Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States

100.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 28547, North Carolina 100.0% 33.8% (+66.2)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#1
2. 16802, Pennsylvania 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#2
3. 01003, Massachusetts 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#3
4. 80902, Colorado 100.0% 33.8% (+66.2)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#4
5. 43210, Ohio 100.0% 33.2% (+66.8)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#5
6. 73503, Oklahoma 100.0% 34.1% (+65.9)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#6
7. 23511, Virginia 100.0% 33.1% (+66.9)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#7
8. 71459, Louisiana 100.0% 32.8% (+67.2)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#8
9. 92136, California 100.0% 44.4% (+55.6)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#9
10. 99703, Alaska 100.0% 33.7% (+66.3)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#10
11. 47406, Indiana 100.0% 29.9% (+70.1)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#11
12. 13244, New York 100.0% 45.7% (+54.3)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#12
13. 30905, Georgia 100.0% 35.0% (+65.0)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#13
14. 80840, Colorado 100.0% 33.8% (+66.2)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#14
15. 10996, New York 100.0% 45.7% (+54.3)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#15
16. 12222, New York 100.0% 45.7% (+54.3)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#16
17. 22904, Virginia 100.0% 33.1% (+66.9)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#17
18. 79906, Texas 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#18
19. 29634, South Carolina 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#19
20. 48109, Michigan 100.0% 27.5% (+72.5)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#20
21. 99505, Alaska 100.0% 33.7% (+66.3)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#21
22. 22807, Virginia 100.0% 33.1% (+66.9)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#22
23. 93106, California 100.0% 44.4% (+55.6)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#23
24. 19383, Pennsylvania 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#24
25. 32508, Florida 100.0% 33.1% (+66.9)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#25
26. 55455, Minnesota 100.0% 27.7% (+72.3)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#26
27. 02912, Rhode Island 100.0% 37.3% (+62.7)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#27
28. 85613, Arizona 100.0% 33.7% (+66.3)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#28
29. 08544, New Jersey 100.0% 36.1% (+63.9)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#29
30. 95671, California 100.0% 44.4% (+55.6)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#31
31. 83844, Idaho 100.0% 28.0% (+72.0)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#32
32. 79908, Texas 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#33
33. 20742, Maryland 100.0% 32.5% (+67.5)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#34
34. 88330, New Mexico 100.0% 31.3% (+68.7)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#35
35. 90089, California 100.0% 44.4% (+55.6)#4 35.2% (+64.8)#36
36. 52242, Iowa 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#37
37. 94129, California 100.0% 44.4% (+55.6)#5 35.2% (+64.8)#38
38. 85540, Arizona 100.0% 33.7% (+66.3)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#39
39. 32542, Florida 100.0% 33.1% (+66.9)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#40
40. 75251, Texas 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#41
41. 33965, Florida 100.0% 33.1% (+66.9)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#42
42. 53706, Wisconsin 100.0% 32.3% (+67.7)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#43
43. 93437, California 100.0% 44.4% (+55.6)#6 35.2% (+64.8)#44
44. 32227, Florida 100.0% 33.1% (+66.9)#4 35.2% (+64.8)#45
45. 28542, North Carolina 100.0% 33.8% (+66.2)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#46
46. 95053, California 100.0% 44.4% (+55.6)#7 35.2% (+64.8)#47
47. 66506, Kansas 100.0% 33.1% (+66.9)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#48
48. 99702, Alaska 100.0% 33.7% (+66.3)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#49
49. 94130, California 100.0% 44.4% (+55.6)#8 35.2% (+64.8)#50
50. 71110, Louisiana 100.0% 32.8% (+67.2)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#51
51. 58202, North Dakota 100.0% 36.8% (+63.2)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#52
52. 02918, Rhode Island 100.0% 37.3% (+62.7)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#53
53. 21402, Maryland 100.0% 32.5% (+67.5)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#54
54. 02325, Massachusetts 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#55
55. 84112, Utah 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#56
56. 93944, California 100.0% 44.4% (+55.6)#9 35.2% (+64.8)#57
57. 78235, Texas 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#4 35.2% (+64.8)#58
58. 48859, Michigan 100.0% 27.5% (+72.5)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#59
59. 68178, Nebraska 100.0% 33.5% (+66.5)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#60
60. 39217, Mississippi 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#61
61. 57706, South Dakota 100.0% 31.6% (+68.4)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#62
62. 32544, Florida 100.0% 33.1% (+66.9)#5 35.2% (+64.8)#63
63. 33621, Florida 100.0% 33.1% (+66.9)#6 35.2% (+64.8)#64
64. 29404, South Carolina 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#65
65. 01063, Massachusetts 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#66
66. 94964, California 100.0% 44.4% (+55.6)#10 35.2% (+64.8)#67
67. 02163, Massachusetts 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#4 35.2% (+64.8)#68
68. 12604, New York 100.0% 45.7% (+54.3)#4 35.2% (+64.8)#69
69. 29614, South Carolina 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#70
70. 23284, Virginia 100.0% 33.1% (+66.9)#4 35.2% (+64.8)#71
71. 20052, District Of Columbia 100.0% 58.6% (+41.4)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#72
72. 58204, North Dakota 100.0% 36.8% (+63.2)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#73
73. 30149, Georgia 100.0% 35.0% (+65.0)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#74
74. 07311, New Jersey 100.0% 36.1% (+63.9)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#75
75. 01731, Massachusetts 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#5 35.2% (+64.8)#76
76. 36688, Alabama 100.0% 30.3% (+69.7)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#77
77. 76127, Texas 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#5 35.2% (+64.8)#78
78. 32925, Florida 100.0% 33.1% (+66.9)#7 35.2% (+64.8)#79
79. 84602, Utah 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#80
80. 52801, Iowa 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#81
81. 98314, Washington 100.0% 36.2% (+63.8)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#82
82. 10162, New York 100.0% 45.7% (+54.3)#5 35.2% (+64.8)#83
83. 96747, Hawaii 100.0% 38.2% (+61.8)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#84
84. 36113, Alabama 100.0% 30.3% (+69.7)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#85
85. 20670, Maryland 100.0% 32.5% (+67.5)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#86
86. 48502, Michigan 100.0% 27.5% (+72.5)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#87
87. 59812, Montana 100.0% 31.0% (+69.0)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#88
88. 83209, Idaho 100.0% 28.0% (+72.0)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#89
89. 29424, South Carolina 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#4 35.2% (+64.8)#90
90. 02841, Rhode Island 100.0% 37.3% (+62.7)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#91
91. 22211, Virginia 100.0% 33.1% (+66.9)#5 35.2% (+64.8)#92
92. 95652, California 100.0% 44.4% (+55.6)#11 35.2% (+64.8)#93
93. 06459, Connecticut 100.0% 33.8% (+66.2)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#94
94. 30118, Georgia 100.0% 35.0% (+65.0)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#95
95. 36115, Alabama 100.0% 30.3% (+69.7)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#96
96. 91125, California 100.0% 44.4% (+55.6)#12 35.2% (+64.8)#97
97. 75247, Texas 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#6 35.2% (+64.8)#98
98. 27506, North Carolina 100.0% 33.8% (+66.2)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#99
99. 44503, Ohio 100.0% 33.2% (+66.8)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#100
100. 72467, Arkansas 100.0% 33.8% (+66.2)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
28547 has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.