Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Electrical Heating
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in the United States

100.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in the United States

Zip Code Electrical Heating vs State vs National
1. 16802, Pennsylvania 100.0% 24.4% (+75.6)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#1
2. 29207, South Carolina 100.0% 71.2% (+28.8)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#2
3. 92136, California 100.0% 28.3% (+71.7)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#3
4. 29634, South Carolina 100.0% 71.2% (+28.8)#2 40.2% (+59.8)#4
5. 55455, Minnesota 100.0% 18.5% (+81.5)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#5
6. 02912, Rhode Island 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#6
7. 83844, Idaho 100.0% 34.6% (+65.4)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#7
8. 20742, Maryland 100.0% 43.1% (+56.9)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#8
9. 90089, California 100.0% 28.3% (+71.7)#2 40.2% (+59.8)#9
10. 33965, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#10
11. 53706, Wisconsin 100.0% 16.7% (+83.3)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#11
12. 95053, California 100.0% 28.3% (+71.7)#3 40.2% (+59.8)#12
13. 66506, Kansas 100.0% 26.0% (+74.0)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#13
14. 29409, South Carolina 100.0% 71.2% (+28.8)#3 40.2% (+59.8)#14
15. 48859, Michigan 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#15
16. 39217, Mississippi 100.0% 58.5% (+41.5)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#16
17. 94964, California 100.0% 28.3% (+71.7)#4 40.2% (+59.8)#17
18. 70630, Louisiana 100.0% 64.3% (+35.7)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#18
19. 29614, South Carolina 100.0% 71.2% (+28.8)#4 40.2% (+59.8)#19
20. 23284, Virginia 100.0% 56.5% (+43.5)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#20
21. 30149, Georgia 100.0% 55.8% (+44.2)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#21
22. 36688, Alabama 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#22
23. 32147, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#2 40.2% (+59.8)#23
24. 71497, Louisiana 100.0% 64.3% (+35.7)#2 40.2% (+59.8)#24
25. 88029, New Mexico 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#25
26. 83209, Idaho 100.0% 34.6% (+65.4)#2 40.2% (+59.8)#26
27. 34797, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#3 40.2% (+59.8)#27
28. 02841, Rhode Island 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#2 40.2% (+59.8)#28
29. 30118, Georgia 100.0% 55.8% (+44.2)#2 40.2% (+59.8)#29
30. 34681, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#4 40.2% (+59.8)#30
31. 27506, North Carolina 100.0% 64.5% (+35.5)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#31
32. 72467, Arkansas 100.0% 52.5% (+47.5)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#32
33. 34216, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#5 40.2% (+59.8)#33
34. 77663, Texas 100.0% 61.2% (+38.8)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#34
35. 98836, Washington 100.0% 57.0% (+43.0)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#35
36. 32157, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#6 40.2% (+59.8)#36
37. 99123, Washington 100.0% 57.0% (+43.0)#2 40.2% (+59.8)#37
38. 99321, Washington 100.0% 57.0% (+43.0)#3 40.2% (+59.8)#38
39. 24280, Virginia 100.0% 56.5% (+43.5)#2 40.2% (+59.8)#39
40. 25611, West Virginia 100.0% 45.3% (+54.7)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#40
41. 77982, Texas 100.0% 61.2% (+38.8)#2 40.2% (+59.8)#41
42. 33521, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#7 40.2% (+59.8)#42
43. 34739, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#8 40.2% (+59.8)#43
44. 76070, Texas 100.0% 61.2% (+38.8)#3 40.2% (+59.8)#44
45. 32133, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#9 40.2% (+59.8)#45
46. 33921, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#10 40.2% (+59.8)#46
47. 33849, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#11 40.2% (+59.8)#47
48. 39174, Mississippi 100.0% 58.5% (+41.5)#2 40.2% (+59.8)#48
49. 25607, West Virginia 100.0% 45.3% (+54.7)#2 40.2% (+59.8)#49
50. 34215, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#12 40.2% (+59.8)#50
51. 58405, North Dakota 100.0% 39.7% (+60.3)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#51
52. 41714, Kentucky 100.0% 53.6% (+46.4)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#52
53. 27531, North Carolina 100.0% 64.5% (+35.5)#2 40.2% (+59.8)#53
54. 78004, Texas 100.0% 61.2% (+38.8)#4 40.2% (+59.8)#54
55. 85347, Arizona 100.0% 60.0% (+40.0)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#55
56. 29434, South Carolina 100.0% 71.2% (+28.8)#5 40.2% (+59.8)#56
57. 39824, Georgia 100.0% 55.8% (+44.2)#3 40.2% (+59.8)#57
58. 85707, Arizona 100.0% 60.0% (+40.0)#2 40.2% (+59.8)#58
59. 78558, Texas 100.0% 61.2% (+38.8)#5 40.2% (+59.8)#59
60. 78161, Texas 100.0% 61.2% (+38.8)#6 40.2% (+59.8)#60
61. 34268, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#13 40.2% (+59.8)#61
62. 29543, South Carolina 100.0% 71.2% (+28.8)#6 40.2% (+59.8)#62
63. 34250, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#14 40.2% (+59.8)#63
64. 77614, Texas 100.0% 61.2% (+38.8)#7 40.2% (+59.8)#64
65. 78567, Texas 100.0% 61.2% (+38.8)#8 40.2% (+59.8)#65
66. 17247, Pennsylvania 100.0% 24.4% (+75.6)#2 40.2% (+59.8)#66
67. 89191, Nevada 100.0% 35.8% (+64.2)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#67
68. 92350, California 100.0% 28.3% (+71.7)#5 40.2% (+59.8)#68
69. 96848, Hawaii 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#69
70. 78027, Texas 100.0% 61.2% (+38.8)#10 40.2% (+59.8)#70
71. 77367, Texas 100.0% 61.2% (+38.8)#11 40.2% (+59.8)#71
72. 27943, North Carolina 100.0% 64.5% (+35.5)#3 40.2% (+59.8)#72
73. 25630, West Virginia 100.0% 45.3% (+54.7)#3 40.2% (+59.8)#73
74. 28757, North Carolina 100.0% 64.5% (+35.5)#4 40.2% (+59.8)#74
75. 61625, Illinois 100.0% 17.9% (+82.1)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#75
76. 70082, Louisiana 100.0% 64.3% (+35.7)#3 40.2% (+59.8)#76
77. 71466, Louisiana 100.0% 64.3% (+35.7)#4 40.2% (+59.8)#77
78. 30454, Georgia 100.0% 55.8% (+44.2)#4 40.2% (+59.8)#78
79. 33503, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#15 40.2% (+59.8)#80
80. 72749, Arkansas 100.0% 52.5% (+47.5)#2 40.2% (+59.8)#81
81. 45051, Ohio 100.0% 25.1% (+74.9)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#82
82. 83013, Wyoming 100.0% 22.9% (+77.1)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#83
83. 29320, South Carolina 100.0% 71.2% (+28.8)#7 40.2% (+59.8)#84
84. 41513, Kentucky 100.0% 53.6% (+46.4)#2 40.2% (+59.8)#85
85. 25672, West Virginia 100.0% 45.3% (+54.7)#4 40.2% (+59.8)#86
86. 33847, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#16 40.2% (+59.8)#87
87. 99346, Washington 100.0% 57.0% (+43.0)#4 40.2% (+59.8)#88
88. 32631, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#17 40.2% (+59.8)#89
89. 23708, Virginia 100.0% 56.5% (+43.5)#3 40.2% (+59.8)#90
90. 77863, Texas 100.0% 61.2% (+38.8)#12 40.2% (+59.8)#91
91. 70442, Louisiana 100.0% 64.3% (+35.7)#5 40.2% (+59.8)#92
92. 41540, Kentucky 100.0% 53.6% (+46.4)#3 40.2% (+59.8)#93
93. 33001, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#18 40.2% (+59.8)#94
94. 77615, Texas 100.0% 61.2% (+38.8)#13 40.2% (+59.8)#95
95. 07939, New Jersey 100.0% 14.9% (+85.1)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#96
96. 20373, District Of Columbia 100.0% 44.7% (+55.3)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#97
97. 77483, Texas 100.0% 61.2% (+38.8)#14 40.2% (+59.8)#98
98. 24851, West Virginia 100.0% 45.3% (+54.7)#5 40.2% (+59.8)#99
99. 25818, West Virginia 100.0% 45.3% (+54.7)#6 40.2% (+59.8)#100
100. 32648, Florida 100.0% 91.2% (+8.80)#19 40.2% (+59.8)#101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in the United States?
16802 has the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in the United States?
Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in the United States is 40.2%.