Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction & Extraction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States

50.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 37845, Tennessee 100.0% 5.0% (+95.0)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#1
2. 25672, West Virginia 100.0% 6.2% (+93.8)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#2
3. 40820, Kentucky 100.0% 4.7% (+95.3)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#3
4. 97335, Oregon 100.0% 4.6% (+95.4)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#4
5. 24604, Virginia 100.0% 4.5% (+95.5)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#5
6. 86313, Arizona 100.0% 5.2% (+94.8)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#6
7. 33944, Florida 100.0% 5.5% (+94.5)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#7
8. 70654, Louisiana 100.0% 6.6% (+93.4)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#8
9. 87028, New Mexico 100.0% 6.3% (+93.7)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#9
10. 77961, Texas 100.0% 6.6% (+93.4)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#10
11. 25864, West Virginia 100.0% 6.2% (+93.8)#2 5.0% (+95.0)#11
12. 72165, Arkansas 100.0% 5.4% (+94.6)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#12
13. 05141, Vermont 100.0% 5.6% (+94.4)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#13
14. 43972, Ohio 100.0% 4.1% (+95.9)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#14
15. 43902, Ohio 100.0% 4.1% (+95.9)#2 5.0% (+95.0)#15
16. 35074, Alabama 100.0% 5.2% (+94.8)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#16
17. 26615, West Virginia 100.0% 6.2% (+93.8)#3 5.0% (+95.0)#18
18. 95248, California 100.0% 4.8% (+95.2)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#19
19. 95511, California 100.0% 4.8% (+95.2)#2 5.0% (+95.0)#20
20. 47437, Indiana 100.0% 4.7% (+95.3)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#21
21. 88040, New Mexico 100.0% 6.3% (+93.7)#2 5.0% (+95.0)#22
22. 15348, Pennsylvania 100.0% 4.4% (+95.6)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#23
23. 89409, Nevada 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#24
24. 79326, Texas 100.0% 6.6% (+93.4)#2 5.0% (+95.0)#25
25. 78564, Texas 100.0% 6.6% (+93.4)#3 5.0% (+95.0)#26
26. 71651, Arkansas 100.0% 5.4% (+94.6)#2 5.0% (+95.0)#27
27. 42163, Kentucky 100.0% 4.7% (+95.3)#2 5.0% (+95.0)#28
28. 83469, Idaho 100.0% 6.5% (+93.5)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#29
29. 65439, Missouri 100.0% 5.0% (+95.0)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#30
30. 45119, Ohio 100.0% 4.1% (+95.9)#3 5.0% (+95.0)#31
31. 02672, Massachusetts 100.0% 4.4% (+95.6)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#32
32. 28108, North Carolina 100.0% 5.0% (+95.0)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#33
33. 31327, Georgia 100.0% 4.7% (+95.3)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#34
34. 93633, California 100.0% 4.8% (+95.2)#3 5.0% (+95.0)#35
35. 40829, Kentucky 100.0% 4.7% (+95.3)#3 5.0% (+95.0)#36
36. 61433, Illinois 100.0% 4.1% (+95.9)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#37
37. 72059, Arkansas 100.0% 5.4% (+94.6)#3 5.0% (+95.0)#38
38. 65730, Missouri 100.0% 5.0% (+95.0)#2 5.0% (+95.0)#39
39. 95480, California 100.0% 4.8% (+95.2)#4 5.0% (+95.0)#40
40. 24411, Virginia 100.0% 4.5% (+95.5)#2 5.0% (+95.0)#41
41. 99679, Alaska 93.2% 6.2% (+87.0)#1 5.0% (+88.2)#42
42. 70782, Louisiana 87.5% 6.6% (+80.9)#2 5.0% (+82.5)#43
43. 25666, West Virginia 84.4% 6.2% (+78.2)#4 5.0% (+79.4)#44
44. 30664, Georgia 83.3% 4.7% (+78.6)#2 5.0% (+78.3)#45
45. 45893, Ohio 82.5% 4.1% (+78.3)#4 5.0% (+77.5)#46
46. 80432, Colorado 79.1% 5.5% (+73.6)#1 5.0% (+74.1)#47
47. 48724, Michigan 78.5% 4.4% (+74.1)#1 5.0% (+73.5)#48
48. 24132, Virginia 77.8% 4.5% (+73.3)#3 5.0% (+72.8)#49
49. 83348, Idaho 77.8% 6.5% (+71.3)#2 5.0% (+72.8)#50
50. 38070, Tennessee 77.2% 5.0% (+72.2)#2 5.0% (+72.2)#51
51. 35457, Alabama 74.5% 5.2% (+69.3)#2 5.0% (+69.5)#52
52. 72180, Arkansas 73.3% 5.4% (+68.0)#4 5.0% (+68.3)#53
53. 14169, New York 71.2% 4.3% (+66.9)#1 5.0% (+66.2)#54
54. 25025, West Virginia 70.6% 6.2% (+64.4)#5 5.0% (+65.6)#55
55. 25630, West Virginia 69.9% 6.2% (+63.7)#6 5.0% (+64.9)#56
56. 40808, Kentucky 69.2% 4.7% (+64.5)#4 5.0% (+64.2)#57
57. 23486, Virginia 67.2% 4.5% (+62.7)#4 5.0% (+62.2)#58
58. 24879, West Virginia 66.7% 6.2% (+60.4)#7 5.0% (+61.7)#59
59. 58205, North Dakota 66.7% 5.8% (+60.9)#1 5.0% (+61.7)#60
60. 77661, Texas 66.3% 6.6% (+59.7)#4 5.0% (+61.3)#61
61. 41660, Kentucky 66.1% 4.7% (+61.3)#5 5.0% (+61.1)#62
62. 94569, California 65.2% 4.8% (+60.4)#5 5.0% (+60.2)#63
63. 78547, Texas 65.2% 6.6% (+58.6)#5 5.0% (+60.2)#64
64. 41604, Kentucky 65.1% 4.7% (+60.4)#6 5.0% (+60.1)#65
65. 67659, Kansas 65.0% 4.8% (+60.2)#1 5.0% (+60.0)#66
66. 99653, Alaska 64.4% 6.2% (+58.2)#2 5.0% (+59.4)#67
67. 41132, Kentucky 64.3% 4.7% (+59.6)#7 5.0% (+59.3)#68
68. 26325, West Virginia 64.3% 6.2% (+58.1)#8 5.0% (+59.3)#69
69. 36476, Alabama 63.6% 5.2% (+58.4)#3 5.0% (+58.6)#70
70. 81429, Colorado 63.4% 5.5% (+58.0)#2 5.0% (+58.4)#71
71. 76267, Texas 63.2% 6.6% (+56.6)#6 5.0% (+58.2)#72
72. 88353, New Mexico 62.7% 6.3% (+56.4)#3 5.0% (+57.7)#73
73. 05833, Vermont 62.5% 5.6% (+56.9)#2 5.0% (+57.5)#74
74. 79223, Texas 62.3% 6.6% (+55.7)#7 5.0% (+57.3)#75
75. 88338, New Mexico 62.1% 6.3% (+55.8)#4 5.0% (+57.1)#76
76. 35745, Alabama 61.9% 5.2% (+56.7)#4 5.0% (+56.9)#77
77. 70575, Louisiana 61.9% 6.6% (+55.3)#3 5.0% (+56.9)#78
78. 18457, Pennsylvania 61.9% 4.4% (+57.5)#2 5.0% (+56.9)#79
79. 87524, New Mexico 61.8% 6.3% (+55.5)#5 5.0% (+56.8)#80
80. 26178, West Virginia 60.7% 6.2% (+54.5)#9 5.0% (+55.7)#81
81. 98267, Washington 60.6% 4.9% (+55.7)#1 5.0% (+55.6)#82
82. 25932, West Virginia 60.4% 6.2% (+54.2)#10 5.0% (+55.4)#83
83. 24894, West Virginia 60.0% 6.2% (+53.8)#11 5.0% (+55.0)#84
84. 26327, West Virginia 60.0% 6.2% (+53.8)#12 5.0% (+55.0)#85
85. 27821, North Carolina 60.0% 5.0% (+55.0)#2 5.0% (+55.0)#86
86. 79231, Texas 60.0% 6.6% (+53.4)#8 5.0% (+55.0)#87
87. 57659, South Dakota 60.0% 5.1% (+54.9)#1 5.0% (+55.0)#88
88. 65657, Missouri 58.5% 5.0% (+53.4)#3 5.0% (+53.5)#89
89. 16220, Pennsylvania 58.1% 4.4% (+53.7)#3 5.0% (+53.1)#90
90. 46704, Indiana 57.9% 4.7% (+53.2)#2 5.0% (+52.9)#91
91. 18413, Pennsylvania 57.7% 4.4% (+53.3)#4 5.0% (+52.7)#92
92. 57571, South Dakota 57.1% 5.1% (+52.0)#2 5.0% (+52.1)#93
93. 84743, Utah 57.0% 5.5% (+51.5)#1 5.0% (+52.0)#94
94. 24846, West Virginia 56.7% 6.2% (+50.4)#13 5.0% (+51.7)#95
95. 38745, Mississippi 56.4% 5.2% (+51.2)#1 5.0% (+51.4)#96
96. 96063, California 56.2% 4.8% (+51.4)#6 5.0% (+51.3)#97
97. 77415, Texas 56.2% 6.6% (+49.6)#9 5.0% (+51.2)#98
98. 14027, New York 55.9% 4.3% (+51.6)#2 5.0% (+50.9)#99
99. 98647, Washington 55.6% 4.9% (+50.6)#2 5.0% (+50.6)#100
100. 28589, North Carolina 55.6% 5.0% (+50.5)#3 5.0% (+50.6)#101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States?
37845 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States is 5.0%.