Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Physical and Health Sciences
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in the United States

40.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in the United States

Zip Code % Graduates vs State vs National
1. 70803, Louisiana 100.0% 3.1% (+96.9)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#1
2. 23668, Virginia 100.0% 3.2% (+96.8)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#2
3. 15546, Pennsylvania 100.0% 3.3% (+96.7)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#3
4. 97534, Oregon 100.0% 3.9% (+96.1)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#4
5. 44101, Ohio 100.0% 3.0% (+97.0)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#5
6. 31623, Georgia 100.0% 2.6% (+97.4)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#6
7. 78344, Texas 100.0% 3.3% (+96.7)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#7
8. 97406, Oregon 100.0% 3.9% (+96.1)#2 3.1% (+96.9)#8
9. 08023, New Jersey 100.0% 3.3% (+96.7)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#9
10. 86445, Arizona 100.0% 2.9% (+97.1)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#10
11. 88411, New Mexico 100.0% 4.8% (+95.2)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#11
12. 77440, Texas 100.0% 3.3% (+96.7)#2 3.1% (+96.9)#12
13. 88350, New Mexico 100.0% 4.8% (+95.2)#2 3.1% (+96.9)#13
14. 44080, Ohio 100.0% 3.0% (+97.0)#2 3.1% (+96.9)#14
15. 12961, New York 100.0% 2.9% (+97.1)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#15
16. 28749, North Carolina 100.0% 3.1% (+96.9)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#16
17. 11973, New York 100.0% 2.9% (+97.1)#2 3.1% (+96.9)#17
18. 83812, Idaho 100.0% 3.2% (+96.8)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#18
19. 47306, Indiana 87.8% 3.1% (+84.7)#1 3.1% (+84.7)#19
20. 70556, Louisiana 84.5% 3.1% (+81.4)#2 3.1% (+81.4)#20
21. 46063, Indiana 81.2% 3.1% (+78.1)#2 3.1% (+78.2)#21
22. 50057, Iowa 80.0% 2.4% (+77.6)#1 3.1% (+76.9)#22
23. 57027, South Dakota 80.0% 2.1% (+77.9)#1 3.1% (+76.9)#23
24. 99675, Alaska 80.0% 4.7% (+75.3)#1 3.1% (+76.9)#24
25. 52660, Iowa 78.6% 2.4% (+76.2)#2 3.1% (+75.5)#25
26. 16744, Pennsylvania 78.6% 3.3% (+75.3)#2 3.1% (+75.5)#26
27. 01343, Massachusetts 78.6% 3.7% (+74.9)#1 3.1% (+75.5)#27
28. 12960, New York 78.5% 2.9% (+75.6)#3 3.1% (+75.4)#28
29. 66622, Kansas 77.8% 2.5% (+75.2)#1 3.1% (+74.7)#29
30. 96129, California 76.8% 3.1% (+73.7)#1 3.1% (+73.7)#30
31. 87930, New Mexico 76.7% 4.8% (+71.8)#3 3.1% (+73.6)#31
32. 77951, Texas 74.4% 3.3% (+71.0)#3 3.1% (+71.3)#32
33. 66732, Kansas 72.2% 2.5% (+69.7)#2 3.1% (+69.1)#33
34. 81640, Colorado 71.2% 3.6% (+67.5)#1 3.1% (+68.1)#34
35. 65335, Missouri 70.3% 2.6% (+67.7)#1 3.1% (+67.2)#35
36. 59529, Montana 68.1% 3.7% (+64.4)#1 3.1% (+65.0)#36
37. 53501, Wisconsin 66.7% 2.9% (+63.8)#1 3.1% (+63.6)#37
38. 97905, Oregon 66.7% 3.9% (+62.8)#3 3.1% (+63.6)#38
39. 35981, Alabama 66.5% 2.9% (+63.6)#1 3.1% (+63.4)#39
40. 87939, New Mexico 65.9% 4.8% (+61.0)#4 3.1% (+62.8)#40
41. 14785, New York 60.4% 2.9% (+57.5)#4 3.1% (+57.3)#41
42. 88430, New Mexico 60.0% 4.8% (+55.2)#5 3.1% (+56.9)#42
43. 50256, Iowa 58.1% 2.4% (+55.7)#3 3.1% (+55.0)#43
44. 43109, Ohio 58.0% 3.0% (+55.0)#3 3.1% (+54.9)#44
45. 82213, Wyoming 57.7% 4.3% (+53.4)#1 3.1% (+54.6)#45
46. 08316, New Jersey 56.1% 3.3% (+52.8)#2 3.1% (+53.0)#46
47. 76370, Texas 56.1% 3.3% (+52.7)#4 3.1% (+53.0)#47
48. 62019, Illinois 56.0% 2.9% (+53.1)#1 3.1% (+52.9)#48
49. 97350, Oregon 55.6% 3.9% (+51.7)#4 3.1% (+52.5)#49
50. 04056, Maine 55.0% 2.8% (+52.2)#1 3.1% (+51.9)#50
51. 22472, Virginia 54.8% 3.2% (+51.6)#2 3.1% (+51.7)#51
52. 61478, Illinois 54.5% 2.9% (+51.7)#2 3.1% (+51.4)#52
53. 25637, West Virginia 54.2% 3.3% (+51.0)#1 3.1% (+51.1)#53
54. 59010, Montana 52.0% 3.7% (+48.3)#2 3.1% (+48.9)#54
55. 96105, California 50.5% 3.1% (+47.4)#2 3.1% (+47.4)#55
56. 99632, Alaska 50.0% 4.7% (+45.3)#2 3.1% (+46.9)#56
57. 75421, Texas 50.0% 3.3% (+46.7)#5 3.1% (+46.9)#57
58. 21251, Maryland 50.0% 3.6% (+46.4)#1 3.1% (+46.9)#58
59. 39326, Mississippi 50.0% 3.0% (+47.0)#1 3.1% (+46.9)#59
60. 68416, Nebraska 50.0% 2.7% (+47.3)#1 3.1% (+46.9)#60
61. 25203, West Virginia 50.0% 3.3% (+46.7)#2 3.1% (+46.9)#61
62. 22730, Virginia 50.0% 3.2% (+46.8)#3 3.1% (+46.9)#62
63. 19457, Pennsylvania 50.0% 3.3% (+46.7)#3 3.1% (+46.9)#63
64. 72860, Arkansas 50.0% 3.2% (+46.8)#1 3.1% (+46.9)#64
65. 95431, California 50.0% 3.1% (+46.9)#3 3.1% (+46.9)#65
66. 99649, Alaska 50.0% 4.7% (+45.3)#3 3.1% (+46.9)#66
67. 79330, Texas 50.0% 3.3% (+46.7)#6 3.1% (+46.9)#67
68. 71651, Arkansas 50.0% 3.2% (+46.8)#2 3.1% (+46.9)#68
69. 62256, Illinois 50.0% 2.9% (+47.1)#3 3.1% (+46.9)#69
70. 93634, California 50.0% 3.1% (+46.9)#4 3.1% (+46.9)#70
71. 29658, South Carolina 48.8% 2.9% (+45.9)#1 3.1% (+45.7)#71
72. 83834, Idaho 48.7% 3.2% (+45.5)#2 3.1% (+45.6)#72
73. 29368, South Carolina 48.6% 2.9% (+45.7)#2 3.1% (+45.5)#73
74. 71333, Louisiana 48.5% 3.1% (+45.4)#3 3.1% (+45.4)#74
75. 77991, Texas 48.5% 3.3% (+45.1)#7 3.1% (+45.4)#75
76. 66946, Kansas 48.4% 2.5% (+45.8)#3 3.1% (+45.3)#76
77. 83631, Idaho 48.2% 3.2% (+45.0)#3 3.1% (+45.1)#77
78. 25125, West Virginia 48.2% 3.3% (+44.9)#3 3.1% (+45.1)#78
79. 77863, Texas 48.1% 3.3% (+44.8)#8 3.1% (+45.0)#79
80. 88112, New Mexico 47.3% 4.8% (+42.5)#6 3.1% (+44.2)#80
81. 83547, Idaho 47.2% 3.2% (+44.0)#4 3.1% (+44.1)#81
82. 47523, Indiana 47.0% 3.1% (+43.9)#3 3.1% (+43.9)#82
83. 68517, Nebraska 46.7% 2.7% (+44.0)#2 3.1% (+43.6)#83
84. 28708, North Carolina 46.3% 3.1% (+43.2)#2 3.1% (+43.2)#84
85. 72467, Arkansas 46.2% 3.2% (+42.9)#3 3.1% (+43.1)#85
86. 24578, Virginia 46.2% 3.2% (+42.9)#4 3.1% (+43.1)#86
87. 67629, Kansas 46.2% 2.5% (+43.6)#4 3.1% (+43.1)#87
88. 16217, Pennsylvania 46.2% 3.3% (+42.9)#4 3.1% (+43.1)#88
89. 28109, North Carolina 45.5% 3.1% (+42.3)#3 3.1% (+42.4)#89
90. 59467, Montana 45.5% 3.7% (+41.7)#3 3.1% (+42.4)#90
91. 99155, Washington 44.1% 3.4% (+40.7)#1 3.1% (+41.0)#91
92. 04469, Maine 43.2% 2.8% (+40.5)#2 3.1% (+40.1)#92
93. 44619, Ohio 43.2% 3.0% (+40.2)#4 3.1% (+40.1)#93
94. 40020, Kentucky 42.9% 3.1% (+39.8)#1 3.1% (+39.8)#94
95. 63784, Missouri 42.9% 2.6% (+40.3)#2 3.1% (+39.8)#95
96. 80456, Colorado 42.6% 3.6% (+39.0)#2 3.1% (+39.5)#96
97. 93517, California 42.6% 3.1% (+39.5)#5 3.1% (+39.5)#97
98. 78670, Texas 42.4% 3.3% (+39.1)#9 3.1% (+39.3)#98
99. 40170, Kentucky 41.2% 3.1% (+38.1)#2 3.1% (+38.1)#99
100. 83227, Idaho 40.8% 3.2% (+37.6)#5 3.1% (+37.7)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in the United States?
70803 has the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in the United States?
Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in the United States is 3.1%.