Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Utility Gas Heating
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in the United States

100.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in the United States

Zip Code Utility Gas Heating vs State vs National
1. 13244, New York 100.0% 59.4% (+40.6)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#1
2. 12222, New York 100.0% 59.4% (+40.6)#2 47.1% (+52.9)#2
3. 48109, Michigan 100.0% 75.6% (+24.4)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#3
4. 08544, New Jersey 100.0% 73.8% (+26.2)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#4
5. 08240, New Jersey 100.0% 73.8% (+26.2)#2 47.1% (+52.9)#5
6. 93944, California 100.0% 62.3% (+37.7)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#6
7. 58105, North Dakota 100.0% 41.6% (+58.4)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#7
8. 12604, New York 100.0% 59.4% (+40.6)#3 47.1% (+52.9)#8
9. 84602, Utah 100.0% 79.8% (+20.2)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#9
10. 26506, West Virginia 100.0% 40.9% (+59.1)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#10
11. 12977, New York 100.0% 59.4% (+40.6)#4 47.1% (+52.9)#11
12. 59812, Montana 100.0% 51.8% (+48.2)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#12
13. 29424, South Carolina 100.0% 23.3% (+76.7)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#13
14. 15358, Pennsylvania 100.0% 51.3% (+48.7)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#14
15. 49894, Michigan 100.0% 75.6% (+24.4)#2 47.1% (+52.9)#15
16. 60512, Illinois 100.0% 76.1% (+23.9)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#16
17. 15444, Pennsylvania 100.0% 51.3% (+48.7)#2 47.1% (+52.9)#17
18. 16172, Pennsylvania 100.0% 51.3% (+48.7)#3 47.1% (+52.9)#18
19. 25040, West Virginia 100.0% 40.9% (+59.1)#2 47.1% (+52.9)#19
20. 50032, Iowa 100.0% 60.6% (+39.4)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#20
21. 37682, Tennessee 100.0% 31.2% (+68.8)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#21
22. 08350, New Jersey 100.0% 73.8% (+26.2)#3 47.1% (+52.9)#22
23. 99258, Washington 100.0% 33.9% (+66.1)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#23
24. 78843, Texas 100.0% 34.6% (+65.4)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#24
25. 14549, New York 100.0% 59.4% (+40.6)#5 47.1% (+52.9)#25
26. 48177, Michigan 100.0% 75.6% (+24.4)#3 47.1% (+52.9)#26
27. 84539, Utah 100.0% 79.8% (+20.2)#2 47.1% (+52.9)#27
28. 43721, Ohio 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#28
29. 48816, Michigan 100.0% 75.6% (+24.4)#4 47.1% (+52.9)#29
30. 25126, West Virginia 100.0% 40.9% (+59.1)#3 47.1% (+52.9)#30
31. 59756, Montana 100.0% 51.8% (+48.2)#2 47.1% (+52.9)#31
32. 80453, Colorado 100.0% 67.2% (+32.8)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#32
33. 46959, Indiana 100.0% 59.0% (+41.0)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#33
34. 90071, California 100.0% 62.3% (+37.7)#2 47.1% (+52.9)#34
35. 13611, New York 100.0% 59.4% (+40.6)#6 47.1% (+52.9)#35
36. 15711, Pennsylvania 100.0% 51.3% (+48.7)#4 47.1% (+52.9)#36
37. 15006, Pennsylvania 100.0% 51.3% (+48.7)#5 47.1% (+52.9)#37
38. 64165, Missouri 100.0% 50.0% (+50.0)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#38
39. 44850, Ohio 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#2 47.1% (+52.9)#39
40. 01242, Massachusetts 100.0% 52.0% (+48.0)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#40
41. 80131, Colorado 100.0% 67.2% (+32.8)#2 47.1% (+52.9)#41
42. 53501, Wisconsin 100.0% 65.5% (+34.5)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#42
43. 15038, Pennsylvania 100.0% 51.3% (+48.7)#6 47.1% (+52.9)#43
44. 15082, Pennsylvania 100.0% 51.3% (+48.7)#7 47.1% (+52.9)#44
45. 07979, New Jersey 100.0% 73.8% (+26.2)#4 47.1% (+52.9)#45
46. 15064, Pennsylvania 100.0% 51.3% (+48.7)#8 47.1% (+52.9)#46
47. 80546, Colorado 100.0% 67.2% (+32.8)#3 47.1% (+52.9)#47
48. 14752, New York 100.0% 59.4% (+40.6)#7 47.1% (+52.9)#48
49. 08032, New Jersey 100.0% 73.8% (+26.2)#5 47.1% (+52.9)#49
50. 36267, Alabama 100.0% 26.3% (+73.7)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#50
51. 15680, Pennsylvania 100.0% 51.3% (+48.7)#9 47.1% (+52.9)#51
52. 60557, Illinois 100.0% 76.1% (+23.9)#2 47.1% (+52.9)#52
53. 40280, Kentucky 100.0% 36.3% (+63.7)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#53
54. 25916, West Virginia 100.0% 40.9% (+59.1)#4 47.1% (+52.9)#54
55. 14302, New York 100.0% 59.4% (+40.6)#8 47.1% (+52.9)#55
56. 43027, Ohio 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#3 47.1% (+52.9)#56
57. 26178, West Virginia 100.0% 40.9% (+59.1)#5 47.1% (+52.9)#57
58. 61941, Illinois 100.0% 76.1% (+23.9)#3 47.1% (+52.9)#58
59. 44630, Ohio 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#4 47.1% (+52.9)#59
60. 61468, Illinois 100.0% 76.1% (+23.9)#4 47.1% (+52.9)#60
61. 25090, West Virginia 100.0% 40.9% (+59.1)#6 47.1% (+52.9)#61
62. 14722, New York 100.0% 59.4% (+40.6)#9 47.1% (+52.9)#62
63. 48143, Michigan 100.0% 75.6% (+24.4)#5 47.1% (+52.9)#63
64. 46154, Indiana 100.0% 59.0% (+41.0)#2 47.1% (+52.9)#64
65. 25048, West Virginia 100.0% 40.9% (+59.1)#7 47.1% (+52.9)#66
66. 48190, Michigan 100.0% 75.6% (+24.4)#6 47.1% (+52.9)#67
67. 44828, Ohio 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#5 47.1% (+52.9)#68
68. 16246, Pennsylvania 100.0% 51.3% (+48.7)#10 47.1% (+52.9)#69
69. 26421, West Virginia 100.0% 40.9% (+59.1)#8 47.1% (+52.9)#70
70. 15420, Pennsylvania 100.0% 51.3% (+48.7)#11 47.1% (+52.9)#71
71. 84334, Utah 100.0% 79.8% (+20.2)#3 47.1% (+52.9)#72
72. 49634, Michigan 100.0% 75.6% (+24.4)#7 47.1% (+52.9)#73
73. 94576, California 100.0% 62.3% (+37.7)#3 47.1% (+52.9)#74
74. 08528, New Jersey 100.0% 73.8% (+26.2)#6 47.1% (+52.9)#75
75. 89405, Nevada 100.0% 58.0% (+42.0)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#76
76. 61043, Illinois 100.0% 76.1% (+23.9)#5 47.1% (+52.9)#77
77. 11947, New York 100.0% 59.4% (+40.6)#10 47.1% (+52.9)#78
78. 26560, West Virginia 100.0% 40.9% (+59.1)#9 47.1% (+52.9)#79
79. 48620, Michigan 100.0% 75.6% (+24.4)#8 47.1% (+52.9)#80
80. 45789, Ohio 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#6 47.1% (+52.9)#81
81. 53176, Wisconsin 100.0% 65.5% (+34.5)#2 47.1% (+52.9)#82
82. 26424, West Virginia 100.0% 40.9% (+59.1)#10 47.1% (+52.9)#83
83. 14135, New York 100.0% 59.4% (+40.6)#11 47.1% (+52.9)#84
84. 49335, Michigan 100.0% 75.6% (+24.4)#9 47.1% (+52.9)#85
85. 50427, Iowa 100.0% 60.6% (+39.4)#2 47.1% (+52.9)#86
86. 25025, West Virginia 100.0% 40.9% (+59.1)#11 47.1% (+52.9)#87
87. 25149, West Virginia 100.0% 40.9% (+59.1)#12 47.1% (+52.9)#88
88. 45041, Ohio 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#7 47.1% (+52.9)#89
89. 96078, California 100.0% 62.3% (+37.7)#4 47.1% (+52.9)#90
90. 57741, South Dakota 100.0% 47.1% (+52.9)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#91
91. 81330, Colorado 100.0% 67.2% (+32.8)#4 47.1% (+52.9)#92
92. 53192, Wisconsin 100.0% 65.5% (+34.5)#3 47.1% (+52.9)#93
93. 44861, Ohio 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#8 47.1% (+52.9)#94
94. 50102, Iowa 100.0% 60.6% (+39.4)#3 47.1% (+52.9)#95
95. 41142, Kentucky 100.0% 36.3% (+63.7)#2 47.1% (+52.9)#96
96. 10519, New York 100.0% 59.4% (+40.6)#12 47.1% (+52.9)#97
97. 44619, Ohio 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#9 47.1% (+52.9)#98
98. 15733, Pennsylvania 100.0% 51.3% (+48.7)#12 47.1% (+52.9)#99
99. 61077, Illinois 100.0% 76.1% (+23.9)#6 47.1% (+52.9)#100
100. 14537, New York 100.0% 59.4% (+40.6)#13 47.1% (+52.9)#101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in the United States?
13244 has the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in the United States?
Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in the United States is 47.1%.