Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Carpool
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States

60.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States

Zip Code % Carpool vs State vs National
1. 81020, Colorado 84.1% 36.6% (+47.5)#1 38.2% (+45.9)#1
2. 64431, Missouri 84.1% 37.7% (+46.4)#1 38.2% (+45.9)#2
3. 95665, California 82.3% 39.3% (+43.0)#1 38.2% (+44.1)#3
4. 68424, Nebraska 81.4% 37.5% (+43.9)#1 38.2% (+43.2)#4
5. 47335, Indiana 81.1% 36.3% (+44.8)#1 38.2% (+42.9)#5
6. 69121, Nebraska 80.3% 37.5% (+42.8)#2 38.2% (+42.1)#6
7. 62446, Illinois 79.8% 39.0% (+40.8)#1 38.2% (+41.6)#7
8. 32561, Florida 79.1% 39.6% (+39.5)#1 38.2% (+40.9)#8
9. 15482, Pennsylvania 78.4% 38.3% (+40.1)#1 38.2% (+40.2)#9
10. 52248, Iowa 77.1% 37.7% (+39.4)#1 38.2% (+38.9)#10
11. 38390, Tennessee 77.1% 37.3% (+39.8)#1 38.2% (+38.9)#11
12. 79237, Texas 76.7% 37.6% (+39.1)#1 38.2% (+38.5)#12
13. 08751, New Jersey 75.7% 40.8% (+34.9)#1 38.2% (+37.5)#13
14. 36555, Alabama 75.3% 37.5% (+37.8)#1 38.2% (+37.1)#14
15. 52321, Iowa 75.2% 37.7% (+37.5)#2 38.2% (+37.0)#15
16. 05340, Vermont 75.1% 39.8% (+35.3)#1 38.2% (+36.9)#16
17. 39119, Mississippi 74.4% 37.8% (+36.6)#1 38.2% (+36.2)#17
18. 87537, New Mexico 74.4% 38.5% (+35.9)#1 38.2% (+36.2)#18
19. 19043, Pennsylvania 74.3% 38.3% (+36.0)#2 38.2% (+36.1)#19
20. 18248, Pennsylvania 74.3% 38.3% (+36.0)#3 38.2% (+36.1)#20
21. 66734, Kansas 74.3% 37.0% (+37.3)#1 38.2% (+36.1)#21
22. 32162, Florida 74.2% 39.6% (+34.6)#2 38.2% (+36.0)#22
23. 23027, Virginia 73.2% 38.8% (+34.4)#1 38.2% (+35.0)#23
24. 10075, New York 73.1% 40.9% (+32.2)#1 38.2% (+34.9)#24
25. 47967, Indiana 73.1% 36.3% (+36.8)#2 38.2% (+34.9)#25
26. 85622, Arizona 72.9% 36.6% (+36.3)#1 38.2% (+34.7)#26
27. 21023, Maryland 72.6% 39.4% (+33.2)#1 38.2% (+34.4)#27
28. 08247, New Jersey 72.5% 40.8% (+31.7)#2 38.2% (+34.3)#28
29. 57036, South Dakota 72.5% 37.5% (+35.0)#1 38.2% (+34.3)#29
30. 63620, Missouri 72.2% 37.7% (+34.5)#2 38.2% (+34.0)#30
31. 21640, Maryland 72.1% 39.4% (+32.7)#2 38.2% (+33.9)#31
32. 73546, Oklahoma 72.1% 37.2% (+34.9)#1 38.2% (+33.9)#32
33. 52533, Iowa 72.1% 37.7% (+34.4)#3 38.2% (+33.9)#33
34. 79256, Texas 72.0% 37.6% (+34.4)#2 38.2% (+33.8)#34
35. 27024, North Carolina 71.3% 37.5% (+33.8)#1 38.2% (+33.1)#35
36. 15861, Pennsylvania 71.3% 38.3% (+33.0)#4 38.2% (+33.1)#36
37. 32461, Florida 71.2% 39.6% (+31.6)#3 38.2% (+33.0)#37
38. 64738, Missouri 71.2% 37.7% (+33.5)#3 38.2% (+33.0)#38
39. 32423, Florida 71.1% 39.6% (+31.5)#4 38.2% (+32.9)#39
40. 35552, Alabama 70.8% 37.5% (+33.3)#2 38.2% (+32.6)#40
41. 51551, Iowa 70.6% 37.7% (+32.9)#4 38.2% (+32.4)#41
42. 23405, Virginia 70.5% 38.8% (+31.7)#2 38.2% (+32.3)#42
43. 59721, Montana 70.5% 38.0% (+32.5)#1 38.2% (+32.3)#43
44. 37729, Tennessee 70.3% 37.3% (+33.0)#2 38.2% (+32.1)#44
45. 68340, Nebraska 70.3% 37.5% (+32.8)#3 38.2% (+32.1)#45
46. 82639, Wyoming 70.3% 37.7% (+32.6)#1 38.2% (+32.1)#46
47. 13141, New York 70.3% 40.9% (+29.4)#2 38.2% (+32.1)#47
48. 39094, Mississippi 70.2% 37.8% (+32.4)#2 38.2% (+32.0)#48
49. 08750, New Jersey 70.2% 40.8% (+29.4)#3 38.2% (+32.0)#49
50. 54165, Wisconsin 70.1% 37.5% (+32.6)#1 38.2% (+31.9)#50
51. 86335, Arizona 70.1% 36.6% (+33.5)#2 38.2% (+31.9)#51
52. 76569, Texas 69.6% 37.6% (+32.0)#3 38.2% (+31.4)#52
53. 07927, New Jersey 69.4% 40.8% (+28.6)#4 38.2% (+31.2)#53
54. 31070, Georgia 69.3% 37.4% (+31.9)#1 38.2% (+31.1)#54
55. 28526, North Carolina 69.2% 37.5% (+31.7)#2 38.2% (+31.0)#55
56. 99180, Washington 69.1% 37.6% (+31.5)#1 38.2% (+30.9)#56
57. 39216, Mississippi 68.8% 37.8% (+31.0)#3 38.2% (+30.6)#57
58. 18602, Pennsylvania 68.8% 38.3% (+30.5)#5 38.2% (+30.6)#58
59. 93440, California 68.7% 39.3% (+29.4)#2 38.2% (+30.5)#59
60. 80749, Colorado 68.5% 36.6% (+31.9)#2 38.2% (+30.3)#60
61. 21153, Maryland 68.4% 39.4% (+29.0)#3 38.2% (+30.2)#61
62. 96091, California 68.3% 39.3% (+29.0)#3 38.2% (+30.1)#62
63. 87083, New Mexico 68.3% 38.5% (+29.8)#2 38.2% (+30.1)#63
64. 81621, Colorado 68.2% 36.6% (+31.6)#3 38.2% (+30.0)#64
65. 17213, Pennsylvania 68.2% 38.3% (+29.9)#6 38.2% (+30.0)#65
66. 30251, Georgia 68.1% 37.4% (+30.7)#2 38.2% (+29.9)#66
67. 15617, Pennsylvania 68.0% 38.3% (+29.7)#7 38.2% (+29.8)#67
68. 50571, Iowa 68.0% 37.7% (+30.3)#5 38.2% (+29.8)#68
69. 34228, Florida 67.5% 39.6% (+27.9)#5 38.2% (+29.3)#69
70. 59761, Montana 67.5% 38.0% (+29.5)#2 38.2% (+29.3)#70
71. 76570, Texas 67.4% 37.6% (+29.8)#4 38.2% (+29.2)#71
72. 68790, Nebraska 67.4% 37.5% (+29.9)#4 38.2% (+29.2)#72
73. 88120, New Mexico 67.4% 38.5% (+28.9)#3 38.2% (+29.2)#73
74. 03752, New Hampshire 67.3% 38.4% (+28.9)#1 38.2% (+29.1)#74
75. 73560, Oklahoma 67.3% 37.2% (+30.1)#2 38.2% (+29.1)#75
76. 05827, Vermont 67.3% 39.8% (+27.5)#2 38.2% (+29.1)#76
77. 58478, North Dakota 67.3% 35.9% (+31.4)#1 38.2% (+29.1)#77
78. 83446, Idaho 67.3% 36.9% (+30.4)#1 38.2% (+29.1)#78
79. 74430, Oklahoma 67.2% 37.2% (+30.0)#3 38.2% (+29.0)#79
80. 73627, Oklahoma 67.2% 37.2% (+30.0)#4 38.2% (+29.0)#80
81. 55786, Minnesota 67.2% 37.5% (+29.7)#1 38.2% (+29.0)#81
82. 02668, Massachusetts 67.1% 39.0% (+28.1)#1 38.2% (+28.9)#82
83. 40009, Kentucky 67.1% 36.6% (+30.5)#1 38.2% (+28.9)#83
84. 24951, West Virginia 67.1% 38.6% (+28.5)#1 38.2% (+28.9)#84
85. 52035, Iowa 67.1% 37.7% (+29.4)#6 38.2% (+28.9)#85
86. 68423, Nebraska 67.1% 37.5% (+29.6)#5 38.2% (+28.9)#86
87. 61416, Illinois 67.1% 39.0% (+28.1)#2 38.2% (+28.9)#87
88. 03592, New Hampshire 67.0% 38.4% (+28.6)#2 38.2% (+28.8)#88
89. 66526, Kansas 67.0% 37.0% (+30.0)#2 38.2% (+28.8)#89
90. 50064, Iowa 66.9% 37.7% (+29.2)#7 38.2% (+28.7)#90
91. 54104, Wisconsin 66.8% 37.5% (+29.3)#2 38.2% (+28.6)#91
92. 85351, Arizona 66.7% 36.6% (+30.1)#3 38.2% (+28.5)#92
93. 24162, Virginia 66.7% 38.8% (+27.9)#3 38.2% (+28.5)#93
94. 10560, New York 66.6% 40.9% (+25.7)#3 38.2% (+28.4)#94
95. 22639, Virginia 66.6% 38.8% (+27.8)#4 38.2% (+28.4)#95
96. 70760, Louisiana 66.5% 37.7% (+28.8)#1 38.2% (+28.3)#96
97. 60184, Illinois 66.5% 39.0% (+27.5)#3 38.2% (+28.3)#97
98. 29163, South Carolina 66.5% 38.2% (+28.3)#1 38.2% (+28.3)#98
99. 44473, Ohio 66.4% 36.5% (+29.9)#1 38.2% (+28.2)#99
100. 24473, Virginia 66.4% 38.8% (+27.6)#5 38.2% (+28.2)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States are:
#1
84.1%
#2
84.1%
#3
82.3%
#4
81.4%
#5
81.1%
#6
80.3%
#7
79.8%
#8
79.1%
#9
78.4%
#10
77.1%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States?
81020 has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States with 84.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States is 38.2%.