Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Family Income | $200k+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in the United States

70.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in the United States

Zip Code Families with Income > $200k vs State vs National
1. 06269, Connecticut 100.0% 22.8% (+77.2)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#1
2. 22904, Virginia 100.0% 20.4% (+79.6)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#2
3. 93106, California 100.0% 21.1% (+78.9)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#3
4. 01063, Massachusetts 100.0% 25.6% (+74.4)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#4
5. 29424, South Carolina 100.0% 9.8% (+90.2)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#5
6. 06414, Connecticut 100.0% 22.8% (+77.2)#2 14.8% (+85.2)#6
7. 64858, Missouri 100.0% 10.1% (+89.9)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#7
8. 19490, Pennsylvania 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#8
9. 44630, Ohio 100.0% 10.8% (+89.2)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#9
10. 76841, Texas 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#10
11. 41821, Kentucky 100.0% 8.2% (+91.8)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#12
12. 87523, New Mexico 100.0% 8.2% (+91.8)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#13
13. 02875, Rhode Island 100.0% 15.7% (+84.3)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#14
14. 19375, Pennsylvania 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#2 14.8% (+85.2)#15
15. 08528, New Jersey 100.0% 24.7% (+75.3)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#16
16. 10279, New York 100.0% 19.2% (+80.8)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#17
17. 20667, Maryland 100.0% 23.6% (+76.4)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#18
18. 18921, Pennsylvania 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#3 14.8% (+85.2)#19
19. 18933, Pennsylvania 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#4 14.8% (+85.2)#20
20. 94021, California 100.0% 21.1% (+78.9)#2 14.8% (+85.2)#21
21. 82640, Wyoming 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#22
22. 12872, New York 100.0% 19.2% (+80.8)#2 14.8% (+85.2)#23
23. 00694, Puerto Rico 100.0% 1.8% (+98.2)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#24
24. 47437, Indiana 100.0% 9.3% (+90.7)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#25
25. 61371, Illinois 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#26
26. 08890, New Jersey 100.0% 24.7% (+75.3)#2 14.8% (+85.2)#27
27. 45147, Ohio 100.0% 10.8% (+89.2)#2 14.8% (+85.2)#28
28. 49942, Michigan 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#29
29. 76848, Texas 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#2 14.8% (+85.2)#30
30. 19535, Pennsylvania 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#5 14.8% (+85.2)#31
31. 08064, New Jersey 100.0% 24.7% (+75.3)#3 14.8% (+85.2)#32
32. 71662, Arkansas 100.0% 7.7% (+92.3)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#33
33. 72383, Arkansas 100.0% 7.7% (+92.3)#2 14.8% (+85.2)#34
34. 08011, New Jersey 100.0% 24.7% (+75.3)#4 14.8% (+85.2)#35
35. 10985, New York 100.0% 19.2% (+80.8)#3 14.8% (+85.2)#36
36. 58236, North Dakota 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#37
37. 76565, Texas 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#3 14.8% (+85.2)#38
38. 30639, Georgia 100.0% 13.0% (+87.0)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#39
39. 82310, Wyoming 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#2 14.8% (+85.2)#40
40. 07870, New Jersey 100.0% 24.7% (+75.3)#5 14.8% (+85.2)#41
41. 98330, Washington 100.0% 19.4% (+80.6)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#42
42. 99651, Alaska 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#43
43. 94950, California 100.0% 21.1% (+78.9)#3 14.8% (+85.2)#44
44. 25421, West Virginia 100.0% 6.6% (+93.4)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#45
45. 58362, North Dakota 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#2 14.8% (+85.2)#46
46. 33530, Florida 100.0% 11.5% (+88.5)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#47
47. 81128, Colorado 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#48
48. 99825, Alaska 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#2 14.8% (+85.2)#49
49. 71475, Louisiana 100.0% 9.2% (+90.8)#1 14.8% (+85.2)#50
50. 93943, California 100.0% 21.1% (+78.9)#4 14.8% (+85.2)#51
51. 26058, West Virginia 93.5% 6.6% (+86.9)#2 14.8% (+78.7)#52
52. 04855, Maine 92.1% 10.4% (+81.7)#1 14.8% (+77.3)#53
53. 20129, Virginia 91.0% 20.4% (+70.6)#2 14.8% (+76.2)#54
54. 40025, Kentucky 90.9% 8.2% (+82.7)#2 14.8% (+76.1)#55
55. 24412, Virginia 90.4% 20.4% (+70.0)#3 14.8% (+75.6)#56
56. 06753, Connecticut 88.9% 22.8% (+66.1)#3 14.8% (+74.1)#57
57. 18927, Pennsylvania 88.6% 14.0% (+74.6)#6 14.8% (+73.8)#58
58. 82925, Wyoming 88.5% 9.5% (+79.0)#3 14.8% (+73.7)#59
59. 60932, Illinois 85.3% 16.3% (+69.0)#2 14.8% (+70.5)#60
60. 20004, District Of Columbia 85.2% 37.0% (+48.2)#1 14.8% (+70.4)#61
61. 21056, Maryland 84.6% 23.6% (+61.0)#2 14.8% (+69.8)#62
62. 18936, Pennsylvania 84.6% 14.0% (+70.6)#7 14.8% (+69.8)#63
63. 88052, New Mexico 84.6% 8.2% (+76.4)#2 14.8% (+69.8)#64
64. 94720, California 84.1% 21.1% (+63.0)#5 14.8% (+69.3)#65
65. 95420, California 83.1% 21.1% (+62.0)#6 14.8% (+68.3)#66
66. 10007, New York 81.0% 19.2% (+61.8)#4 14.8% (+66.2)#67
67. 98164, Washington 80.9% 19.4% (+61.5)#2 14.8% (+66.1)#68
68. 63073, Missouri 79.6% 10.1% (+69.5)#2 14.8% (+64.8)#69
69. 33109, Florida 78.8% 11.5% (+67.3)#2 14.8% (+64.0)#70
70. 30289, Georgia 78.3% 13.0% (+65.3)#2 14.8% (+63.5)#71
71. 59535, Montana 77.8% 9.6% (+68.2)#1 14.8% (+63.0)#72
72. 10004, New York 77.7% 19.2% (+58.5)#5 14.8% (+62.9)#73
73. 18624, Pennsylvania 77.2% 14.0% (+63.2)#8 14.8% (+62.4)#74
74. 07078, New Jersey 76.8% 24.7% (+52.1)#6 14.8% (+62.0)#75
75. 94020, California 76.4% 21.1% (+55.3)#7 14.8% (+61.6)#76
76. 02468, Massachusetts 76.3% 25.6% (+50.7)#2 14.8% (+61.5)#77
77. 79259, Texas 76.2% 13.5% (+62.7)#4 14.8% (+61.4)#78
78. 01965, Massachusetts 75.8% 25.6% (+50.2)#3 14.8% (+61.0)#79
79. 94957, California 75.5% 21.1% (+54.4)#8 14.8% (+60.7)#80
80. 02030, Massachusetts 75.4% 25.6% (+49.8)#4 14.8% (+60.6)#81
81. 06820, Connecticut 75.3% 22.8% (+52.5)#4 14.8% (+60.5)#82
82. 19035, Pennsylvania 75.0% 14.0% (+61.0)#9 14.8% (+60.2)#83
83. 11975, New York 75.0% 19.2% (+55.8)#6 14.8% (+60.2)#84
84. 21652, Maryland 75.0% 23.6% (+51.4)#3 14.8% (+60.2)#85
85. 20015, District Of Columbia 74.9% 37.0% (+37.9)#2 14.8% (+60.1)#86
86. 94105, California 74.8% 21.1% (+53.7)#9 14.8% (+60.0)#87
87. 94027, California 74.4% 21.1% (+53.3)#10 14.8% (+59.6)#88
88. 10577, New York 73.4% 19.2% (+54.2)#7 14.8% (+58.6)#89
89. 28207, North Carolina 73.3% 11.5% (+61.8)#1 14.8% (+58.5)#90
90. 94022, California 73.0% 21.1% (+51.9)#11 14.8% (+58.2)#91
91. 07423, New Jersey 73.0% 24.7% (+48.3)#7 14.8% (+58.2)#92
92. 21738, Maryland 72.9% 23.6% (+49.3)#4 14.8% (+58.1)#93
93. 10006, New York 72.9% 19.2% (+53.7)#8 14.8% (+58.1)#94
94. 77454, Texas 72.7% 13.5% (+59.2)#5 14.8% (+57.9)#95
95. 19085, Pennsylvania 72.6% 14.0% (+58.6)#10 14.8% (+57.8)#96
96. 43523, Ohio 72.4% 10.8% (+61.6)#3 14.8% (+57.6)#97
97. 02481, Massachusetts 72.1% 25.6% (+46.5)#5 14.8% (+57.3)#98
98. 06878, Connecticut 72.1% 22.8% (+49.3)#5 14.8% (+57.3)#99
99. 06853, Connecticut 72.1% 22.8% (+49.3)#6 14.8% (+57.3)#100
100. 94123, California 72.0% 21.1% (+50.9)#12 14.8% (+57.2)#101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in the United States?
06269 has the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in the United States?
Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in the United States is 14.8%.