	Zip Code	Hmong	vs State	vs National
1.	83607, Idaho	314	314 (100.00%)#1	1,767 (17.77%)#1
2.	47802, Indiana	118	187 (63.10%)#1	1,767 (6.68%)#2
3.	40242, Kentucky	90	90 (100.00%)#1	1,767 (5.09%)#3
4.	60656, Illinois	65	82 (79.27%)#1	1,767 (3.68%)#4
5.	48706, Michigan	59	110 (53.64%)#1	1,767 (3.34%)#5
6.	75080, Texas	56	188 (29.79%)#1	1,767 (3.17%)#6
7.	47201, Indiana	55	187 (29.41%)#2	1,767 (3.11%)#7
8.	11797, New York	53	119 (44.54%)#1	1,767 (3.00%)#8
9.	21207, Maryland	51	51 (100.00%)#1	1,767 (2.89%)#9
10.	49014, Michigan	48	110 (43.64%)#2	1,767 (2.72%)#10
11.	32750, Florida	44	65 (67.69%)#1	1,767 (2.49%)#11
12.	90024, California	41	175 (23.43%)#1	1,767 (2.32%)#12
13.	53527, Wisconsin	40	40 (100.00%)#1	1,767 (2.26%)#13
14.	95815, California	36	175 (20.57%)#2	1,767 (2.04%)#14
15.	08102, New Jersey	36	87 (41.38%)#1	1,767 (2.04%)#15
16.	98087, Washington	35	48 (72.92%)#1	1,767 (1.98%)#16
17.	76203, Texas	33	188 (17.55%)#2	1,767 (1.87%)#17
18.	92057, California	32	175 (18.29%)#3	1,767 (1.81%)#18
19.	07003, New Jersey	29	87 (33.33%)#2	1,767 (1.64%)#19
20.	77479, Texas	28	188 (14.89%)#3	1,767 (1.58%)#20
21.	11213, New York	26	119 (21.85%)#2	1,767 (1.47%)#21
22.	78216, Texas	23	188 (12.23%)#4	1,767 (1.30%)#22
23.	63670, Missouri	23	38 (60.53%)#1	1,767 (1.30%)#23
24.	33463, Florida	21	65 (32.31%)#2	1,767 (1.19%)#24
25.	92071, California	20	175 (11.43%)#4	1,767 (1.13%)#25
26.	55051, Minnesota	20	21 (95.24%)#1	1,767 (1.13%)#26
27.	06412, Connecticut	19	42 (45.24%)#1	1,767 (1.08%)#27
28.	77840, Texas	18	188 (9.57%)#5	1,767 (1.02%)#28
29.	10038, New York	18	119 (15.13%)#3	1,767 (1.02%)#29
30.	93950, California	18	175 (10.29%)#5	1,767 (1.02%)#30
31.	07043, New Jersey	17	87 (19.54%)#3	1,767 (0.96%)#31
32.	11355, New York	16	119 (13.45%)#4	1,767 (0.91%)#32
33.	80021, Colorado	16	22 (72.73%)#1	1,767 (0.91%)#33
34.	90703, California	15	175 (8.57%)#6	1,767 (0.85%)#34
35.	60137, Illinois	15	82 (18.29%)#2	1,767 (0.85%)#35
36.	47150, Indiana	14	187 (7.49%)#3	1,767 (0.79%)#36
37.	92656, California	13	175 (7.43%)#7	1,767 (0.74%)#37
38.	27583, North Carolina	13	13 (100.00%)#1	1,767 (0.74%)#38
39.	06511, Connecticut	12	42 (28.57%)#2	1,767 (0.68%)#39
40.	78414, Texas	11	188 (5.85%)#6	1,767 (0.62%)#40
41.	76574, Texas	11	188 (5.85%)#7	1,767 (0.62%)#41
42.	63021, Missouri	10	38 (26.32%)#2	1,767 (0.57%)#42
43.	97124, Oregon	10	17 (58.82%)#1	1,767 (0.57%)#43
44.	99517, Alaska	10	10 (100.00%)#1	1,767 (0.57%)#44
45.	98387, Washington	9	48 (18.75%)#2	1,767 (0.51%)#45
46.	74960, Oklahoma	9	9 (100.00%)#1	1,767 (0.51%)#46
47.	06320, Connecticut	8	42 (19.05%)#3	1,767 (0.45%)#47
48.	85383, Arizona	7	11 (63.64%)#1	1,767 (0.40%)#48
49.	19143, Pennsylvania	7	13 (53.85%)#1	1,767 (0.40%)#49
50.	75965, Texas	7	188 (3.72%)#8	1,767 (0.40%)#50
51.	97828, Oregon	7	17 (41.18%)#2	1,767 (0.40%)#51
52.	10027, New York	6	119 (5.04%)#5	1,767 (0.34%)#52
53.	80516, Colorado	6	22 (27.27%)#2	1,767 (0.34%)#53
54.	15221, Pennsylvania	6	13 (46.15%)#2	1,767 (0.34%)#54
55.	63031, Missouri	5	38 (13.16%)#3	1,767 (0.28%)#55
56.	07102, New Jersey	5	87 (5.75%)#4	1,767 (0.28%)#56
57.	99208, Washington	4	48 (8.33%)#3	1,767 (0.23%)#57
58.	85354, Arizona	4	11 (36.36%)#2	1,767 (0.23%)#58
59.	69127, Nebraska	4	4 (100.00%)#1	1,767 (0.23%)#59
60.	06515, Connecticut	3	42 (7.14%)#4	1,767 (0.17%)#60
61.	20057, District Of Columbia	3	3 (100.00%)#1	1,767 (0.17%)#61
62.	36020, Alabama	3	5 (60.00%)#1	1,767 (0.17%)#62
63.	60640, Illinois	2	82 (2.44%)#3	1,767 (0.11%)#63
64.	49022, Michigan	2	110 (1.82%)#3	1,767 (0.11%)#64
65.	45359, Ohio	2	2 (100.00%)#1	1,767 (0.11%)#65
66.	36353, Alabama	2	5 (40.00%)#2	1,767 (0.11%)#66
67.	48309, Michigan	1	110 (0.91%)#4	1,767 (0.06%)#67
68.	55707, Minnesota	1	21 (4.76%)#2	1,767 (0.06%)#68
69.	50140, Iowa	1	1 (100.00%)#1	1,767 (0.06%)#69
70.	78631, Texas	1	188 (0.53%)#9	1,767 (0.06%)#70