Zip Codes with the Highest Unemployment Rate Amomg Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Unemployment | Senior > 65
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Unemployment Rate Amomg Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States

70.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Unemployment Rate Amomg Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Unemployment Rate Amomg Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States

Zip Code Senior Unemployment vs State vs National
1. 14721, New York 100.0% 4.6% (+95.4)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#1
2. 36505, Alabama 100.0% 2.5% (+97.5)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#2
3. 89019, Nevada 100.0% 7.6% (+92.4)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#3
4. 16343, Pennsylvania 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#4
5. 74850, Oklahoma 100.0% 2.1% (+97.9)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#5
6. 80951, Colorado 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#6
7. 87514, New Mexico 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#7
8. 15346, Pennsylvania 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#2 3.9% (+96.1)#8
9. 72333, Arkansas 100.0% 2.7% (+97.3)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#9
10. 76870, Texas 100.0% 3.9% (+96.1)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#10
11. 47427, Indiana 100.0% 2.9% (+97.1)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#11
12. 64120, Missouri 100.0% 3.0% (+97.0)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#12
13. 99563, Alaska 100.0% 4.4% (+95.6)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#13
14. 13103, New York 100.0% 4.6% (+95.4)#2 3.9% (+96.1)#14
15. 89013, Nevada 100.0% 7.6% (+92.4)#2 3.9% (+96.1)#15
16. 80423, Colorado 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#2 3.9% (+96.1)#16
17. 99744, Alaska 100.0% 4.4% (+95.6)#2 3.9% (+96.1)#17
18. 04964, Maine 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#18
19. 60519, Illinois 100.0% 4.1% (+95.9)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#19
20. 99575, Alaska 100.0% 4.4% (+95.6)#3 3.9% (+96.1)#20
21. 31905, Georgia 100.0% 3.6% (+96.4)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#21
22. 70453, Louisiana 100.0% 3.8% (+96.2)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#22
23. 25446, West Virginia 100.0% 2.6% (+97.4)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#23
24. 12125, New York 100.0% 4.6% (+95.4)#3 3.9% (+96.1)#24
25. 59411, Montana 100.0% 2.8% (+97.2)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#25
26. 35542, Alabama 100.0% 2.5% (+97.5)#2 3.9% (+96.1)#26
27. 23337, Virginia 100.0% 3.1% (+96.9)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#27
28. 42285, Kentucky 100.0% 3.2% (+96.8)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#28
29. 95318, California 100.0% 5.3% (+94.7)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#29
30. 08350, New Jersey 100.0% 6.0% (+94.0)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#30
31. 87731, New Mexico 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#2 3.9% (+96.1)#31
32. 43940, Ohio 100.0% 3.3% (+96.7)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#32
33. 41524, Kentucky 100.0% 3.2% (+96.8)#2 3.9% (+96.1)#33
34. 77431, Texas 100.0% 3.9% (+96.1)#2 3.9% (+96.1)#34
35. 21543, Maryland 100.0% 3.6% (+96.4)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#35
36. 76955, Texas 100.0% 3.9% (+96.1)#3 3.9% (+96.1)#36
37. 18913, Pennsylvania 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#3 3.9% (+96.1)#37
38. 44881, Ohio 100.0% 3.3% (+96.7)#2 3.9% (+96.1)#38
39. 98833, Washington 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#39
40. 83802, Idaho 100.0% 3.2% (+96.8)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#40
41. 54845, Wisconsin 100.0% 2.1% (+97.9)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#41
42. 10540, New York 100.0% 4.6% (+95.4)#4 3.9% (+96.1)#42
43. 06350, Connecticut 100.0% 4.7% (+95.3)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#43
44. 47160, Indiana 100.0% 2.9% (+97.1)#2 3.9% (+96.1)#44
45. 82943, Wyoming 100.0% 2.4% (+97.6)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#45
46. 58452, North Dakota 100.0% 1.9% (+98.1)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#46
47. 23416, Virginia 100.0% 3.1% (+96.9)#2 3.9% (+96.1)#47
48. 67012, Kansas 100.0% 1.9% (+98.1)#1 3.9% (+96.1)#48
49. 99647, Alaska 100.0% 4.4% (+95.6)#4 3.9% (+96.1)#49
50. 99732, Alaska 100.0% 4.4% (+95.6)#5 3.9% (+96.1)#50
51. 41250, Kentucky 99.9% 3.2% (+96.7)#3 3.9% (+96.0)#51
52. 16840, Pennsylvania 99.9% 4.2% (+95.7)#4 3.9% (+96.0)#52
53. 12752, New York 99.9% 4.6% (+95.3)#5 3.9% (+96.0)#53
54. 24894, West Virginia 99.9% 2.6% (+97.3)#2 3.9% (+96.0)#54
55. 78607, Texas 99.9% 3.9% (+96.0)#4 3.9% (+96.0)#55
56. 73744, Oklahoma 99.9% 2.1% (+97.8)#2 3.9% (+96.0)#56
57. 83842, Idaho 99.9% 3.2% (+96.7)#2 3.9% (+96.0)#57
58. 19472, Pennsylvania 99.9% 4.2% (+95.7)#5 3.9% (+96.0)#58
59. 43007, Ohio 99.9% 3.3% (+96.6)#3 3.9% (+96.0)#59
60. 93530, California 99.9% 5.3% (+94.6)#2 3.9% (+96.0)#60
61. 26035, West Virginia 99.8% 2.6% (+97.2)#3 3.9% (+95.9)#61
62. 52801, Iowa 99.8% 2.6% (+97.2)#1 3.9% (+95.9)#62
63. 41231, Kentucky 99.8% 3.2% (+96.6)#4 3.9% (+95.9)#63
64. 48636, Michigan 99.8% 4.3% (+95.5)#1 3.9% (+95.9)#64
65. 27872, North Carolina 99.8% 3.1% (+96.7)#1 3.9% (+95.9)#65
66. 59855, Montana 99.8% 2.8% (+97.0)#2 3.9% (+95.9)#66
67. 97531, Oregon 99.8% 4.7% (+95.1)#1 3.9% (+95.9)#67
68. 22735, Virginia 99.7% 3.1% (+96.6)#3 3.9% (+95.8)#68
69. 39665, Mississippi 99.7% 3.8% (+95.9)#1 3.9% (+95.8)#69
70. 15051, Pennsylvania 99.7% 4.2% (+95.5)#6 3.9% (+95.8)#70
71. 76445, Texas 99.7% 3.9% (+95.8)#5 3.9% (+95.8)#71
72. 27915, North Carolina 99.7% 3.1% (+96.6)#2 3.9% (+95.8)#72
73. 97406, Oregon 99.7% 4.7% (+95.0)#2 3.9% (+95.8)#73
74. 04936, Maine 99.7% 4.2% (+95.5)#2 3.9% (+95.8)#74
75. 30346, Georgia 99.6% 3.6% (+96.0)#2 3.9% (+95.7)#75
76. 80045, Colorado 99.5% 3.4% (+96.1)#3 3.9% (+95.6)#76
77. 93660, California 99.3% 5.3% (+94.0)#3 3.9% (+95.4)#77
78. 47110, Indiana 99.2% 2.9% (+96.3)#3 3.9% (+95.3)#78
79. 58260, North Dakota 99.2% 1.9% (+97.3)#2 3.9% (+95.3)#79
80. 41425, Kentucky 98.5% 3.2% (+95.3)#5 3.9% (+94.6)#80
81. 41773, Kentucky 98.2% 3.2% (+95.0)#6 3.9% (+94.3)#81
82. 72339, Arkansas 97.6% 2.7% (+94.9)#2 3.9% (+93.7)#82
83. 43109, Ohio 93.5% 3.3% (+90.2)#4 3.9% (+89.6)#83
84. 15337, Pennsylvania 91.3% 4.2% (+87.1)#7 3.9% (+87.4)#84
85. 52646, Iowa 88.8% 2.6% (+86.2)#2 3.9% (+84.9)#85
86. 72760, Arkansas 87.3% 2.7% (+84.6)#3 3.9% (+83.4)#86
87. 44510, Ohio 86.5% 3.3% (+83.2)#5 3.9% (+82.6)#87
88. 95983, California 85.6% 5.3% (+80.3)#4 3.9% (+81.7)#88
89. 62992, Illinois 83.2% 4.1% (+79.1)#2 3.9% (+79.3)#89
90. 59915, Montana 81.8% 2.8% (+79.0)#3 3.9% (+77.9)#90
91. 22623, Virginia 80.0% 3.1% (+76.9)#4 3.9% (+76.1)#91
92. 99746, Alaska 79.9% 4.4% (+75.5)#6 3.9% (+76.0)#92
93. 31532, Georgia 79.7% 3.6% (+76.1)#3 3.9% (+75.8)#93
94. 72533, Arkansas 79.7% 2.7% (+77.0)#4 3.9% (+75.8)#94
95. 92398, California 78.0% 5.3% (+72.7)#5 3.9% (+74.1)#95
96. 93224, California 77.9% 5.3% (+72.6)#6 3.9% (+74.0)#96
97. 47352, Indiana 77.7% 2.9% (+74.8)#4 3.9% (+73.8)#97
98. 89085, Nevada 77.3% 7.6% (+69.7)#3 3.9% (+73.4)#98
99. 70658, Louisiana 76.8% 3.8% (+73.0)#2 3.9% (+72.9)#99
100. 48359, Michigan 76.1% 4.3% (+71.8)#2 3.9% (+72.2)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Unemployment Rate Amomg Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Unemployment Rate Amomg Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Unemployment Rate Amomg Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
14721 has the Highest Unemployment Rate Amomg Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Unemployment Rate Amomg Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
Unemployment Rate Amomg Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States is 3.9%.