Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Bio, Nature & Agricultural in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Bio, Nature & Agricultural
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Bio, Nature & Agricultural in the United States

80.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Bio, Nature & Agricultural in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Bio, Nature & Agricultural in the United States

Zip Code % Graduates vs State vs National
1. 27412, North Carolina 100.0% 6.5% (+93.5)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#1
2. 79013, Texas 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#2
3. 57007, South Dakota 100.0% 9.1% (+90.9)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#3
4. 38929, Mississippi 100.0% 7.1% (+92.9)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#4
5. 08320, New Jersey 100.0% 5.2% (+94.8)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#5
6. 77663, Texas 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#6
7. 26338, West Virginia 100.0% 6.9% (+93.1)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#7
8. 77616, Texas 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#3 6.4% (+93.6)#8
9. 83841, Idaho 100.0% 8.8% (+91.2)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#9
10. 92309, California 100.0% 6.8% (+93.2)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#10
11. 96853, Hawaii 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#11
12. 94922, California 100.0% 6.8% (+93.2)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#12
13. 78567, Texas 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#4 6.4% (+93.6)#13
14. 83809, Idaho 100.0% 8.8% (+91.2)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#14
15. 22811, Virginia 100.0% 5.7% (+94.3)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#15
16. 32509, Florida 100.0% 5.1% (+94.9)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#16
17. 78008, Texas 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#5 6.4% (+93.6)#17
18. 79719, Texas 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#6 6.4% (+93.6)#18
19. 62297, Illinois 100.0% 5.7% (+94.3)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#20
20. 40940, Kentucky 100.0% 6.6% (+93.4)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#21
21. 65773, Missouri 100.0% 7.0% (+93.0)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#22
22. 19731, Delaware 100.0% 6.2% (+93.8)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#23
23. 93669, California 100.0% 6.8% (+93.2)#3 6.4% (+93.6)#24
24. 45783, Ohio 100.0% 6.0% (+94.0)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#25
25. 24105, Virginia 100.0% 5.7% (+94.3)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#26
26. 89828, Nevada 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#27
27. 29836, South Carolina 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#28
28. 47580, Indiana 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#29
29. 24464, Virginia 100.0% 5.7% (+94.3)#3 6.4% (+93.6)#30
30. 24945, West Virginia 100.0% 6.9% (+93.1)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#31
31. 72682, Arkansas 100.0% 7.8% (+92.2)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#32
32. 95233, California 100.0% 6.8% (+93.2)#4 6.4% (+93.6)#33
33. 92259, California 100.0% 6.8% (+93.2)#5 6.4% (+93.6)#34
34. 72930, Arkansas 100.0% 7.8% (+92.2)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#35
35. 17570, Pennsylvania 100.0% 6.5% (+93.5)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#36
36. 12172, New York 100.0% 5.0% (+95.0)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#37
37. 72170, Arkansas 100.0% 7.8% (+92.2)#3 6.4% (+93.6)#38
38. 67071, Kansas 100.0% 7.6% (+92.4)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#39
39. 59456, Montana 100.0% 11.2% (+88.8)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#40
40. 76841, Texas 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#7 6.4% (+93.6)#41
41. 72341, Arkansas 100.0% 7.8% (+92.2)#4 6.4% (+93.6)#42
42. 45435, Ohio 100.0% 6.0% (+94.0)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#43
43. 58769, North Dakota 100.0% 8.2% (+91.8)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#44
44. 32463, Florida 100.0% 5.1% (+94.9)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#45
45. 57634, South Dakota 100.0% 9.1% (+90.9)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#46
46. 83802, Idaho 100.0% 8.8% (+91.2)#3 6.4% (+93.6)#47
47. 63745, Missouri 100.0% 7.0% (+93.0)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#48
48. 61731, Illinois 100.0% 5.7% (+94.3)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#49
49. 15756, Pennsylvania 100.0% 6.5% (+93.5)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#50
50. 50272, Iowa 100.0% 8.9% (+91.1)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#51
51. 02815, Rhode Island 100.0% 6.3% (+93.7)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#52
52. 17778, Pennsylvania 100.0% 6.5% (+93.5)#3 6.4% (+93.6)#53
53. 67744, Kansas 100.0% 7.6% (+92.4)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#54
54. 83012, Wyoming 100.0% 11.4% (+88.6)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#55
55. 65461, Missouri 100.0% 7.0% (+93.0)#3 6.4% (+93.6)#56
56. 88422, New Mexico 100.0% 7.8% (+92.2)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#57
57. 17576, Pennsylvania 100.0% 6.5% (+93.5)#4 6.4% (+93.6)#58
58. 52220, Iowa 100.0% 8.9% (+91.1)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#59
59. 97751, Oregon 100.0% 8.7% (+91.3)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#60
60. 84304, Utah 100.0% 5.9% (+94.1)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#61
61. 74368, Oklahoma 100.0% 6.9% (+93.1)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#62
62. 63763, Missouri 100.0% 7.0% (+93.0)#4 6.4% (+93.6)#63
63. 99363, Washington 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#64
64. 67840, Kansas 100.0% 7.6% (+92.4)#3 6.4% (+93.6)#65
65. 79783, Texas 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#8 6.4% (+93.6)#66
66. 57457, South Dakota 100.0% 9.1% (+90.9)#3 6.4% (+93.6)#67
67. 05678, Vermont 100.0% 8.9% (+91.1)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#68
68. 83253, Idaho 100.0% 8.8% (+91.2)#4 6.4% (+93.6)#69
69. 46345, Indiana 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#70
70. 66970, Kansas 100.0% 7.6% (+92.4)#4 6.4% (+93.6)#71
71. 78635, Texas 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#9 6.4% (+93.6)#72
72. 76885, Texas 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#10 6.4% (+93.6)#73
73. 13102, New York 100.0% 5.0% (+95.0)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#74
74. 74761, Oklahoma 100.0% 6.9% (+93.1)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#75
75. 50551, Iowa 100.0% 8.9% (+91.1)#3 6.4% (+93.6)#76
76. 69220, Nebraska 100.0% 8.7% (+91.3)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#77
77. 59535, Montana 100.0% 11.2% (+88.8)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#78
78. 15476, Pennsylvania 100.0% 6.5% (+93.5)#5 6.4% (+93.6)#79
79. 81043, Colorado 100.0% 7.6% (+92.4)#1 6.4% (+93.6)#80
80. 82219, Wyoming 100.0% 11.4% (+88.6)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#81
81. 93633, California 100.0% 6.8% (+93.2)#6 6.4% (+93.6)#82
82. 59058, Montana 100.0% 11.2% (+88.8)#3 6.4% (+93.6)#83
83. 59319, Montana 100.0% 11.2% (+88.8)#4 6.4% (+93.6)#84
84. 38731, Mississippi 100.0% 7.1% (+92.9)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#85
85. 50521, Iowa 100.0% 8.9% (+91.1)#4 6.4% (+93.6)#86
86. 79073, Texas 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#11 6.4% (+93.6)#87
87. 79094, Texas 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#12 6.4% (+93.6)#88
88. 23955, Virginia 100.0% 5.7% (+94.3)#4 6.4% (+93.6)#89
89. 80479, Colorado 100.0% 7.6% (+92.4)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#90
90. 29062, South Carolina 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#91
91. 58310, North Dakota 100.0% 8.2% (+91.8)#2 6.4% (+93.6)#92
92. 79258, Texas 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#13 6.4% (+93.6)#93
93. 68375, Nebraska 94.1% 8.7% (+85.5)#2 6.4% (+87.8)#94
94. 55111, Minnesota 93.1% 7.2% (+85.9)#1 6.4% (+86.7)#95
95. 84734, Utah 92.3% 5.9% (+86.4)#2 6.4% (+86.0)#96
96. 88321, New Mexico 91.8% 7.8% (+84.0)#2 6.4% (+85.5)#97
97. 59077, Montana 91.7% 11.2% (+80.5)#5 6.4% (+85.3)#98
98. 97902, Oregon 91.7% 8.7% (+83.0)#2 6.4% (+85.3)#99
99. 68943, Nebraska 88.6% 8.7% (+80.0)#3 6.4% (+82.3)#100
100. 92140, California 88.2% 6.8% (+81.5)#7 6.4% (+81.9)#101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Bio, Nature & Agricultural in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Bio, Nature & Agricultural in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Bio, Nature & Agricultural in the United States?
27412 has the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Bio, Nature & Agricultural in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population with a Degree in Bio, Nature & Agricultural in the United States?
Percentage of Population with a Degree in Bio, Nature & Agricultural in the United States is 6.4%.