Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Iroquois Population in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Iroquois
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Iroquois Population in the United States

0.00%
100.00%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Iroquois Population in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Iroquois Population in the United States

Zip Code Iroquois vs State vs National
1.13683, New York100.00%0.13%(+99.9)#10.029%(+100.0)#1
2.13655, New York59.63%0.13%(+59.5)#20.029%(+59.6)#2
3.14783, New York43.75%0.13%(+43.6)#30.029%(+43.7)#3
4.12416, New York26.83%0.13%(+26.7)#40.029%(+26.8)#4
5.14091, New York26.31%0.13%(+26.2)#50.029%(+26.3)#5
6.14081, New York24.74%0.13%(+24.6)#60.029%(+24.7)#6
7.13120, New York23.26%0.13%(+23.1)#70.029%(+23.2)#7
8.14779, New York18.94%0.13%(+18.8)#80.029%(+18.9)#8
9.95553, California16.39%0.016%(+16.4)#10.029%(+16.4)#9
10.97859, Oregon15.32%0.032%(+15.3)#10.029%(+15.3)#10
11.59724, Montana14.00%0.027%(+14.0)#10.029%(+14.0)#11
12.14013, New York12.33%0.13%(+12.2)#90.029%(+12.3)#12
13.12937, New York11.82%0.13%(+11.7)#100.029%(+11.8)#13
14.68621, Nebraska11.65%0.0057%(+11.6)#10.029%(+11.6)#14
15.14748, New York11.49%0.13%(+11.4)#110.029%(+11.5)#15
16.97057, Oregon11.11%0.032%(+11.1)#20.029%(+11.1)#16
17.74370, Oklahoma10.43%0.10%(+10.3)#10.029%(+10.4)#17
18.14129, New York9.77%0.13%(+9.63)#120.029%(+9.74)#18
19.54155, Wisconsin9.70%0.16%(+9.54)#10.029%(+9.67)#19
20.40346, Kentucky9.57%0.011%(+9.56)#10.029%(+9.54)#20
21.14070, New York9.28%0.13%(+9.14)#130.029%(+9.25)#21
22.14060, New York8.43%0.13%(+8.29)#140.029%(+8.40)#22
23.54542, Wisconsin8.33%0.16%(+8.17)#20.029%(+8.30)#23
24.50845, Iowa7.00%0.0094%(+6.99)#10.029%(+6.97)#24
25.14061, New York6.45%0.13%(+6.32)#150.029%(+6.42)#25
26.13353, New York4.88%0.13%(+4.74)#160.029%(+4.85)#26
27.45855, Ohio4.83%0.017%(+4.81)#10.029%(+4.80)#27
28.74339, Oklahoma4.82%0.10%(+4.72)#20.029%(+4.79)#28
29.73032, Oklahoma4.76%0.10%(+4.66)#30.029%(+4.73)#29
30.58560, North Dakota4.51%0.021%(+4.49)#10.029%(+4.49)#30
31.54123, Wisconsin4.33%0.16%(+4.17)#30.029%(+4.30)#31
32.31019, Georgia4.12%0.010%(+4.11)#10.029%(+4.09)#32
33.14864, New York4.07%0.13%(+3.93)#170.029%(+4.04)#33
34.14881, New York4.00%0.13%(+3.87)#180.029%(+3.97)#34
35.45353, Ohio3.97%0.017%(+3.96)#20.029%(+3.94)#35
36.74084, Oklahoma3.97%0.10%(+3.87)#40.029%(+3.94)#36
37.96056, California3.79%0.016%(+3.78)#20.029%(+3.76)#37
38.51453, Iowa3.72%0.0094%(+3.71)#20.029%(+3.70)#38
39.28364, North Carolina3.68%0.031%(+3.65)#10.029%(+3.65)#39
40.72529, Arkansas3.67%0.016%(+3.65)#10.029%(+3.64)#40
41.18350, Pennsylvania3.52%0.024%(+3.49)#10.029%(+3.49)#41
42.13324, New York3.45%0.13%(+3.31)#190.029%(+3.42)#42
43.71949, Arkansas3.44%0.016%(+3.42)#20.029%(+3.41)#43
44.87935, New Mexico3.38%0.020%(+3.36)#10.029%(+3.35)#44
45.57325, South Dakota3.34%0.031%(+3.31)#10.029%(+3.32)#45
46.96781, Hawaii3.31%0.051%(+3.26)#10.029%(+3.29)#46
47.49962, Michigan3.20%0.028%(+3.17)#10.029%(+3.17)#47
48.54304, Wisconsin3.15%0.16%(+2.99)#40.029%(+3.12)#48
49.12851, New York3.13%0.13%(+3.00)#200.029%(+3.11)#49
50.95968, California3.07%0.016%(+3.06)#30.029%(+3.05)#50
51.73655, Oklahoma3.00%0.10%(+2.90)#50.029%(+2.98)#51
52.14008, New York2.89%0.13%(+2.75)#210.029%(+2.86)#52
53.13810, New York2.86%0.13%(+2.72)#220.029%(+2.83)#53
54.12950, New York2.84%0.13%(+2.71)#230.029%(+2.82)#54
55.95454, California2.80%0.016%(+2.78)#40.029%(+2.77)#55
56.14545, New York2.78%0.13%(+2.64)#240.029%(+2.75)#56
57.74343, Oklahoma2.69%0.10%(+2.59)#60.029%(+2.66)#57
58.14706, New York2.58%0.13%(+2.44)#250.029%(+2.55)#58
59.54307, Wisconsin2.57%0.16%(+2.41)#50.029%(+2.54)#59
60.66073, Kansas2.50%0.029%(+2.47)#10.029%(+2.47)#60
61.03462, New Hampshire2.48%0.056%(+2.42)#10.029%(+2.45)#61
62.14132, New York2.47%0.13%(+2.33)#260.029%(+2.44)#62
63.54978, Wisconsin2.41%0.16%(+2.25)#60.029%(+2.38)#63
64.47305, Indiana2.35%0.012%(+2.34)#10.029%(+2.32)#64
65.74061, Oklahoma2.32%0.10%(+2.22)#70.029%(+2.29)#65
66.99341, Washington2.31%0.034%(+2.28)#10.029%(+2.28)#66
67.74056, Oklahoma2.30%0.10%(+2.20)#80.029%(+2.27)#67
68.40516, Kentucky2.28%0.011%(+2.27)#20.029%(+2.26)#68
69.06419, Connecticut2.27%0.028%(+2.24)#10.029%(+2.24)#69
70.50105, Iowa2.27%0.0094%(+2.26)#30.029%(+2.24)#70
71.43779, Ohio2.26%0.017%(+2.24)#30.029%(+2.23)#71
72.74363, Oklahoma2.25%0.10%(+2.15)#90.029%(+2.22)#72
73.19944, Delaware2.23%0.022%(+2.21)#10.029%(+2.20)#73
74.99122, Washington2.23%0.034%(+2.20)#20.029%(+2.20)#74
75.13115, New York2.22%0.13%(+2.09)#270.029%(+2.19)#75
76.13103, New York2.21%0.13%(+2.08)#280.029%(+2.18)#76
77.03774, New Hampshire2.20%0.056%(+2.15)#20.029%(+2.17)#77
78.93518, California2.13%0.016%(+2.11)#50.029%(+2.10)#78
79.14213, New York2.11%0.13%(+1.97)#290.029%(+2.08)#79
80.03307, New Hampshire2.09%0.056%(+2.04)#30.029%(+2.06)#80
81.14716, New York2.08%0.13%(+1.94)#300.029%(+2.05)#81
82.74354, Oklahoma2.07%0.10%(+1.97)#100.029%(+2.04)#82
83.12926, New York2.06%0.13%(+1.93)#310.029%(+2.04)#83
84.12914, New York2.05%0.13%(+1.92)#320.029%(+2.03)#84
85.54115, Wisconsin2.03%0.16%(+1.87)#70.029%(+2.00)#85
86.28572, North Carolina2.01%0.031%(+1.98)#20.029%(+1.98)#86
87.14755, New York1.99%0.13%(+1.86)#330.029%(+1.97)#87
88.54416, Wisconsin1.99%0.16%(+1.83)#80.029%(+1.97)#88
89.12920, New York1.98%0.13%(+1.84)#340.029%(+1.95)#89
90.67736, Kansas1.97%0.029%(+1.94)#20.029%(+1.94)#90
91.67565, Kansas1.96%0.029%(+1.93)#30.029%(+1.93)#91
92.54128, Wisconsin1.95%0.16%(+1.79)#90.029%(+1.92)#92
93.13084, New York1.95%0.13%(+1.81)#350.029%(+1.92)#93
94.13113, New York1.92%0.13%(+1.79)#360.029%(+1.89)#94
95.54538, Wisconsin1.92%0.16%(+1.76)#100.029%(+1.89)#95
96.99126, Washington1.89%0.034%(+1.86)#30.029%(+1.86)#96
97.13074, New York1.89%0.13%(+1.75)#370.029%(+1.86)#97
98.63091, Missouri1.88%0.021%(+1.86)#10.029%(+1.85)#98
99.74344, Oklahoma1.87%0.10%(+1.77)#110.029%(+1.84)#99
100.13697, New York1.86%0.13%(+1.73)#380.029%(+1.83)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Iroquois Population in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Iroquois Population in the United States are:
#1
100.00%
#2
59.63%
#3
43.75%
#4
26.83%
#5
26.31%
#6
24.74%
#7
23.26%
#8
18.94%
#9
16.39%
#10
15.32%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Iroquois Population in the United States?
13683 has the Highest Percentage of Iroquois Population in the United States with 100.00%.
What is the Percentage of Iroquois Population in the United States?
Percentage of Iroquois Population in the United States is 0.029%.