	Zip Code	Yugoslavian	vs State	vs National
1.	13501, New York	3,508	17,599 (19.93%)#1	220,292 (1.59%)#1
2.	63125, Missouri	2,762	12,570 (21.97%)#1	220,292 (1.25%)#2
3.	63123, Missouri	2,503	12,570 (19.91%)#2	220,292 (1.14%)#3
4.	63129, Missouri	1,797	12,570 (14.30%)#3	220,292 (0.82%)#4
5.	50702, Iowa	1,037	7,652 (13.55%)#1	220,292 (0.47%)#5
6.	49512, Michigan	1,007	14,489 (6.95%)#1	220,292 (0.46%)#6
7.	32246, Florida	939	14,834 (6.33%)#1	220,292 (0.43%)#7
8.	42104, Kentucky	891	4,202 (21.20%)#1	220,292 (0.40%)#8
9.	06114, Connecticut	891	4,434 (20.09%)#1	220,292 (0.40%)#9
10.	63010, Missouri	888	12,570 (7.06%)#4	220,292 (0.40%)#10
11.	50322, Iowa	880	7,652 (11.50%)#2	220,292 (0.40%)#11
12.	49508, Michigan	827	14,489 (5.71%)#2	220,292 (0.38%)#12
13.	60659, Illinois	780	16,898 (4.62%)#1	220,292 (0.35%)#13
14.	32216, Florida	751	14,834 (5.06%)#2	220,292 (0.34%)#14
15.	42101, Kentucky	726	4,202 (17.28%)#2	220,292 (0.33%)#15
16.	30046, Georgia	720	7,818 (9.21%)#1	220,292 (0.33%)#16
17.	60645, Illinois	711	16,898 (4.21%)#2	220,292 (0.32%)#17
18.	30039, Georgia	699	7,818 (8.94%)#2	220,292 (0.32%)#18
19.	63116, Missouri	675	12,570 (5.37%)#5	220,292 (0.31%)#19
20.	49546, Michigan	674	14,489 (4.65%)#3	220,292 (0.31%)#20
21.	32257, Florida	663	14,834 (4.47%)#3	220,292 (0.30%)#21
22.	50111, Iowa	657	7,652 (8.59%)#3	220,292 (0.30%)#22
23.	60625, Illinois	648	16,898 (3.83%)#3	220,292 (0.29%)#23
24.	60714, Illinois	644	16,898 (3.81%)#4	220,292 (0.29%)#24
25.	50701, Iowa	639	7,652 (8.35%)#4	220,292 (0.29%)#25
26.	17013, Pennsylvania	608	9,564 (6.36%)#1	220,292 (0.28%)#26
27.	63128, Missouri	582	12,570 (4.63%)#6	220,292 (0.26%)#27
28.	60178, Illinois	579	16,898 (3.43%)#5	220,292 (0.26%)#28
29.	06109, Connecticut	576	4,434 (12.99%)#2	220,292 (0.26%)#29
30.	99337, Washington	574	9,126 (6.29%)#1	220,292 (0.26%)#30
31.	48035, Michigan	570	14,489 (3.93%)#4	220,292 (0.26%)#31
32.	30045, Georgia	566	7,818 (7.24%)#3	220,292 (0.26%)#32
33.	50023, Iowa	546	7,652 (7.14%)#5	220,292 (0.25%)#33
34.	98007, Washington	542	9,126 (5.94%)#2	220,292 (0.25%)#34
35.	30044, Georgia	541	7,818 (6.92%)#4	220,292 (0.25%)#35
36.	02151, Massachusetts	537	2,724 (19.71%)#1	220,292 (0.24%)#36
37.	48038, Michigan	526	14,489 (3.63%)#5	220,292 (0.24%)#37
38.	60640, Illinois	523	16,898 (3.10%)#6	220,292 (0.24%)#38
39.	98682, Washington	516	9,126 (5.65%)#3	220,292 (0.23%)#39
40.	37412, Tennessee	486	2,677 (18.15%)#1	220,292 (0.22%)#40
41.	30024, Georgia	468	7,818 (5.99%)#5	220,292 (0.21%)#41
42.	48312, Michigan	466	14,489 (3.22%)#6	220,292 (0.21%)#42
43.	17225, Pennsylvania	460	9,564 (4.81%)#2	220,292 (0.21%)#43
44.	60630, Illinois	456	16,898 (2.70%)#7	220,292 (0.21%)#44
45.	32207, Florida	450	14,834 (3.03%)#4	220,292 (0.20%)#45
46.	84119, Utah	448	4,397 (10.19%)#1	220,292 (0.20%)#46
47.	40214, Kentucky	447	4,202 (10.64%)#3	220,292 (0.20%)#47
48.	50310, Iowa	444	7,652 (5.80%)#6	220,292 (0.20%)#48
49.	32256, Florida	431	14,834 (2.91%)#5	220,292 (0.20%)#49
50.	33626, Florida	426	14,834 (2.87%)#6	220,292 (0.19%)#50
51.	48212, Michigan	416	14,489 (2.87%)#7	220,292 (0.19%)#51
52.	03103, New Hampshire	416	1,373 (30.30%)#1	220,292 (0.19%)#52
53.	98168, Washington	412	9,126 (4.51%)#4	220,292 (0.19%)#53
54.	30188, Georgia	410	7,818 (5.24%)#6	220,292 (0.19%)#54
55.	13502, New York	409	17,599 (2.32%)#2	220,292 (0.19%)#55
56.	28092, North Carolina	405	3,179 (12.74%)#1	220,292 (0.18%)#56
57.	33760, Florida	392	14,834 (2.64%)#7	220,292 (0.18%)#57
58.	84120, Utah	391	4,397 (8.89%)#2	220,292 (0.18%)#58
59.	60660, Illinois	387	16,898 (2.29%)#8	220,292 (0.18%)#59
60.	13057, New York	387	17,599 (2.20%)#3	220,292 (0.18%)#60
61.	06067, Connecticut	382	4,434 (8.62%)#3	220,292 (0.17%)#61
62.	63109, Missouri	378	12,570 (3.01%)#7	220,292 (0.17%)#62
63.	56560, Minnesota	374	5,059 (7.39%)#1	220,292 (0.17%)#63
64.	48093, Michigan	362	14,489 (2.50%)#8	220,292 (0.16%)#64
65.	13088, New York	361	17,599 (2.05%)#4	220,292 (0.16%)#65
66.	03102, New Hampshire	356	1,373 (25.93%)#2	220,292 (0.16%)#66
67.	07026, New Jersey	356	5,029 (7.08%)#1	220,292 (0.16%)#67
68.	95117, California	355	18,769 (1.89%)#1	220,292 (0.16%)#68
69.	59701, Montana	352	1,553 (22.67%)#1	220,292 (0.16%)#69
70.	11558, New York	352	17,599 (2.00%)#5	220,292 (0.16%)#70
71.	95124, California	351	18,769 (1.87%)#2	220,292 (0.16%)#71
72.	63052, Missouri	351	12,570 (2.79%)#8	220,292 (0.16%)#72
73.	58103, North Dakota	350	745 (46.98%)#1	220,292 (0.16%)#73
74.	40299, Kentucky	350	4,202 (8.33%)#4	220,292 (0.16%)#74
75.	50266, Iowa	350	7,652 (4.57%)#7	220,292 (0.16%)#75
76.	97236, Oregon	346	2,933 (11.80%)#1	220,292 (0.16%)#76
77.	11385, New York	344	17,599 (1.95%)#6	220,292 (0.16%)#77
78.	48044, Michigan	344	14,489 (2.37%)#9	220,292 (0.16%)#78
79.	11507, New York	344	17,599 (1.95%)#7	220,292 (0.16%)#79
80.	60016, Illinois	339	16,898 (2.01%)#9	220,292 (0.15%)#80
81.	75075, Texas	339	8,344 (4.06%)#1	220,292 (0.15%)#81
82.	60641, Illinois	330	16,898 (1.95%)#10	220,292 (0.15%)#82
83.	60018, Illinois	330	16,898 (1.95%)#11	220,292 (0.15%)#83
84.	30507, Georgia	327	7,818 (4.18%)#7	220,292 (0.15%)#84
85.	33702, Florida	326	14,834 (2.20%)#8	220,292 (0.15%)#85
86.	11103, New York	323	17,599 (1.84%)#8	220,292 (0.15%)#86
87.	06053, Connecticut	323	4,434 (7.28%)#4	220,292 (0.15%)#87
88.	84047, Utah	312	4,397 (7.10%)#3	220,292 (0.14%)#88
89.	57106, South Dakota	310	692 (44.80%)#1	220,292 (0.14%)#89
90.	44060, Ohio	307	7,305 (4.20%)#1	220,292 (0.14%)#90
91.	95608, California	306	18,769 (1.63%)#3	220,292 (0.14%)#91
92.	80224, Colorado	305	3,869 (7.88%)#1	220,292 (0.14%)#92
93.	12205, New York	304	17,599 (1.73%)#9	220,292 (0.14%)#93
94.	30040, Georgia	292	7,818 (3.73%)#8	220,292 (0.13%)#94
95.	85027, Arizona	286	6,026 (4.75%)#1	220,292 (0.13%)#95
96.	60706, Illinois	286	16,898 (1.69%)#12	220,292 (0.13%)#96
97.	60634, Illinois	285	16,898 (1.69%)#13	220,292 (0.13%)#97
98.	02148, Massachusetts	284	2,724 (10.43%)#2	220,292 (0.13%)#98
99.	89123, Nevada	283	2,690 (10.52%)#1	220,292 (0.13%)#99
100.	50613, Iowa	281	7,652 (3.67%)#8	220,292 (0.13%)#100