Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Family Income | $0-10k
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in the United States

40.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in the United States

Zip Code Families with Income < $10k vs State vs National
1. 92350, California 100.0% 2.9% (+97.1)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#1
2. 78008, Texas 100.0% 3.5% (+96.5)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#2
3. 70148, Louisiana 100.0% 4.9% (+95.1)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#3
4. 30751, Georgia 100.0% 3.6% (+96.4)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#4
5. 13683, New York 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#5
6. 13643, New York 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#2 3.1% (+96.9)#6
7. 78564, Texas 100.0% 3.5% (+96.5)#2 3.1% (+96.9)#7
8. 96136, California 100.0% 2.9% (+97.1)#2 3.1% (+96.9)#8
9. 14893, New York 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#3 3.1% (+96.9)#9
10. 71425, Louisiana 100.0% 4.9% (+95.1)#2 3.1% (+96.9)#10
11. 38947, Mississippi 100.0% 5.0% (+95.0)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#11
12. 36910, Alabama 100.0% 3.9% (+96.1)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#12
13. 57574, South Dakota 88.7% 2.6% (+86.1)#1 3.1% (+85.6)#13
14. 27584, North Carolina 86.4% 3.3% (+83.1)#1 3.1% (+83.3)#14
15. 01066, Massachusetts 84.2% 2.4% (+81.8)#1 3.1% (+81.1)#15
16. 81021, Colorado 80.0% 2.2% (+77.8)#1 3.1% (+76.9)#16
17. 36476, Alabama 77.8% 3.9% (+73.9)#2 3.1% (+74.7)#17
18. 48724, Michigan 77.3% 3.0% (+74.3)#1 3.1% (+74.2)#18
19. 97329, Oregon 76.0% 2.7% (+73.3)#1 3.1% (+72.9)#19
20. 26560, West Virginia 75.6% 4.2% (+71.4)#1 3.1% (+72.5)#20
21. 99569, Alaska 75.0% 2.3% (+72.7)#1 3.1% (+71.9)#21
22. 59053, Montana 73.6% 2.5% (+71.1)#1 3.1% (+70.5)#22
23. 30449, Georgia 71.4% 3.6% (+67.8)#2 3.1% (+68.3)#23
24. 26217, West Virginia 71.2% 4.2% (+67.0)#2 3.1% (+68.1)#24
25. 65777, Missouri 71.2% 2.8% (+68.4)#1 3.1% (+68.1)#25
26. 42047, Kentucky 68.8% 4.2% (+64.6)#1 3.1% (+65.7)#26
27. 26631, West Virginia 67.3% 4.2% (+63.1)#3 3.1% (+64.2)#27
28. 89054, Nevada 66.7% 3.3% (+63.4)#1 3.1% (+63.6)#28
29. 99706, Alaska 66.7% 2.3% (+64.4)#2 3.1% (+63.6)#29
30. 72464, Arkansas 66.7% 3.7% (+63.0)#1 3.1% (+63.6)#30
31. 67364, Kansas 65.3% 2.6% (+62.7)#1 3.1% (+62.2)#31
32. 88042, New Mexico 64.6% 4.6% (+60.0)#1 3.1% (+61.5)#32
33. 62843, Illinois 64.3% 3.0% (+61.3)#1 3.1% (+61.2)#33
34. 25503, West Virginia 64.2% 4.2% (+60.0)#4 3.1% (+61.1)#34
35. 72668, Arkansas 63.5% 3.7% (+59.8)#2 3.1% (+60.4)#35
36. 37916, Tennessee 63.1% 3.5% (+59.6)#1 3.1% (+60.0)#36
37. 70464, Louisiana 61.9% 4.9% (+57.0)#3 3.1% (+58.8)#37
38. 42638, Kentucky 61.8% 4.2% (+57.6)#2 3.1% (+58.7)#38
39. 00913, Puerto Rico 60.9% 17.6% (+43.3)#1 3.1% (+57.8)#39
40. 70721, Louisiana 60.8% 4.9% (+55.9)#4 3.1% (+57.7)#40
41. 24351, Virginia 60.8% 2.5% (+58.3)#1 3.1% (+57.7)#41
42. 41651, Kentucky 60.4% 4.2% (+56.2)#3 3.1% (+57.3)#42
43. 41517, Kentucky 60.0% 4.2% (+55.8)#4 3.1% (+56.9)#43
44. 45630, Ohio 59.7% 3.3% (+56.4)#1 3.1% (+56.6)#44
45. 57750, South Dakota 59.1% 2.6% (+56.5)#2 3.1% (+56.0)#45
46. 42153, Kentucky 59.1% 4.2% (+54.9)#5 3.1% (+56.0)#46
47. 18342, Pennsylvania 58.9% 2.9% (+56.0)#1 3.1% (+55.8)#47
48. 67072, Kansas 57.1% 2.6% (+54.5)#2 3.1% (+54.0)#48
49. 77326, Texas 56.3% 3.5% (+52.8)#3 3.1% (+53.2)#49
50. 36913, Alabama 56.0% 3.9% (+52.1)#3 3.1% (+52.9)#50
51. 95248, California 54.8% 2.9% (+51.9)#3 3.1% (+51.7)#51
52. 27824, North Carolina 53.5% 3.3% (+50.2)#2 3.1% (+50.4)#52
53. 40874, Kentucky 53.3% 4.2% (+49.1)#6 3.1% (+50.2)#53
54. 97369, Oregon 53.2% 2.7% (+50.5)#2 3.1% (+50.1)#54
55. 24846, West Virginia 52.9% 4.2% (+48.7)#5 3.1% (+49.8)#55
56. 44503, Ohio 52.4% 3.3% (+49.1)#2 3.1% (+49.3)#56
57. 52588, Iowa 52.4% 2.4% (+50.0)#1 3.1% (+49.3)#57
58. 25114, West Virginia 52.2% 4.2% (+48.0)#6 3.1% (+49.1)#58
59. 46998, Indiana 51.7% 3.1% (+48.6)#1 3.1% (+48.6)#59
60. 45070, Ohio 51.5% 3.3% (+48.2)#3 3.1% (+48.4)#60
61. 72520, Arkansas 50.9% 3.7% (+47.2)#3 3.1% (+47.8)#61
62. 67627, Kansas 50.7% 2.6% (+48.1)#3 3.1% (+47.6)#62
63. 72528, Arkansas 50.0% 3.7% (+46.3)#4 3.1% (+46.9)#63
64. 12741, New York 50.0% 3.4% (+46.6)#4 3.1% (+46.9)#64
65. 79383, Texas 50.0% 3.5% (+46.5)#4 3.1% (+46.9)#65
66. 57563, South Dakota 50.0% 2.6% (+47.4)#3 3.1% (+46.9)#66
67. 79002, Texas 50.0% 3.5% (+46.5)#5 3.1% (+46.9)#67
68. 58239, North Dakota 50.0% 2.0% (+48.0)#1 3.1% (+46.9)#68
69. 97473, Oregon 49.2% 2.7% (+46.5)#3 3.1% (+46.1)#69
70. 26282, West Virginia 48.7% 4.2% (+44.5)#7 3.1% (+45.6)#70
71. 95930, California 48.5% 2.9% (+45.6)#4 3.1% (+45.4)#71
72. 70756, Louisiana 48.2% 4.9% (+43.3)#5 3.1% (+45.1)#72
73. 16939, Pennsylvania 48.1% 2.9% (+45.2)#2 3.1% (+45.0)#73
74. 99566, Alaska 46.7% 2.3% (+44.4)#3 3.1% (+43.6)#74
75. 32463, Florida 46.2% 3.2% (+43.0)#1 3.1% (+43.1)#75
76. 03441, New Hampshire 46.0% 1.6% (+44.4)#1 3.1% (+42.9)#76
77. 47858, Indiana 45.8% 3.1% (+42.7)#2 3.1% (+42.7)#77
78. 93605, California 45.8% 2.9% (+42.9)#5 3.1% (+42.7)#78
79. 58202, North Dakota 45.5% 2.0% (+43.5)#2 3.1% (+42.4)#79
80. 83212, Idaho 45.5% 2.2% (+43.3)#1 3.1% (+42.4)#80
81. 42762, Kentucky 45.5% 4.2% (+41.3)#7 3.1% (+42.4)#81
82. 93528, California 45.5% 2.9% (+42.6)#6 3.1% (+42.4)#82
83. 19369, Pennsylvania 45.2% 2.9% (+42.3)#3 3.1% (+42.1)#83
84. 65664, Missouri 44.4% 2.8% (+41.6)#2 3.1% (+41.3)#84
85. 99575, Alaska 44.4% 2.3% (+42.1)#4 3.1% (+41.3)#85
86. 59855, Montana 44.2% 2.5% (+41.7)#2 3.1% (+41.1)#86
87. 75562, Texas 44.2% 3.5% (+40.7)#6 3.1% (+41.1)#87
88. 59915, Montana 44.0% 2.5% (+41.5)#3 3.1% (+40.9)#88
89. 15444, Pennsylvania 43.5% 2.9% (+40.6)#4 3.1% (+40.4)#89
90. 77994, Texas 43.5% 3.5% (+40.0)#7 3.1% (+40.4)#90
91. 52701, Iowa 43.5% 2.4% (+41.1)#2 3.1% (+40.4)#91
92. 12207, New York 42.8% 3.4% (+39.4)#5 3.1% (+39.7)#92
93. 85926, Arizona 42.0% 3.4% (+38.6)#1 3.1% (+38.9)#93
94. 67868, Kansas 42.0% 2.6% (+39.4)#4 3.1% (+38.9)#94
95. 25075, West Virginia 41.9% 4.2% (+37.7)#8 3.1% (+38.8)#95
96. 99017, Washington 41.7% 2.4% (+39.3)#1 3.1% (+38.6)#96
97. 39736, Mississippi 41.5% 5.0% (+36.5)#2 3.1% (+38.4)#97
98. 71406, Louisiana 41.4% 4.9% (+36.5)#6 3.1% (+38.3)#98
99. 97033, Oregon 41.3% 2.7% (+38.6)#4 3.1% (+38.2)#99
100. 00740, Puerto Rico 41.0% 17.6% (+23.4)#2 3.1% (+37.9)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in the United States?
92350 has the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in the United States?
Percentage of Families with Income Below $10,000 in the United States is 3.1%.