Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States

70.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States

Zip Code % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. 34714, Florida 100.0% 36.4% (+63.6)#1 33.4% (+66.6)#1
2. 97457, Oregon 90.2% 33.6% (+56.6)#1 33.4% (+56.8)#2
3. 49892, Michigan 87.2% 29.4% (+57.8)#1 33.4% (+53.8)#3
4. 85346, Arizona 86.4% 33.4% (+53.0)#1 33.4% (+53.0)#4
5. 42411, Kentucky 86.4% 28.4% (+58.0)#1 33.4% (+53.0)#5
6. 51639, Iowa 85.6% 31.2% (+54.4)#1 33.4% (+52.2)#6
7. 32190, Florida 84.0% 36.4% (+47.6)#2 33.4% (+50.6)#7
8. 96743, Hawaii 82.2% 33.8% (+48.4)#1 33.4% (+48.8)#8
9. 98933, Washington 82.1% 31.9% (+50.2)#1 33.4% (+48.7)#9
10. 32124, Florida 82.0% 36.4% (+45.6)#3 33.4% (+48.6)#10
11. 96738, Hawaii 82.0% 33.8% (+48.2)#2 33.4% (+48.6)#11
12. 75075, Texas 80.4% 32.0% (+48.4)#1 33.4% (+47.0)#12
13. 78260, Texas 80.4% 32.0% (+48.4)#2 33.4% (+47.0)#13
14. 43155, Ohio 80.3% 30.0% (+50.3)#1 33.4% (+46.9)#14
15. 97856, Oregon 80.2% 33.6% (+46.6)#2 33.4% (+46.8)#15
16. 50577, Iowa 79.4% 31.2% (+48.2)#2 33.4% (+46.0)#16
17. 81415, Colorado 79.3% 31.3% (+48.0)#1 33.4% (+45.9)#17
18. 61834, Illinois 79.2% 32.8% (+46.4)#1 33.4% (+45.8)#18
19. 61924, Illinois 79.0% 32.8% (+46.2)#2 33.4% (+45.6)#19
20. 40008, Kentucky 78.4% 28.4% (+50.0)#2 33.4% (+45.0)#20
21. 15345, Pennsylvania 78.2% 32.1% (+46.1)#1 33.4% (+44.8)#21
22. 49457, Michigan 77.4% 29.4% (+48.0)#2 33.4% (+44.0)#22
23. 42134, Kentucky 77.3% 28.4% (+48.9)#3 33.4% (+43.9)#23
24. 92637, California 77.3% 34.4% (+42.9)#1 33.4% (+43.9)#24
25. 26134, West Virginia 77.3% 34.4% (+42.9)#1 33.4% (+43.9)#25
26. 57538, South Dakota 77.3% 38.0% (+39.3)#1 33.4% (+43.9)#26
27. 52339, Iowa 77.2% 31.2% (+46.0)#3 33.4% (+43.8)#27
28. 72365, Arkansas 77.2% 38.0% (+39.2)#1 33.4% (+43.8)#28
29. 76656, Texas 77.2% 32.0% (+45.2)#3 33.4% (+43.8)#29
30. 61572, Illinois 77.2% 32.8% (+44.4)#3 33.4% (+43.8)#30
31. 58250, North Dakota 77.2% 34.8% (+42.4)#1 33.4% (+43.8)#31
32. 79108, Texas 77.1% 32.0% (+45.1)#4 33.4% (+43.7)#32
33. 48881, Michigan 77.1% 29.4% (+47.7)#3 33.4% (+43.7)#33
34. 32259, Florida 77.0% 36.4% (+40.6)#4 33.4% (+43.6)#34
35. 58621, North Dakota 77.0% 34.8% (+42.2)#2 33.4% (+43.6)#35
36. 32460, Florida 76.9% 36.4% (+40.5)#5 33.4% (+43.5)#36
37. 60154, Illinois 76.6% 32.8% (+43.8)#4 33.4% (+43.2)#37
38. 07440, New Jersey 76.5% 38.0% (+38.5)#1 33.4% (+43.1)#38
39. 67623, Kansas 76.4% 29.4% (+47.0)#1 33.4% (+43.0)#39
40. 33774, Florida 76.3% 36.4% (+39.9)#6 33.4% (+42.9)#40
41. 35136, Alabama 76.3% 33.9% (+42.4)#1 33.4% (+42.9)#41
42. 01264, Massachusetts 76.3% 31.1% (+45.2)#1 33.4% (+42.9)#42
43. 27569, North Carolina 76.2% 29.5% (+46.7)#1 33.4% (+42.8)#43
44. 87325, New Mexico 76.2% 37.1% (+39.1)#1 33.4% (+42.8)#44
45. 95461, California 76.1% 34.4% (+41.7)#2 33.4% (+42.7)#45
46. 50647, Iowa 76.1% 31.2% (+44.9)#4 33.4% (+42.7)#46
47. 50071, Iowa 75.8% 31.2% (+44.6)#5 33.4% (+42.4)#47
48. 11776, New York 75.6% 38.1% (+37.5)#1 33.4% (+42.2)#48
49. 72736, Arkansas 75.5% 38.0% (+37.5)#2 33.4% (+42.1)#49
50. 85348, Arizona 75.4% 33.4% (+42.0)#2 33.4% (+42.0)#50
51. 38730, Mississippi 75.4% 31.5% (+43.9)#1 33.4% (+42.0)#51
52. 35640, Alabama 75.3% 33.9% (+41.4)#2 33.4% (+41.9)#52
53. 37342, Tennessee 75.3% 32.0% (+43.3)#1 33.4% (+41.9)#53
54. 25039, West Virginia 75.3% 34.4% (+40.9)#2 33.4% (+41.9)#54
55. 08059, New Jersey 75.2% 38.0% (+37.2)#2 33.4% (+41.8)#55
56. 49256, Michigan 75.2% 29.4% (+45.8)#4 33.4% (+41.8)#56
57. 28395, North Carolina 75.2% 29.5% (+45.7)#2 33.4% (+41.8)#57
58. 11731, New York 75.1% 38.1% (+37.0)#2 33.4% (+41.7)#58
59. 26836, West Virginia 75.1% 34.4% (+40.7)#3 33.4% (+41.7)#59
60. 61075, Illinois 75.1% 32.8% (+42.3)#5 33.4% (+41.7)#60
61. 29330, South Carolina 75.0% 24.5% (+50.5)#1 33.4% (+41.6)#61
62. 63830, Missouri 75.0% 30.2% (+44.8)#1 33.4% (+41.6)#62
63. 66930, Kansas 75.0% 29.4% (+45.6)#2 33.4% (+41.6)#63
64. 22939, Virginia 74.6% 28.7% (+45.9)#1 33.4% (+41.2)#64
65. 32680, Florida 74.4% 36.4% (+38.0)#7 33.4% (+41.0)#65
66. 19941, Delaware 74.4% 33.6% (+40.8)#1 33.4% (+41.0)#66
67. 51575, Iowa 74.3% 31.2% (+43.1)#6 33.4% (+40.9)#67
68. 66210, Kansas 74.2% 29.4% (+44.8)#3 33.4% (+40.8)#68
69. 30513, Georgia 74.2% 31.4% (+42.8)#1 33.4% (+40.8)#69
70. 08732, New Jersey 74.2% 38.0% (+36.2)#3 33.4% (+40.8)#70
71. 48894, Michigan 74.1% 29.4% (+44.7)#5 33.4% (+40.7)#71
72. 54850, Wisconsin 74.1% 31.3% (+42.8)#1 33.4% (+40.7)#72
73. 67448, Kansas 74.0% 29.4% (+44.6)#4 33.4% (+40.6)#73
74. 40119, Kentucky 73.7% 28.4% (+45.3)#4 33.4% (+40.3)#74
75. 60194, Illinois 73.6% 32.8% (+40.8)#6 33.4% (+40.2)#75
76. 07480, New Jersey 73.6% 38.0% (+35.6)#4 33.4% (+40.2)#76
77. 66413, Kansas 73.5% 29.4% (+44.1)#5 33.4% (+40.1)#77
78. 62365, Illinois 73.5% 32.8% (+40.7)#7 33.4% (+40.1)#78
79. 61525, Illinois 73.3% 32.8% (+40.5)#8 33.4% (+39.9)#79
80. 56055, Minnesota 73.3% 33.4% (+39.9)#1 33.4% (+39.9)#80
81. 67859, Kansas 73.3% 29.4% (+43.9)#6 33.4% (+39.9)#81
82. 67452, Kansas 73.3% 29.4% (+43.9)#7 33.4% (+39.9)#82
83. 34135, Florida 73.2% 36.4% (+36.8)#8 33.4% (+39.8)#83
84. 72543, Arkansas 73.2% 38.0% (+35.2)#3 33.4% (+39.8)#84
85. 80828, Colorado 73.2% 31.3% (+41.9)#2 33.4% (+39.8)#85
86. 65732, Missouri 73.2% 30.2% (+43.0)#2 33.4% (+39.8)#86
87. 44865, Ohio 73.1% 30.0% (+43.1)#2 33.4% (+39.7)#87
88. 96104, California 73.1% 34.4% (+38.7)#3 33.4% (+39.7)#88
89. 97136, Oregon 72.7% 33.6% (+39.1)#3 33.4% (+39.3)#89
90. 98365, Washington 72.5% 31.9% (+40.6)#2 33.4% (+39.1)#90
91. 04579, Maine 72.5% 33.0% (+39.5)#1 33.4% (+39.1)#91
92. 77356, Texas 72.4% 32.0% (+40.4)#5 33.4% (+39.0)#92
93. 78059, Texas 72.4% 32.0% (+40.4)#6 33.4% (+39.0)#93
94. 70788, Louisiana 72.4% 33.7% (+38.7)#1 33.4% (+39.0)#94
95. 58425, North Dakota 72.4% 34.8% (+37.6)#3 33.4% (+39.0)#95
96. 04554, Maine 72.4% 33.0% (+39.4)#2 33.4% (+39.0)#96
97. 12540, New York 72.3% 38.1% (+34.2)#3 33.4% (+38.9)#97
98. 11560, New York 72.3% 38.1% (+34.2)#4 33.4% (+38.9)#98
99. 26753, West Virginia 72.3% 34.4% (+37.9)#4 33.4% (+38.9)#99
100. 63462, Missouri 72.3% 30.2% (+42.1)#3 33.4% (+38.9)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
90.2%
#3
87.2%
#4
86.4%
#5
86.4%
#6
85.6%
#7
84.0%
#8
82.2%
#9
82.1%
#10
82.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
34714 has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.