Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Administrative & Support Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States

30.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.54946, Wisconsin100.0%3.3%(+96.7)#14.1%(+95.9)#1
2.30454, Georgia100.0%4.8%(+95.2)#14.1%(+95.9)#2
3.70654, Louisiana100.0%3.8%(+96.2)#14.1%(+95.9)#3
4.22432, Virginia100.0%4.1%(+95.9)#14.1%(+95.9)#4
5.47437, Indiana100.0%3.5%(+96.5)#14.1%(+95.9)#5
6.79847, Texas100.0%4.4%(+95.6)#14.1%(+95.9)#6
7.18223, Pennsylvania100.0%3.6%(+96.4)#14.1%(+95.9)#7
8.78565, Texas100.0%4.4%(+95.6)#24.1%(+95.9)#8
9.95325, California100.0%4.6%(+95.4)#14.1%(+95.9)#9
10.40058, Kentucky100.0%4.0%(+96.0)#14.1%(+95.9)#10
11.39595, Mississippi100.0%3.4%(+96.6)#14.1%(+95.9)#11
12.77473, Texas100.0%4.4%(+95.6)#34.1%(+95.9)#12
13.32634, Florida100.0%5.9%(+94.1)#14.1%(+95.9)#13
14.43914, Ohio100.0%3.7%(+96.3)#14.1%(+95.9)#14
15.62261, Illinois100.0%4.0%(+96.0)#14.1%(+95.9)#15
16.85902, Arizona100.0%5.4%(+94.6)#14.1%(+95.9)#16
17.35013, Alabama93.3%4.0%(+89.4)#14.1%(+89.2)#17
18.41607, Kentucky91.5%4.0%(+87.6)#24.1%(+87.4)#18
19.71859, Arkansas88.6%3.4%(+85.1)#14.1%(+84.4)#19
20.70082, Louisiana81.3%3.8%(+77.6)#24.1%(+77.2)#20
21.25688, West Virginia80.4%3.4%(+77.0)#14.1%(+76.3)#21
22.25204, West Virginia80.0%3.4%(+76.6)#24.1%(+75.9)#22
23.25972, West Virginia76.7%3.4%(+73.3)#34.1%(+72.6)#23
24.24862, West Virginia73.6%3.4%(+70.2)#44.1%(+69.5)#24
25.87562, New Mexico69.3%3.9%(+65.4)#14.1%(+65.2)#25
26.95429, California69.2%4.6%(+64.7)#24.1%(+65.1)#26
27.72686, Arkansas67.9%3.4%(+64.5)#24.1%(+63.8)#27
28.18455, Pennsylvania63.6%3.6%(+60.1)#24.1%(+59.5)#28
29.58343, North Dakota63.6%2.5%(+61.1)#14.1%(+59.5)#29
30.25647, West Virginia63.3%3.4%(+59.9)#54.1%(+59.2)#30
31.15435, Pennsylvania62.5%3.6%(+58.9)#34.1%(+58.4)#31
32.72573, Arkansas62.2%3.4%(+58.8)#34.1%(+58.1)#32
33.78352, Texas59.7%4.4%(+55.3)#44.1%(+55.5)#33
34.22729, Virginia59.1%4.1%(+55.0)#24.1%(+55.0)#34
35.82430, Wyoming58.3%2.4%(+55.9)#14.1%(+54.2)#35
36.69331, Nebraska58.3%3.4%(+55.0)#14.1%(+54.2)#36
37.71410, Louisiana57.9%3.8%(+54.1)#34.1%(+53.7)#37
38.18340, Pennsylvania55.6%3.6%(+52.0)#44.1%(+51.4)#38
39.20667, Maryland55.3%4.2%(+51.1)#14.1%(+51.1)#39
40.41397, Kentucky55.1%4.0%(+51.1)#34.1%(+50.9)#40
41.41729, Kentucky54.5%4.0%(+50.6)#44.1%(+50.4)#41
42.34141, Florida53.3%5.9%(+47.5)#24.1%(+49.2)#42
43.43805, Ohio53.1%3.7%(+49.4)#24.1%(+49.0)#43
44.16361, Pennsylvania52.9%3.6%(+49.4)#54.1%(+48.8)#44
45.72668, Arkansas52.5%3.4%(+49.1)#44.1%(+48.4)#45
46.12998, New York51.9%3.7%(+48.2)#14.1%(+47.7)#46
47.28708, North Carolina51.2%4.3%(+47.0)#14.1%(+47.1)#47
48.14166, New York50.0%3.7%(+46.3)#24.1%(+45.9)#48
49.95978, California50.0%4.6%(+45.4)#34.1%(+45.9)#49
50.30229, Georgia50.0%4.8%(+45.2)#24.1%(+45.9)#50
51.28424, North Carolina50.0%4.3%(+45.7)#24.1%(+45.9)#51
52.26376, West Virginia49.3%3.4%(+45.9)#64.1%(+45.1)#52
53.15078, Pennsylvania48.1%3.6%(+44.6)#64.1%(+44.0)#53
54.26572, West Virginia48.1%3.4%(+44.7)#74.1%(+44.0)#54
55.47445, Indiana47.9%3.5%(+44.4)#24.1%(+43.8)#55
56.13784, New York47.9%3.7%(+44.2)#34.1%(+43.8)#56
57.19316, Pennsylvania47.9%3.6%(+44.3)#74.1%(+43.7)#57
58.12489, New York47.6%3.7%(+43.9)#44.1%(+43.5)#58
59.82638, Wyoming47.1%2.4%(+44.6)#24.1%(+42.9)#59
60.29923, South Carolina46.5%4.8%(+41.7)#14.1%(+42.4)#60
61.88034, New Mexico45.3%3.9%(+41.4)#24.1%(+41.2)#61
62.93641, California45.0%4.6%(+40.4)#44.1%(+40.9)#62
63.29378, South Carolina44.9%4.8%(+40.1)#24.1%(+40.7)#63
64.96078, California44.3%4.6%(+39.7)#54.1%(+40.1)#64
65.22731, Virginia43.8%4.1%(+39.7)#34.1%(+39.6)#65
66.45428, Ohio43.8%3.7%(+40.0)#34.1%(+39.6)#66
67.43111, Ohio43.5%3.7%(+39.8)#44.1%(+39.3)#67
68.21762, Maryland43.0%4.2%(+38.7)#24.1%(+38.8)#68
69.41621, Kentucky42.9%4.0%(+38.9)#54.1%(+38.7)#69
70.52771, Iowa42.9%3.0%(+39.8)#14.1%(+38.7)#70
71.68056, Nebraska42.9%3.4%(+39.5)#24.1%(+38.7)#71
72.19369, Pennsylvania42.4%3.6%(+38.8)#84.1%(+38.3)#72
73.25942, West Virginia42.3%3.4%(+38.9)#84.1%(+38.2)#73
74.62843, Illinois42.1%4.0%(+38.1)#24.1%(+38.0)#74
75.19733, Delaware41.9%4.4%(+37.5)#14.1%(+37.7)#75
76.40865, Kentucky41.9%4.0%(+37.9)#64.1%(+37.7)#76
77.26546, West Virginia41.8%3.4%(+38.3)#94.1%(+37.6)#77
78.73097, Oklahoma41.5%3.6%(+37.9)#14.1%(+37.4)#78
79.49335, Michigan41.3%3.7%(+37.5)#14.1%(+37.1)#79
80.29122, South Carolina41.2%4.8%(+36.3)#34.1%(+37.0)#80
81.72005, Arkansas40.9%3.4%(+37.5)#54.1%(+36.8)#81
82.41606, Kentucky40.7%4.0%(+36.8)#74.1%(+36.6)#82
83.81612, Colorado40.2%4.1%(+36.1)#14.1%(+36.1)#83
84.40903, Kentucky40.0%4.0%(+36.0)#84.1%(+35.9)#84
85.51520, Iowa40.0%3.0%(+37.0)#24.1%(+35.9)#85
86.58236, North Dakota40.0%2.5%(+37.5)#24.1%(+35.9)#86
87.59932, Montana39.5%3.3%(+36.2)#14.1%(+35.3)#87
88.91980, California38.9%4.6%(+34.3)#64.1%(+34.7)#88
89.45147, Ohio38.6%3.7%(+34.9)#54.1%(+34.5)#89
90.62030, Illinois38.5%4.0%(+34.4)#34.1%(+34.3)#90
91.38772, Mississippi37.7%3.4%(+34.3)#24.1%(+33.6)#91
92.24539, Virginia37.6%4.1%(+33.5)#44.1%(+33.5)#92
93.70639, Louisiana37.2%3.8%(+33.4)#44.1%(+33.0)#93
94.95225, California37.1%4.6%(+32.5)#74.1%(+32.9)#94
95.61311, Illinois37.0%4.0%(+33.0)#44.1%(+32.9)#95
96.16730, Pennsylvania36.8%3.6%(+33.3)#94.1%(+32.7)#96
97.67518, Kansas36.8%3.2%(+33.7)#14.1%(+32.7)#97
98.77878, Texas36.8%4.4%(+32.4)#54.1%(+32.7)#98
99.60557, Illinois36.7%4.0%(+32.7)#54.1%(+32.6)#99
100.27917, North Carolina36.7%4.3%(+32.4)#34.1%(+32.5)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States?
54946 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States is 4.1%.