Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Bhutanese Population in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Bhutanese
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Bhutanese Population in the United States

0.00%
80.00%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Bhutanese Population in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Bhutanese Population in the United States

Zip Code Bhutanese vs State vs National
1. 96759, Hawaii 68.23% 22.17% (+46.1)#1 0.49% (+67.7)#1
2. 36038, Alabama 52.78% 0.14% (+52.6)#1 0.49% (+52.3)#2
3. 96765, Hawaii 43.79% 22.17% (+21.6)#2 0.49% (+43.3)#3
4. 96821, Hawaii 42.78% 22.17% (+20.6)#3 0.49% (+42.3)#4
5. 96789, Hawaii 40.46% 22.17% (+18.3)#4 0.49% (+40.0)#5
6. 95925, California 39.36% 1.22% (+38.1)#1 0.49% (+38.9)#6
7. 96701, Hawaii 39.14% 22.17% (+17.0)#5 0.49% (+38.7)#7
8. 96796, Hawaii 37.83% 22.17% (+15.7)#6 0.49% (+37.3)#8
9. 96816, Hawaii 37.65% 22.17% (+15.5)#7 0.49% (+37.2)#9
10. 96825, Hawaii 36.47% 22.17% (+14.3)#8 0.49% (+36.0)#10
11. 96750, Hawaii 36.46% 22.17% (+14.3)#9 0.49% (+36.0)#11
12. 96744, Hawaii 36.04% 22.17% (+13.9)#10 0.49% (+35.6)#12
13. 96822, Hawaii 35.67% 22.17% (+13.5)#11 0.49% (+35.2)#13
14. 96782, Hawaii 34.58% 22.17% (+12.4)#12 0.49% (+34.1)#14
15. 96813, Hawaii 33.55% 22.17% (+11.4)#13 0.49% (+33.1)#15
16. 96814, Hawaii 32.13% 22.17% (+9.97)#14 0.49% (+31.6)#16
17. 96720, Hawaii 30.85% 22.17% (+8.68)#15 0.49% (+30.4)#17
18. 96826, Hawaii 29.12% 22.17% (+6.96)#16 0.49% (+28.6)#18
19. 25624, West Virginia 28.53% 0.12% (+28.4)#1 0.49% (+28.0)#19
20. 96815, Hawaii 23.95% 22.17% (+1.79)#17 0.49% (+23.5)#20
21. 96817, Hawaii 23.43% 22.17% (+1.27)#18 0.49% (+22.9)#21
22. 96751, Hawaii 23.23% 22.17% (+1.06)#19 0.49% (+22.7)#22
23. 96746, Hawaii 22.30% 22.17% (+0.137)#20 0.49% (+21.8)#23
24. 96793, Hawaii 21.85% 22.17% (-0.318)#21 0.49% (+21.4)#24
25. 96728, Hawaii 21.79% 22.17% (-0.374)#22 0.49% (+21.3)#25
26. 96766, Hawaii 21.53% 22.17% (-0.630)#23 0.49% (+21.0)#26
27. 96705, Hawaii 21.10% 22.17% (-1.07)#24 0.49% (+20.6)#27
28. 96774, Hawaii 20.75% 22.17% (-1.42)#25 0.49% (+20.3)#28
29. 96732, Hawaii 20.64% 22.17% (-1.53)#26 0.49% (+20.1)#29
30. 96760, Hawaii 20.34% 22.17% (-1.82)#27 0.49% (+19.9)#30
31. 96741, Hawaii 20.25% 22.17% (-1.91)#28 0.49% (+19.8)#31
32. 96768, Hawaii 19.87% 22.17% (-2.30)#29 0.49% (+19.4)#32
33. 96719, Hawaii 19.42% 22.17% (-2.74)#30 0.49% (+18.9)#33
34. 90504, California 19.11% 1.22% (+17.9)#2 0.49% (+18.6)#34
35. 96797, Hawaii 18.98% 22.17% (-3.19)#31 0.49% (+18.5)#35
36. 97904, Oregon 18.92% 0.85% (+18.1)#1 0.49% (+18.4)#36
37. 96781, Hawaii 18.66% 22.17% (-3.50)#32 0.49% (+18.2)#37
38. 96716, Hawaii 18.48% 22.17% (-3.69)#33 0.49% (+18.0)#38
39. 01718, Massachusetts 18.18% 0.30% (+17.9)#1 0.49% (+17.7)#39
40. 96707, Hawaii 17.85% 22.17% (-4.31)#34 0.49% (+17.4)#40
41. 96706, Hawaii 17.61% 22.17% (-4.56)#35 0.49% (+17.1)#41
42. 96752, Hawaii 17.48% 22.17% (-4.69)#36 0.49% (+17.0)#42
43. 96734, Hawaii 17.29% 22.17% (-4.87)#37 0.49% (+16.8)#43
44. 96743, Hawaii 17.09% 22.17% (-5.08)#38 0.49% (+16.6)#44
45. 39826, Georgia 16.99% 0.22% (+16.8)#1 0.49% (+16.5)#45
46. 96755, Hawaii 16.75% 22.17% (-5.42)#39 0.49% (+16.3)#46
47. 90248, California 16.14% 1.22% (+14.9)#3 0.49% (+15.6)#47
48. 96818, Hawaii 16.12% 22.17% (-6.04)#40 0.49% (+15.6)#48
49. 10546, New York 16.05% 0.31% (+15.7)#1 0.49% (+15.6)#49
50. 96763, Hawaii 15.51% 22.17% (-6.66)#41 0.49% (+15.0)#50
51. 96730, Hawaii 15.45% 22.17% (-6.72)#42 0.49% (+15.0)#51
52. 96795, Hawaii 15.02% 22.17% (-7.15)#43 0.49% (+14.5)#52
53. 41751, Kentucky 14.69% 0.16% (+14.5)#1 0.49% (+14.2)#53
54. 96725, Hawaii 14.30% 22.17% (-7.87)#44 0.49% (+13.8)#54
55. 96773, Hawaii 14.29% 22.17% (-7.88)#45 0.49% (+13.8)#55
56. 96819, Hawaii 14.13% 22.17% (-8.04)#46 0.49% (+13.6)#56
57. 96748, Hawaii 14.11% 22.17% (-8.06)#47 0.49% (+13.6)#57
58. 03770, New Hampshire 13.79% 0.25% (+13.5)#1 0.49% (+13.3)#58
59. 96757, Hawaii 13.67% 22.17% (-8.50)#48 0.49% (+13.2)#59
60. 96756, Hawaii 13.56% 22.17% (-8.61)#49 0.49% (+13.1)#60
61. 96771, Hawaii 13.48% 22.17% (-8.68)#50 0.49% (+13.0)#61
62. 88042, New Mexico 13.46% 0.28% (+13.2)#1 0.49% (+13.0)#62
63. 96790, Hawaii 12.96% 22.17% (-9.21)#51 0.49% (+12.5)#63
64. 96708, Hawaii 12.83% 22.17% (-9.33)#52 0.49% (+12.3)#64
65. 12153, New York 12.80% 0.31% (+12.5)#2 0.49% (+12.3)#65
66. 96712, Hawaii 12.76% 22.17% (-9.40)#53 0.49% (+12.3)#66
67. 86029, Arizona 12.38% 0.41% (+12.0)#1 0.49% (+11.9)#67
68. 96786, Hawaii 12.37% 22.17% (-9.80)#54 0.49% (+11.9)#68
69. 96749, Hawaii 12.36% 22.17% (-9.81)#55 0.49% (+11.9)#69
70. 96791, Hawaii 12.28% 22.17% (-9.89)#56 0.49% (+11.8)#70
71. 90503, California 12.08% 1.22% (+10.9)#4 0.49% (+11.6)#71
72. 96776, Hawaii 11.68% 22.17% (-10.5)#57 0.49% (+11.2)#72
73. 08346, New Jersey 11.63% 0.29% (+11.3)#1 0.49% (+11.1)#73
74. 96704, Hawaii 11.53% 22.17% (-10.6)#58 0.49% (+11.0)#74
75. 90505, California 11.43% 1.22% (+10.2)#5 0.49% (+10.9)#75
76. 51650, Iowa 10.92% 0.13% (+10.8)#1 0.49% (+10.4)#76
77. 90275, California 10.79% 1.22% (+9.57)#6 0.49% (+10.3)#77
78. 96727, Hawaii 10.78% 22.17% (-11.4)#59 0.49% (+10.3)#78
79. 02561, Massachusetts 10.60% 0.30% (+10.3)#2 0.49% (+10.1)#79
80. 40209, Kentucky 10.49% 0.16% (+10.3)#2 0.49% (+10.00)#80
81. 96740, Hawaii 10.45% 22.17% (-11.7)#60 0.49% (+9.97)#81
82. 96783, Hawaii 10.39% 22.17% (-11.8)#61 0.49% (+9.91)#82
83. 29856, South Carolina 10.38% 0.15% (+10.2)#1 0.49% (+9.89)#83
84. 96792, Hawaii 10.38% 22.17% (-11.8)#62 0.49% (+9.89)#84
85. 96769, Hawaii 10.36% 22.17% (-11.8)#63 0.49% (+9.87)#85
86. 83636, Idaho 10.14% 0.54% (+9.60)#1 0.49% (+9.65)#86
87. 46798, Indiana 9.99% 0.19% (+9.80)#1 0.49% (+9.50)#87
88. 12769, New York 9.92% 0.31% (+9.61)#3 0.49% (+9.43)#88
89. 98670, Washington 9.84% 1.21% (+8.62)#1 0.49% (+9.35)#89
90. 73705, Oklahoma 9.78% 0.21% (+9.57)#1 0.49% (+9.29)#90
91. 90247, California 9.69% 1.22% (+8.47)#7 0.49% (+9.20)#91
92. 92606, California 9.40% 1.22% (+8.18)#8 0.49% (+8.91)#92
93. 96714, Hawaii 9.39% 22.17% (-12.8)#64 0.49% (+8.90)#93
94. 48377, Michigan 9.31% 0.24% (+9.07)#1 0.49% (+8.82)#94
95. 96764, Hawaii 9.29% 22.17% (-12.9)#65 0.49% (+8.81)#95
96. 96753, Hawaii 9.28% 22.17% (-12.9)#66 0.49% (+8.79)#96
97. 91125, California 9.24% 1.22% (+8.02)#9 0.49% (+8.75)#97
98. 93067, California 9.21% 1.22% (+7.99)#10 0.49% (+8.72)#98
99. 90501, California 9.19% 1.22% (+7.97)#11 0.49% (+8.70)#99
100. 73743, Oklahoma 9.09% 0.21% (+8.88)#2 0.49% (+8.60)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Bhutanese Population in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Bhutanese Population in the United States are:
#1
68.23%
#2
52.78%
#3
43.79%
#4
42.78%
#5
40.46%
#6
39.36%
#7
39.14%
#8
37.83%
#9
37.65%
#10
36.47%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Bhutanese Population in the United States?
96759 has the Highest Percentage of Bhutanese Population in the United States with 68.23%.
What is the Percentage of Bhutanese Population in the United States?
Percentage of Bhutanese Population in the United States is 0.49%.