	Zip Code	Iraq	vs State	vs National
1.	48310, Michigan	9,587	55,954 (17.13%)#1	234,088 (4.10%)#1
2.	92020, California	7,055	40,941 (17.23%)#1	234,088 (3.01%)#2
3.	92021, California	4,910	40,941 (11.99%)#2	234,088 (2.10%)#3
4.	92019, California	4,842	40,941 (11.83%)#3	234,088 (2.07%)#4
5.	48312, Michigan	3,947	55,954 (7.05%)#2	234,088 (1.69%)#5
6.	48322, Michigan	3,478	55,954 (6.22%)#3	234,088 (1.49%)#6
7.	48126, Michigan	2,643	55,954 (4.72%)#4	234,088 (1.13%)#7
8.	77407, Texas	2,302	26,598 (8.65%)#1	234,088 (0.98%)#8
9.	37211, Tennessee	2,088	7,701 (27.11%)#1	234,088 (0.89%)#9
10.	48127, Michigan	2,086	55,954 (3.73%)#5	234,088 (0.89%)#10
11.	48314, Michigan	2,069	55,954 (3.70%)#6	234,088 (0.88%)#11
12.	48313, Michigan	1,967	55,954 (3.52%)#7	234,088 (0.84%)#12
13.	48092, Michigan	1,841	55,954 (3.29%)#8	234,088 (0.79%)#13
14.	77084, Texas	1,356	26,598 (5.10%)#2	234,088 (0.58%)#14
15.	60077, Illinois	1,338	13,214 (10.13%)#1	234,088 (0.57%)#15
16.	48317, Michigan	1,282	55,954 (2.29%)#9	234,088 (0.55%)#16
17.	60076, Illinois	1,245	13,214 (9.42%)#2	234,088 (0.53%)#17
18.	48331, Michigan	1,201	55,954 (2.15%)#10	234,088 (0.51%)#18
19.	48044, Michigan	1,197	55,954 (2.14%)#11	234,088 (0.51%)#19
20.	37135, Tennessee	1,170	7,701 (15.19%)#2	234,088 (0.50%)#20
21.	91205, California	1,167	40,941 (2.85%)#4	234,088 (0.50%)#21
22.	48083, Michigan	1,156	55,954 (2.07%)#12	234,088 (0.49%)#22
23.	60016, Illinois	1,120	13,214 (8.48%)#3	234,088 (0.48%)#23
24.	48071, Michigan	1,115	55,954 (1.99%)#13	234,088 (0.48%)#24
25.	37013, Tennessee	1,087	7,701 (14.12%)#3	234,088 (0.46%)#25
26.	48228, Michigan	1,049	55,954 (1.87%)#14	234,088 (0.45%)#26
27.	68521, Nebraska	1,024	3,173 (32.27%)#1	234,088 (0.44%)#27
28.	48093, Michigan	998	55,954 (1.78%)#15	234,088 (0.43%)#28
29.	01089, Massachusetts	987	4,735 (20.84%)#1	234,088 (0.42%)#29
30.	75081, Texas	944	26,598 (3.55%)#3	234,088 (0.40%)#30
31.	78254, Texas	905	26,598 (3.40%)#4	234,088 (0.39%)#31
32.	92071, California	841	40,941 (2.05%)#5	234,088 (0.36%)#32
33.	60714, Illinois	830	13,214 (6.28%)#4	234,088 (0.35%)#33
34.	48390, Michigan	829	55,954 (1.48%)#16	234,088 (0.35%)#34
35.	01605, Massachusetts	813	4,735 (17.17%)#2	234,088 (0.35%)#35
36.	76002, Texas	778	26,598 (2.93%)#5	234,088 (0.33%)#36
37.	22801, Virginia	774	9,351 (8.28%)#1	234,088 (0.33%)#37
38.	80017, Colorado	766	3,281 (23.35%)#1	234,088 (0.33%)#38
39.	48323, Michigan	741	55,954 (1.32%)#17	234,088 (0.32%)#39
40.	91206, California	737	40,941 (1.80%)#6	234,088 (0.31%)#40
41.	85382, Arizona	727	9,335 (7.79%)#1	234,088 (0.31%)#41
42.	85308, Arizona	723	9,335 (7.75%)#2	234,088 (0.31%)#42
43.	48393, Michigan	713	55,954 (1.27%)#18	234,088 (0.30%)#43
44.	77449, Texas	711	26,598 (2.67%)#6	234,088 (0.30%)#44
45.	60659, Illinois	707	13,214 (5.35%)#5	234,088 (0.30%)#45
46.	48088, Michigan	702	55,954 (1.25%)#19	234,088 (0.30%)#46
47.	91977, California	692	40,941 (1.69%)#7	234,088 (0.30%)#47
48.	60645, Illinois	688	13,214 (5.21%)#6	234,088 (0.29%)#48
49.	77063, Texas	652	26,598 (2.45%)#7	234,088 (0.28%)#49
50.	48076, Michigan	632	55,954 (1.13%)#20	234,088 (0.27%)#50
51.	37912, Tennessee	625	7,701 (8.12%)#4	234,088 (0.27%)#51
52.	48334, Michigan	610	55,954 (1.09%)#21	234,088 (0.26%)#52
53.	77077, Texas	591	26,598 (2.22%)#8	234,088 (0.25%)#53
54.	77074, Texas	585	26,598 (2.20%)#9	234,088 (0.25%)#54
55.	30213, Georgia	583	3,921 (14.87%)#1	234,088 (0.25%)#55
56.	61108, Illinois	573	13,214 (4.34%)#7	234,088 (0.24%)#56
57.	64117, Missouri	544	3,509 (15.50%)#1	234,088 (0.23%)#57
58.	78201, Texas	535	26,598 (2.01%)#10	234,088 (0.23%)#58
59.	80231, Colorado	534	3,281 (16.28%)#2	234,088 (0.23%)#59
60.	95355, California	532	40,941 (1.30%)#8	234,088 (0.23%)#60
61.	34746, Florida	531	4,966 (10.69%)#1	234,088 (0.23%)#61
62.	60053, Illinois	525	13,214 (3.97%)#8	234,088 (0.22%)#62
63.	78610, Texas	518	26,598 (1.95%)#11	234,088 (0.22%)#63
64.	56560, Minnesota	516	2,283 (22.60%)#1	234,088 (0.22%)#64
65.	48315, Michigan	513	55,954 (0.92%)#22	234,088 (0.22%)#65
66.	95382, California	508	40,941 (1.24%)#9	234,088 (0.22%)#66
67.	78249, Texas	485	26,598 (1.82%)#12	234,088 (0.21%)#67
68.	77082, Texas	485	26,598 (1.82%)#13	234,088 (0.21%)#68
69.	91202, California	476	40,941 (1.16%)#10	234,088 (0.20%)#69
70.	84107, Utah	475	1,700 (27.94%)#1	234,088 (0.20%)#70
71.	48035, Michigan	473	55,954 (0.85%)#23	234,088 (0.20%)#71
72.	68522, Nebraska	471	3,173 (14.84%)#2	234,088 (0.20%)#72
73.	29210, South Carolina	469	855 (54.85%)#1	234,088 (0.20%)#73
74.	95356, California	467	40,941 (1.14%)#11	234,088 (0.20%)#74
75.	48197, Michigan	465	55,954 (0.83%)#24	234,088 (0.20%)#75
76.	95608, California	461	40,941 (1.13%)#12	234,088 (0.20%)#76
77.	85345, Arizona	459	9,335 (4.92%)#3	234,088 (0.20%)#77
78.	99223, Washington	457	6,259 (7.30%)#1	234,088 (0.20%)#78
79.	48038, Michigan	452	55,954 (0.81%)#25	234,088 (0.19%)#79
80.	48125, Michigan	445	55,954 (0.80%)#26	234,088 (0.19%)#80
81.	48180, Michigan	440	55,954 (0.79%)#27	234,088 (0.19%)#81
82.	64116, Missouri	439	3,509 (12.51%)#2	234,088 (0.19%)#82
83.	50265, Iowa	436	1,510 (28.87%)#1	234,088 (0.19%)#83
84.	63123, Missouri	435	3,509 (12.40%)#3	234,088 (0.19%)#84
85.	92040, California	417	40,941 (1.02%)#13	234,088 (0.18%)#85
86.	97006, Oregon	417	3,094 (13.48%)#1	234,088 (0.18%)#86
87.	20165, Virginia	417	9,351 (4.46%)#2	234,088 (0.18%)#87
88.	75098, Texas	416	26,598 (1.56%)#14	234,088 (0.18%)#88
89.	77042, Texas	411	26,598 (1.55%)#15	234,088 (0.18%)#89
90.	77494, Texas	408	26,598 (1.53%)#16	234,088 (0.17%)#90
91.	49009, Michigan	402	55,954 (0.72%)#28	234,088 (0.17%)#91
92.	20109, Virginia	396	9,351 (4.23%)#3	234,088 (0.17%)#92
93.	91978, California	395	40,941 (0.96%)#14	234,088 (0.17%)#93
94.	85301, Arizona	393	9,335 (4.21%)#4	234,088 (0.17%)#94
95.	85051, Arizona	385	9,335 (4.12%)#5	234,088 (0.16%)#95
96.	48030, Michigan	385	55,954 (0.69%)#29	234,088 (0.16%)#96
97.	53221, Wisconsin	382	1,171 (32.62%)#1	234,088 (0.16%)#97
98.	98042, Washington	379	6,259 (6.06%)#2	234,088 (0.16%)#98
99.	48316, Michigan	378	55,954 (0.68%)#30	234,088 (0.16%)#99
100.	14228, New York	378	6,152 (6.14%)#1	234,088 (0.16%)#100