Zip Codes with the Largest Danish Community in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Danish
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Largest Danish Community in the United States

0
4,000
Zip Codes with the Largest Danish Community in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Largest Danish Community in the United States

Zip Code Danish vs State vs National
1. 84043, Utah 3,787 141,547 (2.68%)#1 1,182,895 (0.32%)#1
2. 84005, Utah 3,550 141,547 (2.51%)#2 1,182,895 (0.30%)#2
3. 84003, Utah 3,234 141,547 (2.28%)#3 1,182,895 (0.27%)#3
4. 84010, Utah 2,730 141,547 (1.93%)#4 1,182,895 (0.23%)#4
5. 84037, Utah 2,695 141,547 (1.90%)#5 1,182,895 (0.23%)#5
6. 84604, Utah 2,651 141,547 (1.87%)#6 1,182,895 (0.22%)#6
7. 83440, Idaho 2,650 31,046 (8.54%)#1 1,182,895 (0.22%)#7
8. 84119, Utah 2,618 141,547 (1.85%)#7 1,182,895 (0.22%)#8
9. 84062, Utah 2,549 141,547 (1.80%)#8 1,182,895 (0.22%)#9
10. 84096, Utah 2,492 141,547 (1.76%)#9 1,182,895 (0.21%)#10
11. 84780, Utah 2,424 141,547 (1.71%)#10 1,182,895 (0.20%)#11
12. 84041, Utah 2,296 141,547 (1.62%)#11 1,182,895 (0.19%)#12
13. 84770, Utah 2,257 141,547 (1.59%)#12 1,182,895 (0.19%)#13
14. 84321, Utah 2,182 141,547 (1.54%)#13 1,182,895 (0.18%)#14
15. 84065, Utah 2,169 141,547 (1.53%)#14 1,182,895 (0.18%)#15
16. 84015, Utah 2,073 141,547 (1.46%)#15 1,182,895 (0.18%)#16
17. 84302, Utah 1,991 141,547 (1.41%)#16 1,182,895 (0.17%)#17
18. 84095, Utah 1,972 141,547 (1.39%)#17 1,182,895 (0.17%)#18
19. 84020, Utah 1,928 141,547 (1.36%)#18 1,182,895 (0.16%)#19
20. 84121, Utah 1,908 141,547 (1.35%)#19 1,182,895 (0.16%)#20
21. 84045, Utah 1,825 141,547 (1.29%)#20 1,182,895 (0.15%)#21
22. 84404, Utah 1,802 141,547 (1.27%)#21 1,182,895 (0.15%)#22
23. 84335, Utah 1,770 141,547 (1.25%)#22 1,182,895 (0.15%)#23
24. 84660, Utah 1,759 141,547 (1.24%)#23 1,182,895 (0.15%)#24
25. 84601, Utah 1,747 141,547 (1.23%)#24 1,182,895 (0.15%)#25
26. 84790, Utah 1,693 141,547 (1.20%)#25 1,182,895 (0.14%)#26
27. 84414, Utah 1,689 141,547 (1.19%)#26 1,182,895 (0.14%)#27
28. 51503, Iowa 1,666 47,126 (3.54%)#1 1,182,895 (0.14%)#28
29. 84074, Utah 1,635 141,547 (1.16%)#27 1,182,895 (0.14%)#29
30. 53406, Wisconsin 1,620 50,428 (3.21%)#1 1,182,895 (0.14%)#30
31. 53402, Wisconsin 1,615 50,428 (3.20%)#2 1,182,895 (0.14%)#31
32. 83401, Idaho 1,612 31,046 (5.19%)#2 1,182,895 (0.14%)#32
33. 84606, Utah 1,564 141,547 (1.10%)#28 1,182,895 (0.13%)#33
34. 84341, Utah 1,538 141,547 (1.09%)#29 1,182,895 (0.13%)#34
35. 84084, Utah 1,507 141,547 (1.06%)#30 1,182,895 (0.13%)#35
36. 84651, Utah 1,507 141,547 (1.06%)#31 1,182,895 (0.13%)#36
37. 84009, Utah 1,469 141,547 (1.04%)#32 1,182,895 (0.12%)#37
38. 84032, Utah 1,469 141,547 (1.04%)#33 1,182,895 (0.12%)#38
39. 84081, Utah 1,435 141,547 (1.01%)#34 1,182,895 (0.12%)#39
40. 84088, Utah 1,430 141,547 (1.01%)#35 1,182,895 (0.12%)#40
41. 84123, Utah 1,416 141,547 (1.00%)#36 1,182,895 (0.12%)#41
42. 84663, Utah 1,387 141,547 (0.98%)#37 1,182,895 (0.12%)#42
43. 84057, Utah 1,372 141,547 (0.97%)#38 1,182,895 (0.12%)#43
44. 84107, Utah 1,364 141,547 (0.96%)#39 1,182,895 (0.12%)#44
45. 84092, Utah 1,319 141,547 (0.93%)#40 1,182,895 (0.11%)#45
46. 84129, Utah 1,315 141,547 (0.93%)#41 1,182,895 (0.11%)#46
47. 84109, Utah 1,301 141,547 (0.92%)#42 1,182,895 (0.11%)#47
48. 84117, Utah 1,282 141,547 (0.91%)#43 1,182,895 (0.11%)#48
49. 84093, Utah 1,273 141,547 (0.90%)#44 1,182,895 (0.11%)#49
50. 84058, Utah 1,269 141,547 (0.90%)#45 1,182,895 (0.11%)#50
51. 53405, Wisconsin 1,254 50,428 (2.49%)#3 1,182,895 (0.11%)#51
52. 68008, Nebraska 1,239 36,509 (3.39%)#1 1,182,895 (0.10%)#52
53. 83201, Idaho 1,231 31,046 (3.97%)#3 1,182,895 (0.10%)#53
54. 84075, Utah 1,206 141,547 (0.85%)#46 1,182,895 (0.10%)#54
55. 84118, Utah 1,202 141,547 (0.85%)#47 1,182,895 (0.10%)#55
56. 84106, Utah 1,202 141,547 (0.85%)#48 1,182,895 (0.10%)#56
57. 84094, Utah 1,199 141,547 (0.85%)#49 1,182,895 (0.10%)#57
58. 84721, Utah 1,198 141,547 (0.85%)#50 1,182,895 (0.10%)#58
59. 56007, Minnesota 1,174 65,672 (1.79%)#1 1,182,895 (0.10%)#59
60. 84120, Utah 1,169 141,547 (0.83%)#51 1,182,895 (0.10%)#60
61. 84097, Utah 1,169 141,547 (0.83%)#52 1,182,895 (0.10%)#61
62. 84108, Utah 1,169 141,547 (0.83%)#53 1,182,895 (0.10%)#62
63. 84337, Utah 1,168 141,547 (0.83%)#54 1,182,895 (0.10%)#63
64. 84025, Utah 1,167 141,547 (0.82%)#55 1,182,895 (0.10%)#64
65. 84405, Utah 1,112 141,547 (0.79%)#56 1,182,895 (0.09%)#65
66. 84701, Utah 1,110 141,547 (0.78%)#57 1,182,895 (0.09%)#66
67. 84087, Utah 1,048 141,547 (0.74%)#58 1,182,895 (0.09%)#67
68. 84124, Utah 1,016 141,547 (0.72%)#59 1,182,895 (0.09%)#68
69. 68516, Nebraska 982 36,509 (2.69%)#2 1,182,895 (0.08%)#69
70. 29072, South Carolina 976 7,608 (12.83%)#1 1,182,895 (0.08%)#70
71. 84103, Utah 968 141,547 (0.68%)#60 1,182,895 (0.08%)#71
72. 83221, Idaho 965 31,046 (3.11%)#4 1,182,895 (0.08%)#72
73. 83202, Idaho 961 31,046 (3.10%)#5 1,182,895 (0.08%)#73
74. 84105, Utah 956 141,547 (0.68%)#61 1,182,895 (0.08%)#74
75. 84014, Utah 952 141,547 (0.67%)#62 1,182,895 (0.08%)#75
76. 84067, Utah 948 141,547 (0.67%)#63 1,182,895 (0.08%)#76
77. 46038, Indiana 947 10,200 (9.28%)#1 1,182,895 (0.08%)#77
78. 84403, Utah 937 141,547 (0.66%)#64 1,182,895 (0.08%)#78
79. 98012, Washington 935 61,497 (1.52%)#1 1,182,895 (0.08%)#79
80. 55044, Minnesota 927 65,672 (1.41%)#2 1,182,895 (0.08%)#80
81. 84047, Utah 921 141,547 (0.65%)#65 1,182,895 (0.08%)#81
82. 84737, Utah 919 141,547 (0.65%)#66 1,182,895 (0.08%)#82
83. 92009, California 910 144,313 (0.63%)#1 1,182,895 (0.08%)#83
84. 83686, Idaho 909 31,046 (2.93%)#6 1,182,895 (0.08%)#84
85. 84116, Utah 894 141,547 (0.63%)#67 1,182,895 (0.08%)#85
86. 84040, Utah 891 141,547 (0.63%)#68 1,182,895 (0.08%)#86
87. 84664, Utah 887 141,547 (0.63%)#69 1,182,895 (0.07%)#87
88. 53142, Wisconsin 882 50,428 (1.75%)#4 1,182,895 (0.07%)#88
89. 85296, Arizona 867 39,214 (2.21%)#1 1,182,895 (0.07%)#89
90. 55126, Minnesota 850 65,672 (1.29%)#3 1,182,895 (0.07%)#90
91. 95747, California 849 144,313 (0.59%)#2 1,182,895 (0.07%)#91
92. 98270, Washington 847 61,497 (1.38%)#2 1,182,895 (0.07%)#92
93. 85142, Arizona 838 39,214 (2.14%)#2 1,182,895 (0.07%)#93
94. 83301, Idaho 834 31,046 (2.69%)#7 1,182,895 (0.07%)#94
95. 84655, Utah 829 141,547 (0.59%)#70 1,182,895 (0.07%)#95
96. 97202, Oregon 823 36,798 (2.24%)#1 1,182,895 (0.07%)#96
97. 57103, South Dakota 821 15,600 (5.26%)#1 1,182,895 (0.07%)#97
98. 83646, Idaho 807 31,046 (2.60%)#8 1,182,895 (0.07%)#98
99. 97206, Oregon 795 36,798 (2.16%)#2 1,182,895 (0.07%)#99
100. 83616, Idaho 795 31,046 (2.56%)#9 1,182,895 (0.07%)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Largest Danish Community in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Largest Danish Community in the United States are:
#1
3,787
#2
3,550
#3
3,234
#4
2,730
#5
2,695
#6
2,651
#7
2,650
#8
2,618
#9
2,549
#10
2,492
What zip code has the Largest Danish Community in the United States?
84043 has the Largest Danish Community in the United States with 3,787.
What is the Total Danish Population in the United States?
Total Danish Population in the United States is 1,182,895.