Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Public Transit
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States

60.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States

Zip Code % Public Transit vs State vs National
1. 44136, Ohio 87.1% 36.7% (+50.4)#1 38.5% (+48.6)#1
2. 56479, Minnesota 79.4% 35.8% (+43.6)#1 38.5% (+40.9)#2
3. 23507, Virginia 77.3% 39.9% (+37.4)#1 38.5% (+38.8)#3
4. 24401, Virginia 76.2% 39.9% (+36.3)#2 38.5% (+37.7)#4
5. 14586, New York 76.2% 39.6% (+36.6)#1 38.5% (+37.7)#5
6. 93561, California 76.1% 38.0% (+38.1)#1 38.5% (+37.6)#6
7. 81122, Colorado 75.3% 35.5% (+39.8)#1 38.5% (+36.8)#7
8. 44139, Ohio 75.0% 36.7% (+38.3)#2 38.5% (+36.5)#8
9. 32963, Florida 74.8% 41.3% (+33.5)#1 38.5% (+36.3)#9
10. 05201, Vermont 74.2% 32.6% (+41.6)#1 38.5% (+35.7)#10
11. 98532, Washington 74.0% 35.2% (+38.8)#1 38.5% (+35.5)#11
12. 63031, Missouri 73.2% 35.4% (+37.8)#1 38.5% (+34.7)#12
13. 56277, Minnesota 73.1% 35.8% (+37.3)#2 38.5% (+34.6)#13
14. 37849, Tennessee 73.0% 42.4% (+30.6)#1 38.5% (+34.5)#14
15. 52580, Iowa 72.9% 30.7% (+42.2)#1 38.5% (+34.4)#15
16. 33014, Florida 72.7% 41.3% (+31.4)#2 38.5% (+34.2)#16
17. 02554, Massachusetts 72.4% 35.9% (+36.5)#1 38.5% (+33.9)#17
18. 85381, Arizona 72.3% 37.1% (+35.2)#1 38.5% (+33.8)#18
19. 86047, Arizona 72.2% 37.1% (+35.1)#2 38.5% (+33.7)#19
20. 49270, Michigan 71.5% 34.1% (+37.4)#1 38.5% (+33.0)#20
21. 90210, California 71.4% 38.0% (+33.4)#2 38.5% (+32.9)#21
22. 01223, Massachusetts 71.2% 35.9% (+35.3)#2 38.5% (+32.7)#22
23. 44307, Ohio 71.0% 36.7% (+34.3)#3 38.5% (+32.5)#23
24. 44503, Ohio 70.4% 36.7% (+33.7)#4 38.5% (+31.9)#24
25. 33773, Florida 70.2% 41.3% (+28.9)#3 38.5% (+31.7)#25
26. 23851, Virginia 70.2% 39.9% (+30.3)#3 38.5% (+31.7)#26
27. 67212, Kansas 70.0% 34.8% (+35.2)#1 38.5% (+31.5)#27
28. 70648, Louisiana 70.0% 39.8% (+30.2)#1 38.5% (+31.5)#28
29. 50501, Iowa 69.6% 30.7% (+38.9)#2 38.5% (+31.1)#29
30. 05733, Vermont 69.5% 32.6% (+36.9)#2 38.5% (+31.0)#30
31. 94516, California 69.5% 38.0% (+31.5)#3 38.5% (+31.0)#31
32. 18969, Pennsylvania 69.4% 37.1% (+32.3)#1 38.5% (+30.9)#32
33. 19966, Delaware 69.3% 42.2% (+27.1)#1 38.5% (+30.8)#33
34. 53589, Wisconsin 69.2% 33.2% (+36.0)#1 38.5% (+30.7)#34
35. 16051, Pennsylvania 69.2% 37.1% (+32.1)#2 38.5% (+30.7)#35
36. 18411, Pennsylvania 69.1% 37.1% (+32.0)#3 38.5% (+30.6)#36
37. 02532, Massachusetts 69.1% 35.9% (+33.2)#3 38.5% (+30.6)#37
38. 13350, New York 69.1% 39.6% (+29.5)#2 38.5% (+30.6)#38
39. 92563, California 69.0% 38.0% (+31.0)#4 38.5% (+30.5)#39
40. 95448, California 69.0% 38.0% (+31.0)#5 38.5% (+30.5)#40
41. 20842, Maryland 68.7% 40.9% (+27.8)#1 38.5% (+30.2)#41
42. 82007, Wyoming 68.4% 38.8% (+29.6)#1 38.5% (+29.9)#42
43. 35203, Alabama 68.2% 37.4% (+30.8)#1 38.5% (+29.7)#43
44. 33432, Florida 68.1% 41.3% (+26.8)#4 38.5% (+29.6)#44
45. 68114, Nebraska 68.0% 34.4% (+33.6)#1 38.5% (+29.5)#45
46. 18058, Pennsylvania 67.4% 37.1% (+30.3)#4 38.5% (+28.9)#46
47. 07077, New Jersey 67.4% 40.9% (+26.5)#1 38.5% (+28.9)#47
48. 78028, Texas 67.3% 38.9% (+28.4)#1 38.5% (+28.8)#48
49. 50320, Iowa 67.3% 30.7% (+36.6)#3 38.5% (+28.8)#49
50. 57301, South Dakota 67.3% 36.3% (+31.0)#1 38.5% (+28.8)#50
51. 01364, Massachusetts 67.3% 35.9% (+31.4)#4 38.5% (+28.8)#51
52. 32174, Florida 67.1% 41.3% (+25.8)#5 38.5% (+28.6)#52
53. 18603, Pennsylvania 67.1% 37.1% (+30.0)#5 38.5% (+28.6)#53
54. 54235, Wisconsin 67.1% 33.2% (+33.9)#2 38.5% (+28.6)#54
55. 57262, South Dakota 67.1% 36.3% (+30.8)#2 38.5% (+28.6)#55
56. 32502, Florida 67.1% 41.3% (+25.8)#6 38.5% (+28.6)#56
57. 46580, Indiana 66.9% 36.2% (+30.7)#1 38.5% (+28.4)#57
58. 44406, Ohio 66.9% 36.7% (+30.2)#5 38.5% (+28.4)#58
59. 54150, Wisconsin 66.9% 33.2% (+33.7)#3 38.5% (+28.4)#59
60. 44907, Ohio 66.6% 36.7% (+29.9)#6 38.5% (+28.1)#60
61. 53011, Wisconsin 66.5% 33.2% (+33.3)#4 38.5% (+28.0)#61
62. 59254, Montana 66.5% 39.4% (+27.1)#1 38.5% (+28.0)#62
63. 33487, Florida 66.3% 41.3% (+25.0)#7 38.5% (+27.8)#63
64. 53181, Wisconsin 66.3% 33.2% (+33.1)#5 38.5% (+27.8)#64
65. 23453, Virginia 66.2% 39.9% (+26.3)#4 38.5% (+27.7)#65
66. 33073, Florida 66.2% 41.3% (+24.9)#8 38.5% (+27.7)#66
67. 92532, California 66.2% 38.0% (+28.2)#6 38.5% (+27.7)#67
68. 45679, Ohio 66.2% 36.7% (+29.5)#7 38.5% (+27.7)#68
69. 64446, Missouri 66.2% 35.4% (+30.8)#2 38.5% (+27.7)#69
70. 01983, Massachusetts 66.1% 35.9% (+30.2)#5 38.5% (+27.6)#70
71. 55073, Minnesota 66.1% 35.8% (+30.3)#3 38.5% (+27.6)#71
72. 63629, Missouri 66.1% 35.4% (+30.7)#3 38.5% (+27.6)#72
73. 12578, New York 66.0% 39.6% (+26.4)#3 38.5% (+27.5)#73
74. 19540, Pennsylvania 65.5% 37.1% (+28.4)#6 38.5% (+27.0)#74
75. 96772, Hawaii 65.5% 42.7% (+22.8)#1 38.5% (+27.0)#75
76. 45331, Ohio 65.4% 36.7% (+28.7)#8 38.5% (+26.9)#76
77. 62951, Illinois 65.4% 36.8% (+28.6)#1 38.5% (+26.9)#77
78. 48836, Michigan 65.3% 34.1% (+31.2)#2 38.5% (+26.8)#78
79. 60548, Illinois 65.3% 36.8% (+28.5)#2 38.5% (+26.8)#79
80. 83313, Idaho 65.3% 44.4% (+20.9)#1 38.5% (+26.8)#80
81. 83852, Idaho 65.3% 44.4% (+20.9)#2 38.5% (+26.8)#81
82. 33411, Florida 65.2% 41.3% (+23.9)#9 38.5% (+26.7)#82
83. 30102, Georgia 65.2% 37.6% (+27.6)#1 38.5% (+26.7)#83
84. 29707, South Carolina 65.2% 40.3% (+24.9)#1 38.5% (+26.7)#84
85. 71730, Arkansas 65.2% 39.3% (+25.9)#1 38.5% (+26.7)#85
86. 30327, Georgia 65.2% 37.6% (+27.6)#2 38.5% (+26.7)#86
87. 87508, New Mexico 65.2% 42.8% (+22.4)#1 38.5% (+26.7)#87
88. 01966, Massachusetts 65.2% 35.9% (+29.3)#6 38.5% (+26.7)#88
89. 44212, Ohio 65.1% 36.7% (+28.4)#9 38.5% (+26.6)#89
90. 60110, Illinois 65.1% 36.8% (+28.3)#3 38.5% (+26.6)#90
91. 92227, California 65.1% 38.0% (+27.1)#7 38.5% (+26.6)#91
92. 27243, North Carolina 65.0% 37.1% (+27.9)#1 38.5% (+26.5)#92
93. 45236, Ohio 64.9% 36.7% (+28.2)#10 38.5% (+26.4)#93
94. 99109, Washington 64.7% 35.2% (+29.5)#2 38.5% (+26.2)#94
95. 83434, Idaho 64.7% 44.4% (+20.3)#3 38.5% (+26.2)#95
96. 62837, Illinois 64.6% 36.8% (+27.8)#4 38.5% (+26.1)#96
97. 94973, California 64.6% 38.0% (+26.6)#8 38.5% (+26.1)#97
98. 33066, Florida 64.5% 41.3% (+23.2)#10 38.5% (+26.0)#98
99. 93950, California 64.5% 38.0% (+26.5)#9 38.5% (+26.0)#99
100. 93510, California 64.5% 38.0% (+26.5)#10 38.5% (+26.0)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States are:
#1
87.1%
#2
79.4%
#3
77.3%
#4
76.2%
#5
76.2%
#6
76.1%
#7
75.3%
#8
75.0%
#9
74.8%
#10
74.2%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States?
44136 has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States with 87.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States is 38.5%.