Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Seniors 65+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States

100.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States

Zip Code Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1. 92369, California 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#1
2. 38738, Mississippi 100.0% 13.4% (+86.6)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#2
3. 93944, California 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#3
4. 48859, Michigan 100.0% 9.0% (+91.0)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#4
5. 74103, Oklahoma 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#5
6. 23160, Virginia 100.0% 8.0% (+92.0)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#6
7. 37140, Tennessee 100.0% 10.1% (+89.9)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#7
8. 20064, District Of Columbia 100.0% 14.2% (+85.8)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#8
9. 00636, Puerto Rico 100.0% 38.8% (+61.2)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#9
10. 57566, South Dakota 100.0% 9.3% (+90.7)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#10
11. 87941, New Mexico 100.0% 12.9% (+87.1)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#11
12. 57794, South Dakota 100.0% 9.3% (+90.7)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#12
13. 57756, South Dakota 100.0% 9.3% (+90.7)#3 10.0% (+90.0)#13
14. 78351, Texas 100.0% 11.4% (+88.6)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#14
15. 41714, Kentucky 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#15
16. 24595, Virginia 100.0% 8.0% (+92.0)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#16
17. 28330, North Carolina 100.0% 9.8% (+90.2)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#17
18. 25638, West Virginia 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#18
19. 25920, West Virginia 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#19
20. 78044, Texas 100.0% 11.4% (+88.6)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#20
21. 81222, Colorado 100.0% 7.6% (+92.4)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#21
22. 13638, New York 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#22
23. 25624, West Virginia 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#3 10.0% (+90.0)#23
24. 87712, New Mexico 100.0% 12.9% (+87.1)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#24
25. 40997, Kentucky 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#25
26. 07961, New Jersey 100.0% 9.1% (+90.9)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#26
27. 11430, New York 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#27
28. 90071, California 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#3 10.0% (+90.0)#28
29. 87049, New Mexico 100.0% 12.9% (+87.1)#3 10.0% (+90.0)#29
30. 25826, West Virginia 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#4 10.0% (+90.0)#30
31. 45428, Ohio 100.0% 9.1% (+90.9)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#31
32. 96759, Hawaii 100.0% 8.2% (+91.8)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#32
33. 70801, Louisiana 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#33
34. 42762, Kentucky 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#3 10.0% (+90.0)#34
35. 17946, Pennsylvania 100.0% 8.9% (+91.1)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#35
36. 41775, Kentucky 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#4 10.0% (+90.0)#36
37. 26463, West Virginia 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#5 10.0% (+90.0)#37
38. 87315, New Mexico 100.0% 12.9% (+87.1)#4 10.0% (+90.0)#38
39. 28708, North Carolina 100.0% 9.8% (+90.2)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#39
40. 22730, Virginia 100.0% 8.0% (+92.0)#3 10.0% (+90.0)#40
41. 14302, New York 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#3 10.0% (+90.0)#41
42. 71455, Louisiana 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#42
43. 67071, Kansas 100.0% 8.2% (+91.8)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#43
44. 57361, South Dakota 100.0% 9.3% (+90.7)#4 10.0% (+90.0)#44
45. 14173, New York 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#4 10.0% (+90.0)#45
46. 25913, West Virginia 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#6 10.0% (+90.0)#46
47. 77453, Texas 100.0% 11.4% (+88.6)#3 10.0% (+90.0)#47
48. 77448, Texas 100.0% 11.4% (+88.6)#4 10.0% (+90.0)#48
49. 26524, West Virginia 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#7 10.0% (+90.0)#49
50. 96014, California 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#4 10.0% (+90.0)#50
51. 97373, Oregon 100.0% 8.8% (+91.2)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#51
52. 85328, Arizona 100.0% 9.3% (+90.7)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#52
53. 44068, Ohio 100.0% 9.1% (+90.9)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#53
54. 73070, Oklahoma 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#54
55. 34140, Florida 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#55
56. 00786, Puerto Rico 100.0% 38.8% (+61.2)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#56
57. 65777, Missouri 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#57
58. 84329, Utah 100.0% 6.6% (+93.4)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#58
59. 89418, Nevada 100.0% 10.1% (+89.9)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#59
60. 83312, Idaho 100.0% 8.1% (+91.9)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#60
61. 25864, West Virginia 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#8 10.0% (+90.0)#61
62. 42131, Kentucky 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#5 10.0% (+90.0)#62
63. 40049, Kentucky 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#6 10.0% (+90.0)#65
64. 10540, New York 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#5 10.0% (+90.0)#66
65. 58402, North Dakota 100.0% 9.1% (+90.9)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#67
66. 36663, Alabama 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#68
67. 25544, West Virginia 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#9 10.0% (+90.0)#69
68. 26615, West Virginia 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#10 10.0% (+90.0)#70
69. 42332, Kentucky 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#7 10.0% (+90.0)#71
70. 84533, Utah 100.0% 6.6% (+93.4)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#72
71. 52344, Iowa 100.0% 7.7% (+92.3)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#73
72. 42061, Kentucky 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#8 10.0% (+90.0)#74
73. 40803, Kentucky 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#9 10.0% (+90.0)#75
74. 93528, California 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#5 10.0% (+90.0)#76
75. 23486, Virginia 100.0% 8.0% (+92.0)#4 10.0% (+90.0)#77
76. 42124, Kentucky 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#10 10.0% (+90.0)#78
77. 57576, South Dakota 100.0% 9.3% (+90.7)#5 10.0% (+90.0)#79
78. 26230, West Virginia 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#11 10.0% (+90.0)#80
79. 82725, Wyoming 100.0% 7.7% (+92.3)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#81
80. 21814, Maryland 100.0% 8.5% (+91.5)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#82
81. 29338, South Carolina 100.0% 10.3% (+89.7)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#83
82. 41364, Kentucky 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#11 10.0% (+90.0)#84
83. 78635, Texas 100.0% 11.4% (+88.6)#5 10.0% (+90.0)#85
84. 25942, West Virginia 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#12 10.0% (+90.0)#86
85. 95375, California 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#6 10.0% (+90.0)#87
86. 27213, North Carolina 100.0% 9.8% (+90.2)#3 10.0% (+90.0)#88
87. 94512, California 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#7 10.0% (+90.0)#89
88. 28641, North Carolina 100.0% 9.8% (+90.2)#4 10.0% (+90.0)#90
89. 58452, North Dakota 100.0% 9.1% (+90.9)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#91
90. 28331, North Carolina 100.0% 9.8% (+90.2)#5 10.0% (+90.0)#92
91. 24830, West Virginia 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#13 10.0% (+90.0)#93
92. 30724, Georgia 100.0% 10.3% (+89.7)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#94
93. 52307, Iowa 100.0% 7.7% (+92.3)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#95
94. 24729, West Virginia 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#14 10.0% (+90.0)#96
95. 23416, Virginia 100.0% 8.0% (+92.0)#5 10.0% (+90.0)#97
96. 26543, West Virginia 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#15 10.0% (+90.0)#98
97. 87735, New Mexico 100.0% 12.9% (+87.1)#5 10.0% (+90.0)#99
98. 83203, Idaho 100.0% 8.1% (+91.9)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#100
99. 15075, Pennsylvania 100.0% 8.9% (+91.1)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#101
100. 13484, New York 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#7 10.0% (+90.0)#102

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States are:
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
92369 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States is 10.0%.