	Zip Code	Taiwanese	vs State	vs National
1.	60139, Illinois	248	482 (51.45%)#1	3,248 (7.64%)#1
2.	95125, California	189	1,045 (18.09%)#1	3,248 (5.82%)#2
3.	91411, California	138	1,045 (13.21%)#2	3,248 (4.25%)#3
4.	17202, Pennsylvania	136	160 (85.00%)#1	3,248 (4.19%)#4
5.	07052, New Jersey	100	100 (100.00%)#1	3,248 (3.08%)#5
6.	85365, Arizona	98	98 (100.00%)#1	3,248 (3.02%)#6
7.	95687, California	92	1,045 (8.80%)#3	3,248 (2.83%)#7
8.	33141, Florida	89	131 (67.94%)#1	3,248 (2.74%)#8
9.	60634, Illinois	83	482 (17.22%)#2	3,248 (2.56%)#9
10.	28269, North Carolina	82	103 (79.61%)#1	3,248 (2.52%)#10
11.	75063, Texas	81	178 (45.51%)#1	3,248 (2.49%)#11
12.	76182, Texas	77	178 (43.26%)#2	3,248 (2.37%)#12
13.	83706, Idaho	72	72 (100.00%)#1	3,248 (2.22%)#13
14.	92843, California	68	1,045 (6.51%)#4	3,248 (2.09%)#14
15.	68164, Nebraska	68	70 (97.14%)#1	3,248 (2.09%)#15
16.	95123, California	56	1,045 (5.36%)#5	3,248 (1.72%)#16
17.	43560, Ohio	55	90 (61.11%)#1	3,248 (1.69%)#17
18.	95823, California	54	1,045 (5.17%)#6	3,248 (1.66%)#18
19.	95521, California	51	1,045 (4.88%)#7	3,248 (1.57%)#19
20.	10030, New York	48	222 (21.62%)#1	3,248 (1.48%)#20
21.	93458, California	43	1,045 (4.11%)#8	3,248 (1.32%)#21
22.	96816, Hawaii	42	42 (100.00%)#1	3,248 (1.29%)#22
23.	81641, Colorado	40	40 (100.00%)#1	3,248 (1.23%)#23
24.	40228, Kentucky	38	38 (100.00%)#1	3,248 (1.17%)#24
25.	60660, Illinois	35	482 (7.26%)#3	3,248 (1.08%)#25
26.	95340, California	35	1,045 (3.35%)#9	3,248 (1.08%)#26
27.	89503, Nevada	35	35 (100.00%)#1	3,248 (1.08%)#27
28.	11419, New York	34	222 (15.32%)#2	3,248 (1.05%)#28
29.	11104, New York	32	222 (14.41%)#3	3,248 (0.99%)#29
30.	94010, California	30	1,045 (2.87%)#10	3,248 (0.92%)#30
31.	98014, Washington	30	70 (42.86%)#1	3,248 (0.92%)#31
32.	92345, California	29	1,045 (2.78%)#11	3,248 (0.89%)#32
33.	91343, California	27	1,045 (2.58%)#12	3,248 (0.83%)#33
34.	60637, Illinois	27	482 (5.60%)#4	3,248 (0.83%)#34
35.	33478, Florida	27	131 (20.61%)#2	3,248 (0.83%)#35
36.	98407, Washington	26	70 (37.14%)#2	3,248 (0.80%)#36
37.	20854, Maryland	24	74 (32.43%)#1	3,248 (0.74%)#37
38.	62901, Illinois	24	482 (4.98%)#5	3,248 (0.74%)#38
39.	11209, New York	23	222 (10.36%)#4	3,248 (0.71%)#39
40.	90005, California	23	1,045 (2.20%)#13	3,248 (0.71%)#40
41.	94085, California	23	1,045 (2.20%)#14	3,248 (0.71%)#41
42.	03275, New Hampshire	23	23 (100.00%)#1	3,248 (0.71%)#42
43.	95648, California	22	1,045 (2.11%)#15	3,248 (0.68%)#43
44.	44120, Ohio	22	90 (24.44%)#2	3,248 (0.68%)#44
45.	60656, Illinois	22	482 (4.56%)#6	3,248 (0.68%)#45
46.	60152, Illinois	22	482 (4.56%)#7	3,248 (0.68%)#46
47.	20910, Maryland	19	74 (25.68%)#2	3,248 (0.58%)#47
48.	92377, California	19	1,045 (1.82%)#16	3,248 (0.58%)#48
49.	84405, Utah	18	18 (100.00%)#1	3,248 (0.55%)#49
50.	21053, Maryland	18	74 (24.32%)#3	3,248 (0.55%)#50
51.	11373, New York	17	222 (7.66%)#5	3,248 (0.52%)#51
52.	52627, Iowa	17	17 (100.00%)#1	3,248 (0.52%)#52
53.	53711, Wisconsin	16	32 (50.00%)#1	3,248 (0.49%)#53
54.	93726, California	16	1,045 (1.53%)#17	3,248 (0.49%)#54
55.	11103, New York	16	222 (7.21%)#6	3,248 (0.49%)#55
56.	60615, Illinois	15	482 (3.11%)#8	3,248 (0.46%)#56
57.	33707, Florida	15	131 (11.45%)#3	3,248 (0.46%)#57
58.	20037, District Of Columbia	15	15 (100.00%)#1	3,248 (0.46%)#58
59.	29073, South Carolina	14	14 (100.00%)#1	3,248 (0.43%)#59
60.	98102, Washington	14	70 (20.00%)#3	3,248 (0.43%)#60
61.	95819, California	14	1,045 (1.34%)#18	3,248 (0.43%)#61
62.	43230, Ohio	13	90 (14.44%)#3	3,248 (0.40%)#62
63.	20170, Virginia	13	14 (92.86%)#1	3,248 (0.40%)#63
64.	94115, California	13	1,045 (1.24%)#19	3,248 (0.40%)#64
65.	94043, California	13	1,045 (1.24%)#20	3,248 (0.40%)#65
66.	94704, California	13	1,045 (1.24%)#21	3,248 (0.40%)#66
67.	20851, Maryland	13	74 (17.57%)#4	3,248 (0.40%)#67
68.	11377, New York	12	222 (5.41%)#7	3,248 (0.37%)#68
69.	90024, California	12	1,045 (1.15%)#22	3,248 (0.37%)#69
70.	91748, California	12	1,045 (1.15%)#23	3,248 (0.37%)#70
71.	94134, California	12	1,045 (1.15%)#24	3,248 (0.37%)#71
72.	90731, California	11	1,045 (1.05%)#25	3,248 (0.34%)#72
73.	90033, California	11	1,045 (1.05%)#26	3,248 (0.34%)#73
74.	53202, Wisconsin	11	32 (34.38%)#2	3,248 (0.34%)#74
75.	90014, California	11	1,045 (1.05%)#27	3,248 (0.34%)#75
76.	14261, New York	11	222 (4.95%)#8	3,248 (0.34%)#76
77.	02148, Massachusetts	10	19 (52.63%)#1	3,248 (0.31%)#77
78.	63026, Missouri	10	20 (50.00%)#1	3,248 (0.31%)#78
79.	47421, Indiana	10	10 (100.00%)#1	3,248 (0.31%)#79
80.	65775, Missouri	10	20 (50.00%)#2	3,248 (0.31%)#80
81.	19001, Pennsylvania	10	160 (6.25%)#2	3,248 (0.31%)#81
82.	11740, New York	10	222 (4.50%)#9	3,248 (0.31%)#82
83.	30307, Georgia	9	9 (100.00%)#1	3,248 (0.28%)#83
84.	75862, Texas	9	178 (5.06%)#3	3,248 (0.28%)#84
85.	01096, Massachusetts	9	19 (47.37%)#2	3,248 (0.28%)#85
86.	28226, North Carolina	8	103 (7.77%)#2	3,248 (0.25%)#86
87.	27569, North Carolina	8	103 (7.77%)#3	3,248 (0.25%)#87
88.	97225, Oregon	7	7 (100.00%)#1	3,248 (0.22%)#88
89.	76574, Texas	7	178 (3.93%)#4	3,248 (0.22%)#89
90.	14886, New York	7	222 (3.15%)#10	3,248 (0.22%)#90
91.	14226, New York	6	222 (2.70%)#11	3,248 (0.18%)#91
92.	14222, New York	6	222 (2.70%)#12	3,248 (0.18%)#92
93.	28278, North Carolina	5	103 (4.85%)#4	3,248 (0.15%)#93
94.	15217, Pennsylvania	5	160 (3.12%)#3	3,248 (0.15%)#94
95.	19520, Pennsylvania	5	160 (3.12%)#4	3,248 (0.15%)#95
96.	90089, California	5	1,045 (0.48%)#28	3,248 (0.15%)#96
97.	54646, Wisconsin	5	32 (15.62%)#3	3,248 (0.15%)#97
98.	60126, Illinois	4	482 (0.83%)#9	3,248 (0.12%)#98
99.	75630, Texas	4	178 (2.25%)#5	3,248 (0.12%)#99
100.	16407, Pennsylvania	3	160 (1.88%)#5	3,248 (0.09%)#100