Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Architecture & Engineering
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in the United States

0.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 85927, Arizona 100.0% 2.4% (+97.6)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#1
2. 83424, Idaho 100.0% 2.2% (+97.8)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#2
3. 63847, Missouri 100.0% 1.7% (+98.3)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#3
4. 10985, New York 100.0% 1.6% (+98.4)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#4
5. 73553, Oklahoma 100.0% 1.8% (+98.2)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#5
6. 07881, New Jersey 100.0% 1.9% (+98.1)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#6
7. 66251, Kansas 100.0% 2.0% (+98.0)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#7
8. 11973, New York 66.7% 1.6% (+65.1)#2 2.1% (+64.5)#8
9. 73705, Oklahoma 65.4% 1.8% (+63.5)#2 2.1% (+63.2)#9
10. 61552, Illinois 63.3% 1.9% (+61.4)#1 2.1% (+61.2)#10
11. 16727, Pennsylvania 55.6% 2.0% (+53.5)#1 2.1% (+53.4)#11
12. 28308, North Carolina 54.5% 1.9% (+52.7)#1 2.1% (+52.4)#12
13. 58074, North Dakota 54.3% 2.0% (+52.3)#1 2.1% (+52.1)#13
14. 77863, Texas 51.9% 2.2% (+49.6)#1 2.1% (+49.7)#14
15. 92266, California 51.9% 2.6% (+49.3)#1 2.1% (+49.7)#15
16. 44671, Ohio 51.3% 2.1% (+49.1)#1 2.1% (+49.1)#16
17. 98623, Washington 50.0% 2.8% (+47.2)#1 2.1% (+47.9)#17
18. 26714, West Virginia 48.2% 1.6% (+46.7)#1 2.1% (+46.1)#18
19. 95140, California 48.0% 2.6% (+45.4)#2 2.1% (+45.9)#19
20. 94576, California 46.7% 2.6% (+44.1)#3 2.1% (+44.5)#20
21. 98421, Washington 45.5% 2.8% (+42.7)#2 2.1% (+43.3)#21
22. 69027, Nebraska 42.9% 1.5% (+41.4)#1 2.1% (+40.7)#22
23. 28542, North Carolina 42.0% 1.9% (+40.1)#2 2.1% (+39.8)#23
24. 35443, Alabama 41.3% 2.4% (+38.9)#1 2.1% (+39.2)#24
25. 41534, Kentucky 40.7% 1.7% (+39.0)#1 2.1% (+38.6)#25
26. 25047, West Virginia 40.7% 1.6% (+39.2)#2 2.1% (+38.6)#26
27. 83111, Wyoming 40.7% 1.9% (+38.8)#1 2.1% (+38.5)#27
28. 01094, Massachusetts 40.0% 2.7% (+37.3)#1 2.1% (+37.9)#28
29. 72201, Arkansas 39.4% 1.3% (+38.1)#1 2.1% (+37.2)#29
30. 22476, Virginia 38.5% 2.3% (+36.2)#1 2.1% (+36.3)#30
31. 18457, Pennsylvania 38.1% 2.0% (+36.1)#2 2.1% (+35.9)#31
32. 87578, New Mexico 37.8% 2.5% (+35.3)#1 2.1% (+35.7)#32
33. 71286, Louisiana 37.6% 1.9% (+35.7)#1 2.1% (+35.5)#33
34. 20630, Maryland 37.1% 2.4% (+34.7)#1 2.1% (+34.9)#34
35. 61562, Illinois 37.0% 1.9% (+35.1)#2 2.1% (+34.9)#35
36. 02647, Massachusetts 36.7% 2.7% (+34.0)#2 2.1% (+34.5)#36
37. 93621, California 36.5% 2.6% (+34.0)#4 2.1% (+34.4)#37
38. 45616, Ohio 36.2% 2.1% (+34.1)#2 2.1% (+34.1)#38
39. 64467, Missouri 36.2% 1.7% (+34.5)#2 2.1% (+34.1)#39
40. 82938, Wyoming 35.8% 1.9% (+33.9)#2 2.1% (+33.7)#40
41. 95715, California 35.8% 2.6% (+33.3)#5 2.1% (+33.7)#41
42. 72099, Arkansas 35.4% 1.3% (+34.1)#2 2.1% (+33.2)#42
43. 21652, Maryland 35.2% 2.4% (+32.8)#2 2.1% (+33.0)#43
44. 25108, West Virginia 34.9% 1.6% (+33.4)#3 2.1% (+32.8)#44
45. 59440, Montana 34.8% 1.8% (+33.1)#1 2.1% (+32.7)#45
46. 94950, California 34.8% 2.6% (+32.2)#6 2.1% (+32.6)#46
47. 98345, Washington 34.3% 2.8% (+31.5)#3 2.1% (+32.2)#47
48. 23128, Virginia 31.9% 2.3% (+29.6)#2 2.1% (+29.8)#48
49. 76070, Texas 30.8% 2.2% (+28.6)#2 2.1% (+28.7)#49
50. 26349, West Virginia 30.6% 1.6% (+29.1)#4 2.1% (+28.5)#50
51. 62950, Illinois 29.9% 1.9% (+28.0)#3 2.1% (+27.7)#51
52. 99635, Alaska 29.6% 2.3% (+27.3)#1 2.1% (+27.5)#52
53. 17861, Pennsylvania 27.6% 2.0% (+25.6)#3 2.1% (+25.5)#53
54. 82083, Wyoming 27.4% 1.9% (+25.5)#3 2.1% (+25.2)#54
55. 52652, Iowa 26.9% 1.8% (+25.1)#1 2.1% (+24.8)#55
56. 77481, Texas 26.7% 2.2% (+24.4)#3 2.1% (+24.5)#56
57. 53501, Wisconsin 26.5% 2.2% (+24.2)#1 2.1% (+24.3)#57
58. 87582, New Mexico 26.4% 2.5% (+23.9)#2 2.1% (+24.2)#58
59. 02663, Massachusetts 26.0% 2.7% (+23.3)#3 2.1% (+23.8)#59
60. 16654, Pennsylvania 25.9% 2.0% (+23.9)#4 2.1% (+23.8)#60
61. 85609, Arizona 25.9% 2.4% (+23.5)#2 2.1% (+23.8)#61
62. 53031, Wisconsin 25.6% 2.2% (+23.4)#2 2.1% (+23.5)#62
63. 20667, Maryland 24.7% 2.4% (+22.3)#3 2.1% (+22.6)#63
64. 25637, West Virginia 24.7% 1.6% (+23.1)#5 2.1% (+22.5)#64
65. 36775, Alabama 24.7% 2.4% (+22.3)#2 2.1% (+22.5)#65
66. 64101, Missouri 24.6% 1.7% (+22.9)#3 2.1% (+22.5)#66
67. 02047, Massachusetts 24.4% 2.7% (+21.7)#4 2.1% (+22.3)#67
68. 28735, North Carolina 24.2% 1.9% (+22.3)#3 2.1% (+22.0)#68
69. 67482, Kansas 24.1% 2.0% (+22.1)#2 2.1% (+22.0)#69
70. 77350, Texas 24.1% 2.2% (+21.9)#4 2.1% (+21.9)#70
71. 97130, Oregon 23.9% 2.8% (+21.1)#1 2.1% (+21.7)#71
72. 02858, Rhode Island 23.8% 2.2% (+21.7)#1 2.1% (+21.7)#72
73. 99566, Alaska 23.8% 2.3% (+21.5)#2 2.1% (+21.7)#73
74. 45884, Ohio 23.7% 2.1% (+21.6)#3 2.1% (+21.6)#74
75. 23942, Virginia 23.4% 2.3% (+21.1)#3 2.1% (+21.2)#75
76. 67675, Kansas 23.2% 2.0% (+21.2)#3 2.1% (+21.1)#76
77. 48440, Michigan 23.2% 3.4% (+19.8)#1 2.1% (+21.0)#77
78. 20684, Maryland 22.9% 2.4% (+20.5)#4 2.1% (+20.8)#78
79. 82243, Wyoming 22.9% 1.9% (+20.9)#4 2.1% (+20.7)#79
80. 89422, Nevada 22.9% 1.5% (+21.4)#1 2.1% (+20.7)#80
81. 50165, Iowa 22.7% 1.8% (+20.9)#2 2.1% (+20.6)#81
82. 39462, Mississippi 22.4% 1.5% (+20.9)#1 2.1% (+20.3)#82
83. 61321, Illinois 22.3% 1.9% (+20.4)#4 2.1% (+20.2)#83
84. 38943, Mississippi 22.1% 1.5% (+20.6)#2 2.1% (+20.0)#84
85. 67232, Kansas 22.0% 2.0% (+20.0)#4 2.1% (+19.9)#85
86. 55968, Minnesota 22.0% 2.4% (+19.6)#1 2.1% (+19.9)#86
87. 26638, West Virginia 21.7% 1.6% (+20.2)#6 2.1% (+19.6)#87
88. 64646, Missouri 21.3% 1.7% (+19.6)#4 2.1% (+19.2)#88
89. 72717, Arkansas 20.9% 1.3% (+19.6)#3 2.1% (+18.7)#89
90. 20692, Maryland 20.8% 2.4% (+18.4)#5 2.1% (+18.7)#90
91. 72776, Arkansas 20.8% 1.3% (+19.5)#4 2.1% (+18.6)#91
92. 93541, California 20.6% 2.6% (+18.1)#7 2.1% (+18.5)#92
93. 48190, Michigan 20.6% 3.4% (+17.2)#2 2.1% (+18.5)#93
94. 15710, Pennsylvania 20.2% 2.0% (+18.2)#5 2.1% (+18.0)#94
95. 60111, Illinois 20.0% 1.9% (+18.1)#5 2.1% (+17.9)#95
96. 64849, Missouri 19.7% 1.7% (+18.0)#5 2.1% (+17.6)#96
97. 98283, Washington 19.7% 2.8% (+16.9)#4 2.1% (+17.5)#97
98. 13483, New York 19.6% 1.6% (+18.0)#3 2.1% (+17.5)#98
99. 63079, Missouri 19.6% 1.7% (+17.9)#6 2.1% (+17.4)#99
100. 58214, North Dakota 19.2% 2.0% (+17.2)#2 2.1% (+17.0)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
66.7%
#9
65.4%
#10
63.3%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in the United States?
85927 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Architecture & Engineering in the United States is 2.1%.