Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Personal Care and Service
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the United States

20.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 80914, Colorado 100.0% 2.6% (+97.4)#1 2.6% (+97.4)#1
2. 12530, New York 100.0% 3.0% (+97.0)#1 2.6% (+97.4)#2
3. 77326, Texas 100.0% 2.3% (+97.7)#1 2.6% (+97.4)#3
4. 41181, Kentucky 100.0% 2.3% (+97.7)#1 2.6% (+97.4)#4
5. 65468, Missouri 100.0% 2.4% (+97.6)#1 2.6% (+97.4)#5
6. 31045, Georgia 100.0% 2.3% (+97.7)#1 2.6% (+97.4)#6
7. 93208, California 89.0% 2.7% (+86.3)#1 2.6% (+86.5)#7
8. 33856, Florida 88.0% 2.8% (+85.2)#1 2.6% (+85.4)#8
9. 28350, North Carolina 87.2% 2.4% (+84.8)#1 2.6% (+84.7)#9
10. 93528, California 79.4% 2.7% (+76.7)#2 2.6% (+76.8)#10
11. 42759, Kentucky 78.1% 2.3% (+75.8)#2 2.6% (+75.6)#11
12. 85932, Arizona 72.7% 2.5% (+70.2)#1 2.6% (+70.2)#12
13. 83826, Idaho 61.4% 2.4% (+59.0)#1 2.6% (+58.9)#13
14. 71242, Louisiana 60.0% 2.6% (+57.4)#1 2.6% (+57.4)#14
15. 58452, North Dakota 60.0% 2.9% (+57.1)#1 2.6% (+57.4)#15
16. 81239, Colorado 57.9% 2.6% (+55.3)#2 2.6% (+55.3)#16
17. 13162, New York 56.8% 3.0% (+53.8)#2 2.6% (+54.2)#17
18. 34138, Florida 54.6% 2.8% (+51.8)#2 2.6% (+52.1)#18
19. 19375, Pennsylvania 54.5% 2.4% (+52.1)#1 2.6% (+52.0)#19
20. 01242, Massachusetts 53.2% 2.8% (+50.4)#1 2.6% (+50.6)#20
21. 23298, Virginia 52.1% 2.6% (+49.6)#1 2.6% (+49.6)#21
22. 63763, Missouri 51.7% 2.4% (+49.3)#2 2.6% (+49.2)#22
23. 38644, Mississippi 51.7% 2.4% (+49.2)#1 2.6% (+49.1)#23
24. 99333, Washington 50.9% 2.4% (+48.5)#1 2.6% (+48.4)#24
25. 99836, Alaska 50.0% 2.9% (+47.1)#1 2.6% (+47.4)#25
26. 87365, New Mexico 50.0% 2.4% (+47.6)#1 2.6% (+47.4)#26
27. 48862, Michigan 50.0% 2.4% (+47.6)#1 2.6% (+47.4)#27
28. 76940, Texas 50.0% 2.3% (+47.7)#2 2.6% (+47.4)#28
29. 48139, Michigan 48.0% 2.4% (+45.6)#2 2.6% (+45.4)#29
30. 89405, Nevada 46.9% 4.4% (+42.5)#1 2.6% (+44.4)#30
31. 63849, Missouri 46.1% 2.4% (+43.6)#3 2.6% (+43.5)#31
32. 59435, Montana 45.8% 2.6% (+43.3)#1 2.6% (+43.3)#32
33. 71272, Louisiana 44.5% 2.6% (+41.9)#2 2.6% (+42.0)#33
34. 34762, Florida 44.0% 2.8% (+41.1)#3 2.6% (+41.4)#34
35. 66621, Kansas 43.9% 2.6% (+41.3)#1 2.6% (+41.3)#35
36. 50041, Iowa 42.9% 2.7% (+40.1)#1 2.6% (+40.3)#36
37. 92060, California 42.5% 2.7% (+39.8)#3 2.6% (+40.0)#37
38. 83012, Wyoming 42.5% 2.7% (+39.8)#1 2.6% (+40.0)#38
39. 85545, Arizona 42.4% 2.5% (+39.9)#2 2.6% (+39.8)#39
40. 98278, Washington 42.1% 2.4% (+39.7)#2 2.6% (+39.5)#40
41. 27708, North Carolina 41.4% 2.4% (+39.0)#2 2.6% (+38.9)#41
42. 25139, West Virginia 41.4% 2.2% (+39.2)#1 2.6% (+38.8)#42
43. 36082, Alabama 41.2% 2.3% (+38.9)#1 2.6% (+38.6)#43
44. 26349, West Virginia 40.8% 2.2% (+38.6)#2 2.6% (+38.3)#44
45. 61027, Illinois 40.7% 2.6% (+38.1)#1 2.6% (+38.2)#45
46. 64149, Missouri 40.6% 2.4% (+38.1)#4 2.6% (+38.0)#46
47. 36481, Alabama 40.0% 2.3% (+37.7)#2 2.6% (+37.4)#47
48. 32830, Florida 40.0% 2.8% (+37.2)#4 2.6% (+37.4)#48
49. 78351, Texas 39.3% 2.3% (+36.9)#3 2.6% (+36.7)#49
50. 39309, Mississippi 38.9% 2.4% (+36.5)#2 2.6% (+36.3)#50
51. 21523, Maryland 38.7% 2.6% (+36.1)#1 2.6% (+36.1)#51
52. 15948, Pennsylvania 38.6% 2.4% (+36.2)#2 2.6% (+36.1)#52
53. 79699, Texas 38.5% 2.3% (+36.1)#4 2.6% (+35.9)#53
54. 38647, Mississippi 38.3% 2.4% (+35.9)#3 2.6% (+35.7)#54
55. 28542, North Carolina 38.3% 2.4% (+35.9)#3 2.6% (+35.7)#55
56. 70575, Louisiana 38.1% 2.6% (+35.5)#3 2.6% (+35.5)#56
57. 65083, Missouri 37.9% 2.4% (+35.5)#5 2.6% (+35.4)#57
58. 62273, Illinois 37.8% 2.6% (+35.2)#2 2.6% (+35.3)#58
59. 61562, Illinois 37.0% 2.6% (+34.4)#3 2.6% (+34.5)#59
60. 76490, Texas 35.9% 2.3% (+33.6)#5 2.6% (+33.3)#60
61. 28274, North Carolina 35.3% 2.4% (+32.9)#4 2.6% (+32.7)#61
62. 40941, Kentucky 35.3% 2.3% (+33.0)#3 2.6% (+32.7)#62
63. 40826, Kentucky 34.3% 2.3% (+32.0)#4 2.6% (+31.7)#63
64. 86029, Arizona 34.3% 2.5% (+31.8)#3 2.6% (+31.7)#64
65. 87745, New Mexico 33.9% 2.4% (+31.5)#2 2.6% (+31.4)#65
66. 40209, Kentucky 33.7% 2.3% (+31.4)#5 2.6% (+31.1)#66
67. 04677, Maine 33.5% 2.4% (+31.1)#1 2.6% (+31.0)#67
68. 98438, Washington 33.3% 2.4% (+30.9)#3 2.6% (+30.8)#68
69. 49628, Michigan 33.3% 2.4% (+30.9)#3 2.6% (+30.8)#69
70. 76869, Texas 33.3% 2.3% (+31.0)#6 2.6% (+30.8)#70
71. 96040, California 33.3% 2.7% (+30.6)#4 2.6% (+30.8)#71
72. 54561, Wisconsin 33.3% 2.2% (+31.1)#1 2.6% (+30.8)#72
73. 29424, South Carolina 32.8% 2.4% (+30.4)#1 2.6% (+30.3)#73
74. 58847, North Dakota 32.7% 2.9% (+29.9)#2 2.6% (+30.1)#74
75. 35458, Alabama 32.7% 2.3% (+30.4)#3 2.6% (+30.1)#75
76. 16871, Pennsylvania 32.6% 2.4% (+30.2)#3 2.6% (+30.0)#76
77. 12407, New York 32.4% 3.0% (+29.3)#3 2.6% (+29.8)#77
78. 24020, Virginia 32.1% 2.6% (+29.6)#2 2.6% (+29.6)#78
79. 79738, Texas 31.7% 2.3% (+29.4)#7 2.6% (+29.1)#79
80. 42541, Kentucky 31.4% 2.3% (+29.1)#6 2.6% (+28.9)#80
81. 03850, New Hampshire 31.4% 2.5% (+29.0)#1 2.6% (+28.9)#81
82. 26506, West Virginia 31.4% 2.2% (+29.2)#3 2.6% (+28.8)#82
83. 13305, New York 31.4% 3.0% (+28.4)#4 2.6% (+28.8)#83
84. 59851, Montana 31.2% 2.6% (+28.7)#2 2.6% (+28.7)#84
85. 32612, Florida 30.8% 2.8% (+27.9)#5 2.6% (+28.2)#85
86. 15454, Pennsylvania 30.6% 2.4% (+28.1)#4 2.6% (+28.0)#86
87. 16675, Pennsylvania 30.4% 2.4% (+28.0)#5 2.6% (+27.9)#87
88. 72527, Arkansas 30.3% 2.1% (+28.2)#1 2.6% (+27.8)#88
89. 67363, Kansas 29.9% 2.6% (+27.3)#2 2.6% (+27.3)#89
90. 17933, Pennsylvania 29.8% 2.4% (+27.4)#6 2.6% (+27.3)#90
91. 75711, Texas 29.6% 2.3% (+27.3)#8 2.6% (+27.1)#91
92. 42252, Kentucky 29.6% 2.3% (+27.3)#7 2.6% (+27.1)#92
93. 50005, Iowa 29.2% 2.7% (+26.5)#2 2.6% (+26.7)#93
94. 27506, North Carolina 29.1% 2.4% (+26.7)#5 2.6% (+26.5)#94
95. 23160, Virginia 28.6% 2.6% (+26.0)#3 2.6% (+26.0)#95
96. 43983, Ohio 28.3% 2.2% (+26.1)#1 2.6% (+25.8)#96
97. 35896, Alabama 28.2% 2.3% (+25.9)#4 2.6% (+25.6)#97
98. 33574, Florida 27.4% 2.8% (+24.6)#6 2.6% (+24.9)#98
99. 58338, North Dakota 27.0% 2.9% (+24.2)#3 2.6% (+24.5)#99
100. 52568, Iowa 26.5% 2.7% (+23.7)#3 2.6% (+23.9)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
89.0%
#8
88.0%
#9
87.2%
#10
79.4%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the United States?
80914 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the United States is 2.6%.