Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Legal Services & Support
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States

0.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.06376, Connecticut100.0%1.4%(+98.6)#11.2%(+98.8)#1
2.25936, West Virginia100.0%1.1%(+98.9)#11.2%(+98.8)#2
3.12441, New York71.8%1.9%(+69.9)#11.2%(+70.6)#3
4.95232, California56.5%1.3%(+55.3)#11.2%(+55.3)#4
5.04019, Maine53.3%0.95%(+52.4)#11.2%(+52.1)#5
6.04855, Maine53.1%0.95%(+52.2)#21.2%(+52.0)#6
7.32639, Florida52.5%1.3%(+51.2)#11.2%(+51.4)#7
8.80929, Colorado50.0%1.2%(+48.8)#11.2%(+48.8)#8
9.15502, Pennsylvania45.3%1.1%(+44.1)#11.2%(+44.1)#9
10.87517, New Mexico44.0%1.3%(+42.6)#11.2%(+42.8)#10
11.24657, Virginia42.1%1.6%(+40.5)#11.2%(+40.9)#11
12.81210, Colorado41.7%1.2%(+40.6)#21.2%(+40.6)#12
13.95679, California40.4%1.3%(+39.1)#21.2%(+39.2)#13
14.20688, Maryland38.0%1.8%(+36.2)#11.2%(+36.8)#14
15.88338, New Mexico37.9%1.3%(+36.6)#21.2%(+36.7)#15
16.15047, Pennsylvania37.7%1.1%(+36.5)#21.2%(+36.5)#16
17.25565, West Virginia36.7%1.1%(+35.6)#21.2%(+35.5)#17
18.83867, Idaho35.8%0.88%(+34.9)#11.2%(+34.6)#18
19.10503, New York35.6%1.9%(+33.7)#21.2%(+34.4)#19
20.12453, New York33.9%1.9%(+32.0)#31.2%(+32.7)#20
21.18440, Pennsylvania29.5%1.1%(+28.4)#31.2%(+28.4)#21
22.11970, New York29.2%1.9%(+27.3)#41.2%(+28.0)#22
23.93424, California28.6%1.3%(+27.4)#31.2%(+27.5)#23
24.10535, New York28.6%1.9%(+26.7)#51.2%(+27.4)#24
25.97125, Oregon27.6%1.1%(+26.5)#11.2%(+26.4)#25
26.43510, Ohio27.3%0.92%(+26.3)#11.2%(+26.1)#26
27.22211, Virginia26.7%1.6%(+25.0)#21.2%(+25.5)#27
28.78658, Texas26.7%1.0%(+25.7)#11.2%(+25.5)#28
29.26259, West Virginia26.7%1.1%(+25.6)#31.2%(+25.5)#29
30.24476, Virginia26.4%1.6%(+24.8)#31.2%(+25.2)#30
31.32133, Florida26.3%1.3%(+25.0)#21.2%(+25.2)#31
32.08014, New Jersey26.2%1.5%(+24.7)#11.2%(+25.0)#32
33.20004, District Of Columbia26.0%8.4%(+17.6)#11.2%(+24.8)#33
34.57630, South Dakota25.0%0.65%(+24.4)#11.2%(+23.8)#34
35.23423, Virginia24.8%1.6%(+23.1)#41.2%(+23.6)#35
36.22711, Virginia24.6%1.6%(+23.0)#51.2%(+23.4)#36
37.78591, Texas24.5%1.0%(+23.5)#21.2%(+23.3)#37
38.59910, Montana24.5%0.99%(+23.5)#11.2%(+23.3)#38
39.94528, California24.3%1.3%(+23.1)#41.2%(+23.1)#39
40.29439, South Carolina24.0%0.97%(+23.1)#11.2%(+22.9)#40
41.64165, Missouri22.0%0.99%(+21.0)#11.2%(+20.8)#41
42.13692, New York21.8%1.9%(+19.9)#61.2%(+20.6)#42
43.78885, Texas21.4%1.0%(+20.4)#31.2%(+20.2)#43
44.65760, Missouri21.1%0.99%(+20.1)#21.2%(+19.9)#44
45.12752, New York20.6%1.9%(+18.7)#71.2%(+19.4)#45
46.87578, New Mexico20.3%1.3%(+19.0)#31.2%(+19.1)#46
47.15449, Pennsylvania20.1%1.1%(+19.0)#41.2%(+18.9)#47
48.40036, Kentucky20.0%0.95%(+19.1)#11.2%(+18.8)#48
49.68381, Nebraska20.0%0.82%(+19.2)#11.2%(+18.8)#49
50.25244, West Virginia19.8%1.1%(+18.7)#41.2%(+18.6)#50
51.28554, North Carolina19.7%0.86%(+18.8)#11.2%(+18.5)#51
52.20036, District Of Columbia19.4%8.4%(+11.1)#21.2%(+18.3)#52
53.12459, New York19.2%1.9%(+17.4)#81.2%(+18.0)#53
54.20015, District Of Columbia19.2%8.4%(+10.8)#31.2%(+18.0)#54
55.98560, Washington18.9%1.1%(+17.8)#11.2%(+17.7)#55
56.24479, Virginia18.6%1.6%(+17.0)#61.2%(+17.4)#56
57.93531, California18.6%1.3%(+17.3)#51.2%(+17.4)#57
58.23354, Virginia18.1%1.6%(+16.5)#71.2%(+16.9)#58
59.34216, Florida17.7%1.3%(+16.4)#31.2%(+16.5)#59
60.58569, North Dakota17.6%0.59%(+17.1)#11.2%(+16.5)#60
61.10006, New York17.6%1.9%(+15.7)#91.2%(+16.4)#61
62.95306, California17.6%1.3%(+16.3)#61.2%(+16.4)#62
63.81220, Colorado17.5%1.2%(+16.3)#31.2%(+16.3)#63
64.24874, West Virginia17.4%1.1%(+16.3)#51.2%(+16.2)#64
65.86437, Arizona17.4%0.99%(+16.4)#11.2%(+16.2)#65
66.77046, Texas17.1%1.0%(+16.1)#41.2%(+15.9)#66
67.13651, New York17.1%1.9%(+15.2)#101.2%(+15.9)#67
68.49793, Michigan17.1%0.89%(+16.2)#11.2%(+15.9)#68
69.18256, Pennsylvania16.9%1.1%(+15.8)#51.2%(+15.8)#69
70.28524, North Carolina16.9%0.86%(+16.0)#21.2%(+15.7)#70
71.43934, Ohio16.7%0.92%(+15.7)#21.2%(+15.5)#71
72.70801, Louisiana16.0%1.3%(+14.7)#11.2%(+14.8)#72
73.10597, New York16.0%1.9%(+14.1)#111.2%(+14.8)#73
74.38626, Mississippi15.7%0.75%(+14.9)#11.2%(+14.5)#74
75.21912, Maryland15.7%1.8%(+13.9)#21.2%(+14.5)#75
76.30456, Georgia15.5%1.1%(+14.4)#11.2%(+14.3)#76
77.80290, Colorado15.4%1.2%(+14.2)#41.2%(+14.2)#77
78.00906, Puerto Rico15.3%1.0%(+14.3)#11.2%(+14.1)#78
79.41631, Kentucky15.2%0.95%(+14.3)#21.2%(+14.1)#79
80.20129, Virginia15.2%1.6%(+13.6)#81.2%(+14.0)#80
81.12574, New York15.2%1.9%(+13.3)#121.2%(+14.0)#81
82.57772, South Dakota14.9%0.65%(+14.3)#21.2%(+13.7)#82
83.80750, Colorado14.8%1.2%(+13.6)#51.2%(+13.6)#83
84.95420, California14.6%1.3%(+13.3)#71.2%(+13.4)#84
85.89411, Nevada14.5%0.99%(+13.6)#11.2%(+13.4)#85
86.73058, Oklahoma14.5%1.0%(+13.5)#11.2%(+13.3)#86
87.25839, West Virginia14.4%1.1%(+13.3)#61.2%(+13.2)#87
88.59214, Montana14.3%0.99%(+13.3)#21.2%(+13.1)#88
89.20008, District Of Columbia14.2%8.4%(+5.87)#41.2%(+13.0)#89
90.00968, Puerto Rico14.2%1.0%(+13.2)#21.2%(+13.0)#90
91.97364, Oregon14.0%1.1%(+12.9)#21.2%(+12.9)#91
92.72851, Arkansas14.0%0.79%(+13.2)#11.2%(+12.8)#92
93.12724, New York14.0%1.9%(+12.1)#131.2%(+12.8)#93
94.50612, Iowa13.9%0.75%(+13.2)#11.2%(+12.7)#94
95.20815, Maryland13.8%1.8%(+12.0)#31.2%(+12.6)#95
96.97877, Oregon13.8%1.1%(+12.7)#31.2%(+12.6)#96
97.79855, Texas13.8%1.0%(+12.8)#51.2%(+12.6)#97
98.20816, Maryland13.6%1.8%(+11.8)#41.2%(+12.4)#98
99.10004, New York13.6%1.9%(+11.7)#141.2%(+12.4)#99
100.87516, New Mexico13.4%1.3%(+12.1)#41.2%(+12.2)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
71.8%
#4
56.5%
#5
53.3%
#6
53.1%
#7
52.5%
#8
50.0%
#9
45.3%
#10
44.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States?
06376 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States is 1.2%.