Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Professional & Scientific Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States

30.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 33858, Florida 100.0% 7.7% (+92.3)#1 7.8% (+92.2)#1
2. 87517, New Mexico 100.0% 8.1% (+91.9)#1 7.8% (+92.2)#2
3. 92155, California 100.0% 9.4% (+90.6)#1 7.8% (+92.2)#3
4. 18349, Pennsylvania 100.0% 7.1% (+92.9)#1 7.8% (+92.2)#4
5. 01937, Massachusetts 100.0% 11.5% (+88.5)#1 7.8% (+92.2)#5
6. 46290, Indiana 100.0% 5.1% (+94.9)#1 7.8% (+92.2)#7
7. 83424, Idaho 100.0% 6.2% (+93.8)#1 7.8% (+92.2)#8
8. 25870, West Virginia 100.0% 4.8% (+95.2)#1 7.8% (+92.2)#9
9. 24729, West Virginia 100.0% 4.8% (+95.2)#2 7.8% (+92.2)#10
10. 06376, Connecticut 100.0% 7.7% (+92.3)#1 7.8% (+92.2)#11
11. 11973, New York 100.0% 8.8% (+91.2)#1 7.8% (+92.2)#12
12. 83285, Idaho 100.0% 6.2% (+93.8)#2 7.8% (+92.2)#13
13. 07881, New Jersey 100.0% 9.9% (+90.1)#1 7.8% (+92.2)#14
14. 03897, New Hampshire 100.0% 8.0% (+92.0)#1 7.8% (+92.2)#15
15. 25936, West Virginia 100.0% 4.8% (+95.2)#3 7.8% (+92.2)#16
16. 87064, New Mexico 90.9% 8.1% (+82.8)#2 7.8% (+83.1)#17
17. 33856, Florida 88.0% 7.7% (+80.3)#2 7.8% (+80.2)#18
18. 64858, Missouri 85.0% 6.3% (+78.7)#1 7.8% (+77.1)#19
19. 41845, Kentucky 83.0% 4.9% (+78.1)#1 7.8% (+75.2)#20
20. 12115, New York 80.5% 8.8% (+71.7)#2 7.8% (+72.6)#21
21. 84529, Utah 79.7% 8.4% (+71.3)#1 7.8% (+71.9)#22
22. 18927, Pennsylvania 77.3% 7.1% (+70.2)#2 7.8% (+69.5)#23
23. 64101, Missouri 73.8% 6.3% (+67.6)#2 7.8% (+66.0)#24
24. 12441, New York 71.8% 8.8% (+63.0)#3 7.8% (+63.9)#25
25. 32681, Florida 70.3% 7.7% (+62.6)#3 7.8% (+62.4)#26
26. 50427, Iowa 69.1% 4.4% (+64.7)#1 7.8% (+61.3)#27
27. 97621, Oregon 68.2% 7.7% (+60.5)#1 7.8% (+60.3)#28
28. 88025, New Mexico 66.7% 8.1% (+58.5)#3 7.8% (+58.8)#29
29. 87525, New Mexico 64.4% 8.1% (+56.3)#4 7.8% (+56.6)#30
30. 61552, Illinois 63.3% 8.3% (+55.0)#1 7.8% (+55.5)#31
31. 59081, Montana 62.7% 6.1% (+56.6)#1 7.8% (+54.9)#32
32. 25036, West Virginia 61.4% 4.8% (+56.6)#4 7.8% (+53.6)#33
33. 26259, West Virginia 60.0% 4.8% (+55.2)#5 7.8% (+52.2)#34
34. 72352, Arkansas 60.0% 4.4% (+55.6)#1 7.8% (+52.2)#35
35. 87578, New Mexico 58.1% 8.1% (+50.0)#5 7.8% (+50.3)#36
36. 01229, Massachusetts 58.0% 11.5% (+46.5)#2 7.8% (+50.2)#37
37. 20688, Maryland 57.4% 11.8% (+45.6)#1 7.8% (+49.5)#38
38. 29659, South Carolina 57.1% 6.0% (+51.2)#1 7.8% (+49.3)#39
39. 95232, California 56.5% 9.4% (+47.1)#2 7.8% (+48.7)#40
40. 24719, West Virginia 56.1% 4.8% (+51.3)#6 7.8% (+48.3)#41
41. 63743, Missouri 54.5% 6.3% (+48.3)#3 7.8% (+46.7)#42
42. 58074, North Dakota 54.3% 4.5% (+49.7)#1 7.8% (+46.4)#43
43. 01066, Massachusetts 53.8% 11.5% (+42.4)#3 7.8% (+46.0)#44
44. 83446, Idaho 53.8% 6.2% (+47.6)#3 7.8% (+46.0)#45
45. 74078, Oklahoma 53.5% 5.3% (+48.2)#1 7.8% (+45.7)#46
46. 04431, Maine 53.3% 6.3% (+47.0)#1 7.8% (+45.5)#47
47. 36727, Alabama 53.2% 5.8% (+47.4)#1 7.8% (+45.3)#48
48. 04855, Maine 53.1% 6.3% (+46.8)#2 7.8% (+45.3)#49
49. 87580, New Mexico 52.5% 8.1% (+44.3)#6 7.8% (+44.6)#50
50. 15421, Pennsylvania 52.1% 7.1% (+45.0)#3 7.8% (+44.2)#51
51. 97125, Oregon 51.7% 7.7% (+44.1)#2 7.8% (+43.9)#52
52. 87544, New Mexico 51.5% 8.1% (+43.3)#7 7.8% (+43.6)#53
53. 10503, New York 51.1% 8.8% (+42.3)#4 7.8% (+43.3)#54
54. 95417, California 50.7% 9.4% (+41.3)#3 7.8% (+42.9)#55
55. 87547, New Mexico 50.6% 8.1% (+42.5)#8 7.8% (+42.8)#56
56. 61478, Illinois 50.0% 8.3% (+41.7)#2 7.8% (+42.2)#57
57. 08528, New Jersey 50.0% 9.9% (+40.1)#2 7.8% (+42.2)#58
58. 80929, Colorado 50.0% 10.6% (+39.4)#1 7.8% (+42.2)#59
59. 07870, New Jersey 50.0% 9.9% (+40.1)#3 7.8% (+42.2)#60
60. 14083, New York 50.0% 8.8% (+41.2)#5 7.8% (+42.2)#61
61. 12856, New York 49.3% 8.8% (+40.4)#6 7.8% (+41.4)#62
62. 43523, Ohio 48.8% 6.1% (+42.8)#1 7.8% (+41.0)#63
63. 81210, Colorado 48.7% 10.6% (+38.1)#2 7.8% (+40.8)#64
64. 32970, Florida 48.1% 7.7% (+40.4)#4 7.8% (+40.3)#65
65. 87516, New Mexico 47.8% 8.1% (+39.6)#9 7.8% (+39.9)#66
66. 25251, West Virginia 47.1% 4.8% (+42.3)#7 7.8% (+39.2)#67
67. 15450, Pennsylvania 46.2% 7.1% (+39.1)#4 7.8% (+38.4)#68
68. 79519, Texas 45.8% 7.6% (+38.2)#1 7.8% (+38.0)#69
69. 97625, Oregon 45.7% 7.7% (+38.0)#3 7.8% (+37.8)#70
70. 05073, Vermont 45.5% 6.3% (+39.2)#1 7.8% (+37.6)#71
71. 15502, Pennsylvania 45.3% 7.1% (+38.2)#5 7.8% (+37.4)#72
72. 99782, Alaska 45.1% 5.4% (+39.7)#1 7.8% (+37.3)#73
73. 25060, West Virginia 45.1% 4.8% (+40.3)#8 7.8% (+37.3)#74
74. 25565, West Virginia 45.0% 4.8% (+40.2)#9 7.8% (+37.2)#75
75. 47522, Indiana 44.6% 5.1% (+39.4)#2 7.8% (+36.7)#76
76. 68881, Nebraska 44.0% 5.7% (+38.3)#1 7.8% (+36.2)#77
77. 75669, Texas 43.9% 7.6% (+36.3)#2 7.8% (+36.1)#78
78. 12720, New York 43.6% 8.8% (+34.8)#7 7.8% (+35.8)#79
79. 95254, California 43.4% 9.4% (+34.0)#4 7.8% (+35.5)#80
80. 05150, Vermont 43.2% 6.3% (+36.9)#2 7.8% (+35.3)#81
81. 69027, Nebraska 42.9% 5.7% (+37.1)#2 7.8% (+35.0)#82
82. 23423, Virginia 42.2% 12.2% (+30.0)#1 7.8% (+34.4)#83
83. 28542, North Carolina 42.0% 7.5% (+34.4)#1 7.8% (+34.1)#84
84. 19490, Pennsylvania 41.7% 7.1% (+34.6)#6 7.8% (+33.9)#85
85. 95715, California 41.5% 9.4% (+32.1)#5 7.8% (+33.7)#86
86. 35443, Alabama 41.3% 5.8% (+35.5)#2 7.8% (+33.5)#87
87. 20129, Virginia 41.3% 12.2% (+29.1)#2 7.8% (+33.5)#88
88. 82073, Wyoming 41.0% 4.4% (+36.7)#1 7.8% (+33.2)#89
89. 45147, Ohio 40.9% 6.1% (+34.9)#2 7.8% (+33.1)#90
90. 15363, Pennsylvania 40.8% 7.1% (+33.6)#7 7.8% (+32.9)#91
91. 94105, California 40.7% 9.4% (+31.3)#6 7.8% (+32.9)#92
92. 83111, Wyoming 40.7% 4.4% (+36.3)#2 7.8% (+32.9)#93
93. 78885, Texas 40.5% 7.6% (+32.9)#3 7.8% (+32.6)#94
94. 80833, Colorado 40.4% 10.6% (+29.8)#3 7.8% (+32.6)#95
95. 78837, Texas 40.0% 7.6% (+32.4)#4 7.8% (+32.2)#96
96. 87551, New Mexico 39.4% 8.1% (+31.3)#10 7.8% (+31.5)#97
97. 18932, Pennsylvania 39.4% 7.1% (+32.3)#8 7.8% (+31.5)#98
98. 29439, South Carolina 39.1% 6.0% (+33.2)#2 7.8% (+31.3)#99
99. 94929, California 38.9% 9.4% (+29.5)#7 7.8% (+31.0)#100
100. 22476, Virginia 38.5% 12.2% (+26.3)#3 7.8% (+30.6)#101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States?
33858 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States is 7.8%.