Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Household Income | $200k+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in the United States

60.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in the United States

Zip Code Households with Income > $200k vs State vs National
1. 22904, Virginia 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#1 11.4% (+88.6)#1
2. 29424, South Carolina 100.0% 7.4% (+92.6)#1 11.4% (+88.6)#2
3. 44630, Ohio 100.0% 7.6% (+92.4)#1 11.4% (+88.6)#3
4. 76841, Texas 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#1 11.4% (+88.6)#4
5. 10279, New York 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#1 11.4% (+88.6)#5
6. 20889, Maryland 100.0% 17.9% (+82.1)#1 11.4% (+88.6)#6
7. 11947, New York 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#2 11.4% (+88.6)#7
8. 82640, Wyoming 100.0% 7.4% (+92.6)#1 11.4% (+88.6)#8
9. 12872, New York 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#3 11.4% (+88.6)#9
10. 08890, New Jersey 100.0% 19.2% (+80.8)#1 11.4% (+88.6)#10
11. 19535, Pennsylvania 100.0% 10.2% (+89.8)#1 11.4% (+88.6)#11
12. 71662, Arkansas 100.0% 5.6% (+94.4)#1 11.4% (+88.6)#12
13. 72383, Arkansas 100.0% 5.6% (+94.4)#2 11.4% (+88.6)#13
14. 08011, New Jersey 100.0% 19.2% (+80.8)#2 11.4% (+88.6)#14
15. 76565, Texas 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#2 11.4% (+88.6)#15
16. 30639, Georgia 100.0% 10.0% (+90.0)#1 11.4% (+88.6)#17
17. 71330, Louisiana 100.0% 6.8% (+93.2)#1 11.4% (+88.6)#18
18. 82310, Wyoming 100.0% 7.4% (+92.6)#2 11.4% (+88.6)#19
19. 07870, New Jersey 100.0% 19.2% (+80.8)#3 11.4% (+88.6)#20
20. 98330, Washington 100.0% 15.4% (+84.6)#1 11.4% (+88.6)#21
21. 25421, West Virginia 100.0% 4.8% (+95.2)#1 11.4% (+88.6)#22
22. 58362, North Dakota 100.0% 8.4% (+91.6)#1 11.4% (+88.6)#23
23. 33530, Florida 100.0% 9.0% (+91.0)#1 11.4% (+88.6)#24
24. 71475, Louisiana 100.0% 6.8% (+93.2)#2 11.4% (+88.6)#25
25. 93943, California 100.0% 17.9% (+82.1)#1 11.4% (+88.6)#26
26. 58236, North Dakota 94.4% 8.4% (+86.0)#2 11.4% (+83.0)#27
27. 26058, West Virginia 93.5% 4.8% (+88.7)#2 11.4% (+82.1)#28
28. 19375, Pennsylvania 92.6% 10.2% (+82.4)#2 11.4% (+81.2)#29
29. 24412, Virginia 90.4% 15.6% (+74.8)#2 11.4% (+79.0)#30
30. 76848, Texas 90.0% 10.6% (+79.4)#3 11.4% (+78.6)#31
31. 20129, Virginia 89.0% 15.6% (+73.4)#3 11.4% (+77.6)#32
32. 82925, Wyoming 86.3% 7.4% (+78.9)#3 11.4% (+74.9)#33
33. 04855, Maine 85.3% 7.4% (+77.9)#1 11.4% (+73.9)#34
34. 33109, Florida 83.5% 9.0% (+74.5)#2 11.4% (+72.1)#35
35. 61371, Illinois 82.6% 12.1% (+70.5)#1 11.4% (+71.2)#36
36. 94021, California 82.0% 17.9% (+64.1)#2 11.4% (+70.6)#37
37. 18927, Pennsylvania 80.7% 10.2% (+70.5)#3 11.4% (+69.3)#38
38. 30289, Georgia 78.3% 10.0% (+68.3)#2 11.4% (+66.9)#39
39. 47437, Indiana 76.7% 6.7% (+70.0)#1 11.4% (+65.3)#40
40. 40025, Kentucky 76.4% 6.0% (+70.4)#1 11.4% (+65.0)#41
41. 79259, Texas 76.2% 10.6% (+65.6)#4 11.4% (+64.8)#42
42. 01965, Massachusetts 75.8% 19.3% (+56.5)#1 11.4% (+64.4)#43
43. 18936, Pennsylvania 74.3% 10.2% (+64.1)#4 11.4% (+62.9)#44
44. 63073, Missouri 74.0% 7.3% (+66.7)#1 11.4% (+62.6)#45
45. 02815, Rhode Island 74.0% 11.3% (+62.7)#1 11.4% (+62.6)#46
46. 07078, New Jersey 73.5% 19.2% (+54.3)#4 11.4% (+62.1)#47
47. 64858, Missouri 73.2% 7.3% (+65.9)#2 11.4% (+61.8)#48
48. 94020, California 73.1% 17.9% (+55.2)#3 11.4% (+61.7)#49
49. 77454, Texas 72.7% 10.6% (+62.1)#5 11.4% (+61.3)#50
50. 43523, Ohio 72.4% 7.6% (+64.8)#2 11.4% (+61.0)#51
51. 02468, Massachusetts 71.3% 19.3% (+52.0)#2 11.4% (+59.9)#52
52. 24957, West Virginia 71.1% 4.8% (+66.3)#3 11.4% (+59.7)#53
53. 18950, Pennsylvania 70.8% 10.2% (+60.6)#5 11.4% (+59.4)#54
54. 10577, New York 70.4% 15.2% (+55.2)#4 11.4% (+59.0)#55
55. 10282, New York 69.8% 15.2% (+54.6)#5 11.4% (+58.4)#56
56. 22027, Virginia 69.6% 15.6% (+54.0)#4 11.4% (+58.2)#57
57. 06878, Connecticut 69.5% 17.0% (+52.5)#1 11.4% (+58.1)#58
58. 19085, Pennsylvania 69.4% 10.2% (+59.2)#6 11.4% (+58.0)#59
59. 60932, Illinois 69.4% 12.1% (+57.3)#2 11.4% (+58.0)#60
60. 95420, California 68.7% 17.9% (+50.8)#4 11.4% (+57.3)#61
61. 94027, California 68.2% 17.9% (+50.3)#5 11.4% (+56.8)#62
62. 19035, Pennsylvania 68.1% 10.2% (+57.9)#7 11.4% (+56.7)#63
63. 02030, Massachusetts 67.7% 19.3% (+48.4)#3 11.4% (+56.3)#64
64. 18913, Pennsylvania 67.7% 10.2% (+57.5)#8 11.4% (+56.3)#65
65. 18935, Pennsylvania 67.6% 10.2% (+57.4)#9 11.4% (+56.2)#66
66. 19108, Pennsylvania 67.6% 10.2% (+57.4)#10 11.4% (+56.2)#67
67. 10007, New York 67.4% 15.2% (+52.2)#6 11.4% (+56.0)#68
68. 01063, Massachusetts 66.7% 19.3% (+47.4)#4 11.4% (+55.3)#69
69. 89420, Nevada 66.7% 8.7% (+58.0)#1 11.4% (+55.3)#70
70. 57767, South Dakota 66.3% 6.5% (+59.8)#1 11.4% (+54.9)#71
71. 94024, California 66.2% 17.9% (+48.3)#6 11.4% (+54.8)#72
72. 10597, New York 66.0% 15.2% (+50.8)#7 11.4% (+54.6)#73
73. 94507, California 65.9% 17.9% (+48.0)#7 11.4% (+54.5)#74
74. 04006, Maine 65.8% 7.4% (+58.4)#2 11.4% (+54.4)#75
75. 22066, Virginia 65.5% 15.6% (+49.9)#5 11.4% (+54.1)#76
76. 21737, Maryland 65.4% 17.9% (+47.5)#2 11.4% (+54.0)#77
77. 07423, New Jersey 65.2% 19.2% (+46.0)#5 11.4% (+53.8)#78
78. 21723, Maryland 65.0% 17.9% (+47.1)#3 11.4% (+53.6)#79
79. 21738, Maryland 64.9% 17.9% (+47.0)#4 11.4% (+53.5)#80
80. 06820, Connecticut 64.8% 17.0% (+47.8)#2 11.4% (+53.4)#81
81. 02481, Massachusetts 64.8% 19.3% (+45.5)#5 11.4% (+53.4)#82
82. 10578, New York 64.7% 15.2% (+49.5)#8 11.4% (+53.3)#83
83. 94105, California 64.6% 17.9% (+46.7)#8 11.4% (+53.2)#84
84. 12720, New York 64.6% 15.2% (+49.4)#9 11.4% (+53.2)#85
85. 21029, Maryland 64.5% 17.9% (+46.6)#5 11.4% (+53.1)#86
86. 76092, Texas 64.3% 10.6% (+53.7)#6 11.4% (+52.9)#87
87. 58009, North Dakota 64.3% 8.4% (+55.9)#3 11.4% (+52.9)#88
88. 21056, Maryland 64.2% 17.9% (+46.3)#6 11.4% (+52.8)#89
89. 10514, New York 64.0% 15.2% (+48.8)#10 11.4% (+52.6)#90
90. 94957, California 63.6% 17.9% (+45.7)#9 11.4% (+52.2)#91
91. 07021, New Jersey 63.5% 19.2% (+44.3)#6 11.4% (+52.1)#92
92. 94022, California 63.3% 17.9% (+45.4)#10 11.4% (+51.9)#93
93. 07046, New Jersey 63.3% 19.2% (+44.1)#7 11.4% (+51.9)#94
94. 01776, Massachusetts 63.2% 19.3% (+43.9)#6 11.4% (+51.8)#95
95. 60043, Illinois 62.9% 12.1% (+50.8)#3 11.4% (+51.5)#96
96. 94129, California 62.8% 17.9% (+44.9)#11 11.4% (+51.4)#97
97. 22039, Virginia 62.4% 15.6% (+46.8)#6 11.4% (+51.0)#98
98. 19490, Pennsylvania 62.2% 10.2% (+52.0)#11 11.4% (+50.8)#99
99. 89402, Nevada 61.9% 8.7% (+53.2)#2 11.4% (+50.5)#100
100. 10932, New York 61.9% 15.2% (+46.7)#11 11.4% (+50.5)#101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in the United States?
22904 has the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in the United States?
Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in the United States is 11.4%.