Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Healthcare Support
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States

0.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.97414, Oregon100.0%4.1%(+95.9)#13.3%(+96.7)#1
2.24716, West Virginia100.0%4.2%(+95.8)#13.3%(+96.7)#2
3.24129, Virginia100.0%2.6%(+97.4)#13.3%(+96.7)#3
4.75562, Texas100.0%2.9%(+97.1)#13.3%(+96.7)#4
5.32337, Florida100.0%2.9%(+97.1)#13.3%(+96.7)#5
6.43325, Ohio100.0%3.4%(+96.6)#13.3%(+96.7)#6
7.43711, Ohio100.0%3.4%(+96.6)#23.3%(+96.7)#7
8.27213, North Carolina100.0%2.9%(+97.1)#13.3%(+96.7)#8
9.27256, North Carolina100.0%2.9%(+97.1)#23.3%(+96.7)#9
10.76685, Texas100.0%2.9%(+97.1)#23.3%(+96.7)#10
11.75788, Texas100.0%2.9%(+97.1)#33.3%(+96.7)#11
12.25699, West Virginia100.0%4.2%(+95.8)#23.3%(+96.7)#12
13.15476, Pennsylvania100.0%3.9%(+96.1)#13.3%(+96.7)#13
14.46786, Indiana100.0%3.0%(+97.0)#13.3%(+96.7)#14
15.83285, Idaho100.0%3.4%(+96.6)#13.3%(+96.7)#15
16.28378, North Carolina100.0%2.9%(+97.1)#33.3%(+96.7)#16
17.26236, West Virginia100.0%4.2%(+95.8)#33.3%(+96.7)#17
18.39115, Mississippi83.7%3.1%(+80.6)#13.3%(+80.4)#18
19.41838, Kentucky83.1%2.9%(+80.2)#13.3%(+79.8)#19
20.87565, New Mexico81.6%4.4%(+77.1)#13.3%(+78.3)#20
21.15443, Pennsylvania81.0%3.9%(+77.1)#23.3%(+77.7)#21
22.26424, West Virginia80.2%4.2%(+76.0)#43.3%(+76.9)#22
23.39156, Mississippi73.6%3.1%(+70.4)#23.3%(+70.3)#23
24.43027, Ohio72.4%3.4%(+69.0)#33.3%(+69.1)#24
25.35573, Alabama71.4%2.7%(+68.8)#13.3%(+68.1)#25
26.72828, Arkansas68.8%3.2%(+65.5)#13.3%(+65.5)#26
27.57758, South Dakota65.3%2.9%(+62.4)#13.3%(+62.0)#27
28.13623, New York64.3%4.8%(+59.5)#13.3%(+61.0)#28
29.70580, Louisiana63.9%3.6%(+60.3)#13.3%(+60.6)#29
30.26366, West Virginia62.9%4.2%(+58.6)#53.3%(+59.6)#30
31.65715, Missouri60.0%3.3%(+56.7)#13.3%(+56.7)#31
32.38768, Mississippi59.5%3.1%(+56.4)#33.3%(+56.2)#32
33.25902, West Virginia59.0%4.2%(+54.8)#63.3%(+55.8)#33
34.78349, Texas58.5%2.9%(+55.6)#43.3%(+55.3)#34
35.56654, Minnesota57.1%3.7%(+53.5)#13.3%(+53.9)#35
36.25110, West Virginia55.9%4.2%(+51.7)#73.3%(+52.6)#36
37.24246, Virginia55.8%2.6%(+53.2)#23.3%(+52.5)#37
38.20899, Maryland54.8%2.8%(+52.0)#13.3%(+51.6)#38
39.25090, West Virginia54.0%4.2%(+49.7)#83.3%(+50.7)#39
40.77876, Texas54.0%2.9%(+51.0)#53.3%(+50.7)#40
41.25121, West Virginia53.3%4.2%(+49.1)#93.3%(+50.1)#41
42.21130, Maryland52.4%2.8%(+49.6)#23.3%(+49.1)#42
43.66522, Kansas51.6%3.0%(+48.6)#13.3%(+48.3)#43
44.15623, Pennsylvania50.9%3.9%(+47.0)#33.3%(+47.6)#44
45.23161, Virginia50.8%2.6%(+48.2)#33.3%(+47.5)#45
46.83278, Idaho50.3%3.4%(+47.0)#23.3%(+47.1)#46
47.72567, Arkansas50.0%3.2%(+46.8)#23.3%(+46.7)#47
48.81024, Colorado50.0%2.7%(+47.3)#13.3%(+46.7)#48
49.08528, New Jersey50.0%2.9%(+47.1)#13.3%(+46.7)#49
50.32616, Florida50.0%2.9%(+47.1)#23.3%(+46.7)#50
51.85360, Arizona50.0%3.1%(+46.9)#13.3%(+46.7)#51
52.08039, New Jersey50.0%2.9%(+47.1)#23.3%(+46.7)#52
53.99638, Alaska50.0%3.3%(+46.7)#13.3%(+46.7)#53
54.90071, California49.4%3.7%(+45.7)#13.3%(+46.1)#54
55.12420, New York49.3%4.8%(+44.5)#23.3%(+46.0)#55
56.95417, California49.3%3.7%(+45.6)#23.3%(+46.0)#56
57.18371, Pennsylvania49.1%3.9%(+45.2)#43.3%(+45.9)#57
58.15951, Pennsylvania47.6%3.9%(+43.7)#53.3%(+44.3)#58
59.40041, Kentucky47.1%2.9%(+44.1)#23.3%(+43.8)#59
60.88042, New Mexico46.9%4.4%(+42.5)#23.3%(+43.7)#60
61.65634, Missouri46.1%3.3%(+42.8)#23.3%(+42.8)#61
62.87742, New Mexico46.0%4.4%(+41.6)#33.3%(+42.7)#62
63.26617, West Virginia45.8%4.2%(+41.6)#103.3%(+42.6)#63
64.87940, New Mexico45.6%4.4%(+41.2)#43.3%(+42.3)#64
65.87746, New Mexico45.2%4.4%(+40.7)#53.3%(+41.9)#65
66.45746, Ohio45.0%3.4%(+41.7)#43.3%(+41.8)#66
67.24828, West Virginia44.5%4.2%(+40.3)#113.3%(+41.3)#67
68.80746, Colorado44.4%2.7%(+41.7)#23.3%(+41.2)#68
69.71662, Arkansas44.4%3.2%(+41.2)#33.3%(+41.2)#69
70.47366, Indiana44.4%3.0%(+41.4)#23.3%(+41.2)#70
71.95983, California44.0%3.7%(+40.4)#33.3%(+40.8)#71
72.61750, Illinois43.8%3.2%(+40.6)#13.3%(+40.5)#72
73.89047, Nevada43.7%2.4%(+41.3)#13.3%(+40.4)#73
74.26230, West Virginia43.5%4.2%(+39.2)#123.3%(+40.2)#74
75.26629, West Virginia42.7%4.2%(+38.5)#133.3%(+39.5)#75
76.25873, West Virginia42.1%4.2%(+37.8)#143.3%(+38.8)#76
77.25846, West Virginia41.9%4.2%(+37.7)#153.3%(+38.7)#77
78.84735, Utah41.9%2.6%(+39.2)#13.3%(+38.6)#78
79.67122, Kansas41.8%3.0%(+38.7)#23.3%(+38.5)#79
80.81241, Colorado41.8%2.7%(+39.0)#33.3%(+38.5)#80
81.45848, Ohio41.7%3.4%(+38.3)#53.3%(+38.4)#81
82.25607, West Virginia41.2%4.2%(+37.0)#163.3%(+37.9)#82
83.87583, New Mexico41.1%4.4%(+36.7)#63.3%(+37.9)#83
84.17506, Pennsylvania40.4%3.9%(+36.5)#63.3%(+37.1)#84
85.26289, West Virginia40.0%4.2%(+35.8)#173.3%(+36.7)#85
86.15827, Pennsylvania39.5%3.9%(+35.6)#73.3%(+36.2)#86
87.17581, Pennsylvania39.3%3.9%(+35.4)#83.3%(+36.0)#87
88.24873, West Virginia39.1%4.2%(+34.8)#183.3%(+35.8)#88
89.16140, Pennsylvania38.5%3.9%(+34.6)#93.3%(+35.2)#89
90.29320, South Carolina38.1%2.8%(+35.3)#13.3%(+34.8)#90
91.46771, Indiana38.0%3.0%(+35.0)#33.3%(+34.7)#91
92.12486, New York37.7%4.8%(+32.9)#33.3%(+34.4)#92
93.35469, Alabama37.5%2.7%(+34.8)#23.3%(+34.2)#93
94.16837, Pennsylvania37.5%3.9%(+33.6)#103.3%(+34.2)#94
95.87012, New Mexico37.3%4.4%(+32.9)#73.3%(+34.1)#95
96.74549, Oklahoma36.5%3.0%(+33.6)#13.3%(+33.2)#96
97.59333, Montana36.4%3.2%(+33.2)#13.3%(+33.1)#97
98.67021, Kansas36.4%3.0%(+33.3)#33.3%(+33.1)#98
99.63870, Missouri36.2%3.3%(+33.0)#33.3%(+32.9)#99
100.74866, Oklahoma35.7%3.0%(+32.8)#23.3%(+32.4)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States?
97414 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States is 3.3%.