Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Installation, Maintenance & Repair
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the United States

30.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 27531, North Carolina 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#1
2. 83866, Idaho 100.0% 3.5% (+96.5)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#2
3. 71859, Arkansas 100.0% 3.8% (+96.2)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#3
4. 25505, West Virginia 100.0% 3.9% (+96.1)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#4
5. 18081, Pennsylvania 100.0% 3.1% (+96.9)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#6
6. 49063, Michigan 100.0% 3.1% (+96.9)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#7
7. 15922, Pennsylvania 100.0% 3.1% (+96.9)#2 3.1% (+96.9)#8
8. 29589, South Carolina 100.0% 3.8% (+96.2)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#9
9. 04227, Maine 100.0% 3.3% (+96.7)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#10
10. 71722, Arkansas 100.0% 3.8% (+96.2)#2 3.1% (+96.9)#11
11. 49258, Michigan 100.0% 3.1% (+96.9)#2 3.1% (+96.9)#12
12. 87573, New Mexico 100.0% 3.7% (+96.3)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#13
13. 83602, Idaho 100.0% 3.5% (+96.5)#2 3.1% (+96.9)#14
14. 47865, Indiana 100.0% 3.5% (+96.5)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#15
15. 87347, New Mexico 77.8% 3.7% (+74.1)#2 3.1% (+74.7)#16
16. 61324, Illinois 75.9% 2.7% (+73.1)#1 3.1% (+72.8)#17
17. 26676, West Virginia 72.3% 3.9% (+68.4)#2 3.1% (+69.2)#18
18. 19511, Pennsylvania 71.7% 3.1% (+68.6)#3 3.1% (+68.6)#19
19. 75475, Texas 68.4% 3.4% (+65.0)#1 3.1% (+65.4)#20
20. 26627, West Virginia 66.7% 3.9% (+62.8)#3 3.1% (+63.6)#21
21. 76869, Texas 66.7% 3.4% (+63.3)#2 3.1% (+63.6)#22
22. 87832, New Mexico 66.7% 3.7% (+63.0)#3 3.1% (+63.6)#23
23. 47435, Indiana 66.7% 3.5% (+63.1)#2 3.1% (+63.6)#24
24. 99657, Alaska 66.7% 4.3% (+62.4)#1 3.1% (+63.6)#25
25. 30423, Georgia 66.7% 3.4% (+63.3)#1 3.1% (+63.6)#26
26. 54417, Wisconsin 66.7% 3.3% (+63.3)#1 3.1% (+63.6)#27
27. 24736, West Virginia 65.5% 3.9% (+61.6)#4 3.1% (+62.4)#28
28. 62829, Illinois 65.2% 2.7% (+62.5)#2 3.1% (+62.1)#29
29. 59546, Montana 60.9% 3.5% (+57.4)#1 3.1% (+57.8)#30
30. 83215, Idaho 60.0% 3.5% (+56.5)#3 3.1% (+56.9)#31
31. 95919, California 59.4% 2.6% (+56.9)#1 3.1% (+56.3)#32
32. 22729, Virginia 59.1% 2.9% (+56.2)#1 3.1% (+56.1)#33
33. 31753, Georgia 59.1% 3.4% (+55.7)#2 3.1% (+56.0)#34
34. 70650, Louisiana 58.8% 3.7% (+55.1)#1 3.1% (+55.7)#35
35. 82243, Wyoming 57.6% 5.0% (+52.6)#1 3.1% (+54.6)#36
36. 25126, West Virginia 57.4% 3.9% (+53.5)#5 3.1% (+54.4)#37
37. 17016, Pennsylvania 56.6% 3.1% (+53.6)#4 3.1% (+53.6)#38
38. 95493, California 56.5% 2.6% (+54.0)#2 3.1% (+53.5)#39
39. 15733, Pennsylvania 56.0% 3.1% (+52.9)#5 3.1% (+52.9)#40
40. 85619, Arizona 55.6% 3.3% (+52.3)#1 3.1% (+52.5)#41
41. 04944, Maine 54.4% 3.3% (+51.1)#2 3.1% (+51.3)#42
42. 94964, California 53.8% 2.6% (+51.2)#3 3.1% (+50.7)#43
43. 77977, Texas 53.4% 3.4% (+50.0)#3 3.1% (+50.3)#44
44. 72540, Arkansas 53.3% 3.8% (+49.5)#3 3.1% (+50.3)#45
45. 19710, Delaware 52.9% 3.4% (+49.5)#1 3.1% (+49.9)#46
46. 73001, Oklahoma 51.9% 4.2% (+47.7)#1 3.1% (+48.8)#47
47. 95978, California 50.0% 2.6% (+47.4)#4 3.1% (+46.9)#48
48. 88125, New Mexico 50.0% 3.7% (+46.3)#4 3.1% (+46.9)#49
49. 62541, Illinois 50.0% 2.7% (+47.3)#3 3.1% (+46.9)#50
50. 76241, Texas 50.0% 3.4% (+46.6)#4 3.1% (+46.9)#51
51. 14083, New York 50.0% 2.3% (+47.7)#1 3.1% (+46.9)#52
52. 98817, Washington 49.2% 2.9% (+46.3)#1 3.1% (+46.1)#53
53. 44630, Ohio 49.0% 3.1% (+45.9)#1 3.1% (+45.9)#54
54. 48870, Michigan 48.2% 3.1% (+45.1)#3 3.1% (+45.2)#55
55. 38844, Mississippi 48.0% 4.3% (+43.7)#1 3.1% (+44.9)#56
56. 47445, Indiana 47.9% 3.5% (+44.4)#3 3.1% (+44.9)#57
57. 65768, Missouri 46.2% 3.2% (+42.9)#1 3.1% (+43.1)#58
58. 15615, Pennsylvania 46.0% 3.1% (+42.9)#6 3.1% (+43.0)#59
59. 77876, Texas 46.0% 3.4% (+42.6)#5 3.1% (+43.0)#60
60. 14480, New York 46.0% 2.3% (+43.7)#2 3.1% (+42.9)#61
61. 25183, West Virginia 45.9% 3.9% (+42.0)#6 3.1% (+42.9)#62
62. 48896, Michigan 45.9% 3.1% (+42.8)#4 3.1% (+42.8)#63
63. 82324, Wyoming 45.9% 5.0% (+40.9)#2 3.1% (+42.8)#64
64. 71424, Louisiana 45.8% 3.7% (+42.1)#2 3.1% (+42.7)#65
65. 81248, Colorado 45.8% 2.8% (+42.9)#1 3.1% (+42.7)#66
66. 28308, North Carolina 45.5% 3.4% (+42.0)#2 3.1% (+42.4)#67
67. 43735, Ohio 45.3% 3.1% (+42.2)#2 3.1% (+42.2)#68
68. 13860, New York 45.1% 2.3% (+42.8)#3 3.1% (+42.0)#69
69. 47367, Indiana 45.0% 3.5% (+41.5)#4 3.1% (+41.9)#70
70. 04491, Maine 44.4% 3.3% (+41.2)#3 3.1% (+41.4)#71
71. 65589, Missouri 44.4% 3.2% (+41.2)#2 3.1% (+41.4)#72
72. 35032, Alabama 44.4% 4.0% (+40.5)#1 3.1% (+41.4)#73
73. 72661, Arkansas 44.2% 3.8% (+40.5)#4 3.1% (+41.2)#74
74. 47580, Indiana 43.9% 3.5% (+40.4)#5 3.1% (+40.9)#75
75. 17779, Pennsylvania 43.9% 3.1% (+40.8)#7 3.1% (+40.8)#76
76. 25845, West Virginia 43.8% 3.9% (+39.9)#7 3.1% (+40.8)#77
77. 24846, West Virginia 43.3% 3.9% (+39.4)#8 3.1% (+40.3)#78
78. 13065, New York 43.2% 2.3% (+40.9)#4 3.1% (+40.1)#79
79. 24860, West Virginia 43.1% 3.9% (+39.2)#9 3.1% (+40.0)#80
80. 58580, North Dakota 43.1% 4.2% (+38.8)#1 3.1% (+40.0)#81
81. 21762, Maryland 43.0% 2.8% (+40.2)#1 3.1% (+39.9)#82
82. 41621, Kentucky 42.9% 3.5% (+39.3)#1 3.1% (+39.8)#83
83. 75415, Texas 42.6% 3.4% (+39.2)#6 3.1% (+39.5)#84
84. 41847, Kentucky 42.5% 3.5% (+39.0)#2 3.1% (+39.4)#85
85. 77616, Texas 42.5% 3.4% (+39.0)#7 3.1% (+39.4)#86
86. 23952, Virginia 42.4% 2.9% (+39.5)#2 3.1% (+39.4)#87
87. 25203, West Virginia 42.0% 3.9% (+38.0)#10 3.1% (+38.9)#88
88. 73097, Oklahoma 41.5% 4.2% (+37.3)#2 3.1% (+38.4)#89
89. 31077, Georgia 41.2% 3.4% (+37.9)#3 3.1% (+38.2)#90
90. 75689, Texas 41.0% 3.4% (+37.6)#8 3.1% (+38.0)#91
91. 50102, Iowa 40.4% 3.5% (+36.9)#1 3.1% (+37.3)#92
92. 29333, South Carolina 40.3% 3.8% (+36.5)#2 3.1% (+37.2)#93
93. 65715, Missouri 40.0% 3.2% (+36.8)#3 3.1% (+36.9)#94
94. 49717, Michigan 40.0% 3.1% (+36.9)#5 3.1% (+36.9)#95
95. 57748, South Dakota 39.5% 3.7% (+35.8)#1 3.1% (+36.4)#96
96. 43722, Ohio 39.5% 3.1% (+36.4)#3 3.1% (+36.4)#97
97. 40020, Kentucky 39.4% 3.5% (+35.9)#3 3.1% (+36.3)#98
98. 50137, Iowa 39.3% 3.5% (+35.8)#2 3.1% (+36.2)#99
99. 38943, Mississippi 38.9% 4.3% (+34.7)#2 3.1% (+35.9)#100
100. 72066, Arkansas 38.7% 3.8% (+34.9)#5 3.1% (+35.6)#101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the United States?
27531 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the United States is 3.1%.