Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Production
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States

50.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 54946, Wisconsin 100.0% 9.6% (+90.4)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#1
2. 25161, West Virginia 100.0% 5.7% (+94.3)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#2
3. 12493, New York 100.0% 3.3% (+96.7)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#3
4. 97531, Oregon 100.0% 5.2% (+94.8)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#4
5. 72528, Arkansas 100.0% 8.4% (+91.6)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#5
6. 26224, West Virginia 100.0% 5.7% (+94.3)#2 5.5% (+94.5)#6
7. 34140, Florida 100.0% 3.2% (+96.8)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#7
8. 58402, North Dakota 100.0% 5.3% (+94.7)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#9
9. 30581, Georgia 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#10
10. 27202, North Carolina 100.0% 6.6% (+93.4)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#11
11. 13632, New York 100.0% 3.3% (+96.7)#2 5.5% (+94.5)#12
12. 87749, New Mexico 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#13
13. 05030, Vermont 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#14
14. 30751, Georgia 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#2 5.5% (+94.5)#15
15. 72340, Arkansas 100.0% 8.4% (+91.6)#2 5.5% (+94.5)#16
16. 84623, Utah 100.0% 5.9% (+94.1)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#17
17. 42061, Kentucky 100.0% 8.9% (+91.1)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#18
18. 71831, Arkansas 100.0% 8.4% (+91.6)#3 5.5% (+94.5)#19
19. 72679, Arkansas 100.0% 8.4% (+91.6)#4 5.5% (+94.5)#20
20. 29046, South Carolina 100.0% 7.7% (+92.3)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#21
21. 23414, Virginia 100.0% 4.1% (+95.9)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#22
22. 35149, Alabama 100.0% 8.6% (+91.4)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#23
23. 75642, Texas 100.0% 4.9% (+95.1)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#24
24. 53571, Wisconsin 100.0% 9.6% (+90.4)#2 5.5% (+94.5)#25
25. 23130, Virginia 100.0% 4.1% (+95.9)#2 5.5% (+94.5)#26
26. 75858, Texas 100.0% 4.9% (+95.1)#2 5.5% (+94.5)#27
27. 98558, Washington 100.0% 4.4% (+95.6)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#28
28. 38879, Mississippi 100.0% 8.3% (+91.7)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#29
29. 43070, Ohio 100.0% 8.1% (+91.9)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#30
30. 28652, North Carolina 100.0% 6.6% (+93.4)#2 5.5% (+94.5)#31
31. 46047, Indiana 100.0% 10.1% (+89.9)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#32
32. 20319, District Of Columbia 100.0% 0.61% (+99.4)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#33
33. 16730, Pennsylvania 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#34
34. 23163, Virginia 100.0% 4.1% (+95.9)#3 5.5% (+94.5)#35
35. 75658, Texas 100.0% 4.9% (+95.1)#3 5.5% (+94.5)#36
36. 02584, Massachusetts 100.0% 3.8% (+96.2)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#37
37. 23398, Virginia 100.0% 4.1% (+95.9)#4 5.5% (+94.5)#38
38. 62344, Illinois 100.0% 6.0% (+94.0)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#39
39. 15763, Pennsylvania 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#2 5.5% (+94.5)#40
40. 99136, Washington 100.0% 4.4% (+95.6)#2 5.5% (+94.5)#41
41. 14827, New York 100.0% 3.3% (+96.7)#3 5.5% (+94.5)#42
42. 17039, Pennsylvania 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#3 5.5% (+94.5)#43
43. 77852, Texas 100.0% 4.9% (+95.1)#4 5.5% (+94.5)#44
44. 79066, Texas 100.0% 4.9% (+95.1)#5 5.5% (+94.5)#45
45. 66760, Kansas 100.0% 6.9% (+93.1)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#46
46. 99774, Alaska 100.0% 3.9% (+96.1)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#47
47. 82224, Wyoming 100.0% 4.3% (+95.7)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#48
48. 71472, Louisiana 97.9% 5.2% (+92.7)#1 5.5% (+92.4)#49
49. 35013, Alabama 93.3% 8.6% (+84.7)#2 5.5% (+87.9)#50
50. 61057, Illinois 91.7% 6.0% (+85.7)#2 5.5% (+86.2)#51
51. 87723, New Mexico 90.8% 3.4% (+87.3)#2 5.5% (+85.3)#52
52. 63560, Missouri 84.4% 6.6% (+77.9)#1 5.5% (+79.0)#53
53. 47880, Indiana 83.3% 10.1% (+73.2)#2 5.5% (+77.9)#54
54. 18221, Pennsylvania 80.1% 5.8% (+74.3)#4 5.5% (+74.7)#55
55. 15420, Pennsylvania 78.6% 5.8% (+72.8)#5 5.5% (+73.1)#56
56. 46946, Indiana 77.8% 10.1% (+67.7)#3 5.5% (+72.3)#57
57. 76887, Texas 76.9% 4.9% (+72.0)#6 5.5% (+71.5)#58
58. 87828, New Mexico 76.4% 3.4% (+73.0)#3 5.5% (+70.9)#59
59. 46381, Indiana 75.6% 10.1% (+65.5)#4 5.5% (+70.1)#60
60. 68072, Nebraska 74.7% 6.9% (+67.8)#1 5.5% (+69.2)#61
61. 88431, New Mexico 70.2% 3.4% (+66.8)#4 5.5% (+64.7)#62
62. 52548, Iowa 70.0% 8.3% (+61.7)#1 5.5% (+64.5)#63
63. 52759, Iowa 68.9% 8.3% (+60.7)#2 5.5% (+63.5)#64
64. 70632, Louisiana 68.5% 5.2% (+63.3)#2 5.5% (+63.0)#65
65. 72841, Arkansas 68.2% 8.4% (+59.8)#5 5.5% (+62.7)#66
66. 14413, New York 68.0% 3.3% (+64.7)#4 5.5% (+62.5)#67
67. 38953, Mississippi 67.2% 8.3% (+58.9)#2 5.5% (+61.7)#68
68. 26611, West Virginia 66.2% 5.7% (+60.5)#3 5.5% (+60.7)#69
69. 15680, Pennsylvania 65.9% 5.8% (+60.1)#6 5.5% (+60.4)#70
70. 40941, Kentucky 64.7% 8.9% (+55.8)#2 5.5% (+59.2)#71
71. 36314, Alabama 64.3% 8.6% (+55.7)#3 5.5% (+58.8)#72
72. 46572, Indiana 64.2% 10.1% (+54.0)#5 5.5% (+58.7)#73
73. 72852, Arkansas 63.0% 8.4% (+54.7)#6 5.5% (+57.6)#74
74. 13138, New York 62.5% 3.3% (+59.2)#5 5.5% (+57.0)#75
75. 89420, Nevada 62.2% 3.8% (+58.4)#1 5.5% (+56.7)#76
76. 37730, Tennessee 61.9% 7.7% (+54.2)#1 5.5% (+56.4)#77
77. 98235, Washington 61.8% 4.4% (+57.4)#3 5.5% (+56.3)#78
78. 65766, Missouri 61.5% 6.6% (+55.0)#2 5.5% (+56.1)#79
79. 72066, Arkansas 61.3% 8.4% (+52.9)#7 5.5% (+55.8)#80
80. 30807, Georgia 61.2% 5.8% (+55.4)#3 5.5% (+55.8)#81
81. 76041, Texas 61.0% 4.9% (+56.1)#7 5.5% (+55.5)#82
82. 26720, West Virginia 60.9% 5.7% (+55.2)#4 5.5% (+55.4)#83
83. 25021, West Virginia 60.8% 5.7% (+55.1)#5 5.5% (+55.3)#84
84. 67036, Kansas 60.6% 6.9% (+53.7)#2 5.5% (+55.1)#85
85. 48410, Michigan 60.4% 8.9% (+51.6)#1 5.5% (+54.9)#86
86. 67260, Kansas 60.0% 6.9% (+53.1)#3 5.5% (+54.5)#87
87. 72428, Arkansas 59.3% 8.4% (+51.0)#8 5.5% (+53.9)#88
88. 68440, Nebraska 59.0% 6.9% (+52.1)#2 5.5% (+53.5)#89
89. 58069, North Dakota 58.8% 5.3% (+53.6)#2 5.5% (+53.4)#90
90. 71862, Arkansas 58.7% 8.4% (+50.4)#9 5.5% (+53.3)#91
91. 89003, Nevada 58.4% 3.8% (+54.6)#2 5.5% (+52.9)#92
92. 99553, Alaska 58.0% 3.9% (+54.2)#2 5.5% (+52.6)#93
93. 49863, Michigan 57.9% 8.9% (+49.0)#2 5.5% (+52.4)#94
94. 43346, Ohio 57.6% 8.1% (+49.6)#2 5.5% (+52.2)#95
95. 66754, Kansas 57.6% 6.9% (+50.7)#4 5.5% (+52.1)#96
96. 01338, Massachusetts 57.1% 3.8% (+53.3)#2 5.5% (+51.7)#97
97. 62879, Illinois 56.2% 6.0% (+50.2)#3 5.5% (+50.8)#98
98. 19052, Pennsylvania 56.1% 5.8% (+50.3)#7 5.5% (+50.6)#99
99. 65463, Missouri 55.7% 6.6% (+49.1)#3 5.5% (+50.2)#100
100. 97817, Oregon 55.6% 5.2% (+50.4)#2 5.5% (+50.1)#101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States?
54946 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States is 5.5%.