Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Work from Home
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States

0.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States

Zip Code % Work from Home vs State vs National
1.99612, Alaska94.1%45.9%(+48.2)#144.0%(+50.1)#1
2.63940, Missouri87.2%44.1%(+43.1)#144.0%(+43.2)#2
3.62822, Illinois86.1%43.1%(+43.0)#144.0%(+42.1)#3
4.13338, New York84.2%42.4%(+41.8)#144.0%(+40.2)#4
5.81081, Colorado82.4%43.6%(+38.8)#144.0%(+38.4)#5
6.57433, South Dakota82.2%46.5%(+35.7)#144.0%(+38.2)#6
7.47922, Indiana82.1%44.5%(+37.6)#144.0%(+38.1)#7
8.68711, Nebraska82.1%44.3%(+37.8)#144.0%(+38.1)#8
9.98850, Washington81.4%43.0%(+38.4)#144.0%(+37.4)#9
10.24983, West Virginia81.1%45.7%(+35.4)#144.0%(+37.1)#10
11.58464, North Dakota81.1%45.0%(+36.1)#144.0%(+37.1)#11
12.51525, Iowa81.0%44.6%(+36.4)#144.0%(+37.0)#12
13.24265, Virginia80.4%43.9%(+36.5)#144.0%(+36.4)#13
14.23828, Virginia80.4%43.9%(+36.5)#244.0%(+36.4)#14
15.15849, Pennsylvania80.3%44.2%(+36.1)#144.0%(+36.3)#15
16.12860, New York80.3%42.4%(+37.9)#244.0%(+36.3)#16
17.71940, Arkansas79.9%43.2%(+36.7)#144.0%(+35.9)#17
18.61773, Illinois79.9%43.1%(+36.8)#244.0%(+35.9)#18
19.77640, Texas79.7%43.1%(+36.6)#144.0%(+35.7)#19
20.51527, Iowa79.4%44.6%(+34.8)#244.0%(+35.4)#20
21.59545, Montana79.4%46.2%(+33.2)#144.0%(+35.4)#21
22.05907, Vermont79.3%49.0%(+30.3)#144.0%(+35.3)#22
23.95562, California79.2%43.4%(+35.8)#144.0%(+35.2)#23
24.71456, Louisiana79.2%43.8%(+35.4)#144.0%(+35.2)#24
25.87752, New Mexico79.0%47.3%(+31.7)#144.0%(+35.0)#25
26.11005, New York78.5%42.4%(+36.1)#344.0%(+34.5)#26
27.68328, Nebraska78.5%44.3%(+34.2)#244.0%(+34.5)#27
28.62217, Illinois78.3%43.1%(+35.2)#344.0%(+34.3)#28
29.78569, Texas78.1%43.1%(+35.0)#244.0%(+34.1)#29
30.05774, Vermont78.1%49.0%(+29.1)#244.0%(+34.1)#30
31.68442, Nebraska78.1%44.3%(+33.8)#344.0%(+34.1)#31
32.57027, South Dakota77.9%46.5%(+31.4)#244.0%(+33.9)#32
33.28366, North Carolina77.5%44.2%(+33.3)#144.0%(+33.5)#33
34.59212, Montana77.5%46.2%(+31.3)#244.0%(+33.5)#34
35.17729, Pennsylvania77.5%44.2%(+33.3)#244.0%(+33.5)#35
36.43006, Ohio77.4%44.6%(+32.8)#144.0%(+33.4)#36
37.07723, New Jersey77.3%45.0%(+32.3)#144.0%(+33.3)#37
38.85623, Arizona77.2%44.1%(+33.1)#144.0%(+33.2)#38
39.36475, Alabama77.2%44.6%(+32.6)#144.0%(+33.2)#39
40.62865, Illinois77.2%43.1%(+34.1)#444.0%(+33.2)#40
41.81049, Colorado77.2%43.6%(+33.6)#244.0%(+33.2)#41
42.45831, Ohio77.1%44.6%(+32.5)#244.0%(+33.1)#42
43.67865, Kansas77.1%44.4%(+32.7)#144.0%(+33.1)#43
44.43066, Ohio77.0%44.6%(+32.4)#344.0%(+33.0)#44
45.64498, Missouri76.9%44.1%(+32.8)#244.0%(+32.9)#45
46.83434, Idaho76.4%44.2%(+32.2)#144.0%(+32.4)#46
47.14740, New York76.4%42.4%(+34.0)#444.0%(+32.4)#47
48.83420, Idaho76.3%44.2%(+32.1)#244.0%(+32.3)#48
49.68844, Nebraska76.3%44.3%(+32.0)#444.0%(+32.3)#49
50.28135, North Carolina76.2%44.2%(+32.0)#244.0%(+32.2)#50
51.40510, Kentucky76.2%44.2%(+32.0)#144.0%(+32.2)#51
52.52554, Iowa76.2%44.6%(+31.6)#344.0%(+32.2)#52
53.31044, Georgia76.1%44.4%(+31.7)#144.0%(+32.1)#53
54.98624, Washington76.1%43.0%(+33.1)#244.0%(+32.1)#54
55.57748, South Dakota76.1%46.5%(+29.6)#344.0%(+32.1)#55
56.50444, Iowa76.0%44.6%(+31.4)#444.0%(+32.0)#56
57.17769, Pennsylvania75.7%44.2%(+31.5)#344.0%(+31.7)#57
58.65470, Missouri75.5%44.1%(+31.4)#344.0%(+31.5)#58
59.76821, Texas75.3%43.1%(+32.2)#344.0%(+31.3)#59
60.66431, Kansas75.3%44.4%(+30.9)#244.0%(+31.3)#60
61.62244, Illinois75.2%43.1%(+32.1)#544.0%(+31.2)#61
62.95914, California75.2%43.4%(+31.8)#244.0%(+31.2)#62
63.47145, Indiana75.1%44.5%(+30.6)#244.0%(+31.1)#63
64.05070, Vermont75.1%49.0%(+26.1)#344.0%(+31.1)#64
65.15962, Pennsylvania75.1%44.2%(+30.9)#444.0%(+31.1)#65
66.96134, California74.7%43.4%(+31.3)#344.0%(+30.7)#66
67.82639, Wyoming74.6%46.7%(+27.9)#144.0%(+30.6)#67
68.64682, Missouri74.4%44.1%(+30.3)#444.0%(+30.4)#68
69.93445, California74.3%43.4%(+30.9)#444.0%(+30.3)#69
70.70354, Louisiana74.3%43.8%(+30.5)#244.0%(+30.3)#70
71.76443, Texas74.3%43.1%(+31.2)#444.0%(+30.3)#71
72.15637, Pennsylvania74.3%44.2%(+30.1)#544.0%(+30.3)#72
73.46731, Indiana74.3%44.5%(+29.8)#344.0%(+30.3)#73
74.22535, Virginia74.3%43.9%(+30.4)#344.0%(+30.3)#74
75.79252, Texas74.2%43.1%(+31.1)#544.0%(+30.2)#75
76.49338, Michigan74.2%44.4%(+29.8)#144.0%(+30.2)#76
77.94567, California74.2%43.4%(+30.8)#544.0%(+30.2)#77
78.57213, South Dakota74.2%46.5%(+27.7)#444.0%(+30.2)#78
79.25962, West Virginia74.1%45.7%(+28.4)#244.0%(+30.1)#79
80.30730, Georgia74.1%44.4%(+29.7)#244.0%(+30.1)#80
81.79343, Texas74.1%43.1%(+31.0)#644.0%(+30.1)#81
82.95488, California74.1%43.4%(+30.7)#644.0%(+30.1)#82
83.34216, Florida74.0%46.0%(+28.0)#144.0%(+30.0)#83
84.76251, Texas73.8%43.1%(+30.7)#744.0%(+29.8)#84
85.67658, Kansas73.8%44.4%(+29.4)#344.0%(+29.8)#85
86.46996, Indiana73.7%44.5%(+29.2)#444.0%(+29.7)#86
87.01229, Massachusetts73.6%44.0%(+29.6)#144.0%(+29.6)#87
88.71638, Arkansas73.5%43.2%(+30.3)#244.0%(+29.5)#88
89.50628, Iowa73.4%44.6%(+28.8)#544.0%(+29.4)#89
90.61067, Illinois73.4%43.1%(+30.3)#644.0%(+29.4)#90
91.51230, Iowa73.3%44.6%(+28.7)#644.0%(+29.3)#91
92.96065, California73.3%43.4%(+29.9)#744.0%(+29.3)#92
93.54430, Wisconsin73.3%45.3%(+28.0)#144.0%(+29.3)#93
94.18430, Pennsylvania73.3%44.2%(+29.1)#644.0%(+29.3)#94
95.10537, New York73.2%42.4%(+30.8)#544.0%(+29.2)#95
96.13658, New York73.2%42.4%(+30.8)#644.0%(+29.2)#96
97.76935, Texas73.2%43.1%(+30.1)#844.0%(+29.2)#97
98.15345, Pennsylvania73.2%44.2%(+29.0)#744.0%(+29.2)#98
99.78672, Texas73.2%43.1%(+30.1)#944.0%(+29.2)#99
100.58783, North Dakota73.2%45.0%(+28.2)#244.0%(+29.2)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States are:
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States?
99612 has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States with 94.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States is 44.0%.