Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Wholesale Trade
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in the United States

20.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 95305, California 100.0% 2.6% (+97.4)#1 2.4% (+97.6)#1
2. 24984, West Virginia 100.0% 1.9% (+98.1)#1 2.4% (+97.6)#2
3. 18081, Pennsylvania 100.0% 2.5% (+97.5)#1 2.4% (+97.6)#3
4. 95514, California 100.0% 2.6% (+97.4)#2 2.4% (+97.6)#4
5. 14788, New York 100.0% 2.1% (+97.9)#1 2.4% (+97.6)#5
6. 41390, Kentucky 100.0% 2.3% (+97.7)#1 2.4% (+97.6)#6
7. 82943, Wyoming 100.0% 1.9% (+98.1)#1 2.4% (+97.6)#7
8. 66863, Kansas 100.0% 2.5% (+97.5)#1 2.4% (+97.6)#8
9. 93262, California 100.0% 2.6% (+97.4)#3 2.4% (+97.6)#9
10. 79314, Texas 66.7% 2.6% (+64.1)#1 2.4% (+64.3)#10
11. 81612, Colorado 59.8% 2.3% (+57.5)#1 2.4% (+57.4)#11
12. 59064, Montana 58.2% 2.1% (+56.0)#1 2.4% (+55.8)#12
13. 20656, Maryland 56.5% 1.7% (+54.9)#1 2.4% (+54.1)#13
14. 26230, West Virginia 56.5% 1.9% (+54.7)#2 2.4% (+54.1)#14
15. 73770, Oklahoma 55.6% 2.3% (+53.2)#1 2.4% (+53.2)#15
16. 39635, Mississippi 55.4% 2.2% (+53.2)#1 2.4% (+53.0)#16
17. 25823, West Virginia 54.9% 1.9% (+53.1)#3 2.4% (+52.5)#17
18. 24854, West Virginia 54.7% 1.9% (+52.9)#4 2.4% (+52.3)#18
19. 79056, Texas 53.8% 2.6% (+51.3)#2 2.4% (+51.4)#19
20. 28666, North Carolina 53.2% 2.3% (+50.9)#1 2.4% (+50.8)#20
21. 99034, Washington 51.4% 2.5% (+49.0)#1 2.4% (+49.0)#21
22. 76061, Texas 50.8% 2.6% (+48.3)#3 2.4% (+48.4)#22
23. 21543, Maryland 50.8% 1.7% (+49.2)#2 2.4% (+48.4)#23
24. 77616, Texas 48.8% 2.6% (+46.2)#4 2.4% (+46.4)#24
25. 15361, Pennsylvania 47.7% 2.5% (+45.2)#2 2.4% (+45.3)#25
26. 87580, New Mexico 47.5% 1.8% (+45.8)#1 2.4% (+45.1)#26
27. 77428, Texas 46.9% 2.6% (+44.3)#5 2.4% (+44.5)#27
28. 26148, West Virginia 46.2% 1.9% (+44.3)#5 2.4% (+43.8)#28
29. 59435, Montana 45.8% 2.1% (+43.7)#2 2.4% (+43.4)#29
30. 76041, Texas 45.6% 2.6% (+43.0)#6 2.4% (+43.2)#30
31. 12977, New York 45.5% 2.1% (+43.4)#2 2.4% (+43.1)#31
32. 43735, Ohio 45.3% 2.4% (+42.8)#1 2.4% (+42.8)#32
33. 70393, Louisiana 45.2% 2.5% (+42.7)#1 2.4% (+42.8)#33
34. 58362, North Dakota 45.0% 2.9% (+42.1)#1 2.4% (+42.6)#34
35. 13649, New York 43.8% 2.1% (+41.7)#3 2.4% (+41.3)#35
36. 59750, Montana 43.4% 2.1% (+41.2)#3 2.4% (+41.0)#36
37. 67521, Kansas 41.9% 2.5% (+39.4)#2 2.4% (+39.5)#37
38. 39352, Mississippi 41.7% 2.2% (+39.4)#2 2.4% (+39.3)#38
39. 77882, Texas 41.7% 2.6% (+39.1)#7 2.4% (+39.3)#39
40. 35544, Alabama 41.2% 2.3% (+38.9)#1 2.4% (+38.8)#40
41. 95312, California 40.2% 2.6% (+37.6)#4 2.4% (+37.8)#41
42. 78949, Texas 40.2% 2.6% (+37.6)#8 2.4% (+37.8)#42
43. 58452, North Dakota 40.0% 2.9% (+37.1)#2 2.4% (+37.6)#43
44. 54857, Wisconsin 40.0% 2.6% (+37.4)#1 2.4% (+37.6)#44
45. 62319, Illinois 39.6% 2.8% (+36.8)#1 2.4% (+37.2)#45
46. 79538, Texas 39.2% 2.6% (+36.7)#9 2.4% (+36.8)#46
47. 36513, Alabama 38.8% 2.3% (+36.5)#2 2.4% (+36.4)#47
48. 07926, New Jersey 38.5% 3.1% (+35.4)#1 2.4% (+36.1)#48
49. 26298, West Virginia 37.5% 1.9% (+35.6)#6 2.4% (+35.1)#49
50. 16321, Pennsylvania 37.5% 2.5% (+35.0)#3 2.4% (+35.1)#50
51. 57779, South Dakota 35.4% 2.6% (+32.8)#1 2.4% (+33.0)#51
52. 62375, Illinois 35.4% 2.8% (+32.6)#2 2.4% (+33.0)#52
53. 62279, Illinois 35.3% 2.8% (+32.5)#3 2.4% (+32.9)#53
54. 77867, Texas 34.8% 2.6% (+32.2)#10 2.4% (+32.4)#54
55. 59424, Montana 34.8% 2.1% (+32.6)#4 2.4% (+32.4)#55
56. 13826, New York 34.1% 2.1% (+32.0)#4 2.4% (+31.7)#56
57. 78358, Texas 34.0% 2.6% (+31.4)#11 2.4% (+31.6)#57
58. 42332, Kentucky 34.0% 2.3% (+31.7)#2 2.4% (+31.6)#58
59. 27584, North Carolina 33.3% 2.3% (+31.0)#2 2.4% (+30.9)#59
60. 42131, Kentucky 33.3% 2.3% (+31.0)#3 2.4% (+30.9)#60
61. 56125, Minnesota 33.3% 2.7% (+30.6)#1 2.4% (+30.9)#61
62. 47869, Indiana 33.3% 2.3% (+31.0)#1 2.4% (+30.9)#62
63. 25044, West Virginia 33.1% 1.9% (+31.2)#7 2.4% (+30.7)#63
64. 15446, Pennsylvania 32.7% 2.5% (+30.2)#4 2.4% (+30.3)#64
65. 65541, Missouri 32.2% 2.6% (+29.7)#1 2.4% (+29.8)#65
66. 12024, New York 31.8% 2.1% (+29.8)#5 2.4% (+29.4)#66
67. 72322, Arkansas 31.8% 2.3% (+29.6)#1 2.4% (+29.4)#67
68. 36314, Alabama 30.8% 2.3% (+28.5)#3 2.4% (+28.4)#68
69. 62378, Illinois 30.8% 2.8% (+28.0)#4 2.4% (+28.4)#69
70. 62998, Illinois 30.8% 2.8% (+28.0)#5 2.4% (+28.4)#70
71. 63866, Missouri 30.6% 2.6% (+28.0)#2 2.4% (+28.2)#71
72. 99730, Alaska 30.6% 1.5% (+29.1)#1 2.4% (+28.2)#72
73. 51645, Iowa 29.7% 2.7% (+27.0)#1 2.4% (+27.3)#73
74. 80721, Colorado 28.8% 2.3% (+26.6)#2 2.4% (+26.4)#74
75. 63471, Missouri 28.6% 2.6% (+26.1)#3 2.4% (+26.2)#75
76. 89039, Nevada 28.6% 2.0% (+26.6)#1 2.4% (+26.2)#76
77. 07846, New Jersey 28.6% 3.1% (+25.5)#2 2.4% (+26.2)#77
78. 79062, Texas 28.2% 2.6% (+25.6)#12 2.4% (+25.8)#78
79. 18950, Pennsylvania 28.2% 2.5% (+25.7)#5 2.4% (+25.8)#79
80. 15953, Pennsylvania 28.2% 2.5% (+25.7)#6 2.4% (+25.8)#80
81. 57772, South Dakota 28.1% 2.6% (+25.5)#2 2.4% (+25.7)#81
82. 12085, New York 28.0% 2.1% (+25.9)#6 2.4% (+25.6)#82
83. 93244, California 28.0% 2.6% (+25.4)#5 2.4% (+25.6)#83
84. 62518, Illinois 27.9% 2.8% (+25.1)#6 2.4% (+25.5)#84
85. 42371, Kentucky 27.8% 2.3% (+25.5)#4 2.4% (+25.4)#85
86. 81220, Colorado 27.5% 2.3% (+25.2)#3 2.4% (+25.1)#86
87. 64672, Missouri 27.3% 2.6% (+24.7)#4 2.4% (+24.9)#87
88. 17880, Pennsylvania 27.3% 2.5% (+24.8)#7 2.4% (+24.9)#88
89. 15764, Pennsylvania 26.5% 2.5% (+24.0)#8 2.4% (+24.1)#89
90. 05678, Vermont 26.5% 1.8% (+24.8)#1 2.4% (+24.1)#90
91. 41751, Kentucky 26.3% 2.3% (+24.0)#5 2.4% (+23.9)#91
92. 41825, Kentucky 26.3% 2.3% (+24.0)#6 2.4% (+23.9)#92
93. 47983, Indiana 26.1% 2.3% (+23.8)#2 2.4% (+23.7)#93
94. 59242, Montana 25.9% 2.1% (+23.8)#5 2.4% (+23.5)#94
95. 32410, Florida 25.9% 2.5% (+23.4)#1 2.4% (+23.5)#95
96. 41759, Kentucky 25.9% 2.3% (+23.6)#7 2.4% (+23.5)#96
97. 62373, Illinois 25.8% 2.8% (+23.0)#7 2.4% (+23.4)#97
98. 58224, North Dakota 25.8% 2.9% (+22.9)#3 2.4% (+23.4)#98
99. 26058, West Virginia 25.7% 1.9% (+23.8)#8 2.4% (+23.3)#99
100. 97326, Oregon 25.5% 2.5% (+23.1)#1 2.4% (+23.1)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
66.7%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in the United States?
95305 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in the United States is 2.4%.