Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Not-for-profit Organizations
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States

50.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States

Zip Code % Employed in Not-for-profit vs State vs National
1. 60141, Illinois 100.0% 9.3% (+90.7)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#1
2. 65479, Missouri 100.0% 10.2% (+89.8)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#2
3. 83119, Wyoming 100.0% 6.9% (+93.1)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#3
4. 46789, Indiana 100.0% 9.8% (+90.2)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#4
5. 03291, New Hampshire 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#5
6. 17576, Pennsylvania 100.0% 12.4% (+87.6)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#6
7. 79832, Texas 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#7
8. 30581, Georgia 100.0% 6.3% (+93.7)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#8
9. 40049, Kentucky 100.0% 8.2% (+91.8)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#9
10. 13632, New York 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#10
11. 44809, Ohio 100.0% 9.8% (+90.2)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#11
12. 16155, Pennsylvania 100.0% 12.4% (+87.6)#2 8.4% (+91.6)#12
13. 32356, Florida 100.0% 6.6% (+93.4)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#13
14. 35149, Alabama 100.0% 6.7% (+93.3)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#14
15. 08890, New Jersey 100.0% 7.4% (+92.6)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#15
16. 78635, Texas 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#2 8.4% (+91.6)#16
17. 59257, Montana 100.0% 9.9% (+90.1)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#17
18. 96031, California 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#18
19. 76885, Texas 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#3 8.4% (+91.6)#19
20. 08246, New Jersey 100.0% 7.4% (+92.6)#2 8.4% (+91.6)#21
21. 98558, Washington 100.0% 8.3% (+91.7)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#22
22. 27256, North Carolina 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#23
23. 95325, California 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#2 8.4% (+91.6)#24
24. 95923, California 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#3 8.4% (+91.6)#25
25. 15647, Pennsylvania 100.0% 12.4% (+87.6)#3 8.4% (+91.6)#26
26. 46786, Indiana 100.0% 9.8% (+90.2)#2 8.4% (+91.6)#27
27. 01097, Massachusetts 100.0% 13.4% (+86.6)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#28
28. 98623, Washington 100.0% 8.3% (+91.7)#2 8.4% (+91.6)#29
29. 71401, Louisiana 100.0% 7.0% (+93.0)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#30
30. 72441, Arkansas 100.0% 7.6% (+92.4)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#31
31. 92384, California 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#4 8.4% (+91.6)#32
32. 69365, Nebraska 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#33
33. 24895, West Virginia 100.0% 8.3% (+91.7)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#34
34. 13847, New York 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#2 8.4% (+91.6)#35
35. 65409, Missouri 100.0% 10.2% (+89.8)#2 8.4% (+91.6)#36
36. 66760, Kansas 100.0% 8.1% (+91.9)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#37
37. 15123, Pennsylvania 100.0% 12.4% (+87.6)#4 8.4% (+91.6)#38
38. 01242, Massachusetts 96.3% 13.4% (+83.0)#2 8.4% (+87.9)#39
39. 10545, New York 91.1% 11.3% (+79.8)#3 8.4% (+82.7)#40
40. 31623, Georgia 89.8% 6.3% (+83.6)#2 8.4% (+81.4)#41
41. 88431, New Mexico 89.4% 7.8% (+81.6)#1 8.4% (+81.0)#42
42. 97373, Oregon 87.5% 9.7% (+77.8)#1 8.4% (+79.1)#43
43. 28616, North Carolina 87.0% 7.2% (+79.7)#2 8.4% (+78.5)#44
44. 36559, Alabama 85.7% 6.7% (+79.0)#2 8.4% (+77.3)#45
45. 52307, Iowa 81.2% 8.8% (+72.5)#1 8.4% (+72.8)#46
46. 15443, Pennsylvania 81.0% 12.4% (+68.6)#5 8.4% (+72.5)#47
47. 93628, California 77.1% 7.2% (+69.9)#5 8.4% (+68.7)#48
48. 64433, Missouri 77.0% 10.2% (+66.8)#3 8.4% (+68.6)#49
49. 84408, Utah 76.9% 7.0% (+69.9)#1 8.4% (+68.5)#50
50. 56321, Minnesota 76.8% 11.8% (+65.0)#1 8.4% (+68.4)#51
51. 13774, New York 76.7% 11.3% (+65.3)#4 8.4% (+68.2)#52
52. 97626, Oregon 76.1% 9.7% (+66.4)#2 8.4% (+67.7)#53
53. 78828, Texas 75.9% 5.8% (+70.1)#4 8.4% (+67.4)#54
54. 81640, Colorado 74.1% 7.9% (+66.2)#1 8.4% (+65.6)#55
55. 23045, Virginia 73.1% 8.2% (+64.9)#1 8.4% (+64.6)#56
56. 15723, Pennsylvania 72.7% 12.4% (+60.3)#6 8.4% (+64.3)#57
57. 28136, North Carolina 72.2% 7.2% (+65.0)#3 8.4% (+63.8)#58
58. 88314, New Mexico 72.0% 7.8% (+64.2)#2 8.4% (+63.6)#59
59. 96076, California 71.7% 7.2% (+64.6)#6 8.4% (+63.3)#60
60. 35573, Alabama 71.4% 6.7% (+64.7)#3 8.4% (+63.0)#61
61. 65320, Missouri 70.6% 10.2% (+60.4)#4 8.4% (+62.1)#62
62. 25088, West Virginia 68.9% 8.3% (+60.6)#2 8.4% (+60.4)#63
63. 78712, Texas 66.7% 5.8% (+60.9)#5 8.4% (+58.2)#64
64. 64065, Missouri 66.7% 10.2% (+56.5)#5 8.4% (+58.2)#65
65. 78871, Texas 66.7% 5.8% (+60.9)#6 8.4% (+58.2)#66
66. 41619, Kentucky 64.6% 8.2% (+56.4)#2 8.4% (+56.2)#67
67. 21023, Maryland 64.3% 10.1% (+54.1)#1 8.4% (+55.8)#68
68. 36722, Alabama 63.2% 6.7% (+56.5)#4 8.4% (+54.7)#69
69. 29941, South Carolina 63.0% 6.5% (+56.6)#1 8.4% (+54.6)#70
70. 26656, West Virginia 63.0% 8.3% (+54.6)#3 8.4% (+54.5)#71
71. 65541, Missouri 62.7% 10.2% (+52.5)#6 8.4% (+54.3)#72
72. 13301, New York 62.5% 11.3% (+51.2)#5 8.4% (+54.1)#73
73. 06258, Connecticut 62.5% 10.4% (+52.1)#1 8.4% (+54.1)#74
74. 38047, Tennessee 62.3% 7.7% (+54.6)#1 8.4% (+53.9)#75
75. 02791, Massachusetts 62.0% 13.4% (+48.7)#3 8.4% (+53.6)#76
76. 12751, New York 61.9% 11.3% (+50.5)#6 8.4% (+53.4)#77
77. 16220, Pennsylvania 61.5% 12.4% (+49.1)#7 8.4% (+53.1)#78
78. 13333, New York 61.5% 11.3% (+50.2)#7 8.4% (+53.1)#79
79. 12987, New York 61.1% 11.3% (+49.7)#8 8.4% (+52.6)#80
80. 25112, West Virginia 60.6% 8.3% (+52.3)#4 8.4% (+52.2)#81
81. 71066, Louisiana 60.0% 7.0% (+53.0)#2 8.4% (+51.6)#82
82. 83460, Idaho 60.0% 7.2% (+52.8)#1 8.4% (+51.6)#83
83. 05041, Vermont 59.7% 16.3% (+43.4)#1 8.4% (+51.3)#84
84. 13861, New York 59.3% 11.3% (+48.0)#9 8.4% (+50.9)#85
85. 15562, Pennsylvania 58.9% 12.4% (+46.4)#8 8.4% (+50.4)#86
86. 95671, California 58.3% 7.2% (+51.2)#7 8.4% (+49.9)#87
87. 76077, Texas 58.2% 5.8% (+52.5)#7 8.4% (+49.8)#88
88. 90089, California 57.7% 7.2% (+50.5)#8 8.4% (+49.2)#89
89. 76909, Texas 57.6% 5.8% (+51.9)#8 8.4% (+49.2)#90
90. 41835, Kentucky 57.2% 8.2% (+49.0)#3 8.4% (+48.8)#91
91. 33924, Florida 57.1% 6.6% (+50.5)#2 8.4% (+48.7)#92
92. 02873, Rhode Island 57.1% 12.1% (+45.0)#1 8.4% (+48.7)#93
93. 18454, Pennsylvania 57.1% 12.4% (+44.7)#9 8.4% (+48.7)#94
94. 68056, Nebraska 57.1% 9.5% (+47.6)#2 8.4% (+48.7)#95
95. 14752, New York 56.2% 11.3% (+44.9)#10 8.4% (+47.8)#96
96. 12527, New York 56.2% 11.3% (+44.9)#11 8.4% (+47.8)#97
97. 65534, Missouri 55.8% 10.2% (+45.6)#7 8.4% (+47.3)#98
98. 26039, West Virginia 55.8% 8.3% (+47.4)#5 8.4% (+47.3)#99
99. 18046, Pennsylvania 55.7% 12.4% (+43.2)#10 8.4% (+47.2)#100
100. 62359, Illinois 55.3% 9.3% (+46.0)#2 8.4% (+46.8)#101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States?
60141 has the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States?
Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States is 8.4%.