Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Farming, Fishing & Forestry
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in the United States

30.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 77453, Texas 100.0% 0.37% (+99.6)#1 0.61% (+99.4)#1
2. 79376, Texas 100.0% 0.37% (+99.6)#2 0.61% (+99.4)#2
3. 93670, California 100.0% 1.4% (+98.6)#1 0.61% (+99.4)#3
4. 72328, Arkansas 100.0% 0.96% (+99.0)#1 0.61% (+99.4)#4
5. 97712, Oregon 100.0% 1.4% (+98.6)#1 0.61% (+99.4)#5
6. 28331, North Carolina 100.0% 0.51% (+99.5)#1 0.61% (+99.4)#6
7. 31062, Georgia 100.0% 0.45% (+99.5)#1 0.61% (+99.4)#7
8. 31081, Georgia 100.0% 0.45% (+99.5)#2 0.61% (+99.4)#8
9. 73946, Oklahoma 100.0% 0.66% (+99.3)#1 0.61% (+99.4)#9
10. 79247, Texas 100.0% 0.37% (+99.6)#3 0.61% (+99.4)#11
11. 77973, Texas 100.0% 0.37% (+99.6)#4 0.61% (+99.4)#12
12. 79243, Texas 100.0% 0.37% (+99.6)#5 0.61% (+99.4)#13
13. 70050, Louisiana 100.0% 0.50% (+99.5)#1 0.61% (+99.4)#14
14. 72133, Arkansas 100.0% 0.96% (+99.0)#2 0.61% (+99.4)#15
15. 87011, New Mexico 100.0% 0.91% (+99.1)#1 0.61% (+99.4)#16
16. 93623, California 100.0% 1.4% (+98.6)#2 0.61% (+99.4)#17
17. 79537, Texas 87.5% 0.37% (+87.1)#6 0.61% (+86.9)#18
18. 87936, New Mexico 86.5% 0.91% (+85.6)#2 0.61% (+85.9)#19
19. 93624, California 77.3% 1.4% (+75.8)#3 0.61% (+76.7)#20
20. 96031, California 75.0% 1.4% (+73.6)#4 0.61% (+74.4)#21
21. 25928, West Virginia 72.2% 0.36% (+71.9)#1 0.61% (+71.6)#22
22. 98829, Washington 71.8% 1.5% (+70.2)#1 0.61% (+71.2)#23
23. 23160, Virginia 71.4% 0.33% (+71.1)#1 0.61% (+70.8)#24
24. 67868, Kansas 71.1% 0.91% (+70.1)#1 0.61% (+70.4)#25
25. 95595, California 69.4% 1.4% (+68.0)#5 0.61% (+68.8)#26
26. 30449, Georgia 66.7% 0.45% (+66.2)#3 0.61% (+66.1)#27
27. 58339, North Dakota 66.7% 1.6% (+65.1)#1 0.61% (+66.1)#28
28. 95676, California 65.8% 1.4% (+64.4)#6 0.61% (+65.2)#29
29. 69161, Nebraska 65.7% 1.3% (+64.4)#1 0.61% (+65.1)#30
30. 93640, California 64.1% 1.4% (+62.7)#7 0.61% (+63.5)#31
31. 98813, Washington 63.8% 1.5% (+62.3)#2 0.61% (+63.2)#32
32. 67518, Kansas 63.2% 0.91% (+62.2)#2 0.61% (+62.6)#33
33. 59025, Montana 63.0% 1.7% (+61.3)#1 0.61% (+62.4)#34
34. 88422, New Mexico 61.5% 0.91% (+60.6)#3 0.61% (+60.9)#35
35. 88134, New Mexico 60.6% 0.91% (+59.7)#4 0.61% (+60.0)#36
36. 64868, Missouri 58.3% 0.49% (+57.8)#1 0.61% (+57.7)#37
37. 72945, Arkansas 58.0% 0.96% (+57.0)#3 0.61% (+57.4)#38
38. 67018, Kansas 57.7% 0.91% (+56.8)#3 0.61% (+57.1)#39
39. 99349, Washington 56.2% 1.5% (+54.7)#3 0.61% (+55.6)#40
40. 93608, California 54.9% 1.4% (+53.5)#8 0.61% (+54.3)#41
41. 67519, Kansas 54.7% 0.91% (+53.8)#4 0.61% (+54.1)#42
42. 85320, Arizona 54.6% 0.51% (+54.1)#1 0.61% (+54.0)#43
43. 88051, New Mexico 54.5% 0.91% (+53.6)#5 0.61% (+53.9)#44
44. 72341, Arkansas 53.9% 0.96% (+53.0)#4 0.61% (+53.3)#45
45. 59642, Montana 52.9% 1.7% (+51.3)#2 0.61% (+52.3)#46
46. 82428, Wyoming 52.2% 1.2% (+51.0)#1 0.61% (+51.6)#47
47. 27982, North Carolina 52.0% 0.51% (+51.5)#2 0.61% (+51.4)#48
48. 99356, Washington 51.9% 1.5% (+50.4)#4 0.61% (+51.3)#49
49. 87943, New Mexico 51.9% 0.91% (+50.9)#6 0.61% (+51.2)#50
50. 93234, California 51.3% 1.4% (+49.9)#9 0.61% (+50.7)#51
51. 57457, South Dakota 51.0% 1.7% (+49.2)#1 0.61% (+50.4)#52
52. 23427, Virginia 50.5% 0.33% (+50.2)#2 0.61% (+49.9)#53
53. 42762, Kentucky 50.3% 0.52% (+49.8)#1 0.61% (+49.7)#54
54. 20184, Virginia 50.0% 0.33% (+49.7)#3 0.61% (+49.4)#55
55. 57574, South Dakota 50.0% 1.7% (+48.3)#2 0.61% (+49.4)#56
56. 84533, Utah 50.0% 0.32% (+49.7)#1 0.61% (+49.4)#57
57. 04851, Maine 50.0% 1.5% (+48.5)#1 0.61% (+49.4)#58
58. 59467, Montana 49.3% 1.7% (+47.6)#3 0.61% (+48.7)#59
59. 72948, Arkansas 49.2% 0.96% (+48.3)#5 0.61% (+48.6)#60
60. 98950, Washington 48.9% 1.5% (+47.4)#5 0.61% (+48.3)#61
61. 18624, Pennsylvania 48.9% 0.41% (+48.5)#1 0.61% (+48.3)#62
62. 83253, Idaho 47.9% 2.0% (+46.0)#1 0.61% (+47.3)#63
63. 24974, West Virginia 47.9% 0.36% (+47.5)#2 0.61% (+47.3)#64
64. 93249, California 47.7% 1.4% (+46.3)#10 0.61% (+47.1)#65
65. 77448, Texas 47.3% 0.37% (+46.9)#7 0.61% (+46.7)#66
66. 31631, Georgia 46.9% 0.45% (+46.5)#4 0.61% (+46.3)#67
67. 77428, Texas 46.9% 0.37% (+46.5)#8 0.61% (+46.3)#68
68. 04019, Maine 46.7% 1.5% (+45.2)#2 0.61% (+46.1)#69
69. 78005, Texas 46.4% 0.37% (+46.0)#9 0.61% (+45.8)#70
70. 04685, Maine 44.9% 1.5% (+43.4)#3 0.61% (+44.3)#71
71. 81331, Colorado 44.6% 0.49% (+44.1)#1 0.61% (+43.9)#72
72. 13360, New York 44.6% 0.24% (+44.3)#1 0.61% (+43.9)#73
73. 87824, New Mexico 44.4% 0.91% (+43.5)#7 0.61% (+43.8)#74
74. 72383, Arkansas 44.4% 0.96% (+43.5)#6 0.61% (+43.8)#75
75. 64499, Missouri 44.3% 0.49% (+43.8)#2 0.61% (+43.7)#76
76. 69354, Nebraska 44.3% 1.3% (+42.9)#2 0.61% (+43.7)#77
77. 93239, California 44.2% 1.4% (+42.8)#11 0.61% (+43.6)#78
78. 93241, California 44.1% 1.4% (+42.7)#12 0.61% (+43.5)#79
79. 93201, California 44.1% 1.4% (+42.6)#13 0.61% (+43.4)#80
80. 93219, California 44.0% 1.4% (+42.6)#14 0.61% (+43.4)#81
81. 82222, Wyoming 43.8% 1.2% (+42.6)#2 0.61% (+43.2)#82
82. 93261, California 43.8% 1.4% (+42.4)#15 0.61% (+43.2)#83
83. 36581, Alabama 43.5% 0.42% (+43.1)#1 0.61% (+42.9)#84
84. 59424, Montana 43.5% 1.7% (+41.8)#4 0.61% (+42.9)#85
85. 82229, Wyoming 43.3% 1.2% (+42.2)#3 0.61% (+42.7)#86
86. 81136, Colorado 42.9% 0.49% (+42.4)#2 0.61% (+42.3)#87
87. 67049, Kansas 42.9% 0.91% (+41.9)#5 0.61% (+42.3)#88
88. 93258, California 42.6% 1.4% (+41.2)#16 0.61% (+42.0)#89
89. 76937, Texas 42.1% 0.37% (+41.7)#10 0.61% (+41.5)#90
90. 69221, Nebraska 41.7% 1.3% (+40.3)#3 0.61% (+41.1)#91
91. 65570, Missouri 41.5% 0.49% (+41.0)#3 0.61% (+40.9)#92
92. 57529, South Dakota 41.5% 1.7% (+39.7)#3 0.61% (+40.8)#93
93. 80721, Colorado 41.0% 0.49% (+40.5)#3 0.61% (+40.4)#94
94. 98843, Washington 40.8% 1.5% (+39.3)#6 0.61% (+40.2)#95
95. 98590, Washington 40.8% 1.5% (+39.2)#7 0.61% (+40.1)#96
96. 67862, Kansas 40.7% 0.91% (+39.8)#6 0.61% (+40.1)#97
97. 81335, Colorado 40.7% 0.49% (+40.3)#4 0.61% (+40.1)#98
98. 97033, Oregon 40.4% 1.4% (+39.0)#2 0.61% (+39.8)#99
99. 85172, Arizona 40.2% 0.51% (+39.7)#2 0.61% (+39.6)#100
100. 72178, Arkansas 40.0% 0.96% (+39.0)#7 0.61% (+39.4)#101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in the United States?
77453 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in the United States is 0.61%.