Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Retail Trade
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the United States

50.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 77431, Texas 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#1
2. 96046, California 100.0% 10.3% (+89.7)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#2
3. 83677, Idaho 100.0% 11.8% (+88.2)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#3
4. 25818, West Virginia 100.0% 12.5% (+87.5)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#4
5. 96759, Hawaii 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#5
6. 40830, Kentucky 100.0% 11.8% (+88.2)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#6
7. 77334, Texas 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#7
8. 25862, West Virginia 100.0% 12.5% (+87.5)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#8
9. 71455, Louisiana 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#9
10. 70340, Louisiana 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#10
11. 26404, West Virginia 100.0% 12.5% (+87.5)#3 11.0% (+89.0)#11
12. 61855, Illinois 100.0% 10.5% (+89.5)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#12
13. 12872, New York 100.0% 9.8% (+90.2)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#13
14. 55111, Minnesota 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#14
15. 43925, Ohio 100.0% 11.2% (+88.8)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#15
16. 28749, North Carolina 100.0% 11.4% (+88.6)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#16
17. 15635, Pennsylvania 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#17
18. 04944, Maine 100.0% 12.9% (+87.1)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#18
19. 98571, Washington 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#19
20. 70451, Louisiana 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#3 11.0% (+89.0)#20
21. 53571, Wisconsin 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#21
22. 41517, Kentucky 100.0% 11.8% (+88.2)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#22
23. 23667, Virginia 100.0% 9.9% (+90.1)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#23
24. 98641, Washington 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#25
25. 24962, West Virginia 100.0% 12.5% (+87.5)#4 11.0% (+89.0)#26
26. 65484, Missouri 100.0% 11.4% (+88.6)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#27
27. 43791, Ohio 100.0% 11.2% (+88.8)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#28
28. 24826, West Virginia 100.0% 12.5% (+87.5)#5 11.0% (+89.0)#29
29. 74753, Oklahoma 100.0% 11.8% (+88.2)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#30
30. 47455, Indiana 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#31
31. 38733, Mississippi 100.0% 11.4% (+88.6)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#32
32. 37732, Tennessee 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#33
33. 17056, Pennsylvania 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#34
34. 15075, Pennsylvania 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#3 11.0% (+89.0)#35
35. 42338, Kentucky 100.0% 11.8% (+88.2)#3 11.0% (+89.0)#36
36. 24888, West Virginia 100.0% 12.5% (+87.5)#6 11.0% (+89.0)#37
37. 79033, Texas 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#3 11.0% (+89.0)#38
38. 71425, Louisiana 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#4 11.0% (+89.0)#39
39. 02584, Massachusetts 100.0% 9.9% (+90.1)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#40
40. 46984, Indiana 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#41
41. 29724, South Carolina 100.0% 11.4% (+88.6)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#42
42. 79025, Texas 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#4 11.0% (+89.0)#43
43. 81642, Colorado 100.0% 10.5% (+89.5)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#44
44. 87070, New Mexico 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#45
45. 87573, New Mexico 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#46
46. 39832, Georgia 100.0% 11.2% (+88.8)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#47
47. 38947, Mississippi 90.0% 11.4% (+78.6)#2 11.0% (+79.0)#48
48. 35032, Alabama 88.9% 11.7% (+77.2)#1 11.0% (+77.9)#49
49. 41543, Kentucky 87.4% 11.8% (+75.6)#4 11.0% (+76.4)#50
50. 51554, Iowa 85.7% 11.6% (+74.1)#1 11.0% (+74.7)#51
51. 19511, Pennsylvania 83.3% 11.0% (+72.3)#4 11.0% (+72.3)#52
52. 26138, West Virginia 83.0% 12.5% (+70.5)#7 11.0% (+72.0)#53
53. 83220, Idaho 80.9% 11.8% (+69.0)#2 11.0% (+69.9)#54
54. 49717, Michigan 80.0% 10.8% (+69.2)#1 11.0% (+69.0)#55
55. 96132, California 80.0% 10.3% (+69.7)#2 11.0% (+69.0)#56
56. 43909, Ohio 77.6% 11.2% (+66.3)#3 11.0% (+66.6)#57
57. 15463, Pennsylvania 76.8% 11.0% (+65.8)#5 11.0% (+65.9)#58
58. 25907, West Virginia 76.5% 12.5% (+64.0)#8 11.0% (+65.5)#59
59. 27967, North Carolina 76.2% 11.4% (+64.8)#2 11.0% (+65.2)#60
60. 97626, Oregon 76.1% 11.8% (+64.3)#1 11.0% (+65.1)#61
61. 71452, Louisiana 76.0% 11.3% (+64.7)#5 11.0% (+65.0)#62
62. 24845, West Virginia 75.0% 12.5% (+62.5)#9 11.0% (+64.0)#63
63. 17979, Pennsylvania 74.4% 11.0% (+63.3)#6 11.0% (+63.4)#64
64. 14785, New York 73.8% 9.8% (+64.0)#2 11.0% (+62.9)#65
65. 41159, Kentucky 73.3% 11.8% (+61.5)#5 11.0% (+62.3)#66
66. 25076, West Virginia 72.7% 12.5% (+60.2)#10 11.0% (+61.7)#67
67. 06389, Connecticut 72.6% 10.7% (+61.9)#1 11.0% (+61.6)#68
68. 74836, Oklahoma 72.4% 11.8% (+60.7)#2 11.0% (+61.4)#69
69. 26276, West Virginia 72.0% 12.5% (+59.5)#11 11.0% (+61.0)#70
70. 25174, West Virginia 71.7% 12.5% (+59.2)#12 11.0% (+60.7)#71
71. 46381, Indiana 70.9% 11.0% (+59.9)#3 11.0% (+59.9)#72
72. 14035, New York 70.8% 9.8% (+61.0)#3 11.0% (+59.8)#73
73. 22725, Virginia 68.4% 9.9% (+58.5)#2 11.0% (+57.4)#74
74. 47580, Indiana 68.2% 11.0% (+57.3)#4 11.0% (+57.2)#75
75. 23358, Virginia 67.9% 9.9% (+57.9)#3 11.0% (+56.9)#76
76. 44678, Ohio 67.7% 11.2% (+56.5)#4 11.0% (+56.7)#77
77. 41735, Kentucky 67.6% 11.8% (+55.9)#6 11.0% (+56.7)#78
78. 87831, New Mexico 66.7% 11.0% (+55.7)#3 11.0% (+55.7)#79
79. 86029, Arizona 65.7% 11.9% (+53.8)#1 11.0% (+54.7)#80
80. 77460, Texas 65.4% 11.3% (+54.1)#5 11.0% (+54.4)#81
81. 17076, Pennsylvania 65.0% 11.0% (+54.0)#7 11.0% (+54.1)#82
82. 58644, North Dakota 65.0% 11.2% (+53.8)#1 11.0% (+54.0)#83
83. 72332, Arkansas 64.3% 13.1% (+51.2)#1 11.0% (+53.3)#84
84. 50839, Iowa 64.3% 11.6% (+52.7)#2 11.0% (+53.3)#85
85. 61435, Illinois 64.2% 10.5% (+53.7)#2 11.0% (+53.2)#86
86. 87577, New Mexico 62.8% 11.0% (+51.7)#4 11.0% (+51.8)#87
87. 58705, North Dakota 62.5% 11.2% (+51.3)#2 11.0% (+51.5)#88
88. 86028, Arizona 62.2% 11.9% (+50.2)#2 11.0% (+51.2)#89
89. 45055, Ohio 61.8% 11.2% (+50.6)#5 11.0% (+50.8)#90
90. 62030, Illinois 61.5% 10.5% (+51.0)#3 11.0% (+50.5)#91
91. 27972, North Carolina 61.4% 11.4% (+50.0)#3 11.0% (+50.4)#92
92. 62469, Illinois 61.3% 10.5% (+50.8)#4 11.0% (+50.3)#93
93. 13860, New York 60.8% 9.8% (+51.0)#4 11.0% (+49.8)#94
94. 78161, Texas 60.2% 11.3% (+49.0)#6 11.0% (+49.2)#95
95. 81655, Colorado 60.0% 10.5% (+49.5)#2 11.0% (+49.0)#96
96. 63750, Missouri 60.0% 11.4% (+48.6)#2 11.0% (+49.0)#97
97. 83433, Idaho 60.0% 11.8% (+48.2)#3 11.0% (+49.0)#98
98. 26289, West Virginia 60.0% 12.5% (+47.5)#13 11.0% (+49.0)#99
99. 03911, Maine 59.8% 12.9% (+47.0)#2 11.0% (+48.8)#100
100. 83525, Idaho 59.8% 11.8% (+47.9)#4 11.0% (+48.8)#101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the United States?
77431 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the United States is 11.0%.