Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Law Enforcement
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in the United States

0.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 32831, Florida 100.0% 1.0% (+99.0)#1 0.96% (+99.0)#1
2. 36267, Alabama 100.0% 1.0% (+99.0)#1 0.96% (+99.0)#2
3. 77855, Texas 100.0% 1.1% (+98.9)#1 0.96% (+99.0)#3
4. 81059, Colorado 100.0% 0.81% (+99.2)#1 0.96% (+99.0)#4
5. 85191, Arizona 100.0% 1.1% (+98.9)#1 0.96% (+99.0)#5
6. 57741, South Dakota 98.1% 0.97% (+97.2)#1 0.96% (+97.2)#6
7. 10914, New York 76.3% 1.3% (+75.0)#1 0.96% (+75.4)#7
8. 65461, Missouri 67.3% 0.94% (+66.4)#1 0.96% (+66.4)#8
9. 83643, Idaho 65.5% 0.80% (+64.7)#1 0.96% (+64.6)#9
10. 87049, New Mexico 61.8% 1.2% (+60.6)#1 0.96% (+60.9)#10
11. 13472, New York 61.2% 1.3% (+59.9)#2 0.96% (+60.3)#11
12. 78243, Texas 60.0% 1.1% (+58.9)#2 0.96% (+59.0)#12
13. 24612, Virginia 59.3% 1.3% (+58.0)#1 0.96% (+58.3)#13
14. 87712, New Mexico 54.2% 1.2% (+53.0)#2 0.96% (+53.2)#14
15. 70464, Louisiana 51.9% 1.3% (+50.5)#1 0.96% (+50.9)#15
16. 98430, Washington 50.0% 0.68% (+49.3)#1 0.96% (+49.0)#16
17. 96014, California 50.0% 0.80% (+49.2)#1 0.96% (+49.0)#17
18. 62541, Illinois 50.0% 0.97% (+49.0)#1 0.96% (+49.0)#18
19. 79258, Texas 50.0% 1.1% (+48.9)#3 0.96% (+49.0)#19
20. 78391, Texas 48.7% 1.1% (+47.6)#4 0.96% (+47.7)#20
21. 24415, Virginia 48.6% 1.3% (+47.3)#2 0.96% (+47.6)#21
22. 72478, Arkansas 48.4% 1.1% (+47.3)#1 0.96% (+47.4)#22
23. 12787, New York 47.1% 1.3% (+45.7)#3 0.96% (+46.1)#23
24. 12448, New York 43.2% 1.3% (+41.9)#4 0.96% (+42.3)#24
25. 12823, New York 42.6% 1.3% (+41.3)#5 0.96% (+41.7)#25
26. 29122, South Carolina 41.2% 0.99% (+40.2)#1 0.96% (+40.2)#26
27. 10975, New York 38.7% 1.3% (+37.4)#6 0.96% (+37.7)#27
28. 25979, West Virginia 36.8% 1.2% (+35.7)#1 0.96% (+35.9)#28
29. 13638, New York 36.2% 1.3% (+34.9)#7 0.96% (+35.3)#29
30. 41764, Kentucky 33.9% 0.88% (+33.1)#1 0.96% (+33.0)#30
31. 77464, Texas 33.3% 1.1% (+32.2)#5 0.96% (+32.4)#31
32. 82450, Wyoming 33.3% 1.0% (+32.3)#1 0.96% (+32.4)#32
33. 78712, Texas 33.3% 1.1% (+32.2)#6 0.96% (+32.4)#33
34. 72168, Arkansas 33.0% 1.1% (+31.9)#2 0.96% (+32.0)#34
35. 47445, Indiana 32.9% 0.87% (+32.0)#1 0.96% (+31.9)#35
36. 87051, New Mexico 32.6% 1.2% (+31.4)#3 0.96% (+31.7)#36
37. 88263, New Mexico 31.9% 1.2% (+30.6)#4 0.96% (+30.9)#37
38. 22725, Virginia 31.6% 1.3% (+30.3)#3 0.96% (+30.6)#38
39. 73851, Oklahoma 31.4% 0.94% (+30.4)#1 0.96% (+30.4)#39
40. 25173, West Virginia 30.8% 1.2% (+29.6)#2 0.96% (+29.8)#40
41. 12161, New York 30.8% 1.3% (+29.4)#8 0.96% (+29.8)#41
42. 29519, South Carolina 30.5% 0.99% (+29.5)#2 0.96% (+29.5)#42
43. 17887, Pennsylvania 30.2% 1.00% (+29.2)#1 0.96% (+29.2)#43
44. 27862, North Carolina 29.6% 0.93% (+28.6)#1 0.96% (+28.6)#44
45. 17865, Pennsylvania 28.6% 1.00% (+27.6)#2 0.96% (+27.6)#45
46. 31527, Georgia 28.0% 0.98% (+27.0)#1 0.96% (+27.0)#46
47. 47174, Indiana 27.9% 0.87% (+27.0)#2 0.96% (+26.9)#47
48. 67529, Kansas 27.9% 0.91% (+27.0)#1 0.96% (+26.9)#48
49. 14061, New York 27.5% 1.3% (+26.2)#9 0.96% (+26.5)#49
50. 41636, Kentucky 27.5% 0.88% (+26.6)#2 0.96% (+26.5)#50
51. 96857, Hawaii 27.2% 1.2% (+26.1)#1 0.96% (+26.3)#51
52. 41262, Kentucky 27.2% 0.88% (+26.3)#3 0.96% (+26.2)#52
53. 21766, Maryland 26.6% 1.2% (+25.4)#1 0.96% (+25.7)#53
54. 99720, Alaska 25.8% 1.3% (+24.5)#1 0.96% (+24.8)#54
55. 70736, Louisiana 25.7% 1.3% (+24.4)#2 0.96% (+24.8)#55
56. 31544, Georgia 25.6% 0.98% (+24.7)#2 0.96% (+24.7)#56
57. 20373, District Of Columbia 25.4% 0.70% (+24.7)#1 0.96% (+24.4)#57
58. 25989, West Virginia 25.3% 1.2% (+24.2)#3 0.96% (+24.4)#58
59. 12952, New York 24.4% 1.3% (+23.0)#10 0.96% (+23.4)#59
60. 12778, New York 24.1% 1.3% (+22.8)#11 0.96% (+23.1)#60
61. 70712, Louisiana 23.1% 1.3% (+21.8)#3 0.96% (+22.1)#61
62. 57521, South Dakota 23.1% 0.97% (+22.1)#2 0.96% (+22.1)#62
63. 15633, Pennsylvania 22.9% 1.00% (+21.9)#3 0.96% (+21.9)#63
64. 92385, California 22.9% 0.80% (+22.1)#2 0.96% (+21.9)#64
65. 32083, Florida 22.9% 1.0% (+21.9)#2 0.96% (+21.9)#65
66. 67515, Kansas 22.9% 0.91% (+21.9)#2 0.96% (+21.9)#66
67. 41267, Kentucky 22.8% 0.88% (+22.0)#4 0.96% (+21.9)#67
68. 24884, West Virginia 22.7% 1.2% (+21.6)#4 0.96% (+21.8)#68
69. 32697, Florida 22.4% 1.0% (+21.3)#3 0.96% (+21.4)#69
70. 78598, Texas 22.2% 1.1% (+21.1)#7 0.96% (+21.3)#70
71. 29175, South Carolina 21.9% 0.99% (+20.9)#3 0.96% (+20.9)#71
72. 58772, North Dakota 21.7% 0.82% (+20.9)#1 0.96% (+20.7)#72
73. 19456, Pennsylvania 20.8% 1.00% (+19.8)#4 0.96% (+19.9)#73
74. 95249, California 20.8% 0.80% (+20.0)#3 0.96% (+19.9)#74
75. 41203, Kentucky 20.7% 0.88% (+19.9)#5 0.96% (+19.8)#75
76. 96128, California 20.6% 0.80% (+19.8)#4 0.96% (+19.7)#76
77. 87567, New Mexico 20.6% 1.2% (+19.3)#5 0.96% (+19.6)#77
78. 43962, Ohio 20.5% 0.84% (+19.7)#1 0.96% (+19.6)#78
79. 59411, Montana 20.2% 0.84% (+19.4)#1 0.96% (+19.3)#79
80. 25638, West Virginia 20.0% 1.2% (+18.8)#5 0.96% (+19.0)#80
81. 27259, North Carolina 20.0% 0.93% (+19.1)#2 0.96% (+19.0)#81
82. 25966, West Virginia 20.0% 1.2% (+18.8)#6 0.96% (+19.0)#82
83. 85609, Arizona 19.9% 1.1% (+18.8)#2 0.96% (+18.9)#83
84. 71473, Louisiana 19.8% 1.3% (+18.5)#4 0.96% (+18.8)#84
85. 27916, North Carolina 19.7% 0.93% (+18.8)#3 0.96% (+18.7)#85
86. 18347, Pennsylvania 19.6% 1.00% (+18.6)#5 0.96% (+18.6)#86
87. 76666, Texas 19.4% 1.1% (+18.3)#8 0.96% (+18.5)#87
88. 62570, Illinois 19.2% 0.97% (+18.3)#2 0.96% (+18.3)#88
89. 22709, Virginia 19.2% 1.3% (+17.9)#4 0.96% (+18.2)#89
90. 73066, Oklahoma 19.2% 0.94% (+18.3)#2 0.96% (+18.2)#90
91. 26422, West Virginia 19.2% 1.2% (+18.0)#7 0.96% (+18.2)#91
92. 83118, Wyoming 19.2% 1.0% (+18.1)#2 0.96% (+18.2)#92
93. 65282, Missouri 19.1% 0.94% (+18.2)#2 0.96% (+18.2)#93
94. 73011, Oklahoma 19.1% 0.94% (+18.1)#3 0.96% (+18.1)#94
95. 70789, Louisiana 19.0% 1.3% (+17.7)#5 0.96% (+18.1)#95
96. 88341, New Mexico 19.0% 1.2% (+17.8)#6 0.96% (+18.0)#96
97. 77616, Texas 18.9% 1.1% (+17.8)#9 0.96% (+17.9)#97
98. 24326, Virginia 18.8% 1.3% (+17.6)#5 0.96% (+17.9)#98
99. 15713, Pennsylvania 18.8% 1.00% (+17.8)#6 0.96% (+17.8)#99
100. 65760, Missouri 18.4% 0.94% (+17.5)#3 0.96% (+17.5)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
98.1%
#7
76.3%
#8
67.3%
#9
65.5%
#10
61.8%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in the United States?
32831 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in the United States is 0.96%.