Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Not-for-profit Organizations
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States

0.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States

Zip Code % Employed in Not-for-profit vs State vs National
1.60141, Illinois100.0%9.3%(+90.7)#18.4%(+91.6)#1
2.65479, Missouri100.0%10.2%(+89.8)#18.4%(+91.6)#2
3.83119, Wyoming100.0%6.9%(+93.1)#18.4%(+91.6)#3
4.46789, Indiana100.0%9.8%(+90.2)#18.4%(+91.6)#4
5.03291, New Hampshire100.0%11.7%(+88.3)#18.4%(+91.6)#5
6.17576, Pennsylvania100.0%12.4%(+87.6)#18.4%(+91.6)#6
7.79832, Texas100.0%5.8%(+94.2)#18.4%(+91.6)#7
8.30581, Georgia100.0%6.3%(+93.7)#18.4%(+91.6)#8
9.40049, Kentucky100.0%8.2%(+91.8)#18.4%(+91.6)#9
10.13632, New York100.0%11.3%(+88.7)#18.4%(+91.6)#10
11.44809, Ohio100.0%9.8%(+90.2)#18.4%(+91.6)#11
12.16155, Pennsylvania100.0%12.4%(+87.6)#28.4%(+91.6)#12
13.32356, Florida100.0%6.6%(+93.4)#18.4%(+91.6)#13
14.35149, Alabama100.0%6.7%(+93.3)#18.4%(+91.6)#14
15.08890, New Jersey100.0%7.4%(+92.6)#18.4%(+91.6)#15
16.78635, Texas100.0%5.8%(+94.2)#28.4%(+91.6)#16
17.59257, Montana100.0%9.9%(+90.1)#18.4%(+91.6)#17
18.96031, California100.0%7.2%(+92.8)#18.4%(+91.6)#18
19.76885, Texas100.0%5.8%(+94.2)#38.4%(+91.6)#19
20.08246, New Jersey100.0%7.4%(+92.6)#28.4%(+91.6)#21
21.98558, Washington100.0%8.3%(+91.7)#18.4%(+91.6)#22
22.27256, North Carolina100.0%7.2%(+92.8)#18.4%(+91.6)#23
23.95325, California100.0%7.2%(+92.8)#28.4%(+91.6)#24
24.95923, California100.0%7.2%(+92.8)#38.4%(+91.6)#25
25.15647, Pennsylvania100.0%12.4%(+87.6)#38.4%(+91.6)#26
26.46786, Indiana100.0%9.8%(+90.2)#28.4%(+91.6)#27
27.01097, Massachusetts100.0%13.4%(+86.6)#18.4%(+91.6)#28
28.98623, Washington100.0%8.3%(+91.7)#28.4%(+91.6)#29
29.71401, Louisiana100.0%7.0%(+93.0)#18.4%(+91.6)#30
30.72441, Arkansas100.0%7.6%(+92.4)#18.4%(+91.6)#31
31.92384, California100.0%7.2%(+92.8)#48.4%(+91.6)#32
32.69365, Nebraska100.0%9.5%(+90.5)#18.4%(+91.6)#33
33.24895, West Virginia100.0%8.3%(+91.7)#18.4%(+91.6)#34
34.13847, New York100.0%11.3%(+88.7)#28.4%(+91.6)#35
35.65409, Missouri100.0%10.2%(+89.8)#28.4%(+91.6)#36
36.66760, Kansas100.0%8.1%(+91.9)#18.4%(+91.6)#37
37.15123, Pennsylvania100.0%12.4%(+87.6)#48.4%(+91.6)#38
38.01242, Massachusetts96.3%13.4%(+83.0)#28.4%(+87.9)#39
39.10545, New York91.1%11.3%(+79.8)#38.4%(+82.7)#40
40.31623, Georgia89.8%6.3%(+83.6)#28.4%(+81.4)#41
41.88431, New Mexico89.4%7.8%(+81.6)#18.4%(+81.0)#42
42.97373, Oregon87.5%9.7%(+77.8)#18.4%(+79.1)#43
43.28616, North Carolina87.0%7.2%(+79.7)#28.4%(+78.5)#44
44.36559, Alabama85.7%6.7%(+79.0)#28.4%(+77.3)#45
45.52307, Iowa81.2%8.8%(+72.5)#18.4%(+72.8)#46
46.15443, Pennsylvania81.0%12.4%(+68.6)#58.4%(+72.5)#47
47.93628, California77.1%7.2%(+69.9)#58.4%(+68.7)#48
48.64433, Missouri77.0%10.2%(+66.8)#38.4%(+68.6)#49
49.84408, Utah76.9%7.0%(+69.9)#18.4%(+68.5)#50
50.56321, Minnesota76.8%11.8%(+65.0)#18.4%(+68.4)#51
51.13774, New York76.7%11.3%(+65.3)#48.4%(+68.2)#52
52.97626, Oregon76.1%9.7%(+66.4)#28.4%(+67.7)#53
53.78828, Texas75.9%5.8%(+70.1)#48.4%(+67.4)#54
54.81640, Colorado74.1%7.9%(+66.2)#18.4%(+65.6)#55
55.23045, Virginia73.1%8.2%(+64.9)#18.4%(+64.6)#56
56.15723, Pennsylvania72.7%12.4%(+60.3)#68.4%(+64.3)#57
57.28136, North Carolina72.2%7.2%(+65.0)#38.4%(+63.8)#58
58.88314, New Mexico72.0%7.8%(+64.2)#28.4%(+63.6)#59
59.96076, California71.7%7.2%(+64.6)#68.4%(+63.3)#60
60.35573, Alabama71.4%6.7%(+64.7)#38.4%(+63.0)#61
61.65320, Missouri70.6%10.2%(+60.4)#48.4%(+62.1)#62
62.25088, West Virginia68.9%8.3%(+60.6)#28.4%(+60.4)#63
63.78712, Texas66.7%5.8%(+60.9)#58.4%(+58.2)#64
64.64065, Missouri66.7%10.2%(+56.5)#58.4%(+58.2)#65
65.78871, Texas66.7%5.8%(+60.9)#68.4%(+58.2)#66
66.41619, Kentucky64.6%8.2%(+56.4)#28.4%(+56.2)#67
67.21023, Maryland64.3%10.1%(+54.1)#18.4%(+55.8)#68
68.36722, Alabama63.2%6.7%(+56.5)#48.4%(+54.7)#69
69.29941, South Carolina63.0%6.5%(+56.6)#18.4%(+54.6)#70
70.26656, West Virginia63.0%8.3%(+54.6)#38.4%(+54.5)#71
71.65541, Missouri62.7%10.2%(+52.5)#68.4%(+54.3)#72
72.13301, New York62.5%11.3%(+51.2)#58.4%(+54.1)#73
73.06258, Connecticut62.5%10.4%(+52.1)#18.4%(+54.1)#74
74.38047, Tennessee62.3%7.7%(+54.6)#18.4%(+53.9)#75
75.02791, Massachusetts62.0%13.4%(+48.7)#38.4%(+53.6)#76
76.12751, New York61.9%11.3%(+50.5)#68.4%(+53.4)#77
77.16220, Pennsylvania61.5%12.4%(+49.1)#78.4%(+53.1)#78
78.13333, New York61.5%11.3%(+50.2)#78.4%(+53.1)#79
79.12987, New York61.1%11.3%(+49.7)#88.4%(+52.6)#80
80.25112, West Virginia60.6%8.3%(+52.3)#48.4%(+52.2)#81
81.71066, Louisiana60.0%7.0%(+53.0)#28.4%(+51.6)#82
82.83460, Idaho60.0%7.2%(+52.8)#18.4%(+51.6)#83
83.05041, Vermont59.7%16.3%(+43.4)#18.4%(+51.3)#84
84.13861, New York59.3%11.3%(+48.0)#98.4%(+50.9)#85
85.15562, Pennsylvania58.9%12.4%(+46.4)#88.4%(+50.4)#86
86.95671, California58.3%7.2%(+51.2)#78.4%(+49.9)#87
87.76077, Texas58.2%5.8%(+52.5)#78.4%(+49.8)#88
88.90089, California57.7%7.2%(+50.5)#88.4%(+49.2)#89
89.76909, Texas57.6%5.8%(+51.9)#88.4%(+49.2)#90
90.41835, Kentucky57.2%8.2%(+49.0)#38.4%(+48.8)#91
91.33924, Florida57.1%6.6%(+50.5)#28.4%(+48.7)#92
92.02873, Rhode Island57.1%12.1%(+45.0)#18.4%(+48.7)#93
93.18454, Pennsylvania57.1%12.4%(+44.7)#98.4%(+48.7)#94
94.68056, Nebraska57.1%9.5%(+47.6)#28.4%(+48.7)#95
95.14752, New York56.2%11.3%(+44.9)#108.4%(+47.8)#96
96.12527, New York56.2%11.3%(+44.9)#118.4%(+47.8)#97
97.65534, Missouri55.8%10.2%(+45.6)#78.4%(+47.3)#98
98.26039, West Virginia55.8%8.3%(+47.4)#58.4%(+47.3)#99
99.18046, Pennsylvania55.7%12.4%(+43.2)#108.4%(+47.2)#100
100.62359, Illinois55.3%9.3%(+46.0)#28.4%(+46.8)#101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States?
60141 has the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States?
Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States is 8.4%.