Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Legal Services & Support
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States

0.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 06376, Connecticut 100.0% 1.4% (+98.6)#1 1.2% (+98.8)#1
2. 25936, West Virginia 100.0% 1.1% (+98.9)#1 1.2% (+98.8)#2
3. 12441, New York 71.8% 1.9% (+69.9)#1 1.2% (+70.6)#3
4. 95232, California 56.5% 1.3% (+55.3)#1 1.2% (+55.3)#4
5. 04019, Maine 53.3% 0.95% (+52.4)#1 1.2% (+52.1)#5
6. 04855, Maine 53.1% 0.95% (+52.2)#2 1.2% (+52.0)#6
7. 32639, Florida 52.5% 1.3% (+51.2)#1 1.2% (+51.4)#7
8. 80929, Colorado 50.0% 1.2% (+48.8)#1 1.2% (+48.8)#8
9. 15502, Pennsylvania 45.3% 1.1% (+44.1)#1 1.2% (+44.1)#9
10. 87517, New Mexico 44.0% 1.3% (+42.6)#1 1.2% (+42.8)#10
11. 24657, Virginia 42.1% 1.6% (+40.5)#1 1.2% (+40.9)#11
12. 81210, Colorado 41.7% 1.2% (+40.6)#2 1.2% (+40.6)#12
13. 95679, California 40.4% 1.3% (+39.1)#2 1.2% (+39.2)#13
14. 20688, Maryland 38.0% 1.8% (+36.2)#1 1.2% (+36.8)#14
15. 88338, New Mexico 37.9% 1.3% (+36.6)#2 1.2% (+36.7)#15
16. 15047, Pennsylvania 37.7% 1.1% (+36.5)#2 1.2% (+36.5)#16
17. 25565, West Virginia 36.7% 1.1% (+35.6)#2 1.2% (+35.5)#17
18. 83867, Idaho 35.8% 0.88% (+34.9)#1 1.2% (+34.6)#18
19. 10503, New York 35.6% 1.9% (+33.7)#2 1.2% (+34.4)#19
20. 12453, New York 33.9% 1.9% (+32.0)#3 1.2% (+32.7)#20
21. 18440, Pennsylvania 29.5% 1.1% (+28.4)#3 1.2% (+28.4)#21
22. 11970, New York 29.2% 1.9% (+27.3)#4 1.2% (+28.0)#22
23. 93424, California 28.6% 1.3% (+27.4)#3 1.2% (+27.5)#23
24. 10535, New York 28.6% 1.9% (+26.7)#5 1.2% (+27.4)#24
25. 97125, Oregon 27.6% 1.1% (+26.5)#1 1.2% (+26.4)#25
26. 43510, Ohio 27.3% 0.92% (+26.3)#1 1.2% (+26.1)#26
27. 22211, Virginia 26.7% 1.6% (+25.0)#2 1.2% (+25.5)#27
28. 78658, Texas 26.7% 1.0% (+25.7)#1 1.2% (+25.5)#28
29. 26259, West Virginia 26.7% 1.1% (+25.6)#3 1.2% (+25.5)#29
30. 24476, Virginia 26.4% 1.6% (+24.8)#3 1.2% (+25.2)#30
31. 32133, Florida 26.3% 1.3% (+25.0)#2 1.2% (+25.2)#31
32. 08014, New Jersey 26.2% 1.5% (+24.7)#1 1.2% (+25.0)#32
33. 20004, District Of Columbia 26.0% 8.4% (+17.6)#1 1.2% (+24.8)#33
34. 57630, South Dakota 25.0% 0.65% (+24.4)#1 1.2% (+23.8)#34
35. 23423, Virginia 24.8% 1.6% (+23.1)#4 1.2% (+23.6)#35
36. 22711, Virginia 24.6% 1.6% (+23.0)#5 1.2% (+23.4)#36
37. 78591, Texas 24.5% 1.0% (+23.5)#2 1.2% (+23.3)#37
38. 59910, Montana 24.5% 0.99% (+23.5)#1 1.2% (+23.3)#38
39. 94528, California 24.3% 1.3% (+23.1)#4 1.2% (+23.1)#39
40. 29439, South Carolina 24.0% 0.97% (+23.1)#1 1.2% (+22.9)#40
41. 64165, Missouri 22.0% 0.99% (+21.0)#1 1.2% (+20.8)#41
42. 13692, New York 21.8% 1.9% (+19.9)#6 1.2% (+20.6)#42
43. 78885, Texas 21.4% 1.0% (+20.4)#3 1.2% (+20.2)#43
44. 65760, Missouri 21.1% 0.99% (+20.1)#2 1.2% (+19.9)#44
45. 12752, New York 20.6% 1.9% (+18.7)#7 1.2% (+19.4)#45
46. 87578, New Mexico 20.3% 1.3% (+19.0)#3 1.2% (+19.1)#46
47. 15449, Pennsylvania 20.1% 1.1% (+19.0)#4 1.2% (+18.9)#47
48. 40036, Kentucky 20.0% 0.95% (+19.1)#1 1.2% (+18.8)#48
49. 68381, Nebraska 20.0% 0.82% (+19.2)#1 1.2% (+18.8)#49
50. 25244, West Virginia 19.8% 1.1% (+18.7)#4 1.2% (+18.6)#50
51. 28554, North Carolina 19.7% 0.86% (+18.8)#1 1.2% (+18.5)#51
52. 20036, District Of Columbia 19.4% 8.4% (+11.1)#2 1.2% (+18.3)#52
53. 12459, New York 19.2% 1.9% (+17.4)#8 1.2% (+18.0)#53
54. 20015, District Of Columbia 19.2% 8.4% (+10.8)#3 1.2% (+18.0)#54
55. 98560, Washington 18.9% 1.1% (+17.8)#1 1.2% (+17.7)#55
56. 24479, Virginia 18.6% 1.6% (+17.0)#6 1.2% (+17.4)#56
57. 93531, California 18.6% 1.3% (+17.3)#5 1.2% (+17.4)#57
58. 23354, Virginia 18.1% 1.6% (+16.5)#7 1.2% (+16.9)#58
59. 34216, Florida 17.7% 1.3% (+16.4)#3 1.2% (+16.5)#59
60. 58569, North Dakota 17.6% 0.59% (+17.1)#1 1.2% (+16.5)#60
61. 10006, New York 17.6% 1.9% (+15.7)#9 1.2% (+16.4)#61
62. 95306, California 17.6% 1.3% (+16.3)#6 1.2% (+16.4)#62
63. 81220, Colorado 17.5% 1.2% (+16.3)#3 1.2% (+16.3)#63
64. 24874, West Virginia 17.4% 1.1% (+16.3)#5 1.2% (+16.2)#64
65. 86437, Arizona 17.4% 0.99% (+16.4)#1 1.2% (+16.2)#65
66. 77046, Texas 17.1% 1.0% (+16.1)#4 1.2% (+15.9)#66
67. 13651, New York 17.1% 1.9% (+15.2)#10 1.2% (+15.9)#67
68. 49793, Michigan 17.1% 0.89% (+16.2)#1 1.2% (+15.9)#68
69. 18256, Pennsylvania 16.9% 1.1% (+15.8)#5 1.2% (+15.8)#69
70. 28524, North Carolina 16.9% 0.86% (+16.0)#2 1.2% (+15.7)#70
71. 43934, Ohio 16.7% 0.92% (+15.7)#2 1.2% (+15.5)#71
72. 70801, Louisiana 16.0% 1.3% (+14.7)#1 1.2% (+14.8)#72
73. 10597, New York 16.0% 1.9% (+14.1)#11 1.2% (+14.8)#73
74. 38626, Mississippi 15.7% 0.75% (+14.9)#1 1.2% (+14.5)#74
75. 21912, Maryland 15.7% 1.8% (+13.9)#2 1.2% (+14.5)#75
76. 30456, Georgia 15.5% 1.1% (+14.4)#1 1.2% (+14.3)#76
77. 80290, Colorado 15.4% 1.2% (+14.2)#4 1.2% (+14.2)#77
78. 00906, Puerto Rico 15.3% 1.0% (+14.3)#1 1.2% (+14.1)#78
79. 41631, Kentucky 15.2% 0.95% (+14.3)#2 1.2% (+14.1)#79
80. 20129, Virginia 15.2% 1.6% (+13.6)#8 1.2% (+14.0)#80
81. 12574, New York 15.2% 1.9% (+13.3)#12 1.2% (+14.0)#81
82. 57772, South Dakota 14.9% 0.65% (+14.3)#2 1.2% (+13.7)#82
83. 80750, Colorado 14.8% 1.2% (+13.6)#5 1.2% (+13.6)#83
84. 95420, California 14.6% 1.3% (+13.3)#7 1.2% (+13.4)#84
85. 89411, Nevada 14.5% 0.99% (+13.6)#1 1.2% (+13.4)#85
86. 73058, Oklahoma 14.5% 1.0% (+13.5)#1 1.2% (+13.3)#86
87. 25839, West Virginia 14.4% 1.1% (+13.3)#6 1.2% (+13.2)#87
88. 59214, Montana 14.3% 0.99% (+13.3)#2 1.2% (+13.1)#88
89. 20008, District Of Columbia 14.2% 8.4% (+5.87)#4 1.2% (+13.0)#89
90. 00968, Puerto Rico 14.2% 1.0% (+13.2)#2 1.2% (+13.0)#90
91. 97364, Oregon 14.0% 1.1% (+12.9)#2 1.2% (+12.9)#91
92. 72851, Arkansas 14.0% 0.79% (+13.2)#1 1.2% (+12.8)#92
93. 12724, New York 14.0% 1.9% (+12.1)#13 1.2% (+12.8)#93
94. 50612, Iowa 13.9% 0.75% (+13.2)#1 1.2% (+12.7)#94
95. 20815, Maryland 13.8% 1.8% (+12.0)#3 1.2% (+12.6)#95
96. 97877, Oregon 13.8% 1.1% (+12.7)#3 1.2% (+12.6)#96
97. 79855, Texas 13.8% 1.0% (+12.8)#5 1.2% (+12.6)#97
98. 20816, Maryland 13.6% 1.8% (+11.8)#4 1.2% (+12.4)#98
99. 10004, New York 13.6% 1.9% (+11.7)#14 1.2% (+12.4)#99
100. 87516, New Mexico 13.4% 1.3% (+12.1)#4 1.2% (+12.2)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
71.8%
#4
56.5%
#5
53.3%
#6
53.1%
#7
52.5%
#8
50.0%
#9
45.3%
#10
44.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States?
06376 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States is 1.2%.