Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Healthcare Support
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States

30.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 97414, Oregon 100.0% 4.1% (+95.9)#1 3.3% (+96.7)#1
2. 24716, West Virginia 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#1 3.3% (+96.7)#2
3. 24129, Virginia 100.0% 2.6% (+97.4)#1 3.3% (+96.7)#3
4. 75562, Texas 100.0% 2.9% (+97.1)#1 3.3% (+96.7)#4
5. 32337, Florida 100.0% 2.9% (+97.1)#1 3.3% (+96.7)#5
6. 43325, Ohio 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#1 3.3% (+96.7)#6
7. 43711, Ohio 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#2 3.3% (+96.7)#7
8. 27213, North Carolina 100.0% 2.9% (+97.1)#1 3.3% (+96.7)#8
9. 27256, North Carolina 100.0% 2.9% (+97.1)#2 3.3% (+96.7)#9
10. 76685, Texas 100.0% 2.9% (+97.1)#2 3.3% (+96.7)#10
11. 75788, Texas 100.0% 2.9% (+97.1)#3 3.3% (+96.7)#11
12. 25699, West Virginia 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#2 3.3% (+96.7)#12
13. 15476, Pennsylvania 100.0% 3.9% (+96.1)#1 3.3% (+96.7)#13
14. 46786, Indiana 100.0% 3.0% (+97.0)#1 3.3% (+96.7)#14
15. 83285, Idaho 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#1 3.3% (+96.7)#15
16. 28378, North Carolina 100.0% 2.9% (+97.1)#3 3.3% (+96.7)#16
17. 26236, West Virginia 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#3 3.3% (+96.7)#17
18. 39115, Mississippi 83.7% 3.1% (+80.6)#1 3.3% (+80.4)#18
19. 41838, Kentucky 83.1% 2.9% (+80.2)#1 3.3% (+79.8)#19
20. 87565, New Mexico 81.6% 4.4% (+77.1)#1 3.3% (+78.3)#20
21. 15443, Pennsylvania 81.0% 3.9% (+77.1)#2 3.3% (+77.7)#21
22. 26424, West Virginia 80.2% 4.2% (+76.0)#4 3.3% (+76.9)#22
23. 39156, Mississippi 73.6% 3.1% (+70.4)#2 3.3% (+70.3)#23
24. 43027, Ohio 72.4% 3.4% (+69.0)#3 3.3% (+69.1)#24
25. 35573, Alabama 71.4% 2.7% (+68.8)#1 3.3% (+68.1)#25
26. 72828, Arkansas 68.8% 3.2% (+65.5)#1 3.3% (+65.5)#26
27. 57758, South Dakota 65.3% 2.9% (+62.4)#1 3.3% (+62.0)#27
28. 13623, New York 64.3% 4.8% (+59.5)#1 3.3% (+61.0)#28
29. 70580, Louisiana 63.9% 3.6% (+60.3)#1 3.3% (+60.6)#29
30. 26366, West Virginia 62.9% 4.2% (+58.6)#5 3.3% (+59.6)#30
31. 65715, Missouri 60.0% 3.3% (+56.7)#1 3.3% (+56.7)#31
32. 38768, Mississippi 59.5% 3.1% (+56.4)#3 3.3% (+56.2)#32
33. 25902, West Virginia 59.0% 4.2% (+54.8)#6 3.3% (+55.8)#33
34. 78349, Texas 58.5% 2.9% (+55.6)#4 3.3% (+55.3)#34
35. 56654, Minnesota 57.1% 3.7% (+53.5)#1 3.3% (+53.9)#35
36. 25110, West Virginia 55.9% 4.2% (+51.7)#7 3.3% (+52.6)#36
37. 24246, Virginia 55.8% 2.6% (+53.2)#2 3.3% (+52.5)#37
38. 20899, Maryland 54.8% 2.8% (+52.0)#1 3.3% (+51.6)#38
39. 25090, West Virginia 54.0% 4.2% (+49.7)#8 3.3% (+50.7)#39
40. 77876, Texas 54.0% 2.9% (+51.0)#5 3.3% (+50.7)#40
41. 25121, West Virginia 53.3% 4.2% (+49.1)#9 3.3% (+50.1)#41
42. 21130, Maryland 52.4% 2.8% (+49.6)#2 3.3% (+49.1)#42
43. 66522, Kansas 51.6% 3.0% (+48.6)#1 3.3% (+48.3)#43
44. 15623, Pennsylvania 50.9% 3.9% (+47.0)#3 3.3% (+47.6)#44
45. 23161, Virginia 50.8% 2.6% (+48.2)#3 3.3% (+47.5)#45
46. 83278, Idaho 50.3% 3.4% (+47.0)#2 3.3% (+47.1)#46
47. 72567, Arkansas 50.0% 3.2% (+46.8)#2 3.3% (+46.7)#47
48. 81024, Colorado 50.0% 2.7% (+47.3)#1 3.3% (+46.7)#48
49. 08528, New Jersey 50.0% 2.9% (+47.1)#1 3.3% (+46.7)#49
50. 32616, Florida 50.0% 2.9% (+47.1)#2 3.3% (+46.7)#50
51. 85360, Arizona 50.0% 3.1% (+46.9)#1 3.3% (+46.7)#51
52. 08039, New Jersey 50.0% 2.9% (+47.1)#2 3.3% (+46.7)#52
53. 99638, Alaska 50.0% 3.3% (+46.7)#1 3.3% (+46.7)#53
54. 90071, California 49.4% 3.7% (+45.7)#1 3.3% (+46.1)#54
55. 12420, New York 49.3% 4.8% (+44.5)#2 3.3% (+46.0)#55
56. 95417, California 49.3% 3.7% (+45.6)#2 3.3% (+46.0)#56
57. 18371, Pennsylvania 49.1% 3.9% (+45.2)#4 3.3% (+45.9)#57
58. 15951, Pennsylvania 47.6% 3.9% (+43.7)#5 3.3% (+44.3)#58
59. 40041, Kentucky 47.1% 2.9% (+44.1)#2 3.3% (+43.8)#59
60. 88042, New Mexico 46.9% 4.4% (+42.5)#2 3.3% (+43.7)#60
61. 65634, Missouri 46.1% 3.3% (+42.8)#2 3.3% (+42.8)#61
62. 87742, New Mexico 46.0% 4.4% (+41.6)#3 3.3% (+42.7)#62
63. 26617, West Virginia 45.8% 4.2% (+41.6)#10 3.3% (+42.6)#63
64. 87940, New Mexico 45.6% 4.4% (+41.2)#4 3.3% (+42.3)#64
65. 87746, New Mexico 45.2% 4.4% (+40.7)#5 3.3% (+41.9)#65
66. 45746, Ohio 45.0% 3.4% (+41.7)#4 3.3% (+41.8)#66
67. 24828, West Virginia 44.5% 4.2% (+40.3)#11 3.3% (+41.3)#67
68. 80746, Colorado 44.4% 2.7% (+41.7)#2 3.3% (+41.2)#68
69. 71662, Arkansas 44.4% 3.2% (+41.2)#3 3.3% (+41.2)#69
70. 47366, Indiana 44.4% 3.0% (+41.4)#2 3.3% (+41.2)#70
71. 95983, California 44.0% 3.7% (+40.4)#3 3.3% (+40.8)#71
72. 61750, Illinois 43.8% 3.2% (+40.6)#1 3.3% (+40.5)#72
73. 89047, Nevada 43.7% 2.4% (+41.3)#1 3.3% (+40.4)#73
74. 26230, West Virginia 43.5% 4.2% (+39.2)#12 3.3% (+40.2)#74
75. 26629, West Virginia 42.7% 4.2% (+38.5)#13 3.3% (+39.5)#75
76. 25873, West Virginia 42.1% 4.2% (+37.8)#14 3.3% (+38.8)#76
77. 25846, West Virginia 41.9% 4.2% (+37.7)#15 3.3% (+38.7)#77
78. 84735, Utah 41.9% 2.6% (+39.2)#1 3.3% (+38.6)#78
79. 67122, Kansas 41.8% 3.0% (+38.7)#2 3.3% (+38.5)#79
80. 81241, Colorado 41.8% 2.7% (+39.0)#3 3.3% (+38.5)#80
81. 45848, Ohio 41.7% 3.4% (+38.3)#5 3.3% (+38.4)#81
82. 25607, West Virginia 41.2% 4.2% (+37.0)#16 3.3% (+37.9)#82
83. 87583, New Mexico 41.1% 4.4% (+36.7)#6 3.3% (+37.9)#83
84. 17506, Pennsylvania 40.4% 3.9% (+36.5)#6 3.3% (+37.1)#84
85. 26289, West Virginia 40.0% 4.2% (+35.8)#17 3.3% (+36.7)#85
86. 15827, Pennsylvania 39.5% 3.9% (+35.6)#7 3.3% (+36.2)#86
87. 17581, Pennsylvania 39.3% 3.9% (+35.4)#8 3.3% (+36.0)#87
88. 24873, West Virginia 39.1% 4.2% (+34.8)#18 3.3% (+35.8)#88
89. 16140, Pennsylvania 38.5% 3.9% (+34.6)#9 3.3% (+35.2)#89
90. 29320, South Carolina 38.1% 2.8% (+35.3)#1 3.3% (+34.8)#90
91. 46771, Indiana 38.0% 3.0% (+35.0)#3 3.3% (+34.7)#91
92. 12486, New York 37.7% 4.8% (+32.9)#3 3.3% (+34.4)#92
93. 35469, Alabama 37.5% 2.7% (+34.8)#2 3.3% (+34.2)#93
94. 16837, Pennsylvania 37.5% 3.9% (+33.6)#10 3.3% (+34.2)#94
95. 87012, New Mexico 37.3% 4.4% (+32.9)#7 3.3% (+34.1)#95
96. 74549, Oklahoma 36.5% 3.0% (+33.6)#1 3.3% (+33.2)#96
97. 59333, Montana 36.4% 3.2% (+33.2)#1 3.3% (+33.1)#97
98. 67021, Kansas 36.4% 3.0% (+33.3)#3 3.3% (+33.1)#98
99. 63870, Missouri 36.2% 3.3% (+33.0)#3 3.3% (+32.9)#99
100. 74866, Oklahoma 35.7% 3.0% (+32.8)#2 3.3% (+32.4)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States?
97414 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States is 3.3%.