Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Computers and Mathematics in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Computers and Mathematics
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Computers and Mathematics in the United States

40.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Computers and Mathematics in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Computers and Mathematics in the United States

Zip Code % Graduates vs State vs National
1. 16563, Pennsylvania 100.0% 4.6% (+95.4)#1 4.9% (+95.1)#1
2. 25755, West Virginia 100.0% 3.0% (+97.0)#1 4.9% (+95.1)#2
3. 40404, Kentucky 100.0% 3.8% (+96.2)#1 4.9% (+95.1)#3
4. 92327, California 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#1 4.9% (+95.1)#4
5. 24866, West Virginia 100.0% 3.0% (+97.0)#2 4.9% (+95.1)#5
6. 95385, California 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#2 4.9% (+95.1)#6
7. 36583, Alabama 100.0% 4.4% (+95.6)#1 4.9% (+95.1)#7
8. 65446, Missouri 100.0% 4.4% (+95.6)#1 4.9% (+95.1)#8
9. 87940, New Mexico 100.0% 3.7% (+96.3)#1 4.9% (+95.1)#9
10. 81222, Colorado 100.0% 5.2% (+94.8)#1 4.9% (+95.1)#10
11. 15489, Pennsylvania 100.0% 4.6% (+95.4)#2 4.9% (+95.1)#11
12. 45070, Ohio 100.0% 4.1% (+95.9)#1 4.9% (+95.1)#12
13. 13138, New York 100.0% 4.7% (+95.3)#1 4.9% (+95.1)#13
14. 49409, Michigan 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#1 4.9% (+95.1)#14
15. 95978, California 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#3 4.9% (+95.1)#15
16. 48139, Michigan 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#2 4.9% (+95.1)#16
17. 18323, Pennsylvania 100.0% 4.6% (+95.4)#3 4.9% (+95.1)#17
18. 89315, Nevada 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#1 4.9% (+95.1)#18
19. 82642, Wyoming 100.0% 2.6% (+97.4)#1 4.9% (+95.1)#19
20. 46704, Indiana 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#1 4.9% (+95.1)#20
21. 88254, New Mexico 100.0% 3.7% (+96.3)#2 4.9% (+95.1)#21
22. 17822, Pennsylvania 100.0% 4.6% (+95.4)#4 4.9% (+95.1)#22
23. 52566, Iowa 88.9% 3.7% (+85.2)#1 4.9% (+84.0)#23
24. 64655, Missouri 85.7% 4.4% (+81.3)#2 4.9% (+80.8)#24
25. 72841, Arkansas 84.8% 4.0% (+80.7)#1 4.9% (+79.9)#25
26. 62851, Illinois 82.4% 5.1% (+77.3)#1 4.9% (+77.5)#26
27. 27847, North Carolina 80.2% 5.0% (+75.2)#1 4.9% (+75.3)#27
28. 85922, Arizona 79.6% 4.5% (+75.1)#1 4.9% (+74.7)#28
29. 01380, Massachusetts 77.8% 5.3% (+72.5)#1 4.9% (+72.9)#29
30. 82428, Wyoming 75.0% 2.6% (+72.4)#2 4.9% (+70.1)#30
31. 18349, Pennsylvania 74.6% 4.6% (+70.1)#5 4.9% (+69.8)#31
32. 11794, New York 72.5% 4.7% (+67.8)#2 4.9% (+67.7)#32
33. 84743, Utah 71.4% 5.5% (+65.9)#1 4.9% (+66.5)#33
34. 10919, New York 70.9% 4.7% (+66.2)#3 4.9% (+66.0)#34
35. 67843, Kansas 70.6% 4.0% (+66.6)#1 4.9% (+65.7)#35
36. 75960, Texas 70.0% 5.2% (+64.8)#1 4.9% (+65.1)#36
37. 52557, Iowa 69.5% 3.7% (+65.8)#2 4.9% (+64.6)#37
38. 50255, Iowa 69.2% 3.7% (+65.5)#3 4.9% (+64.3)#38
39. 98859, Washington 68.8% 7.0% (+61.8)#1 4.9% (+63.9)#39
40. 29743, South Carolina 67.1% 3.7% (+63.3)#1 4.9% (+62.2)#40
41. 75764, Texas 66.7% 5.2% (+61.5)#2 4.9% (+61.8)#41
42. 17323, Pennsylvania 64.3% 4.6% (+59.7)#6 4.9% (+59.4)#42
43. 03238, New Hampshire 62.5% 4.9% (+57.6)#1 4.9% (+57.6)#43
44. 12724, New York 62.5% 4.7% (+57.8)#4 4.9% (+57.6)#44
45. 52570, Iowa 61.5% 3.7% (+57.9)#4 4.9% (+56.6)#45
46. 39067, Mississippi 61.1% 3.2% (+57.9)#1 4.9% (+56.2)#46
47. 92398, California 60.9% 5.8% (+55.1)#4 4.9% (+56.0)#47
48. 15617, Pennsylvania 60.5% 4.6% (+56.0)#7 4.9% (+55.6)#48
49. 43350, Ohio 60.0% 4.1% (+55.9)#2 4.9% (+55.1)#49
50. 39363, Mississippi 59.6% 3.2% (+56.3)#2 4.9% (+54.7)#50
51. 93528, California 58.8% 5.8% (+53.0)#5 4.9% (+53.9)#51
52. 42715, Kentucky 58.6% 3.8% (+54.8)#2 4.9% (+53.7)#52
53. 96117, California 57.6% 5.8% (+51.8)#6 4.9% (+52.7)#53
54. 42361, Kentucky 57.4% 3.8% (+53.6)#3 4.9% (+52.6)#54
55. 18912, Pennsylvania 57.1% 4.6% (+52.6)#8 4.9% (+52.2)#55
56. 18980, Pennsylvania 56.8% 4.6% (+52.2)#9 4.9% (+51.9)#56
57. 41751, Kentucky 56.5% 3.8% (+52.7)#4 4.9% (+51.6)#57
58. 70356, Louisiana 55.6% 3.0% (+52.5)#1 4.9% (+50.7)#58
59. 71965, Arkansas 55.6% 4.0% (+51.5)#2 4.9% (+50.7)#59
60. 53003, Wisconsin 55.6% 3.9% (+51.7)#1 4.9% (+50.7)#60
61. 99160, Washington 55.6% 7.0% (+48.6)#2 4.9% (+50.7)#61
62. 16244, Pennsylvania 54.5% 4.6% (+50.0)#10 4.9% (+49.7)#62
63. 29373, South Carolina 53.3% 3.7% (+49.6)#2 4.9% (+48.4)#63
64. 52074, Iowa 53.1% 3.7% (+49.4)#5 4.9% (+48.2)#64
65. 13863, New York 53.1% 4.7% (+48.3)#5 4.9% (+48.2)#65
66. 78558, Texas 53.0% 5.2% (+47.9)#3 4.9% (+48.1)#66
67. 28434, North Carolina 52.9% 5.0% (+47.9)#2 4.9% (+48.0)#67
68. 98535, Washington 52.4% 7.0% (+45.5)#3 4.9% (+47.5)#68
69. 49863, Michigan 52.4% 4.2% (+48.1)#3 4.9% (+47.5)#69
70. 19316, Pennsylvania 52.4% 4.6% (+47.8)#11 4.9% (+47.5)#70
71. 66777, Kansas 52.3% 4.0% (+48.3)#2 4.9% (+47.4)#71
72. 70757, Louisiana 51.4% 3.0% (+48.4)#2 4.9% (+46.5)#72
73. 61050, Illinois 51.0% 5.1% (+45.9)#2 4.9% (+46.1)#73
74. 79406, Texas 50.0% 5.2% (+44.8)#4 4.9% (+45.1)#74
75. 02912, Rhode Island 50.0% 3.9% (+46.1)#1 4.9% (+45.1)#75
76. 50012, Iowa 50.0% 3.7% (+46.3)#6 4.9% (+45.1)#76
77. 74077, Oklahoma 50.0% 3.4% (+46.6)#1 4.9% (+45.1)#77
78. 93201, California 50.0% 5.8% (+44.2)#7 4.9% (+45.1)#78
79. 24270, Virginia 50.0% 6.6% (+43.4)#1 4.9% (+45.1)#79
80. 23440, Virginia 50.0% 6.6% (+43.4)#2 4.9% (+45.1)#80
81. 21543, Maryland 50.0% 7.0% (+43.0)#1 4.9% (+45.1)#81
82. 72026, Arkansas 50.0% 4.0% (+46.0)#3 4.9% (+45.1)#82
83. 97484, Oregon 50.0% 3.9% (+46.1)#1 4.9% (+45.1)#83
84. 47584, Indiana 50.0% 4.2% (+45.8)#2 4.9% (+45.1)#84
85. 72449, Arkansas 50.0% 4.0% (+46.0)#4 4.9% (+45.1)#85
86. 58402, North Dakota 50.0% 3.4% (+46.6)#1 4.9% (+45.1)#86
87. 68001, Nebraska 50.0% 3.8% (+46.2)#1 4.9% (+45.1)#87
88. 84313, Utah 50.0% 5.5% (+44.5)#2 4.9% (+45.1)#88
89. 62256, Illinois 50.0% 5.1% (+44.9)#3 4.9% (+45.1)#89
90. 99144, Washington 50.0% 7.0% (+43.0)#4 4.9% (+45.1)#90
91. 25866, West Virginia 48.7% 3.0% (+45.7)#3 4.9% (+43.8)#91
92. 70040, Louisiana 48.6% 3.0% (+45.6)#3 4.9% (+43.8)#92
93. 52039, Iowa 47.7% 3.7% (+44.0)#7 4.9% (+42.8)#93
94. 30322, Georgia 47.6% 5.5% (+42.1)#1 4.9% (+42.7)#94
95. 07961, New Jersey 47.6% 6.2% (+41.5)#1 4.9% (+42.7)#95
96. 98940, Washington 47.4% 7.0% (+40.5)#5 4.9% (+42.5)#96
97. 83547, Idaho 47.2% 3.5% (+43.6)#1 4.9% (+42.3)#97
98. 41651, Kentucky 47.1% 3.8% (+43.2)#5 4.9% (+42.2)#98
99. 24622, Virginia 46.9% 6.6% (+40.3)#3 4.9% (+42.0)#99
100. 98164, Washington 46.8% 7.0% (+39.8)#6 4.9% (+41.9)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Computers and Mathematics in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Computers and Mathematics in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Computers and Mathematics in the United States?
16563 has the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Computers and Mathematics in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population with a Degree in Computers and Mathematics in the United States?
Percentage of Population with a Degree in Computers and Mathematics in the United States is 4.9%.