Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States

100.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States

Zip Code Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. 37916, Tennessee 100.0% 19.6% (+80.4)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#1
2. 30303, Georgia 100.0% 19.3% (+80.7)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#2
3. 86432, Arizona 100.0% 18.0% (+82.0)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#3
4. 84112, Utah 100.0% 8.8% (+91.2)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#4
5. 00715, Puerto Rico 100.0% 56.8% (+43.2)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#5
6. 12733, New York 100.0% 18.2% (+81.8)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#6
7. 13616, New York 100.0% 18.2% (+81.8)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#7
8. 23065, Virginia 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#8
9. 01901, Massachusetts 100.0% 11.8% (+88.2)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#9
10. 87560, New Mexico 100.0% 24.3% (+75.7)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#10
11. 85332, Arizona 100.0% 18.0% (+82.0)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#11
12. 52801, Iowa 100.0% 12.9% (+87.1)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#12
13. 87942, New Mexico 100.0% 24.3% (+75.7)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#13
14. 72320, Arkansas 100.0% 23.3% (+76.7)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#14
15. 27824, North Carolina 100.0% 19.2% (+80.8)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#15
16. 92275, California 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#16
17. 57772, South Dakota 100.0% 15.7% (+84.3)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#17
18. 28447, North Carolina 100.0% 19.2% (+80.8)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#18
19. 46340, Indiana 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#19
20. 48502, Michigan 100.0% 18.3% (+81.7)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#20
21. 71261, Louisiana 100.0% 26.1% (+73.9)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#21
22. 96109, California 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#22
23. 25646, West Virginia 100.0% 23.7% (+76.3)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#23
24. 95497, California 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#24
25. 38588, Tennessee 100.0% 19.6% (+80.4)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#25
26. 72069, Arkansas 100.0% 23.3% (+76.7)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#26
27. 85325, Arizona 100.0% 18.0% (+82.0)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#27
28. 00636, Puerto Rico 100.0% 56.8% (+43.2)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#28
29. 28527, North Carolina 100.0% 19.2% (+80.8)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#29
30. 95553, California 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#30
31. 12734, New York 100.0% 18.2% (+81.8)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#31
32. 85334, Arizona 100.0% 18.0% (+82.0)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#32
33. 33930, Florida 100.0% 17.8% (+82.2)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#33
34. 75247, Texas 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#34
35. 26581, West Virginia 100.0% 23.7% (+76.3)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#35
36. 93243, California 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#5 17.0% (+83.0)#36
37. 87530, New Mexico 100.0% 24.3% (+75.7)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#37
38. 71358, Louisiana 100.0% 26.1% (+73.9)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#38
39. 40170, Kentucky 100.0% 22.0% (+78.0)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#39
40. 41824, Kentucky 100.0% 22.0% (+78.0)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#40
41. 41602, Kentucky 100.0% 22.0% (+78.0)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#41
42. 87527, New Mexico 100.0% 24.3% (+75.7)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#42
43. 18435, Pennsylvania 100.0% 16.5% (+83.5)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#43
44. 31625, Georgia 100.0% 19.3% (+80.7)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#44
45. 98836, Washington 100.0% 12.0% (+88.0)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#45
46. 25186, West Virginia 100.0% 23.7% (+76.3)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#46
47. 24836, West Virginia 100.0% 23.7% (+76.3)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#47
48. 95466, California 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#6 17.0% (+83.0)#48
49. 65627, Missouri 100.0% 17.1% (+82.9)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#49
50. 87941, New Mexico 100.0% 24.3% (+75.7)#5 17.0% (+83.0)#50
51. 57794, South Dakota 100.0% 15.7% (+84.3)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#51
52. 45770, Ohio 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#52
53. 25843, West Virginia 100.0% 23.7% (+76.3)#5 17.0% (+83.0)#53
54. 35460, Alabama 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#54
55. 42076, Kentucky 100.0% 22.0% (+78.0)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#55
56. 88311, New Mexico 100.0% 24.3% (+75.7)#6 17.0% (+83.0)#56
57. 84726, Utah 100.0% 8.8% (+91.2)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#57
58. 15451, Pennsylvania 100.0% 16.5% (+83.5)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#58
59. 25109, West Virginia 100.0% 23.7% (+76.3)#6 17.0% (+83.0)#59
60. 48724, Michigan 100.0% 18.3% (+81.7)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#60
61. 40903, Kentucky 100.0% 22.0% (+78.0)#5 17.0% (+83.0)#61
62. 18342, Pennsylvania 100.0% 16.5% (+83.5)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#62
63. 26739, West Virginia 100.0% 23.7% (+76.3)#7 17.0% (+83.0)#64
64. 38647, Mississippi 100.0% 27.2% (+72.8)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#65
65. 26585, West Virginia 100.0% 23.7% (+76.3)#8 17.0% (+83.0)#66
66. 72661, Arkansas 100.0% 23.3% (+76.7)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#67
67. 59844, Montana 100.0% 14.7% (+85.3)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#68
68. 85932, Arizona 100.0% 18.0% (+82.0)#5 17.0% (+83.0)#69
69. 27917, North Carolina 100.0% 19.2% (+80.8)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#70
70. 72851, Arkansas 100.0% 23.3% (+76.7)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#71
71. 24857, West Virginia 100.0% 23.7% (+76.3)#9 17.0% (+83.0)#72
72. 87931, New Mexico 100.0% 24.3% (+75.7)#7 17.0% (+83.0)#73
73. 01074, Massachusetts 100.0% 11.8% (+88.2)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#74
74. 57756, South Dakota 100.0% 15.7% (+84.3)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#75
75. 41203, Kentucky 100.0% 22.0% (+78.0)#6 17.0% (+83.0)#76
76. 15692, Pennsylvania 100.0% 16.5% (+83.5)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#77
77. 47120, Indiana 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#78
78. 87828, New Mexico 100.0% 24.3% (+75.7)#8 17.0% (+83.0)#79
79. 97627, Oregon 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#80
80. 25651, West Virginia 100.0% 23.7% (+76.3)#10 17.0% (+83.0)#81
81. 24150, Virginia 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#82
82. 70465, Louisiana 100.0% 26.1% (+73.9)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#83
83. 92327, California 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#7 17.0% (+83.0)#84
84. 12433, New York 100.0% 18.2% (+81.8)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#85
85. 24845, West Virginia 100.0% 23.7% (+76.3)#11 17.0% (+83.0)#86
86. 65580, Missouri 100.0% 17.1% (+82.9)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#87
87. 86438, Arizona 100.0% 18.0% (+82.0)#6 17.0% (+83.0)#88
88. 92347, California 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#8 17.0% (+83.0)#89
89. 71935, Arkansas 100.0% 23.3% (+76.7)#5 17.0% (+83.0)#90
90. 24872, West Virginia 100.0% 23.7% (+76.3)#12 17.0% (+83.0)#91
91. 25644, West Virginia 100.0% 23.7% (+76.3)#13 17.0% (+83.0)#92
92. 87577, New Mexico 100.0% 24.3% (+75.7)#9 17.0% (+83.0)#93
93. 78592, Texas 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#94
94. 93517, California 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#9 17.0% (+83.0)#95
95. 61560, Illinois 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#96
96. 25573, West Virginia 100.0% 23.7% (+76.3)#15 17.0% (+83.0)#97
97. 24981, West Virginia 100.0% 23.7% (+76.3)#16 17.0% (+83.0)#98
98. 78349, Texas 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#99
99. 24839, West Virginia 100.0% 23.7% (+76.3)#17 17.0% (+83.0)#100
100. 41839, Kentucky 100.0% 22.0% (+78.0)#7 17.0% (+83.0)#101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
37916 has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.