Alaska 70.6% 9.2% (+61.4)#11 7.2% (+63.4)#63
63. 98562, Washington 70.5% 7.1% (+63.4)#1 7.2% (+63.3)#64
64. 99641, Alaska 70.1% 9.2% (+60.9)#12 7.2% (+62.9)#65
65. 99733, Alaska 70.0% 9.2% (+60.8)#13 7.2% (+62.8)#66
66. 24167, Virginia 69.8% 7.7% (+62.1)#4 7.2% (+62.6)#67
67. 33877, Florida 69.8% 6.6% (+63.2)#1 7.2% (+62.5)#68
68. 43842, Ohio 69.6% 7.4% (+62.2)#1 7.2% (+62.4)#69
69. 12820, New York 69.6% 9.9% (+59.7)#7 7.2% (+62.3)#70
70. 99759, Alaska 69.4% 9.2% (+60.2)#14 7.2% (+62.1)#71
71. 99154, Washington 68.8% 7.1% (+61.7)#2 7.2% (+61.5)#72
72. 75475, Texas 68.4% 7.2% (+61.2)#5 7.2% (+61.2)#73
73. 82514, Wyoming 68.3% 10.5% (+57.8)#2 7.2% (+61.1)#74
74. 57621, South Dakota 68.3% 7.7% (+60.6)#2 7.2% (+61.1)#75
75. 99781, Alaska 68.3% 9.2% (+59.1)#15 7.2% (+61.1)#76
76. 99724, Alaska 68.3% 9.2% (+59.1)#16 7.2% (+61.1)#77
77. 56666, Minnesota 67.8% 7.2% (+60.6)#1 7.2% (+60.6)#78
78. 99680, Alaska 67.4% 9.2% (+58.2)#17 7.2% (+60.2)#79
79. 56670, Minnesota 67.3% 7.2% (+60.1)#2 7.2% (+60.1)#80
80. 86434, Arizona 67.0% 6.7% (+60.3)#2 7.2% (+59.8)#81
81. 81046, Colorado 66.7% 7.2% (+59.5)#2 7.2% (+59.4)#82
82. 57577, South Dakota 65.7% 7.7% (+58.1)#3 7.2% (+58.5)#83
83. 99648, Alaska 65.4% 9.2% (+56.2)#18 7.2% (+58.2)#84
84. 77977, Texas 65.0% 7.2% (+57.8)#6 7.2% (+57.8)#85
85. 67659, Kansas 65.0% 8.1% (+56.9)#1 7.2% (+57.8)#86
86. 97441, Oregon 64.7% 6.9% (+57.8)#1 7.2% (+57.5)#87
87. 44274, Ohio 64.5% 7.4% (+57.1)#2 7.2% (+57.3)#88
88. 99727, Alaska 63.8% 9.2% (+54.6)#19 7.2% (+56.5)#89
89. 99754, Alaska 63.4% 9.2% (+54.2)#20 7.2% (+56.2)#90
90. 46595, Indiana 63.2% 6.2% (+57.0)#2 7.2% (+55.9)#91
91. 57772, South Dakota 62.7% 7.7% (+55.1)#4 7.2% (+55.5)#92
92. 99551, Alaska 62.6% 9.2% (+53.4)#21 7.2% (+55.4)#93
93. 24464, Virginia 61.7% 7.7% (+54.0)#5 7.2% (+54.5)#94
94. 57737, South Dakota 61.7% 7.7% (+54.0)#5 7.2% (+54.5)#95
95. 71820, Arkansas 60.9% 6.2% (+54.7)#2 7.2% (+53.6)#96
96. 82050, Wyoming 60.4% 10.5% (+49.9)#3 7.2% (+53.2)#97
97. 59465, Montana 60.0% 7.3% (+52.7)#2 7.2% (+52.8)#98
98. 17727, Pennsylvania 60.0% 6.0% (+54.0)#2 7.2% (+52.8)#99
99. 12448, New York 59.5% 9.9% (+49.6)#8 7.2% (+52.2)#100
100. 86038, Arizona 59.4% 6.7% (+52.6)#3 7.2% (+52.1)#101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States?
28330 has the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States?
Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States is 7.2%.