Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Family Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in the United States

70.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in the United States

Zip Code Family Poverty vs State vs National
1. 58202, North Dakota 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#1
2. 75247, Texas 100.0% 10.7% (+89.3)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#2
3. 44503, Ohio 100.0% 9.3% (+90.7)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#3
4. 57756, South Dakota 100.0% 7.5% (+92.5)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#4
5. 28330, North Carolina 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#5
6. 92350, California 100.0% 8.5% (+91.5)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#6
7. 78008, Texas 100.0% 10.7% (+89.3)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#7
8. 41663, Kentucky 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#8
9. 70148, Louisiana 100.0% 13.9% (+86.1)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#9
10. 87539, New Mexico 100.0% 13.7% (+86.3)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#10
11. 25907, West Virginia 100.0% 11.9% (+88.1)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#11
12. 45469, Ohio 100.0% 9.3% (+90.7)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#12
13. 71455, Louisiana 100.0% 13.9% (+86.1)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#13
14. 67071, Kansas 100.0% 7.6% (+92.4)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#14
15. 95443, California 100.0% 8.5% (+91.5)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#15
16. 77453, Texas 100.0% 10.7% (+89.3)#3 8.8% (+91.2)#17
17. 97432, Oregon 100.0% 7.3% (+92.7)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#18
18. 44828, Ohio 100.0% 9.3% (+90.7)#3 8.8% (+91.2)#19
19. 70464, Louisiana 100.0% 13.9% (+86.1)#3 8.8% (+91.2)#20
20. 24239, Virginia 100.0% 6.8% (+93.2)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#21
21. 65777, Missouri 100.0% 8.5% (+91.5)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#22
22. 40939, Kentucky 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#23
23. 25149, West Virginia 100.0% 11.9% (+88.1)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#24
24. 03291, New Hampshire 100.0% 4.4% (+95.6)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#25
25. 35477, Alabama 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#26
26. 30581, Georgia 100.0% 10.0% (+90.0)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#27
27. 26615, West Virginia 100.0% 11.9% (+88.1)#3 8.8% (+91.2)#28
28. 40062, Kentucky 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#3 8.8% (+91.2)#29
29. 30751, Georgia 100.0% 10.0% (+90.0)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#30
30. 35013, Alabama 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#31
31. 40803, Kentucky 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#4 8.8% (+91.2)#32
32. 71279, Louisiana 100.0% 13.9% (+86.1)#4 8.8% (+91.2)#33
33. 65468, Missouri 100.0% 8.5% (+91.5)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#34
34. 41364, Kentucky 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#5 8.8% (+91.2)#35
35. 13683, New York 100.0% 9.7% (+90.3)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#36
36. 24993, West Virginia 100.0% 11.9% (+88.1)#4 8.8% (+91.2)#37
37. 13643, New York 100.0% 9.7% (+90.3)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#38
38. 38768, Mississippi 100.0% 14.4% (+85.6)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#39
39. 94512, California 100.0% 8.5% (+91.5)#3 8.8% (+91.2)#40
40. 24830, West Virginia 100.0% 11.9% (+88.1)#5 8.8% (+91.2)#41
41. 78564, Texas 100.0% 10.7% (+89.3)#4 8.8% (+91.2)#42
42. 25699, West Virginia 100.0% 11.9% (+88.1)#6 8.8% (+91.2)#43
43. 74068, Oklahoma 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#44
44. 85341, Arizona 100.0% 9.2% (+90.8)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#45
45. 96136, California 100.0% 8.5% (+91.5)#4 8.8% (+91.2)#46
46. 14893, New York 100.0% 9.7% (+90.3)#3 8.8% (+91.2)#47
47. 99569, Alaska 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#48
48. 73946, Oklahoma 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#49
49. 24888, West Virginia 100.0% 11.9% (+88.1)#7 8.8% (+91.2)#50
50. 99706, Alaska 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#51
51. 28024, North Carolina 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#53
52. 71425, Louisiana 100.0% 13.9% (+86.1)#5 8.8% (+91.2)#54
53. 80732, Colorado 100.0% 6.0% (+94.0)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#55
54. 38947, Mississippi 100.0% 14.4% (+85.6)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#56
55. 97909, Oregon 100.0% 7.3% (+92.7)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#57
56. 82332, Wyoming 100.0% 6.8% (+93.2)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#58
57. 26289, West Virginia 100.0% 11.9% (+88.1)#8 8.8% (+91.2)#59
58. 97057, Oregon 100.0% 7.3% (+92.7)#3 8.8% (+91.2)#60
59. 72338, Arkansas 100.0% 11.6% (+88.4)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#61
60. 36910, Alabama 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#3 8.8% (+91.2)#62
61. 99790, Alaska 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#3 8.8% (+91.2)#63
62. 35577, Alabama 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#4 8.8% (+91.2)#64
63. 79376, Texas 94.7% 10.7% (+84.1)#5 8.8% (+86.0)#65
64. 65664, Missouri 94.4% 8.5% (+86.0)#3 8.8% (+85.7)#66
65. 15443, Pennsylvania 94.3% 8.0% (+86.3)#1 8.8% (+85.5)#67
66. 78635, Texas 94.1% 10.7% (+83.4)#6 8.8% (+85.3)#68
67. 38928, Mississippi 93.1% 14.4% (+78.7)#3 8.8% (+84.3)#69
68. 24984, West Virginia 90.0% 11.9% (+78.1)#9 8.8% (+81.2)#70
69. 57574, South Dakota 88.7% 7.5% (+81.2)#2 8.8% (+79.9)#71
70. 72668, Arkansas 88.7% 11.6% (+77.0)#2 8.8% (+79.9)#72
71. 24854, West Virginia 87.6% 11.9% (+75.7)#10 8.8% (+78.8)#73
72. 57361, South Dakota 87.0% 7.5% (+79.4)#3 8.8% (+78.2)#74
73. 27584, North Carolina 86.4% 9.5% (+76.9)#3 8.8% (+77.7)#75
74. 57794, South Dakota 86.3% 7.5% (+78.7)#4 8.8% (+77.5)#76
75. 87577, New Mexico 86.1% 13.7% (+72.4)#2 8.8% (+77.3)#77
76. 96068, California 85.7% 8.5% (+77.2)#5 8.8% (+76.9)#78
77. 48724, Michigan 84.3% 8.8% (+75.5)#1 8.8% (+75.5)#79
78. 01066, Massachusetts 84.2% 6.5% (+77.7)#1 8.8% (+75.4)#80
79. 39115, Mississippi 83.7% 14.4% (+69.3)#4 8.8% (+74.9)#81
80. 15488, Pennsylvania 82.9% 8.0% (+74.9)#2 8.8% (+74.1)#82
81. 61468, Illinois 82.4% 8.2% (+74.2)#1 8.8% (+73.6)#83
82. 95925, California 81.8% 8.5% (+73.3)#6 8.8% (+73.0)#84
83. 70082, Louisiana 81.6% 13.9% (+67.7)#6 8.8% (+72.9)#85
84. 12733, New York 81.5% 9.7% (+71.7)#4 8.8% (+72.7)#86
85. 41845, Kentucky 81.5% 11.7% (+69.8)#6 8.8% (+72.7)#87
86. 41651, Kentucky 81.1% 11.7% (+69.4)#7 8.8% (+72.4)#88
87. 72178, Arkansas 80.0% 11.6% (+68.4)#3 8.8% (+71.2)#89
88. 81021, Colorado 80.0% 6.0% (+74.0)#2 8.8% (+71.2)#90
89. 00913, Puerto Rico 79.2% 38.8% (+40.4)#1 8.8% (+70.4)#91
90. 95697, California 78.6% 8.5% (+70.0)#7 8.8% (+69.8)#92
91. 57772, South Dakota 78.3% 7.5% (+70.8)#5 8.8% (+69.6)#93
92. 64147, Missouri 78.3% 8.5% (+69.8)#4 8.8% (+69.5)#94
93. 75565, Texas 77.8% 10.7% (+67.1)#7 8.8% (+69.0)#95
94. 36476, Alabama 77.8% 11.3% (+66.5)#5 8.8% (+69.0)#96
95. 57639, South Dakota 77.4% 7.5% (+69.9)#6 8.8% (+68.6)#97
96. 99788, Alaska 76.9% 7.2% (+69.8)#4 8.8% (+68.1)#98
97. 99666, Alaska 76.9% 7.2% (+69.8)#5 8.8% (+68.1)#99
98. 87828, New Mexico 76.4% 13.7% (+62.7)#3 8.8% (+67.6)#100
99. 97329, Oregon 76.0% 7.3% (+68.7)#4 8.8% (+67.2)#101
100. 26560, West Virginia 75.6% 11.9% (+63.6)#11 8.8% (+66.8)#102

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in the United States?
58202 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Families in the United States is 8.8%.